TIP OF THE ICEBERG F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

tip of the iceberg
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

TIP OF THE ICEBERG F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

AT T H E TIP OF THE ICEBERG F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T May 3, 2017 Forward-Looking Statements Disclaimer This presentation contains forward-looking information within the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

May 3, 2017 AT T H E

“TIP OF THE ICEBERG”

slide-2
SLIDE 2

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

Forward-Looking Statements Disclaimer

2

This presentation contains “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation, and “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (collectively referred to as “forward-looking statements”). All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. The words "believe", "expect", "anticipate", "contemplate", "target", "plan", "intend", "continue", "budget", "estimate", "may", "will", "schedule" and similar expressions or statements identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements related to the following: the 2017, 2018 and 2019 operations outlook and production guidance, including estimates related to gold and silver Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources (including growing Mineral Reserves and/or Mineral Resources in Canada by two to four million ounces by 2020), production (including growing gold production to over half a million ounces in 2019 and to over 550,000 in 2020 through expansion of the Shahuindo mine to a capacity of 36,000 tpd by mid-2018 and through completion of the BC Shaft Project by mid-2018), total cash cost per ounce, all-in sustaining cost per ounce, capital expenditures, corporate general and administration expenses and exploration expenses; the expected working capital requirements, the sufficiency of capital resources and the possibility of considering alternative financing arrangements to meet strategic needs; the expected depreciation and depletion rates; exploration and review of prospective mineral acquisitions; changes in Guatemalan, Peruvian and Canadian mining laws and regulations; changes to the tax and royalty rates in Guatemala, Peru and Canada; the timing and results of court proceedings; the anticipated timing of updated Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates; the anticipated timing of completion of the PEA for the La Arena Phase II and Fenn-Gib projects; the timing of completion of the BC Shaft Project; the cost and timing of sustaining capital projects; the expectation of meeting production targets; the timing of the receipt of permits at Shahuindo; the availability and sufficiency of power and water for operations; the timing and cost of the design, procurement, and construction of the crushing and agglomeration circuit at Shahuindo, including the expected timeline for achieving 80% recovery for agglomerated ore; the expectation that changes to the crushing and agglomeration circuit will result in slightly lower capital and operating costs at Shahuindo; and the expected commissioning of the complete pump station at Escobal in Q2 2017. Forward-looking statements are based on the reasonable assumptions, estimates, analyses and opinions of management made in light of its experience and its perception of trends, current conditions and expected developments, as well as other factors that management believes to be relevant and reasonable in the circumstances at the date that such statements are made, but which may prove to be incorrect. Management believes that the assumptions and expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable. Assumptions have been made regarding, among other things: the Company’s performance and ability to implement

  • perational improvements at the Escobal, La Arena, Shahuindo and Timmins mines; the Company’s ability to carry on exploration and development activities, including land acquisition and construction; the timely receipt of

permits and other approvals; the successful outcomes of consultations with First Nations; the price of silver, gold and other metals; prices for key mining supplies, including labor costs and consumables, remaining consistent with the Company’s current expectations; production meeting expectations and being consistent with estimates; plant, equipment and processes operating as anticipated; there being no material variations in the current tax and regulatory environment; the Company’s ability to operate in a safe, efficient and effective manner; the exchange rates among the Canadian dollar, Guatemalan quetzal, Peruvian sol and the USD remaining consistent with current levels; and the Company’s ability to obtain financing as and when required and on reasonable terms. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list is not exhaustive of all factors and assumptions which may have been used. Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking

  • statements. Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include but are not limited to: the fluctuation of the price of silver, gold and other metals; changes in national and local government legislation, taxation and controls or

regulations; social unrest, and political or economic instability in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates; the availability of additional funding as and when required; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development; the timing and ability to maintain and, where necessary, obtain necessary permits and licenses; the uncertainty in the estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves; the uncertainty in geologic, hydrological, metallurgical and geotechnical studies and opinions; infrastructure risks, including access to water and power; drought and other environmental conditions outside the Company’s control; the impact of inflation; changes in the administration of governmental regulation, policies and practices; environmental risks and hazards; insurance and uninsured risks; land title risks; risks associated with illegal mining activities by unauthorized individuals on the Company’s mining or exploration properties; risks associated with competition; risks associated with currency fluctuations; contractor, labor and employment risks; dependence on key management personnel and executives; the timing and possible outcome of pending or threatened litigation; the risk of unanticipated litigation; risks associated with cyber security; risks associated with the repatriation of earnings; risks associated with negative operating cash flow; risks associated with the Company’s hedging policies; risks associated with dilution; and risks associated with effecting service of process and enforcing judgments. For a further discussion of risks relevant to the Company, see the Company’s AIF under the heading “Description of Our Business – Risk Factors”, available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com, on EDGAR at www.sec.gov or on the Company’s website at www.tahoeresources.com. Although management has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There is no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking

  • statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements, except as, and to the extent required by,

applicable securities laws. For a more detailed discussion of risks and uncertainties affecting the Company, see the most recent AIF and other regulatory filings with the Canadian Securities Administrators, which are available

  • n SEDAR under the Company’s issuer profile at www.sedar.com.
slide-3
SLIDE 3

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

Q1 2017

3

A Great Start to 2017

Record Financial Results Strong Production Low Costs

Results Compare Favourably to Guidance

Higher Metal Prices

slide-4
SLIDE 4

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

Q1 2017: Strong Per Share Financial Performance

4

Record Revenue, Cash Flow Per Share, Earnings and Adjusted Earnings $0.30 $0.24 $0.43 Q1 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017

Record Cash Flow

(1) Per Share

$0.17 $0.00 $0.24 Q1 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017

Record Earnings: $74.7 million Strong Growth in Earnings Per Share

  • 1. References to cash flow in this presentation refer to cash flow provided by operating activities before change in working capital
slide-5
SLIDE 5

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

Keys to Strong Financial Results

5

50.6 98.1 108.8 100.7 115.9 1,166 1,255 1,321 1,197 1,201

800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 10 30 50 70 90 110 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017

Gold Sales and Prices

4.6 5.2 4.8 4.5 5.6 15.92 18.95 20.64 14.45 19.22 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 22.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017

Silver Sales and Prices

(koz) ($/oz) (moz) ($/oz)

  • Record gold sales – 15% growth from Q4 2016
  • Silver sales increased ~1.0 moz from Q4 & Q1 2016
  • Significant increase in realized silver price
slide-6
SLIDE 6

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T 6

  • 1. Dollars per ounce of production net of byproduct credits
  • 2. Refers to all-in sustaining costs
  • 3. Total cash costs averaged $623 per ounce and AISC averaged $931 per ounce in Q1 2017 before the impact of a one-time contribution to production from an accounting change at La Arena and Shahuindo

Q1 2017 Operating Performance

Silver 5.7 moz produced $5.72 total cash costs

(1)

$8.11 AISC

(1)(2)

Gold 119.1 koz produced $574 total cash costs

(1)(3)

$860 AISC

(1)(2)(3)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

Q1 2017

La Arena Timmins Shahuindo

Gold Operations Performed Well

7

119.1 koz

(1)

53.0 43.9 19.7

  • 1. Includes 2.5 koz of gold produced at Escobal as a byproduct
  • Strong production at La Arena
  • S/T mine plan optimization
  • Positive grade reconciliation
  • Shahuindo production in line with

guidance

  • Solid results from Timmins reflect

improved grades

slide-8
SLIDE 8

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T 8

2017 Production, Cost & Expenditure Guidance Maintained

2017 Guidance Q1 2017 (Actuals)

Silver production (moz) 18-21 5.7 Total cash costs per silver oz produced ($/oz)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7) 375-425 119.1 AISC per silver oz produced ($/oz)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7) $7.00-$8.00 $5.72 Gold production (koz)(2) $9.50-$10.50 $8.11 Total cash costs per gold oz produced ($/oz)(4)(7) $700-$750 $574 AISC per gold oz produced ($/oz) (4)(7) $1,150-$1,250 $860 Sustaining capital (incl. capitalized drilling) ($M) $160-$175 $33.1 Project capital ($M) $150-$175 $15.5 Exploration expenses ($M) $35-$45 $4.2 Corporate G&A expenses(8) ($M) $45-$55 $11.7

  • 1. See “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Cautionary Note on Non-GAAP Financial Measures” at the end of this press release.
  • 2. Gold production range of 375 to 425 thousand ounces includes gold ounces produced in concentrate from the Escobal mine.
  • 3. Assumes the following metals prices: $1,250/oz gold; $0.90/pound lead; $0.90/pound zinc.
  • 4. Total cash costs and AISC are presented net of by-product credits.
  • 5. Assumes payable by-product metal production:10,190 oz gold; 16,332 thousand pounds lead; 23,109 thousand pounds zinc.
  • 6. Silver cost guidance assumes a 1% statutory royalty and a 4.5% voluntary and private royalty on all silver sales above $16/oz.
  • 7. All per ounce costs are based on silver ounces contained in concentrates (silver) and gold ounces in doré (gold).
  • 8. Corporate G&A includes non-cash, stock-based compensation.
  • 9. Numbers may not add due to rounding.
  • Production/costs to achieve target levels
  • Capital expenditures to increase
slide-9
SLIDE 9

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

Three-Year Guidance

9

2017 2018 2019

Silver production (moz) 18 - 21 18 - 21 18 - 21 Total cash costs/silver oz ($/oz)(2)(3)(8)(9) $7.00 - $8.00 $7.50 - $8.50 $7.50 - $8.50 AISC/silver oz ($/oz)(2)(3)(8)(9) $9.50 - $10.50 $10.00 - $11.00 $10.00 - $11.00 Gold production (koz) 375 - 425 425 - 500 500 - 550 Total cash costs/gold oz ($/oz) $700 - $750 $650 - $750 $650 - $750 AISC/gold oz ($/oz) $1,150 - $1,250 $1,050 - $1,150 $900 - $1,000 Sustaining capital ($M) $160 - $175 $140 - $160 $100 - $125 Project capital ($M) $150 - $175 $50 - $70 $0 - $10 Exploration expenses ($M) $35 - $45 $30 - $40 $30 - $40 Corporate G&A expenses ($M) $45 - $55 $45 - $55 $45 - $55

2017 expenditures lead to strong production growth, low capital & costs

  • 1. See “Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Information” in the Company’s MD&A dated March 9, 2017 and “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in the press release dated January 5, 2017 available at www.sedar.com.
  • 2. Assumes the following metals prices: $1,250/oz gold; $0.90/lb lead; $0.90/lb zinc.
  • 3. Assumes payable by-product metal production for 2017 of 10,190 ozs gold; 16,332 thousand lbs lead; 23,109 thousand lbs zinc; for 2018 of 9,610 ozs gold; 14,011 thousand lbs lead; 19,900 thousand lbs zinc; and for 2019 of 11,810
  • zs gold; 17,280 thousand lbs lead; 23,900 thousand lbs zinc.
  • 4. All per ounce costs are based on silver ounces contained in concentrates (silver) and gold ounces in doré (gold) and are net of byproduct credits.
  • 5. Guidance does not include inflation adjustments.
  • 6. The following foreign exchange rates were used: CAD/USD - $1.25; Peruvian Nuevo Sol – 3.40; Guatemalan Quetzal – 7.65.
  • 7. Gold production includes gold produced at Escobal.
  • 8. Silver cost guidance assume a 1% statutory royalty and a 4.5% voluntary and private royalty on all silver sales above $16.00/oz
  • 9. Per ounce costs based on ounces produced
slide-10
SLIDE 10

F I N A N C I A L R E V I E W

AT T H E

“TIP OF THE ICEBERG”

slide-11
SLIDE 11

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

Q1 2017: Strong Per Share Financial Performance

11

Strong Cash Flow Key to Value Creation $0.30 $0.24 $0.43 Q1 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017

Record Cash FlowPer Share 79%

  • Record cash flow of $132.9M or

$0.43 per share

  • 79% growth from Q4 2016, 42%

improvement from Q1 2016

  • Strong results driven by:
  • Record revenue of $251M
  • Low operating costs
slide-12
SLIDE 12

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

Q1 2017: Strong Per Share Financial Performance

12

Record Earnings and Adjusted Earnings

d Cash Flow

(1) Per Share

  • Record earnings and

adjusted earnings

  • $0.24 EPS highest since

Q2 2014

  • Q4 2016 EPS impacted by
  • ne-time, non-cash impact

from tax rate change in Peru

$38 $17 $63 $- $75 $35 $58 $66 $18 $75

$(10) $40 $90 $140 $190 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017

$ millions

Earnings Adjusted Earnings

slide-13
SLIDE 13

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

189 251 34

22

6

140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 Q4 2016 Volume Price Provisional Pricing Q1 2107

$ Millions

Record Revenue: $251M in Q1 2017

Q1 2017: Increased Volumes & Prices Drive Record Revenue

13

Record Revenue, Cash Flow Per Share, Earnings and Adjusted Earnings

slide-14
SLIDE 14

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

Strong Growth in Silver Sales & Prices

14

4.6 5.2 4.8 4.5 5.6 15.92 18.95 20.64 14.45 19.22

10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 22.00 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017

Silver Sales and Prices

(koz) ($/oz)

  • Silver sales of 5.6 moz increased ~ 1moz from Q4 2016
  • 33% increase in realized silver price
slide-15
SLIDE 15

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

Record Gold Sales

15

50.6 98.1 108.8 100.7 115.9 1,166 1,255 1,321 1,197 1,201

800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 10 30 50 70 90 110 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017

Gold Sales and Prices

(koz) ($/oz)

  • Record gold sales – 15% growth from Q4 2016
  • Strong production growth in Q1 2017
  • Sales partially reflect inventories held at year-end 2016
slide-16
SLIDE 16

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T 16

3.53 3.24 2.70 3.30 3.40 $15.45 $18.60 $19.17 $15.95 $18.26 $15.92 $18.95 $20.64 $14.45 $19.22

$0.00 $5.00 $10.00 $15.00 $20.00 $25.00

  • 0.50

1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017

$ Per Ounce Ag moz

Provisionally Priced Silver Oz Silver - Provisional Price Silver - Realized Price

Revenue Recognition: Provisional Pricing Impact

slide-17
SLIDE 17

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

Q1 2017 Costs in Line with Expectations

17

  • Production costs $97.4M vs. $91.2M in Q4 2016
  • Increase reflects higher sales, increased mining costs in Timmins
  • Depreciation expense $41.8M approx. $240/oz gold & $3/oz silver
  • In line or slightly better than estimates
  • Corporate G&A $11.7M, up from $9.1M in Q4 2016
  • Includes charge for update of in-situ oz in Timmins
  • Exploration expense $4.2M vs. $6.9M in Q4 2016
  • Impacted by timing of permits & to commence/complete programs
slide-18
SLIDE 18

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

Strong Per Ounce Cost Performance: Silver

18

$4.51 $6.07 $6.50 $6.48 $5.72 $5.97 $8.16 $8.68 $9.76 $8.11

4,200 4,400 4,600 4,800 5,000 5,200 5,400 5,600 5,800 $- $2.00 $4.00 $6.00 $8.00 $10.00 $12.00 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017

Oz produced (000s) Cost per ounce

Silver

TCC AISC Production

  • Silver total cash costs of

$5.72/oz, well below target range of $7.00 – $8.00/oz

  • Byproduct credit ~$2.90/oz

(assumed $2.15/oz in 2017 guidance)

  • AISC averaged $8.11/oz,

better than 2017 guidance

  • f $9.50 – $10.50/oz
slide-19
SLIDE 19

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

  • Gold total cash costs of

$574/oz, well below target range of $700 – $750/oz

  • AISC averaged $860/oz,

better than 2017 guidance of $1,150 – $1,250/oz

  • Low AISC reflects low total

cash costs & low levels of sustaining capital

Strong Per Ounce Cost Performance: Gold

19

$638 $647 $625 $594 $574 $825 $973 $974 $945 $860

  • 20

40 60 80 100 120 140 $- $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017

Oz produced (000s) Cost per ounce

Gold

TCC AISC Production

slide-20
SLIDE 20

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

Q1 2017

Sustaining Project

Q1 2017 Capital Expenditures

20

$48.6 Million

53.0 $15.5 $33.1

  • $33.1M sustaining capital
  • $15.5M project capital
  • Capital expenditure levels to increase
  • 2017 Guidance remains unchanged
  • Sustaining: $160M – $175M
  • Project: $150M – $175M
slide-21
SLIDE 21

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

Strong Balance Sheet Supports Growth

21

Well Positioned to Fund Growth & Maintain Industry‐Leading Dividend

Strong Financial Results Solid Operating Performance Low Capital Expenditures Increased Balance Sheet Strength: W/C: >$40M Cash & Cash Equ.: $175.4M Net Cash: ~$125M

slide-22
SLIDE 22

P R O J E C T O V E R V I E W

AT T H E

“TIP OF THE ICEBERG”

slide-23
SLIDE 23

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

Targeting 500 – 550 koz Gold Ounces in 2019

(1)

23

230 385 375 - 425 425 - 500 500 - 550 550

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Projected Gold Production (koz)(2)(3)

Actual Target - Low Target - High

AISC <$1,000/oz in 2019

  • 1. Contains forward-looking information
  • 2. 2015 gold production pro forma to include full year of results from Rio Alto
  • 3. 2016 results include nine months of production from Canadian operations and pre-commercial production ounces at Shahuindo

~140% growth in 5 years

slide-24
SLIDE 24

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T 24

  • Expanding Shahuindo to 36,000 tonnes per day
  • Doubling production at Bell Creek Mine

Bell Creek Mine Shahuindo

  • 1. Contains forward-looking information

Two Key Projects Driving Growth

(1)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

Shahuindo: Ramping Up to 200 koz in 2019

(1)

25

  • 1. Contains forward-looking information
  • 12,000 tpd crushing & agglomeration

(C&A) circuit

  • Permitting completed
  • Construction commenced
  • $20M of total $80M budget for 36,000

tpd C&A plant incurred to date

  • Initial circuit on track for completion in H2

2017

  • Completion of second circuit mid-2018

Initial crushing/agglomeration circuit in construction

slide-26
SLIDE 26

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T 26

  • 1. Contains forward-looking information

Recovery Rate to Reach ~80%, Potentially Higher Capital Expenditures to increase

  • In line with construction schedules
  • Timing for permitting
  • Impact of heavy rains

Project on schedule & budget to reach 36,000 tpd in H2 2018 Capital Expenditures to increase

  • In line with construction schedules
  • Timing for permitting
  • Impact of heavy rains

Project on schedule & budget to reach 36,000 tpd in H2 2018

Shahuindo: On Schedule and Budget

(1)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

Bell Creek Shaft Project: On Track to Double Production

(1)

27

  • 1. Contains forward-looking information
  • $20M of $80M budget spent to date
  • Lateral development on 4 of 5 shaft

access levels complete

  • Commencing last section of vertical

development

  • Shaft rehabilitation progressing well
  • Surface infrastructure work advancing
  • Project on schedule and budget for

completion in mid-2018

installing new shaft guides Benching pilot raise (535L to 320L)

(Looking up the shaft)

Construction of new office/dry complex

  • Production to reach 80 koz/year
  • Mine life to grow to >10 years
slide-28
SLIDE 28

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

Targeting 500 – 550 koz Gold Ounces in 2019

(1)

28

230 385 375 - 425 425 - 500 500 - 550 550

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Projected Gold Production (koz)(2)(3)

Actual Target - Low Target - High

Ramp up to at least 500 koz per year in H2 2018

  • 1. Contains forward-looking information
  • 2. 2015 gold production pro forma to include full year of results from Rio Alto
  • 3. 2016 results include nine months of production from Canadian operations and pre-commercial production ounces at Shahuindo

Projects completed mid-2018

slide-29
SLIDE 29

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

  • 2017 peak capital investment in growth
  • Sustaining capital returns to $100M – $125M in 2019
  • Growth capital to ~$10 million in 2019 (assuming no new projects)

Capital Requirements Decline Sharply After 2017

(1)

29 93 150 – 175 50 – 70 0 –10 113 160 – 175 140 – 160 100 – 125 206 310 – 350 190 – 230 100 – 135 2016 (Actuals) 2017 2018 2019

Capital Expenditures (2016 - 2019)(2)

($ Millions)

Project Capital Sustaining Capital Total Capital Expenditures

  • 1. Contains forward-looking information
  • 2. Plot points represent mid-point of expected ranges

Capital Expenditures Decline Significantly Beginning in Mid-2018

slide-30
SLIDE 30

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T 30

  • Fenn-Gib – near surface resource with

potential for large-scale production

  • Accounted for ~half of Canadian

exploration drilling in Q1 2017

  • Current resource evaluated as open pit

with low strip ratio

  • Highly prospective geology with multiple

additional exploration targets identified

  • PEA targeted for fourth quarter 2017(1)

Fenn-Gib – Recent Drilling (Longitudinal Looking Northwards)

  • 1. Contains forward-looking information
slide-31
SLIDE 31

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

Shahuindo: Targeting Near-Pit Zones, District Targets

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

La Arena Phase II Project – Drilling to Commence in Q2 2017

32

  • 1. Contains forward-looking information

Open at Depth Deepest drill holes show no decrease in grade 265 MT pit shell 65 MT pit shell .05 to .18% Cu .18 to .45% .45 to 1.05% >1.05% Calaorco Pit

  • Large Au-Cu deposit in close proximity to

existing La Arena Oxide deposit

  • Internal scoping study returns positive results
  • M3 Engineering & Technology commissioned

to complete NI 43-101 PEA

  • Target completion third quarter 2017(1)
slide-33
SLIDE 33

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

Tahoe: Strong Start to 2017

33

Funded to Achieve Growth Plans while Maintaining Industry‐Leading Dividend Record Cash Flow Per Share & Earnings Performed Well Against 2017 Guidance Near-Term Growth on Schedule & Budget Advancing PEAs on Longer-Term Projects Extensive Exploration Program Focused on High- Potential Targets

slide-34
SLIDE 34

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The Company has included certain non-GAAP financial measures throughout this presentation which include total cash costs and all- in sustaining costs per silver and per gold ounce (“all-in sustaining costs”). These measures are not defined under IFRS and may be calculated differently by other companies depending on the underlying accounting principles and policies applied. As such, these Non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation. The Company’s Escobal mine produces primarily silver in concentrates with other metals (gold, lead and zinc) produced simultaneously in the mining process, the value of which represents a small percentage of the Company’s revenue and is therefore considered “byproduct”. The Company’s La Arena, Shahuindo, Timmins mines produce primarily gold with other metals (primarily silver) produced simultaneously in the mining process, the value of which represents a small percentage of the Company’s revenue and is therefore considered “byproduct”. The Company believes these measures will provide investors and analysts with useful information about the Company’s underlying earnings, cash costs of

  • perations, the impact of byproduct credits on the Company’s cost structure and its ability to generate cash flow, as well as providing

a meaningful comparison to other mining companies. These measures are intended to provide additional information and should not be substituted for GAAP measures. The Company reports total cash costs and total production costs on a silver ounce and a gold ounce produced basis. The Company follows the recommendation of the cost standard as endorsed by the Silver Institute (“the Institute”) for the reporting of cash costs (silver) and the generally accepted standard of reporting cash costs (gold) by precious metal mining companies. The Institute is a nonprofit international association with membership from across the silver industry. The Institute serves as the industry’s voice in increasing public understanding of the many uses and values of silver. This remains the generally accepted standard for reporting cash costs of production by precious metal mining companies. Total cash costs and total production costs are divided by the number

  • f silver ounces contained in concentrate or gold ounces recovered in doré to calculate per ounce figures. When deriving the

production costs associated with an ounce of silver or gold, the Company deducts byproduct credits from sales which are incidental to producing silver and gold. The Company has adopted the reporting of all-in sustaining costs as a non-GAAP measure of a precious metals mining company’s

  • perating performance and the ability to generate cash flow from operations. This measure has no standardized meaning and the

Company has utilized an adapted version of the guidance released by the World Gold Council, the market development organization for the gold industry. The World Gold Council is not a regulatory industry organization and does not have the authority to develop accounting standards or disclosure requirements. All-in sustaining costs include total cash costs incurred at the Company’s mining

  • peration, sustaining capital expenditures, corporate administrative expense, certain exploration and evaluations costs, and

reclamation and closure accretion. The Company believes that this non-GAAP measure represents the total costs of producing silver and gold from its operation, and provides additional information of the Company’s operational performance and ability to generate cash flows to support future capital investments and to sustain future production. For additional information regarding these non-GAAP measures (including reconciliations to IFRS measures and by-product credit calculations, as applicable), see Tahoe’s management’s discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and its press release dated May 2, 2017, both available at www.tahoeresources.com and on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

42

slide-35
SLIDE 35

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

Total cash costs and total production costs ($000's) Ag Au Production costs (including royalties) $164,000 $290,000 Treatment and refining charges 28,750

  • Total cash costs before by-product credits

$192,750 $290,000 Less gold credit1 (12,750)

  • Less zinc credit2

(16,750)

  • Less lead credit3

(13,300)

  • Total cash costs net of by-product credits

$149,950 $290,000 Silver ounces produced in concentrate (000's) 20,000

  • Gold ounces produced in dore (000's)
  • 400

Total cash costs per ounce before by-product credits $9.64 $725 Total cash costs per ounce net of by-product credits $ 7.50 $725 All-in sustaining costs ($000's) Total cash costs net of by-product credits $149,950 $290,000 Sustaining capital 32,500 135,000 Exploration 1,500 20,000 Reclamation cost accretion 200 2,000 General and administrative expenses 15,750 33,000 All-in sustaining costs $199,900 $480,000 Silver ounces produced in concentrate (000's) 20,000

  • Gold ounces produced in dore (000's)
  • 400

All-in sustaining cost per ounce produced net of by-product credits $10.00 $1,200 Metal Quantity Price

1 Au (oz)

10,190 $ 1,250

2 Zn (lb)

23,109,000 $ 0.90

3 Pb (lb)

16,332,000 $ 0.90

Non-GAAP Measures – 2017 Guidance Calculations

43

slide-36
SLIDE 36

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T

Reserves and Resources; QP Statement

44 Reserves and Resource Disclosure

The basis of the Escobal Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves is from Escobal Mine Guatemala NI 43-101 Feasibility Study, dated November 5, 2014. Mineral Resources at January 1, 2017 estimated by subtracting mine depletion volumes through December 31, 2016 from the Mineral Resources stated in the aforementioned technical report. Mineral Resources are reported at a silver-equivalent cut-off grade of 130 g/t using metal prices of $22/oz silver, $1,325/oz gold, $1.00/lb lead and $0.95/lb zinc. Mineral Reserves at January 1, 2017 calculated by applying an optimized mine plan to the updated Mineral Resources. Mineral Reserves are reported using a cut-off calculated from the net smelter return value less production costs using metal prices of $20/oz silver, $1,300/oz gold, $1.00/lb lead and $1.25/lb zinc. The basis of the La Arena Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates is from La Arena Project, Peru Technical Report (NI 43- 101), dated February 27, 2015. Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves at January 1, 2017 calculated by applying the mine topographic surface at January 1, 2017 to an updated Mineral Resource estimate completed at July 1, 2016. Sulfide Mineral Resources remain unchanged from the aforementioned technical report as there has been no depletion of the sulfide Mineral Resources. Oxide Mineral Resources are reported using a gold cut-off grade of 0.10 g/t within a $1,400/oz gold pit shell. Oxide Mineral Reserves are reported using gold cut-off grades of 0.15 g/t for planned 2017 production and 0.10 g/t for production post-2017 within a pit designed from a $1,200/oz gold pit shell. Sulfide Mineral Resources are reported using a copper cut-off grade of 0.12% within a $3.50/lb copper and $1,400/oz gold pit shell. Sulfide Mineral Reserves are reported using a copper cut-off grade of 0.18% within a pit designed from a $3.00/lb copper and $1,200/oz gold pit shell. The basis of the Shauhindo Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates is from Technical Report on the Shahuindo Mine, Cajabamba, Peru, dated January 25, 2016. Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves at January 1, 2017 calculated by applying the mine topographic surface at January 1, 2017 to an updated Mineral Resource estimate completed at July 1, 2016. Sulfide Mineral Resources remain unchanged from the aforementioned technical report as there has been no depletion of the sulfide Mineral Resources. Oxide Mineral Resources are reported using a gold cut-off grade of 0.15 g/t within a $1,400/oz gold pit shell. Oxide Mineral Reserves are reported using gold cut-off grades of 0.25 g/t for planned 2017 and 2018 production and 0.18 g/t for production post-2018 within a pit designed from a $1,200/oz gold pit shell. Sulfide Mineral Resources are reported using a gold cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t. Shahuindo currently has no sulfide Mineral Reserves. The basis of the Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates is from 43-101 Technical Report, Updated Mineral Reserve Estimate for Timmins West Mine and Initial Resource Estimate for the 144 Gap Deposit, Timmins, Ontario, Canada, dated February 29, 2016. Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves at January 1, 2017 calculated by subtracting June through October 2016 mine depletion volumes and November through December 2016 forecasted production from an updated Mineral Resource estimate effective June 1,

  • 2016. Mineral Resources are reported using a gold cut-off grade of 1.5 g/t. Mineral Reserves are reported using a gold cut-off grade of

2.0 g/t and a gold price of $1,250/oz.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

F I R S T Q U A R T E R 2 0 1 7 C O N F E R E N C E C A L L & W E B C A S T Reserves and Resource Disclosure

The basis of the Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates is from NI 43-101 Technical Report, Updated Mineral Reserve Estimate for Bell Creek Mine, Hoyle Township, Ontario, Canada, dated March 27, 2015. Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves at January 1, 2017 calculated by subtracting June through October 2016 mine depletion volumes and November through December 2016 forecasted production from an updated Mineral Resource estimate effective June 1, 2016. Mineral Resources are reported using a gold cut-off grade of 2.2 g/t. Mineral Reserves are reported using a gold cut-off grade of 2.2 g/t and a gold price of $1,250/oz. The basis of the Whitney Mineral Resources is from Technical Report and Resource Estimate on the Upper Hallnor, C-Zone, and Broulan Reef Deposits, Whitney Gold Property, Timmins Area, Ontario, Canada, dated February 26, 2014. Mineral Resources are reported using a gold cut-off grade of 3.0 g/t. The basis of the Gold River Mineral Resources is from Technical Report on the Update of Mineral Resource Estimate for the Gold River Property, Thorneloe Township, Timmins, Ontario, Canada, dated April 5, 2012. Mineral Resources are reported using a gold cut-off grade of 2.0 g/t. The basis of the Juby Mineral Resources is from Technical Report on the Updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Juby Gold Project, Tyrrell Township, Shining Tree Area, Ontario, dated February 24, 2014. Mineral Resources are reported using a gold cut-off grade of 0.40 g/t. The basis of the Fenn-Gib Mineral Resources is from Fenn-Gib Resource Estimate Technical Report, Timmins Canada, dated November 17, 2011. Indicated Mineral Resources and approximately 90% of Inferred Mineral Resources within a $1,190/oz gold pit shell reported using a gold cut-off grade of 0.50 g/t. The remaining 10% of Inferred Mineral Resources reported using a gold cut-off grade of 1.5 g/t.

Reserves and Resources; QP Statement

45

Qualified Person Statement Technical information in this presentation has been approved by Tahoe’s Vice President Technical Services, Charles Muerhoff, a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101.