Timeliness of Crime Recording Supt Simon Jones Introduction How - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

timeliness of crime recording
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Timeliness of Crime Recording Supt Simon Jones Introduction How - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Timeliness of Crime Recording Supt Simon Jones Introduction How does crime come into BTP What requirements do we have to meet What dont we count Performance How do we compare amongst our peers Future steps Point


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Timeliness of Crime Recording

Supt Simon Jones

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

  • How does crime come into BTP
  • What requirements do we have to meet
  • What don’t we count
  • Performance
  • How do we compare amongst our peers
  • Future steps
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Point of Entry

  • Crimes are reported to BTP by a number of

methods:

1. Direct from Members of the public and staff to the FCC in Birmingham. 2. To police officers responding to calls 3. Via Email, text and social media. 4. Via crime transfer – CAD – Tel call

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Requirements - 2016 NCRS Guidance

  • Para 3.4 - Timeliness of Recording: Where the

information obtained at the first point of contact satisfies the crime recording decision making process the expectation is that identified crimes will be recorded without delay. It is expected that such crimes will be recorded on the same day the report is received – and in any case recording must take place within 24 hours of the time the initial report was received.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

What do we count

  • All Notifiable crime - A Notifiable Offence is any
  • ffence under United Kingdom law where the

police must inform the Home Office by completing a crime report form for statistical purposes.

  • Therefore we are not required to supply all

railway offences

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Performance

  • Challenges
  • Major changes to our crime and incident

recording platforms.

  • Training of staff both in the control rooms and

police officers

  • 14% less resources than nearest force
  • 3% cut in resources - 5 call handlers and £172k
  • f savings
slide-7
SLIDE 7

The journey

Recorded Date Month Year Notifiable Crimes Recorded Percentage Recorded within 24 Hrs Percentage Recorded within 48 Hrs Percentage Recorded within 72 Hrs Jan2017 545 93.58% 95.96% 96.51% Dec2016 4562 79.66% 85.38% 87.44% Nov2016 5266 71.91% 76.79% 79.34% Oct2016 4903 75.53% 79.91% 82.60% Sep2016 4834 82.54% 88.21% 90.40% Aug2016 5215 70.35% 74.92% 76.95% Jul2016 4567 65.60% 70.46% 73.81% Jun2016 4703 66.62% 74.53% 77.35% May2016 4522 66.59% 69.64% 71.78% Apr2016 4090 68.83% 76.87% 79.90%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Apr2016 May2016 Jun2016 Jul2016 Aug2016 Sep2016 Oct2016 Nov2016 Dec2016 Jan2017

Notifiable Crime Vs. Percentage recorded within 24 Hours

Sum of Notifiable Crimes Recorded Sum of Percentage Recorded within 24 Hrs

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Actual Crime Recording

  • Whilst timeliness is one aspect of the HMIC

inspection process another is actual recording.

  • Failing to recording and then record correctly

can have significant implications for efficiency and more importantly confidence.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Future steps

  • Sussex – on line crime recording
  • Mobile platform – Surrey and linear platform
  • Removal of Non Notifiable non entity based

crime from Niche

  • Direct officer Entry
  • Non Crime Occurrences - Thrive