third international workshop on food supply chain wfsc
play

Third International Workshop on Food Supply Chain - WFSC Quality - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Third International Workshop on Food Supply Chain - WFSC Quality assessment of fine Italian chocolate subject to time-varying stress of temperature during the logistic distribution Riccardo Manzini, Riccardo Accorsi, Marco Bortolini, Emilio


  1. Third International Workshop on Food Supply Chain - WFSC Quality assessment of fine Italian chocolate subject to time-varying stress of temperature during the logistic distribution Riccardo Manzini, Riccardo Accorsi, Marco Bortolini, Emilio Ferrari, Mauro Gamberi (*), Marco Trombini Department of Industrial Engineering – A LMA M ATER S TUDIORUM B OLOGNA U NIVERSITY Italy (*) Department of Industrial and Management Engineering (DTG), P ADOVA U NIVERSITY Italy

  2. Agenda • closed-loop supply chain quality assessment at UniBO • the finest chocolate Italian supply chain – Majani and Cremino FIAT • products and shipments selection • sensory analysis • samples comparison and results analysis • further research and conclusions

  3. Closed-loop supply chain quality assessment at UniBO Loop 2 “continuouse improvements” -new packaging and containment solutions -facility locations -transportation modes -demand allocation Set-points Etc. (targets & expected KPI) ADD NEW FSC configuration On-field data Logistic Lab Logistic Lab Food science Lab collection data warehosuing reference Product/package selection and + FSC “sensed Feedback OK International Physical & Safety and FSC best FSC configurati Lab value” shipments environment quality configuration configuration on simulation system monitoring al stresses evaluation (TO-BE) - i- th output System modification & Feedback NOT OK adjustments Manzini Product/package and FSC adjustments: and Accorsi, 2013 - new packaging and containment Loop 1 solutions -facility locations -transportation modes -demand allocation Etc. Real Shipment Shipment Simulation

  4. Closed-loop supply chain quality assessment at UniBO

  5. The finest chocolate FSC & the quality assessment

  6. Products and shipments selection Cremino Gianduiotto Scorza A selection of: • 2 national shipments • September-October, 2013 • Transp.mode: the truck • No control of temperature

  7. Products and shipment Selection (2) – the first shipm. A selection of: 30 • 2 national shipments • Sptember-October, 2013 25 • Transp.mode: the truck • No control of temperature Temperature [°C] 20 15 10 5 1,0 2,0 3,0 4,0 5,0 6,0 7,0 8,0 9,0 10,0 Time [day of shipment] Bologna-Messina

  8. Products and shipment Selection (3) – the secon ship. A selection of: 23 • 2 national shipments • Sptember-October, 2013 21 • Transp.mode: the truck 19 • No control of temperature 17 Temperature [°C] 15 13 11 9 7 5 1,0 2,0 3,0 4,0 5,0 6,0 7,0 8,0 9,0 Time [day of shipment] Bologna-Trapani

  9. Sensory analysis Sensory analysis procedure: • Involvment of human assessors (experts) • Several facts measurements according to 5 senses • A quantitative approach with multiple scores/summary results

  10. Sensory analysis (2) Sensory analysis survey: • 3 blind runs: Analysis 1 – “Immediately after”, Analysis 2 – “After 2 weeks”, Analysis 3 – “After 6 months • 2 replications for each run • 3 journeys: time ZERO, Shipment 1 and Shipment 2 • SURVEY - Several descriptors grouped into 5 senses (sight, smell, taste, touch and hearing)  5 summary scores • “Final sensation” score • “Global” score = weighted mean KPI (taste 73%, smell 20%, sight 4%, touch 1%, hearing 1%, final sensation 1%).

  11. Obtained results Summary score “TASTE” I nteraction Plot for taste • Cremino & Scorza Data Means vary from A2 to A3 shipment 1 shipment 2 time-zero • Scorza improves vs 1 2 3 Cremino gets worst Product 40 CREMI NO from A2 to A3 GI ANDUI OTTO Product 36 SCORZA 32 Analysis 40 1 2 Analysis 36 3 32 Expert 40 21 32 Expert 36 43 58 32 64 40 Sample 36 Sample shipment 1 shipment 2 time-zero 32 CREMINO IOTTO CORZA 21 32 43 58 64 S GIANDU

  12. Obtained results Summary score “SMELL” • Cremino & Gianduiotto reduce quality due to time passing • No effects on Scorza due to time

  13. Obtained results The Total Score (1) • The effect on quality due to the stress of temperature is significant on the smell and not significant on the taste. • Time-zero analysis performs better for all products in terms of smell. • The largest part of expert (with the exception of 43 ) found better the time- zero samples. Main Effects Plot for total score% Data Means Product Analysis 85 80 75 Time-zero sample performs better 70 Mean CREMINO GIANDUIOTTO SCORZA 1 2 3 Sample 85 80 75 70 shipment 1 shipment 2 t ime-zero

  14. Obtained results The Total Score (2) • Gianduiotto does not change its level of global I nteraction Plot for total score% quality when time is Data Means passing 1 2 3 88 • Scorza improves the Product CREMINO 80 global quality after 6 GIANDUIOTTO Pr oduct SCORZA 72 months 88 Analysis • Cremino looses quality 1 80 2 A nalysis 3 72 88 Sample shipment 1 80 shipment 2 Sample time-zero 72 CREMI NO GI ANDUIO TTO shipment 1 shipment 2 time-zero SCORZA

  15. Conclusions and further research • The quality of food products is affected by logistics decisions • The proposed closed-loop and simulation-based system is effective • The selection of other FSCs and food products is expected • The introduction of other stresses to be monitored and to be simulated…

  16. Conclusions and further research • What happens in an int.shipment? (i.e. in a long journey) • Multiple-stress analysis. What happens when RH is varying? (e.g. ship. To Japan by air Cargo or by maritime transpor container)

  17. Sensory analysis Sensory analysis survey: • 3 blind runs: Analysis 1 – “Immediately after”, Analysis 2 – “After 2 weeks”, Analysis 3 – “After 6 months • 2 replications for each run • 3 journeys: time ZERO, Shipment 1 and Shipment 2 • SURVEY - Several descriptors grouped into 5 senses (sight, smell, taste, Would you try? touch and hearing)  5 summary scores • “Final sensation” score • “Global” score = weighted mean KPI (taste 73%, smell 20%, sight 4%, touch 1%, hearing 1%, final sensation 1%).

  18. 2 samples for each product: 1 travelling inside the cabin; the other inside the cargo hold. We do not know which. Please distinguish each sample in agreement of the dot/little cross green. I know the meaning…you do not

  19. Riccardo Manzini Department of Industrial Engineering riccardo.manzini@unibo.it Tel. +39 051 2093406 www.unibo.it

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend