theories and models of language change
play

Theories and Models of Language Change A Study of Self-Organization - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Roland Mhlenbernd Introduction: The Evolut. Approach Universals of Sound Systems Theories and Models of Language Change A Study of Self-Organization Session 6: Models II - Emergence of Universals Agent Architecture Agent Interaction


  1. Roland Mühlenbernd Introduction: The Evolut. Approach Universals of Sound Systems Theories and Models of Language Change A Study of Self-Organization Session 6: Models II - Emergence of Universals Agent Architecture Agent Interaction Simulation Results Conclusion Further Studies Roland Mühlenbernd Homeworks June 9, 2015

  2. Review: Universal Darwinism Roland Mühlenbernd Introduction: The Evolut. Approach Universals of Sound Systems Mechanisms of universal evolution: A Study of Self-Organization 1. variation : continuing abundance of different elements Agent Architecture Agent Interaction 2. selection : number/probability of copies of elements - Simulation Results Conclusion depending on interaction between element features and Further Studies environmental features Homeworks 3. replication : reproduction/copying of elements What is the role of linguistic universals in an evolutionary model of language change?

  3. Language Change - Broad and Narrow Sense Roland Mühlenbernd Introduction: The Evolut. Approach Universals of Sound Systems A Study of Self-Organization Agent Architecture Agent Interaction Simulation Results Conclusion Further Studies Homeworks

  4. Linguistic Universals Roland Mühlenbernd Introduction: The Evolut. Approach ◮ are patterns that occur systematically across natural Universals of Sound languages Systems ◮ can be distinguished between A Study of Self-Organization ◮ absolute (e.g. all languages have nouns and verbs) Agent Architecture ◮ implicational (e.g. if a language is spoken, it has vowels Agent Interaction Simulation Results and consonants) Conclusion Further Studies ◮ are given on all linguistic levels: Homeworks ◮ phonology (e.g. symmetry of sound inventories) ◮ syntax (Greenberg universals, e.g. SOV → postpositional) ◮ semantics (Swadesh list, natural semantic metalanguage and its semantic primitives, basic color terms) ◮ pragmatics (e.g. generalized implicatures, speech acts) ◮ are given as innate cognitive structures or realized for functional reasons under communicative aspects?

  5. Universals of Sound Systems (Exercise 1) Roland Mühlenbernd Introduction: The Evolut. Approach Universals of Sound Systems The UCLA Phonological Segment Inventory Database A Study of (UPSID) contains 921 different speech sounds with the Self-Organization following values (over all 451 languages of the database): Agent Architecture Agent Interaction Simulation Results ◮ average number of phonemes: 20 to 37 Conclusion Further Studies ◮ minimal number of phonemes: 11 (Rotokas, Pirahã) Homeworks ◮ maximal number of phonemes: 141 (!X˜ u) Example: Hawaiian phonemes: a, e, i, o, u, p, k, m, n, w, l, h, P

  6. Universals of Sound Systems Roland Mühlenbernd Phonetic inventories of the world’s languages exhibit Introduction: The ◮ frequent and rare sounds: f ( [m] ) = 94 % , f ( [ ö ] ) = 1 % Evolut. Approach ◮ a tendency to symmetric inventories: Universals of Sound Systems ◮ f ( [ ď ] | [ O ] ) = 83 % ; f ( [ ď ] | ¬ [ O ] ) = 18 % A Study of ◮ f ( [t] ) = 40 % ; f ( [t] | [d] ) = 83 % Self-Organization Agent Architecture Agent Interaction Simulation Results Conclusion Sound sequences of the world’s languages exhibit Further Studies ◮ frequent and rare syllable structures: universal V , CV Homeworks ◮ follow a sonority hierarchy sonority class value plosives 1 fricatives 2 nasals 3 liquids 4 approximates 5 closed vowels 6 open vowels 7

  7. Universals of Sound Systems (Exercise 2) Roland Mühlenbernd The repertoire and use of speech sounds in human languages Introduction: The are constrained. According to de Boer, explanations for those Evolut. Approach Universals of Sound regularities can by divided in the following two classes: Systems ◮ they are based on physiological features of the human A Study of Self-Organization vocal tract and articulators Agent Architecture Agent Interaction ◮ they are based on the human audible frequencies Simulation Results Conclusion ◮ they are based on innate human cognitive capabilities √ Further Studies ◮ they are based on functional constraints of a good Homeworks communication system √ ◮ enable learnable and robust communication ◮ redundancy and predictability ◮ easily to distinguish and to produce Note: It is hard to find out how specific capacities might have become innate

  8. Universals of Sound Systems Roland Mühlenbernd Sound systems of human languages are often optimized for Introduction: The criteria such as Evolut. Approach Universals of Sound ◮ acoustic distinctiveness (especially vowels) Systems A Study of ◮ articulatory ease (especially consonants) Self-Organization Agent Architecture → f ( [m] ) = 94 % , f ( [ ö ] ) = 1 % Agent Interaction Simulation Results Conclusion Further Studies Homeworks Fig: realization of German vowels Fig: vowel systems of human languages

  9. Universals of Sound Systems Roland Mühlenbernd Introduction: The Evolut. Approach Universals of Sound Systems How do sound systems become optimized? A Study of Self-Organization Agent Architecture ◮ when children learn, they don’t explicitly optimize, but Agent Interaction imitate members of their community Simulation Results Conclusion ◮ their imitation is closer to the source material than Further Studies necessary for successful communication (see dialects) Homeworks ◮ suggestion: optimization is caused by self-organization in a population of language users

  10. Self-Organization in a Language Community Roland Mühlenbernd Introduction: The Evolut. Approach Universals of Sound Systems A Study of Self-Organization Agent Architecture Hypothesis: “...the structure of human vowel systems Agent Interaction Simulation Results is determined by self-organization in a population Conclusion under constraints of perception and production.” Further Studies Homeworks Bart de Boer (2000), Self-organization in vowel systems

  11. Self-Organization in a Language Community Roland Mühlenbernd Introduction: The Evolut. Approach Universals of Sound Systems Conditions for a model of self-organization A Study of 1. emergence of organization on a global scale : most Self-Organization Agent Architecture members have same inventories Agent Interaction Simulation Results 2. emergence due to interaction between members, not Conclusion optimization-actions of single members Further Studies Homeworks 3. non-local influence between members: no direct access to other members’ inventories 4. no pre-wired knowledge : members start with empty inventories; or as tabula rasa

  12. Self-Organization in a Language Community Roland Mühlenbernd Introduction: The Evolut. Approach Universals of Sound Systems Why a computer simulation model for a system of A Study of Self-Organization self-organization? Agent Architecture Agent Interaction 1. phenomenon of self-organization is hard to predict from Simulation Results Conclusion just the description of the system Further Studies 2. computer simulations help to investigate life-like Homeworks phenomena 3. computer model formulates a hypothesis, its simulation synthesizes the phenomenon

  13. de Boer’s Model Roland Mühlenbernd Introduction: The Evolut. Approach Universals of Sound Systems Properties of the model: A Study of Self-Organization 1. population of agents Agent Architecture Agent Interaction Simulation Results 2. agents can produce, perceive and remember speech sounds Conclusion in a human-like way Further Studies Homeworks 3. agents interact with others by imitating them 4. agents update their repertoires in dependence of interaction outcome (imitation success)

  14. de Boer’s Model: Articulatory Space Roland Mühlenbernd Introduction: The Evolut. Approach Universals of Sound Systems A Study of Self-Organization Agent Architecture Agent Interaction Simulation Results Conclusion Further Studies Homeworks Fig: Articulatory space (from de Boer 1999, page 64)

  15. de Boer’s Model: Acoustic Space Roland Mühlenbernd Introduction: The Evolut. Approach Universals of Sound Systems A Study of Self-Organization Agent Architecture Agent Interaction Simulation Results Conclusion Further Studies Homeworks Fig: Acoustic space (from de Boer 1999, page 42)

  16. de Boer’s Model: Space Conversion Roland Mühlenbernd Introduction: The Evolut. Approach Universals of Sound Systems A Study of Self-Organization Agent Architecture Agent Interaction Simulation Results Conclusion Further Studies Homeworks Fig: Space Conversion (from de Boer 2000, page 7)

  17. de Boer’s Model: Agent Architecture Roland Mühlenbernd Introduction: The Evolut. Approach Universals of Sound Systems A Study of Self-Organization Agent Architecture Agent Interaction Simulation Results Conclusion Further Studies Homeworks Fig: Agent architecture (from de Boer 2000, page 6)

  18. de Boer’s Model: Agent Architecture (Exercise 3) Roland Mühlenbernd Introduction: The Evolut. Approach Universals of Sound Systems De Boer is using a prototype model for the agents to store A Study of vowels. In his model a prototype has the following features: Self-Organization Agent Architecture ◮ non-static √ Agent Interaction Simulation Results Conclusion ◮ space-segmenting Further Studies ◮ addable/removable √ Homeworks ◮ unerasable ◮ articulatory/acoustic aspect √ ◮ feature-based

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend