The World Banks Sanctions System: The Use of Suspension and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the world bank s sanctions system
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The World Banks Sanctions System: The Use of Suspension and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The World Banks Sanctions System: The Use of Suspension and Debarment to Combat Fraud and Corruption in International Development 13 th PRIMO Forum Kyiv, Ukraine May 24, 2017 Presented by: Paul Ezzeddin Senior Policy Officer, Office of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The World Bank’s Sanctions System:

The Use of Suspension and Debarment to Combat Fraud and Corruption in International Development

13th PRIMO Forum Kyiv, Ukraine May 24, 2017 Presented by: Paul Ezzeddin Senior Policy Officer, Office of Suspension and Debarment (OSD) The World Bank

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Why Does the World Bank Care About Fraud & Corruption?

2

Anticorruption Procurement Aid Effectiveness

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Infrastructure Project (East Asia Pacific)

  • Road 30% narrower than

specifications

  • No road surfacing, contrary to

specifications

  • The contract was paid in full

Why Integrity in Procurement Matters

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Why Integrity in Procurement Matters

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

30 days to completion – more than 50% of funds disbursed

Why Integrity in Procurement Matters

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Along with Prevention, Deterrence: The World Bank’s Sanctions System

  • At the World Bank, “sanctions” means suspension and

debarment

  • Suspensions and debarments imposed by the World Bank are

administrative remedies, not criminal sanctions

  • One of a number of tools that the World Bank uses to combat

fraud and corruption

  • Suspended and debarred companies/individuals are

ineligible to receive new contracts for World Bank-financed projects

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

World Bank Financing: How Are The Parties Related ?

FINANCING/ CREDIT AGREEMENT CONTRACTS, BIDDING DOCUMENTS INVESTIGATIONS, AUDITS, SANCTIONS

7

Companies and Individuals (Bidders / Contractors)

IMPLEMENTING AGENCY (Borrowing Country Government)

The World Bank

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Who Can Be Sanctioned?

 Companies / Individuals competing for, or executing,

Bank-financed contracts

 Covered by the World Bank Sanctions System  May be suspended/debarred from receiving new contracts

8

Bank staff members and consultants (World Bank Internal Justice

  • Bank staff members and consultants (World Bank Internal Justice

System)

– Under the Internal Justice System, misconduct may result in termination, blacklisting against future employment with the World Bank

  • Government agencies and officials (Referrals to Member governments)

– Evidence of misconduct by government agencies and officials is referred to member governments

Actors Covered by Other WB Systems

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Sanctionable Misconduct

9

The World Bank has defined five sanctionable practices:

  • Fraudulent Practice
  • Corrupt Practice
  • Collusive Practice
  • Coercive Practice
  • Obstructive Practice
  • Definitions found in: Loan, Grant and Contracting Documents (via

Consultant and Procurement Guidelines (old) and Procurement Regulations (new); Sanctions Procedures; Anti-Corruption Guidelines for Borrowing Countries)

  • Applies across the World Bank Group (IBRD/IDA, IFC, MIGA)
  • First four definitions are harmonized with other Multilateral

Development Banks (IDB, ADB, AfDB, EBRD)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Sanctions System Overview

10

  • Evaluates evidence presented by INT
  • Issues Notice of Sanctions Proceedings to respondent
  • Temporarily suspends respondent
  • Recommends a sanction (becomes effective if respondent

does not contest)

  • 67% of cases resolved at this level

Integrity Vice Presidency (INT) Suspension and Debarment Officer (SDO) Sanctions Board (SB) Integrity Compliance Officers (ICO)

INVESTIGATIVE ADJUDICATIVE COMPLIANCE

  • Investigates allegations of

sanctionable practices in World Bank-financed projects.

  • Prepares and submits

Statements of Accusations and Evidence (SAEs) to the SDO.

  • Determines sufficiency of evidence
  • f sanctionable practices in SAEs

presented by INT.

  • Issues Notices of Sanctions

Proceedings (Notices) to respondents.

  • Temporarily suspends respondents

pending final outcome of proceedings.

  • Recommends sanctions (become

effective if respondents do not contest).

  • Reviews Explanations submitted by

respondents in response to Notices.

  • 66% of cases resolved at this level.
  • If respondents appeal,

reviews cases de novo.

  • Comprised of 7 external

members (including chair).

  • May hold hearings with

parties and witnesses.

  • Determines if sanctionable

practices occurred.

  • Imposes sanctions (not bound

by SDO’s recommendations).

  • Decisions are final and not

appealable.

  • 34% of cases resolved at this

level.

  • Monitors integrity

compliance by sanctioned companies (or codes of conduct for individuals).

  • Decides whether

compliance condition(s) established by the SDO or Sanctions Board as part of a sanction have been satisfied.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Range of Sanctions

  • Debarment with Conditional Release

(‘baseline’ or default)

  • Indefinite or Fixed-Term Debarment

(without conditions)

  • Conditional Non-Debarment
  • Letter of Reprimand
  • Restitution or other Remedy

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Scope of Debarment

12

  • Suspended/debarred companies and individuals are

not eligible to receive new contracts for World Bank projects

  • Also cannot be a nominated sub-contractor, consultant,

supplier, or service provider of an otherwise eligible firm being awarded a World Bank-financed contract

  • In most instances, entities controlled by a debarred

company or individual (i.e., subsidiaries) will also be ineligible

  • Suspensions/debarments can also extend to other

affiliates (e.g., parents, affiliates under common control) under certain circumstances

slide-13
SLIDE 13

MDB Cross-Debarment

  • In March 2010 the WBG and four other MDBs

signed an agreement for the mutual enforcement

  • f debarment decisions
  • Covers debarments that are public, over one year
  • Harmonized definitions of sanctionable practices
  • Cross-debarment automatic, subject to ‘opt out’ in

exceptional cases on legal/policy grounds

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The Compliance Phase:

Conditional Release

14 Integrity Compliance Office Sanction Decision Evaluate Program Ongoing Program Monitoring Release Decision Notify Sanctioned Party of Conditional Release Process WBG Eligible Application Rejected; May Appeal to Sanctions Board

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Sanctions are Public

www.worldbank.org/debarr

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Sanctions are Published

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

World Bank Suspension and Debarment:

By the Numbers

18

Since 1999…  800+ firms and individuals publicly debarred  400+ firms and individuals temporarily suspended  At least 35 criminal convictions based on referrals

For more information on suspension and debarment at the World Bank, please visit www.worldbank.org/sanctions

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Debarment Systems: Lessons and Questions

19

  • The Purpose of the System Must Be Clear:
  • Is the system punitive? Or is the focus on rehabilitation/self-cleansing?
  • Is it focused on the past (adjudicating misconduct), or the future (looking

at present responsibility)?

  • What is the balance between deterrence and fostering maximum

competition?

  • Is a suspension/debarment seen as a “good result” or a “bad result”?
  • Context Matters:
  • Is suspension and debarment one among a number of available remedies?

Or is it your only available remedy?

  • MDBs: Tension between competing legal systems and perspectives

/standards of member countries

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Debarment Systems: Lessons and Questions

20

  • Practical Questions:
  • What is the right balance between certainty and efficiency?
  • How many levels of review?
  • Who is the decision-maker? Is authority/accountability clear?
  • What are the grounds? Fraud and corruption? Poor Performance?
  • What is the evidentiary standard? Other key criteria?
  • What due process rights are afforded to the accused party?
  • What are the right performance measures for the system?