The World Banks Development Policy Lending: Is it Delivering - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the world bank s development policy lending is it
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The World Banks Development Policy Lending: Is it Delivering - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The World Banks Development Policy Lending: Is it Delivering Results? Ed Mountfield The World Bank Brussels, 13 July 2011 1 Country Economics Overview of the Presentation Development Policy Lending in perspective How are DPLs meant to


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

The World Bank’s Development Policy Lending: Is it Delivering Results?

Ed Mountfield The World Bank Brussels, 13 July 2011

Country Economics

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Overview of the Presentation

Development Policy Lending in perspective How are DPLs meant to deliver results? What’s the evidence it’s working? How can we make it work better?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

DEVELOPMENT POLICY LENDING IN PERSPECTIVE

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Emerging Spectrum of World Bank Lending Instruments

Country’s National and Sectoral Development Programs World Bank’s Country Assistance Strategy

Development Policy Lending (General Budget Support – Disburses against Policy/Institutional Actions) Program for Results Lending** (Expenditure Program Support – Disburses against Measurable Program Results) Investment Lending (Project Support – Disburses against Specific Investments)

4

*Program for Results Lending subject to Board approval Note: The Bank also provides policy-based and project-based guarantees as well as analytical and advisory services

RIGHT CHOICE OF INSTRUMENT DEPENDS ON CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Total World Bank Lending Increases During Crises – and DPLs in particular

10 20 30 40 50 60 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

U$$ Millions

Investment Lending US$M Development Policy Lending US$M

US $ billions

slide-6
SLIDE 6

HOW ARE DPLS MEANT TO DELIVER RESULTS?

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

DPLs Deliver Results through Substantive Engagement on Policy and Institutions

7 Development Program

  • The country designs and implements its

development program/strategy (World Bank provides support)

Prior Actions

  • The country and the World Bank agree key

policy/institutional actions, drawn from the country program, which form the basis of the operation

Results

  • The country and the World Bank agree key results,

flowing from the prior actions, which will be used to monitor and evaluate impact

Adequate macroeconomic policy Adequate fiduciary systems

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Declining Number of Prior Actions per Operation

35 38 33 26 35 28 33 27 19 19 11 12 9 10 10 11 9 31 32 21 18 32 20 22 16 17 12 12 12 11 9 9 9 10 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011*

Number of Prior Actions in DPOs - FY95-FY11 (through Q2)

  • Avg. Prior Actions IBRD
  • Avg. Prior Actions

IDA+TF

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

More Focus on Social Sector and Public Financial Management Reforms

1980-94

Social Sectors 8% Public Sector Governance 24% Trade and Economiv Manag. 24% Environm., Rural, and Urban Develop. 18% Financial and Private Sector Develop. 26%

2005-09

Social Sectors 15% Public Sector Governance 43% Environment, Rural, and Urban Develop. 16% Financial and Private Sector Develop. 18% Trade and Economic Manag. 8%

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Strong Emphasis on Results, Evaluation, Validation and Transparency

10

Results Focus. Each DPL must have an explicit results framework (indicators, baselines and dated targets)

  • Evaluation. Each DPL is evaluated at end of

implementation (Implementation Completion and Results Report) Independent Validation. Management evaluation is validated by the Independent Evaluation Group (reports directly to Board)

  • Transparency. New Access to Information

policy – public has almost total access to Bank information => public can evaluate DPLs

slide-11
SLIDE 11

WHAT’S THE EVIDENCE IT’S WORKING?

  • MACRO EVIDENCE
  • OPERATION-LEVEL EVIDENCE

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Poverty Rates for PRSC and Non-PRSC Countries (% of population below $38 per month)

PRSC countries (20) Better performing non-PRSC (24)* Non-PRSC counties (36) All IDA countries (56) % change (1984-99)

  • 16.2
  • 12.6
  • 2.1
  • 7.8

% change (1999- 2005)

  • 19.3
  • 13.0
  • 10.8
  • 14.1

Countries Supported by World Bank PRSCs Had Faster Poverty Reduction

12

Source: World Bank Independent Evaluation Group

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Countries Supported by World Bank PRSCs Had Greater Progress With MDGs

PRSC and Other Countries: Millennium Development Goal Achievement

Difference (%)

(% of population)

(1990/1–2000/1) (2001–06)

Primary enrollment, net PRSC

9.7 14.8

All IDA countries

11.6 9.1

Infant mortality (per 1000) PRSC

  • 19.0
  • 13.3

All IDA countries

  • 14.5
  • 9.6

13

Source: World Bank Independent Evaluation Group

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Examples of Country Results Influenced by DPO-Supported Programs

Bangladesh Education Sector DPC Series supported a successful means tested stipend program Rwanda PRSC Series focused on the legal framework for health and education, performance- based contracting Gross Enrollment in Secondary Education: 40% (2003); 57% (2007); Gender Parity: 36% (2003); 41% (2007)

Immunization Coverage: 83% (2003); 95% (2006) Primary Completion Rate: 33% (2003); 52% (2006)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Examples of Public Sector Governance Results Influenced by DPO-Supported Programs

Lao PDR: Creation of centralized treasury and revenue functions and establishment of Procurement Management Office Rwanda: Medium Term Expenditure Framework with

  • utput-oriented MTEFs for

education, health, water and energy sectors Madagascar: Improvements in revenue forecasting, streamlined expenditure management procedures, and better cash flow management and commitment control Georgia: Better Treasury Management with establishment of a Treasury Single Account across central government

slide-16
SLIDE 16

World Bank Policy Lending Performs as Least as Well as Other Instruments

16

(% operations satisfactory according to Independent Evaluation Group validation of Implementation Completion Report)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

HOW CAN WE MAKE IT WORK BETTER?

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

How Can We Make DPLs (and GBS More Broadly) Work Better? (1)

Don’t be afraid of engaging on policy and institutions:

– Budget support needs to support real reform

Continue to strengthen results management:

– M&E matters; results need to be linked to action

Push the envelope on transparency and participation:

– E.g. Zoellick announcement at Spring Meetings

  • n budget transparency and DPLs
slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

How Can We Make DPLs (and GBS More Broadly) Work Better? (2)

Further enhance attention to fiduciary and macroeconomic underpinnings:

– Budget support should support good governance and strong macro policy

Review established approaches to multi-donor budget support:

– Risk of bureaucracy, donor-driving, lack of flexibility in crises?

Continue to innovate:

– E.g. municipal DPLs, Deferred Drawdown DPLs, Policy-Based Guarantees, Regional DPLs