THE URBN CENTER & ANNEX Philadelphia, PA Penn State AE Senior - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

THE URBN CENTER & ANNEX Philadelphia, PA Penn State AE Senior Thesis Project Ghaith Yacoub I Construction Management Dr. Robert Leicht I CM Advisor Photo Property of: Mr. Nuno Cruz

Philadelphia, PA Project Background Ghaith Yacoub I Construction Management Project Location: Building’s History: I. Project Overview I. History and Location II. Background II. Presentation Overview III. Analysis#1: Demolition Alternatives IV. Analysis#2: SIP Scheduling of the Steel Erection V. Analysis#3: Prefabrication of the Curtain Walls VI. Analysis#4: Supply Chain of the Mechanical System VII. Summary and Conclusion VIII. Acknowledgments

Philadelphia, PA Project Background Ghaith Yacoub I Construction Management Project Volume: $ 31 Million Building Layout: I. Project Overview I. History and Location II. Background Size: 145917 SF II. Presentation Overview III. Analysis#1: Demolition Alternatives Construction Duration: URBN Center: 10/11-9/12 IV. Analysis#2: SIP Scheduling of the Steel Erection Annex: 12/11-10/12 V. Analysis#3: Prefabrication of the Curtain Walls Delivery Method: Design-Bid-Build. Lump-Sum Contract VI. Analysis#4: Supply Chain of the Mechanical System VII. Summary and Conclusion Renovation Scope: Demo of core VIII. Acknowledgments New Mezzanine levels Curtain walls MEP replacemen t Photo Property of: MS&R LTD.

Philadelphia, PA Presentation Overview Ghaith Yacoub I Construction Management Construction Depths: Breadth Topics: I. Project Background II. Presentation Overview III. Analysis#1: Demolition Alternatives Analysis # 1: Demolition Alternatives for the Building’s Structural Breadth #1: Steel Beam Sizing (Related to IV. Analysis#2: SIP Scheduling of the Steel Erection Core. V. Analysis#3: Prefabrication of the Curtain Walls Analysis #1) VI. Analysis#4: Supply Chain of the Mechanical System VII. Summary and Conclusion Analysis # 2: SIP Scheduling for the Steel Erection VIII. Acknowledgments Mechanical Breadth #2 : Energy Comparison Between Analysis # 3: Prefabrication of the Curtain Walls Chilled Beams and VAV System (Related to Analysis #4 ) Analysis # 4: Supply Chain Research of the Mechanical System

ANALYSIS I Demolition Alternatives for the Building’s Core

Philadelphia, PA Analysis # 1: Demolition Alternatives Ghaith Yacoub I Construction Management Concern : Columns are un-braced for more I. Project Background than 14’ II. Presentation Overview III. Analysis#1: Demolition Alternatives I. Existing Demo II. Demo Alternatives III. Methods Comparisons IV. Conclusion IV. Analysis#2: SIP Scheduling of the Steel Erection V. Analysis#3: Prefabrication of the Curtain Walls VI. Analysis#4: Supply Chain of the Mechanical System VII. Summary and Conclusion VIII. Acknowledgments

Philadelphia, PA Analysis # 1: Demolition Alternatives Ghaith Yacoub I Construction Management I. Project Background II. Presentation Overview Solution: Maintain critical existing beams III. Analysis#1: Demolition Alternatives during demolition. I. Existing Demo II. Demo Alternatives Schedule Effects: 10 Mondays. III. Methods Comparisons Recovered with overtime/2 nd shift IV. Conclusion IV. Analysis#2: SIP Scheduling of the Steel Erection V. Analysis#3: Prefabrication of the Curtain Walls VI. Analysis#4: Supply Chain of the Mechanical System VII. Summary and Conclusion VIII. Acknowledgments

Philadelphia, PA Analysis # 1: Demolition Alternatives Ghaith Yacoub I Construction Management Cost of Cable Bracing: I. Project Background [Using AISC Guide: Erection Bracing of Low-Rise Structural Steel Buildings II. Presentation Overview Proposed Plan: Remove all steel in 1phase and implement III. Analysis#1: Demolition Alternatives Temporary bracing through either I. Existing Demo A) Cross Cable Bracing II. Demo Alternatives III. Methods Comparisons IV. Conclusion Schedule Changes: IV. Analysis#2: SIP Scheduling of the Steel Erection V. Analysis#3: Prefabrication of the Curtain Walls VI. Analysis#4: Supply Chain of the Mechanical System VII. Summary and Conclusion VIII. Acknowledgments B) Temporary Beam Placement

Philadelphia, PA Analysis # 1: Demolition Alternatives Ghaith Yacoub I Construction Management I. Project Background II. Presentation Overview Comparison Factors: III. Analysis#1: Demolition Alternatives Additional cost I. Existing Demo Effects on next critical path item [ Steel erection] II. Demo Alternatives III. Methods Comparisons IV. Conclusion IV. Analysis#2: SIP Scheduling of the Steel Erection V. Analysis#3: Prefabrication of the Curtain Walls VI. Analysis#4: Supply Chain of the Mechanical System VII. Summary and Conclusion VIII. Acknowledgments

Philadelphia, PA Analysis # 1: Demolition Alternatives Ghaith Yacoub I Construction Management I. Project Background II. Presentation Overview III. Analysis#1: Demolition Alternatives Demolition Photos: I. Existing Demo Existing demolition plan is most effective due to II. Demo Alternatives having no additional cost and no effect on the III. Methods Comparisons steel erection. IV. Conclusion IV. Analysis#2: SIP Scheduling of the Steel Erection V. Analysis#3: Prefabrication of the Curtain Walls Time taken to develop demo plan [10 Days] VI. Analysis#4: Supply Chain of the Mechanical System allows for schedule Acceleration Opportunities VII. Summary and Conclusion VIII. Acknowledgments

ANALYSIS II SIP Scheduling for Mezzanine Levels

Philadelphia, PA Analysis # 2: Short Interval Production Scheduling Ghaith Yacoub I Construction Management I. Project Background Why? II. Presentation Overview III. Analysis#1: Demolition Alternatives Highly repetitive activities in mezzanine levels IV. Analysis#2: SIP Scheduling of the Steel Erection I. SIP Utilization Potential acceleration of critical path items II. Labor and Equipment Identification III. SIP Plans IV. Cost & Schedule Effects [38 DAYS TOTAL] V. Conclusion V. Analysis#3: Prefabrication of the Curtain Walls VI. Analysis#4: Supply Chain of the Mechanical System VII. Summary and Conclusion VIII. Acknowledgments [STEEL ERECTION IS MOST CRITICAL]

Philadelphia, PA Analysis # 2: Short Interval Production Scheduling Ghaith Yacoub I Construction Management I. Project Background II. Presentation Overview Labor: III. Analysis#1: Demolition Alternatives IV. Analysis#2: SIP Scheduling of the Steel Erection • 1 foreman I. SIP Utilization • 2 erectors II. Labor and Equipment Identification • 1 crane operator III. SIP Plans • 2 welders IV. Cost & Schedule Effects • 1 Apprentice V. Conclusion V. Analysis#3: Prefabrication of the Curtain Walls VI. Analysis#4: Supply Chain of the Mechanical System Equipment: VII. Summary and Conclusion VIII. Acknowledgments • 26 Ton Mobile Crane • Propane Powered Mini Crane • Chain Falls • Trolleys

Philadelphia, PA Analysis # 2: Short Interval Production Scheduling Ghaith Yacoub I Construction Management Levels 1A-2A Sequence: I. Project Background II. Presentation Overview III. Analysis#1: Demolition Alternatives Load beam on trolley……………….. 4 Mins IV. Analysis#2: SIP Scheduling of the Steel Erection Transport beam inside the building..4 Mins I. SIP Utilization Crane lift ……………………………..… 8 Mins Tack (initial) welding .………………. 20 Mins II. Labor and Equipment Identification III. SIP Plans Total member duration: 36 Mins IV. Cost & Schedule Effects Total of 28 members on each level V. Conclusion V. Analysis#3: Prefabrication of the Curtain Walls VI. Analysis#4: Supply Chain of the Mechanical System VII. Summary and Conclusion VIII. Acknowledgments

Philadelphia, PA Analysis # 2: Short Interval Production Scheduling Ghaith Yacoub I Construction Management Levels 3A-4A Sequence: I. Project Background II. Presentation Overview III. Analysis#1: Demolition Alternatives Crane lift …………………………………………………………...…8mins Beam placement on trolley from window opening ……...….4mins IV. Analysis#2: SIP Scheduling of the Steel Erection Transporting the beam to center of the building ……..…......4mins I. SIP Utilization Using chain falls to move the beam into place……………....4mins II. Labor and Equipment Identification Tack welding ……………………………..……………………...…20mins III. SIP Plans IV. Cost & Schedule Effects Total member duration: 40 Mins Total of 28 members on each level V. Conclusion V. Analysis#3: Prefabrication of the Curtain Walls VI. Analysis#4: Supply Chain of the Mechanical System VII. Summary and Conclusion VIII. Acknowledgments

Philadelphia, PA Analysis # 2: Short Interval Production Scheduling Ghaith Yacoub I Construction Management I. Project Background II. Presentation Overview III. Analysis#1: Demolition Alternatives IV. Analysis#2: SIP Scheduling of the Steel Erection I. SIP Utilization II. Labor and Equipment Identification Total Savings: 2.12 Work Days III. SIP Plans IV. Cost & Schedule Effects General Conditions Cost/Day: $6,031 V. Conclusion General Conditions Savings : $12,800 V. Analysis#3: Prefabrication of the Curtain Walls VI. Analysis#4: Supply Chain of the Mechanical System VII. Summary and Conclusion VIII. Acknowledgments [ TOTAL SAVINGS = $16,780 ]