The The Ca Case fo for Ba Banning Expanded Po Polystyrene (E - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the the ca case fo for ba banning expanded po polystyrene
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The The Ca Case fo for Ba Banning Expanded Po Polystyrene (E - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The The Ca Case fo for Ba Banning Expanded Po Polystyrene (E (EPS) ) Fo Foam Fo Food Con Containers Sydney Jacobs, Chair Maryland Sierra Club Zero Waste Committee Martha Ainsworth, Chair Prince Georges Sierra Club Group Overview


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The The Ca Case fo for Ba Banning Expanded Po Polystyrene (E (EPS) ) Fo Foam Fo Food Con Containers

Sydney Jacobs, Chair

Maryland Sierra Club Zero Waste Committee

Martha Ainsworth, Chair

Prince George’s Sierra Club Group

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The Big Picture: EPS Foam bans in a larger context Environmental impact of EPS Foam Issues around recycling EPS foam The success of current EPS foam bans in Maryland

Overview

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Plastic Revolution - Gone Rogue

slide-4
SLIDE 4

EPS Foam is a major component of beach and ocean litter….

  • 80% of ocean plastic pollution originates on land.
  • Foam containers are easily blown over long distances

Where they breaks down into increasingly smaller pieces.

  • EPS foam litter is very difficult

to recover: Tiny pieces mix into Beach sands and float with Plankton on the ocean surface.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Plastic litter, including EPS Foam, is especially harmful to wildlife….

  • Marine litter harms over 700 marine

animal species

  • Seabirds are particularly vulnerable –

in some populations nearly 100% have ingested plastic

slide-6
SLIDE 6

EPS Foam Food Containers are not Recyclable

  • Used food service foam

is not recyclable unless it’s very clean

  • Breaks into pieces in

single stream collection, contaminating other materials

  • It’s Expensive to

transport

  • There’s no market for

the collected material

slide-7
SLIDE 7

EPS takes up valuable space in landfills

EPS is lightweight but high in volume

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Two drop-off centers in Carroll County take primarily block foam packaging

Collection and processing is done by Dart, not the county.. Dart distribution center, Hampstead Northern Landfill, Westminster

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Bans on EPS food containers are already working in Maryland!

  • Montgomery and Prince

George’s County bans became effective in 2016

  • Prohibits use of foam by all

businesses that sell food

  • Prohibits the sale of foam

containers

  • Foam meat/fish trays and

products packaged outside counties are exempt

  • Complaint-driven and public

health inspector enforcement; in Prince George’s, first time warning, second time $250, third $1000/day.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Affordable alternatives are widely available and in use

Prince George's County, March 2015

(random sample of 186 restaurants county-wide)

Exclusively foam containers 3% No foam 25% Mix of foam and other types 72%

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Major chains have switched to alternatives where bans exist, and some are completely eliminating EPS foam from all locations everywhere

EPS EPS EPS Recyclable Plastic Recyclable Plastic Paper These alternatives are already in use in

  • ther

Maryland counties… Why not in Carroll County?

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Compliance rates are excellent!

Prince George’s County

Source: PGSC Monitoring of 465 businesses in 45 shopping centers, 2017

76 78 65 50 91 91 91 93 20 40 60 80 100 All businesses (n=441) Eateries (n=324) Retailers (n=77) Pharmacies (n=14) Percent in compliance Compliance rate (Spring 2017) Compliance rate (Fall 2017) Type of business

Compliance rose to over 90% after face-to-face education of businesses by Sierra Club volunteers.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Compliance rates are high!

Montgomery County

86 90 94 88 87 81 79 33 20 40 60 80 100

All businesses (n=328) Gaithersburg businesses (n=82) Fast food (n=79) Carry outs (n=60) Restaurants (n=104) Grocery stores (n=21) Retail (n=28) Pharmacies (n=12)

Percent compliant

* As of February 14, 2018 TYPE OF BUSINESS

Source: Montgomery Sierra Club monitoring of 328 businesses in 38 shopping centers, Jan-Feb 2018 Compliance by Montgomery businesses and those in Gaithersburg (separate ban) is about 90% at first visit, though pharmacies are less aware.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Lessons & Recommendations

(a) Retail sales, and institutions such as hospitals and schools, should be included with all food service businesses (b) ban packing peanuts (c) A well-planned and executed education campaign is essential before and after adoption (d) Penalties should be substantial enough to discourage non-compliance (e) Consistency with bans in nearby jurisdictions is pro-business (f) EPS food service ban should be integrated into an overall Zero Waste plan, with expanded recycling and composting of other container types

slide-15
SLIDE 15