The Syntactic Atlas of the Dutch Dialects A corpus of elicited - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1

The Syntactic Atlas

• f the Dutch Dialects

A corpus of elicited speech as an on-line Dynamic Atlas

Sjef Barbiers & Jan Pieter Kunst

Meertens Institute (KNAW)

2

Coordination

• Hans Bennis (Meertens Institute)
• Hans den Besten (University of

Amsterdam)

• Magda Devos (University Ghent)
• Johan Rooryck (Leiden University)
• Johan Van der Auwera (University

Antwerpen)

3

Project leader

Sjef Barbiers (Meertens Institute)

Research Jeroen van Craenenbroeck (Leiden University) Marjo van Koppen (Leiden University / Meertens Institute) Annemie Neuckermans (University Antwerpen) Guido Vanden Wyngaerd (University Antwerpen) Gunther de Vogelaer (University Gent) Henk Wolf (Fryske Akademy) Hedde Zeijlstra (University of Amsterdam) Methodology

Leonie Cornips (Meertens Institute)

Willy Jongenburger (Meertens Institute)

4

General assistance

Margreet van der Ham (Meertens Institute; daily coordination)

Irene Haslinger (Meertens Institute) Vicky van den Heede (University Gent) Mathilde Jansen (Meertens Institute) Alies MacLean (Meertens Institute) Vivien Waszink (Meertens Institute) Sofware development

Jan Pieter Kunst (Meertens Institute)

Ilse van Gemert (Meertens Institute)

5

Financial support

• VNC (Flemish-Dutch committee for Dutch Language and

Culture)

• KNAW (Royal Dutch Academy of Arts and Sciences)
• NWO (Dutch Science Foundation)
• FWO (Flemish Science Foundation)
• Meertens Institute (KNAW)
• Universities of Amsterdam, Antwerpen, Ghent & Leiden

6

Theoretical perspective

• generative syntax
• language typology

Empirical perspective

• dialect geography: Dutch speaking area in

the Netherlands and Belgium

7

Empirical domains

• left-periphery of the clause

e.g., complementizer agreement, subject doubling, relative clauses, Wh-clauses

• right-periphery of the clause

e.g., verbal clusters, verb cluster interruption, IPP

• negation and quantification

e.g., negative particle, negative concord, scope, negative quantifiers

• pronominal reference

e.g., reflexives, reciprocals, weak and strong pronouns

8

Data

• Postal interviews (2000; pilot): 368 informants in

318 locations; 424 test sentences

• Oral interviews (2001/2): 607 informants in 267

locations (110 in Belgium + French Flanders; 157 in the Netherlands); > 160 test sentences)

• Telephone interviews (2003): 252 locations,

average of 105 test sentences

9

Informants

(i) All subjects were native speakers of the local dialect; (ii) Both the subject and their parents were born in the same community and have lived there until adulthood; (iii) The subjects didn't leave their community for longer than seven years; (iv) The subjects speak their local dialect in several functional domains; (v) The subjects belong to lower middle class; (vi) The subjects were aged between 55 and 70 years

10

Methodology (oral fieldwork)

Interviews in dialect between two native speakers

• f the local dialect (one speaker is assistant-interviewer

who questions the other) to avoid accommodation, i.e., adjustment from the dialect in the direction of the standard-like varieties.

11

Results (1)

Barbiers, S., H. Bennis, G. De Vogelaer, M. Devos and

• M. van der Ham (2005). Syntactic Atlas of the

Dutch Dialects, Volume 1. Amsterdam

University Press.

12

Results (2)

Dissertations

• Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van (2004). Ellipsis in

Dutch Dialects. LOT Dissertation 96.

• Zeijlstra, Hedde (2004). Sentential Negation and

Negative Concord. LOT Dissertation 101.

• Koppen, Marjo van (2005). One Probe - Two

Goals: Aspects of agreement in Dutch dialects. LOT Dissertation 105.

• De Vogelaer, Gunther (t.a.). Subjectsmarkering in de

Nederlandse en Friese dialecten. Diss. Gent.

• Neuckermans, Annemie (t.a.). Negatie in de Vlaamse
• dialecten. Diss. Gent.
• Wolf, Henk (in prep.). The Imperative in Frisian

13

Results (3) Dynamic Atlas (on-line) – database (transcriptions, speech) – search engine – cartographic software

14

Current size of the SAND-corpus

• Postal interviews

156,000 question - answer pairs (424 test sentences * 368 informants)

• Oral interviews
• Transcription of 45,000 question-answer pairs

(1,200,000 words; 267 dialects of Dutch)

• Partial tagging
• 425 hours of speech
• Telephone interviews

26,000 questions answer-pairs (105 test sentences * 252 different locations)

15

Dynamic Syntactic Atlas of the Dutch Dialects

http://www.meertens.nl/sand/; on-line in May 2005