the sampling theorem in and digital dividers
play

The sampling theorem in and digital dividers Claudio E. Calosso - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

In memoriam of Jacques Groslambert The sampling theorem in and digital dividers Claudio E. Calosso and Enrico Rubiola INRIM, Torino, Italy CNRS FEMTO-ST Institute, Besancon, France Outline Theoretical introduction


  1. In memoriam of Jacques Groslambert The sampling theorem in Π and Λ digital dividers Claudio E. Calosso ∇ and Enrico Rubiola ∃ ∇ INRIM, Torino, Italy ∃ CNRS FEMTO-ST Institute, Besancon, France Outline • Theoretical introduction • Π and Λ digital dividers • Experiments home page http://rubiola.org

  2. 2 Motivations • Seminal article by W. F . Egan (1990) • Milestone in the domain, never forget it • However, TTL and ECL logic families are now obsolete • Microwave (photonics) –> highest spectral purity • Transfer the spectral purity to HF/VHF • Dividers are more comfortable than multipliers • NIST now uses analog dividers • Nowadays digital electronics is fantastic • CPLD & FPGA –> Easy to duplicate • High number of gates for cheap • High toggling frequency (1.5 GHz) W. F . Egan Egan WF , Modeling phase noise in frequency dividers, IEEE T UFFC 37(4), July 1990 E. Rubiola & al, Phase noise in the regenerative frequency dividers, IEEE T IM 41(3), June 1992 A. Hati & al, Ultra-low-noise regenerative frequency divider…, Proc IEEE IFCS, May 2012

  3. 3 The gearwork model phase ϕ o = 1 D ϕ i • The noise-free divider jitter x o = x i phase ϕ i ν o • Keeps the input jitter x( t ) ν i (phase-time fluctuation) ν o = 1 • Scales down D ν i • φ by 1/ D [rad] N teeth ND teeth • S φ by 1/ D 2 [rad 2 /Hz] S 힅 ( f ) input • In the real divider 1 / D 2 • S φ of the output stage adds up actual (output stage) and often dominates 1 / D 2 1 / D 2 gearbox f W. F . Egan Egan WF , Modeling phase noise in frequency dividers, IEEE T UFFC 37(4), July 1990

  4. 4 Sampling and aliasing — Energy conservation applies to the unfiltered signal — II Input signal S x (ƒ) (unfiltered wide-band noise) • Multiple aliases overlap to the main etc. etc. part of the spectrum main ƒ f s 2 f s 3 f s − 3 f s − 2 f s − f s alias a l i alias a alias s a • With white noise, the l i a s s a i l a PSD increases by B /ƒ N Reconstructed signal (Bandwidth / Nyquist ƒ) (aliased) ƒ f N = 1 2 f s Nyquist frequency Downsampling increases the (PM) noise spectrum High ƒ N Low ƒ N N = σ 2 /f N N = σ 2 /f N S x (ƒ) S x (ƒ) I I ƒ ƒ f N f N

  5. 5 Aliasing and 1/ƒ noise II S x (ƒ) Proportionally lower power in the higher-ƒ aliases Input signal (unfiltered wide-band 1/f noise) etc. etc. ƒ f s 2 f s 3 f s − 3 f s − 2 f s − f s main alias s a i l a alias alias alias Small e ff ect on the alias overall noise spectrum Reconstructed signal (little aliasing effect) ƒ f N = 1 2 f s Nyquist frequency

  6. 6 PM-noise aliasing in the input stage saturated in out t analog gain Convert the input sinusoid into a square wave, as appropriate t equivalent sampling function • Edge-sampling at 2 ν i inherent in the sin-to-square conversion • Full-bandwidth ( B ) noise is taken in • The phase-noise Nyquist frequency is ν i • The sampling process increases the noise by B / ν i Eventually, clipping removes the AM noise [Pfa ff 1974]

  7. 7 Aliasing in Π divider Regular synchronous divider The Greek letter Π recalls the square wave Π Π Π Π input sampling frequency 2 ν i input t jitter is discarded jitter is discarded jitter is discarded ÷ 10 jitter is jitter is jitter is jitter is transmitted transmitted transmitted transmitted out t output sampling frequency ν o = 2 1 D ν i squarewave • The gearbox scales S φ down by 1/ D 2 clock sin 1 / D input aliasing • The divider takes 1 edge out of D White S 힅 ( f ) = b 0 Π divider • Raw decimation without low-pass filter 1 / D 2 • Aliasing increases S φ by D • Overall, S φ scales down by 1/ D Λ divider

  8. 8 The Λ divider – Little/no aliasing New divider architecture Series of Greek letters ΛΛΛΛΛ recalls the triangular wave • Gearbox and aliasing –> 1/ D law ÷ 10 D shift register • Add D independent realizations in out shifted by 1/2 input clock, • reduce the phase noise by 1/ D , shift register • … and get back the 1/ D 2 law ÷ 10 D squarewave input clock sin 1 / D input aliasing White S 힅 ( f ) = b 0 Π divider output 1 / D 2 Λ divider The names Π and Λ derive from the shape of the weight functions in our article on frequency counters E. Rubiola, On the measurement of frequency … with high-resolution counters, RSI 76 054703, 2005

  9. 9 Experimental method Large input PM noise is used to emphasize the e ff ect of aliasing • Intentionally high PM noise at the input • The scaled-down input noise is higher than the output-stage noise ! • Large attenuation/ampli –> noise S 힅 ( f ) input • Digital instruments for phase-noise 1 / D 2 measurement can handle 1 / D 2 ƒ input ≠ ƒ reference gearbox output stage • Correlation reduces the background f

  10. 10 Dividers under test EPM3064A CPLD (Altera MAX 3000 Series, 64 macro-cells, speed grade 7 ns) out in Π divider ÷ 10 – the one everybody knows – Multi-bu ff er Π divider Λ divider ÷ 10 D shift register ÷ 10 in out D-type register in out shift register ÷ 10 D White noise: The outputs are arguably independent The clock edges are independent Try to reduce the output-stage noise Correct for aliasing

  11. 11 Results – Test on aliasing Λ and dividers (multi-buf Π config) 0 . 5 d B d i s c r e p a n c y –20 dB internal clock +4 dB sin input Π divider –9.3 dB output (theory –10) Λ divider –18.7 dB output (theory –20) • Flicker region • White region • Negligible aliasing • Aliasing in the front-end –> +4 dB • 1/ D 2 law (–20 dB) • 1/ D law and 1/ D 2 law

  12. 12 Phase noise of real dividers Multibu ff er Π divider ÷ 10 Λ and Π dividers b –1 = –120 dB (multibuffer Π config) D-type register in out i n –116.5 dB a s multiple outputs are v u e ffi b –1 = –130.5 dB r expected to reduce the a c –128.5 dB g i e output-stage noise i n n g t – not happened, why? – ? artifacts? b –1 ≈ –156 dB b 0 ≈ –165 dB experimental problems still present • Flicker region –> Negligible aliasing • The multibu ff er Π divider is still not well explained • The Λ divider exhibits low 1/ƒ and low white noise

  13. 13 Allan deviation of real dividers • Slope 1/ τ , typical of white and flicker PM noise • The Λ divider performs 2 × 10 –14 at τ = 1 s, 10 MHz output

  14. 14 The bottom line • Aliasing in traditional dividers • Increases white noise • Has little e ff ect on flicker • Flicker in multi-bu ff er Π divider not understood yet • The new Λ divider • Is little/no a ff ected by aliasing • Exhibits the lowest PM noise flicker: b –1 ≈ –130 dB white: b 0 ≈ –165 dB • Features 2 × 10 –14 at τ = 1 s, 10 MHz output home page http://rubiola.org Thanks – J. Groslambert, V. Giordano, M. Siccardi, J.-M. Friedt Grants from ANR (Oscillator IMP and First-TF network), and Region Franche Comte

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend