The Roper resonance from spatially large interpolation fields The - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the roper resonance from spatially large interpolation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Roper resonance from spatially large interpolation fields The - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Roper resonance from spatially large interpolation fields The QCD Collaboration: Mingyang Sun (speaker), Keh-Fei Liu, Yi-Bo Yang, Ying Chen, Ming Gong, Terrence Draper, Raza Sabbir Sufian, Andrei Alexandru QCD Motivation Radial


slide-1
SLIDE 1

χQCD

The Roper resonance from spatially large interpolation fields

The χQCD Collaboration: Mingyang Sun (speaker), Keh-Fei Liu, Yi-Bo Yang, Ying Chen, Ming Gong, Terrence Draper, Raza Sabbir Sufian, Andrei Alexandru

slide-2
SLIDE 2

χQCD

Motivation

  • Radial excitation of nucleon
  • Roper mass experimental value: 1440 MeV (Γ ≈ 300 MeV)

2 Keh-Fei Liu et al., arXiv:1403.6847 (2014)

Sequential Empirical Bayesian

Ying Chen et al., arXiv:hep-lat/0405001 (2004)

Mathur H3.2 fmL Sasaki H3.0 fmL Lasscock H2.6 fmL Burch H2.4 fmL Brommel H2.4 fmL Basak H2.3 fmL Mahbub H2.0 fmL

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 MΠ

2 HGeV2L

MN HGeVL

Huey-Wen Lin, CJP , 49 827 (2011)

Overlap Quenched Dynamical

slide-3
SLIDE 3

χQCD

3 Keh-Fei Liu et al., arXiv:1403.6847 (2014)

0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 MH(GeV) mπ

2(GeV2)

a-1=1.77GeV, mla=0.005

Nucleon (coulomb) Roper(coulomb) Roper (JLab) Roper (SEB) CSSM exp.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

χQCD

Ground State Elimination (GSE) method

Consider two correlators

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

χQCD

Lattices used

  • RBC/UKQCD 2+1 flavor domain wall 243 ⨉ 64, a ≈ 0.112 fm,

mπ = 330 MeV, with overlap fermion on top, 200 configurations

  • JLab 2+1 flavor anisotropic clover 243 ⨉ 128, a ≈ 0.123 fm, mπ

= 390 MeV, 760 configurations

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

χQCD

Steps

6

  • 1. Take two correlators C1, C2
  • 2. Fit for proton, note the fitting window
  • 3. Take linear combination of the two correlators with

parameter a: C = C1 + aC2

  • 4. For each jackknife sample, fit C to zero in the proton fitting

window to fix a

  • 5. For each jackknife sample, fit C for mass of the 1st excited

state.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

χQCD

7

Coulomb wall source, point sink Smeared source (RMS r ≈ 1 fm), point sink Overlap on domain wall

slide-8
SLIDE 8

χQCD

8

0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 MH(GeV) mπ

2(GeV2)

a-1=1.77GeV, mla=0.005

Nucleon (coulomb) Roper(coulomb) Roper (JLab) Roper (SEB) CSSM exp. GSE on overlap

slide-9
SLIDE 9

χQCD

9

Anisotropic Clover Smeared source (RMS r ≈ 1.1 fm), point sink Smeared source (RMS r ≈ 0.62 fm), point sink

slide-10
SLIDE 10

χQCD

10

0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 MH(GeV) mπ

2(GeV2)

a-1=1.77GeV, mla=0.005

Nucleon (coulomb) Roper(coulomb) Roper (JLab) Roper (SEB) CSSM exp. GSE on overlap GSE on clover (big src)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

χQCD

11

Smeared source (RMS r ≈ 0.32 fm), point sink Point source, point sink

slide-12
SLIDE 12

χQCD

12

0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 MH(GeV) mπ

2(GeV2)

a-1=1.77GeV, mla=0.005

Nucleon (coulomb) Roper(coulomb) Roper (JLab) Roper (SEB) CSSM exp. GSE on overlap GSE on clover (big src) GSE on clover (small src)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

χQCD

Cause of Discrepency

Size of operator. Source should cover node of roper wave function.

13 Dale S. Roberts et al. (CSSM), PRD 89, 074501 (2014) Ying Chen, Mod. Phys. Lett. A22, 583 (2007)

≈ 0.8 fm ≈ 0.5 fm ≈ 0.9 fm

slide-14
SLIDE 14

χQCD

14

0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 MH(GeV) mπ

2(GeV2)

a-1=1.77GeV, mla=0.005

Nucleon (coulomb) Roper(coulomb) Roper (JLab) Roper (SEB) CSSM exp. GSE on overlap GSE on clover (big src) GSE on clover (small src)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

χQCD

15

Roper couples strongly to πN state. “Meson cloud effect”

  • B. Juliá-Díaz et al., PRC 80, 025207 (2009)

1.19 GeV

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 mN

eff(t)a

t/a (1/2)- (1/2)+ mN+mπ would-be mS11

  • 300
  • 200
  • 100

1400 1600 1800 Im (E) (MeV) Re (E) (MeV)

C(1820,-248) A(1357,-76) B(1364,-105) πN,ππ N ηN ρN σN π∆

Naomichi Suzuki et al. PRL 104, 042302 (2010)

  • M. Selim Mahbub et al., PRD 87 094506 (2013)

Sea mπ ≈ 139 MeV Valence mπ ≈ 208 MeV

RBC/UKQCD 483 ⨉ 96 domain wall w/ overlap

slide-16
SLIDE 16

χQCD

Summary

  • We used GSE method to extract the mass of roper
  • The roper extracted is sensitive to the size of the operator.

One needs a set of large sources.

  • We speculate that the πN state coupling to the 3-quark

interpolation field is important.

  • Effective in terms of statistics
  • I invite you to try this method on your data.

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

χQCD

Variation Method

Most studies use this approach, with multiple smear sizes, and interpolation fields.

17

Anisotropic clover