The role of local government in the transition from fossil fuel to - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the role of local government in the transition from
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The role of local government in the transition from fossil fuel to - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Life After Coal: Environmental Rights Seminar, 2016 The role of local government in the transition from fossil fuel to renewable energy Status Quo Cities Mitigation Study Concentrated Largely fossil fuels Dirty electricity Intensive


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The role of local government in the transition from fossil fuel to renewable energy

Life After Coal: Environmental Rights Seminar, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Status Quo

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Cities Mitigation Study

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Concentrated

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Largely fossil fuels

slide-6
SLIDE 6

“Dirty” electricity

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Intensive

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Energy and emissions by sector

  • Energy largely transport
  • Emissions largely built environment (residential, commercial,

industrial)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Inequality

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Inequality

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Municipal response

slide-12
SLIDE 12

How can municipalities influence energy use?

  • Building regulations
  • By-laws, standards, codes
  • Urban layout
  • Transport planning (parking requirements,

BRT, etc.)

  • Procurement policies
  • Budget allocations
  • Air quality control measures
  • Tax incentives
slide-13
SLIDE 13

How can municipalities influence energy use?

  • Electricity distribution
  • 52% of customers
  • 12 largest municipalities account for 80% of

municipal distribution

  • Electrification / energy service provision

(SWHs, etc.)

  • Regulator / procurer of embedded

renewable energy generation

  • Awareness (energy efficiency behaviour

campaigns, forums)

  • Lead by example (city facilities, rental units,

etc.)

  • Electricity generation / IPP large-scale

procurement (potential)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

A response story / timeline

  • DATA: a new picture, what to manage,

what potential EE and RE

  • STRATEGIES: beginning to define local

government role in sustainable energy and institutionalise this

  • TARGETS: e.g. EMM, CCT - 10% RE… can drive decisions
  • IMPLEMENTATION: community EE (campaigns,

forums), municipal EE, Solar water heating, RE: landfill gas, biogas, rooftop PV, PV array, wheeling, SSEG, Power purchase agreements (?)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Growth in sustainable energy governance

slide-16
SLIDE 16

City Renewable Developments and Targets

Municipality and RE project engagement Year MWh 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 (in pipeline) City of Cape Town: PPA (wind) 7770 7770 7770 City of Cape Town: rooftop PV 15 135 City of Cape Town: microhydro

2

Ekurhuleni Metro: PV array 350 350 Ekurhuleni Metro: Landfill gas to electricity 7135 21405 Ekurhuleni Metro: rooftop PV 46 46 Ethekwini Metro: Landfill gas to electricity 6000 45000 45000 45000 City of Johannesburg: wastewater gas to electricity 2331 4662 City of Johannesburg: landfill gas to electricity - 150000 City of Johannesburg: rooftop PV Nelson Mandela Bay Metro: wheeling agreement (wind) 5000 5000 City of Tshwane: wheeling agreement (biowaste gas to elec) 35000

  • Approx. Total MWh/year

6000 52770 67647 269368 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 (in pipeline)

Approx MWh/year

Municipal (led or assisted) local RE development

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Solar water heater rollout

  • Johannesburg: 80 000 low-pressure systems
  • EThekwini: 20 000 low-pressure systems; have high-pressure campaign

(Shisa Solar)

  • Cape Town: 25 000 high-pressure; 4 500 low-pressure
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Landfill gas to electricity

Municipality Size Project Finance / ownership Ekurhuleni 1 MW Simmer and Jack Municipality developed and owned; O&M contract outsourced; plans to expand to

  • ther sites

EThekwini 7.5 MW Bisasar and Marion Hill Municipality developed and owned; O&M contract outsourced Johannesburg 11 MW (current) 18.6 MW (planned) 2 landfill sites (current) 5 landfill sites (planned) Private developer; profit-sharing with CoJ via REIPPP; BOOT (Build, Own, Operate and Transfer) More information: www.cityenergy.org.za

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Wastewater biogas to energy

  • City of Johannesburg: 1MW

(Diepsloot, northern works); municipal developed and owned, with O&M contract

  • Opportunities: improved sludge

management

  • Challenges: generation dependent
  • n ‘down line’ water management

(city function) – no control over this and thus complex contracting (optimising performance, mitigating risk of contracting company)

More information: www.cityenergy.org.za

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Municipal rooftop PV

  • EThekwini Water and Sanitation

(Customer Service Building) = 45kW

  • Cape Town: 167kW March 2015;

additional 90kW planned by end 2015 (various locations)

More information: www.cityenergy.org.za

slide-21
SLIDE 21

3rd Party Wheeling

  • Nelson Mandela Bay: Wheeling framework –

up to 10% of local demand from privately traded RE energy (80% must be local).

  • Tshwane: Electricity generated from biogas on

an on-site cattle farm wheeled through Eskom and Tshwane’s grids to a private user.

  • Opportunities: stimulate local renewable

industry,

  • Challenges: must unbundle tariff and

establish accurate cost of supply; administrative complexity/burden; Regulatory rules on network charges for 3rd Party transportation of energy (wheeling) – still under development (municipal concerns relating to risk)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Small-scale embedded generation

  • Cape Town only NERSA approved

tariffs: September 2014: Black River parkway first ‘official’ – 1.2MW

  • EThekwini solar mapping tool
  • Johannesburg Parkhurst ‘off-

grid’ project

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Disruptive forces

slide-24
SLIDE 24

The imperative of climate change

  • NASA: each month in 2016 was the warmest respective month

globally in the modern temperature record, which dates to 1880. This trend suggests 2016 will surpass 2015 as the hottest year on record.

slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Electricity use to meet basic household energy needs

(Stats SA 1996, 2001, 2011)

1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011 Buffalo City 47% 63% 81% 42% 43% 74% 39% 36% 41% City of Cape Town 87% 89% 94% 80% 80% 88% 75% 75% 63% City of Johannesburg 85% 85% 91% 80% 79% 87% 79% 77% 82% City of Tshwane 77% 80% 89% 71% 71% 84% 70% 69% 74% Ekurhuleni 75% 75% 82% 64% 66% 79% 60% 62% 66% EThekwini 74% 80% 90% 71% 72% 86% 69% 72% 76% Mangaung 61% 85% 91% 52% 61% 88% 49% 54% 53% Nelson Mandela Bay 71% 75% 90% 65% 65% 86% 60% 59% 54% Metro average 77% 81% 89% 71% 72% 85% 68% 68% 70% National average 58% 70% 85% 47% 51% 74% 44% 49% 59% Space Heating Households that use electricity for… Lighting Cooking

Household electricity use

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Electricity price

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Electricity generating technologies

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Electricity demand

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Electricity demand

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Electricity demand uncertainty

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Prices of renewable energy decreasing and shift in power system value chain from extraction and generation to distribution and demand

Impact on municipal functions: greater role in demand response and distributed/embedded generation

slide-33
SLIDE 33
slide-34
SLIDE 34
  • 1,000

2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 Revenue Cost Revenue Cost Revenue Cost Low income High income Non-residential

Rmillion

Crosssubsidisation (Source: PDG)

Surplus Deficit Equitable share User charges Cost

Cross-subsidising low-income electrification

CT subsidises R150/month for lifeline customers – R540 million/yr from mid-high residential customers

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Australia demand forecasts

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Australia electricity retail prices

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Australia PV installation – largely small-scale

slide-38
SLIDE 38

The future…? And challenges

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Business as Usual untenable

slide-40
SLIDE 40

What happens if transport shifts to electricity?

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Municipality as off-taker: IPP procurement ?

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Unclear policy hurts RE economy

  • SWH: rebate → national programme → on hold
  • SEGG tariffs: NERSA stating Cape Town and Drakenstein were “pilots”

→ only recently allowed other municipalities to institute SSEG tariffs

  • REIPPPP uncertainty: decision by Eskom board to discontinue the

signing-on of any PPAs → Presidency Statement that REIPPP is policy and won’t be halted

slide-43
SLIDE 43
slide-44
SLIDE 44

New approaches

  • Some cities embracing: rethinking new role as energy service

providers, e.g. smarter management of load (supply vs. demand). Basket of measures: dispatchable load (gas, PV), EE, etc. Combination rather than one big supplier.

  • Proposed thinking: not revenue that matters, but margins. As long as

costs go down, revenue can go down. Be more efficient, e.g. meet peak demand differently (rather than incurring loss). Offering storage / grid (grid manager) rather than distributor. Will take time.

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Thank you

Zanie Cilliers For more information: www.cityenergy.org.za www.sustainable.org.za