the roi workforce for
play

The ROI Workforce for Public Health J. Mac McCullough, PhD, MPH - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The ROI Workforce for Public Health J. Mac McCullough, PhD, MPH Assistant Professor School for the Science of Health Care Delivery Arizona State University The LHD Health Economist Workforce The position Health Economist is


  1. The “ROI” Workforce for Public Health J. Mac McCullough, PhD, MPH Assistant Professor School for the Science of Health Care Delivery Arizona State University

  2. The LHD Health Economist Workforce • The position “Health Economist” is quite rare for local health departments • More state health departments have this capacity • Full-time, internal positions: currently found in large jurisdictions • Los Angeles County (pop. 9,285,379) • Maricopa County (pop. 3,880,244)

  3. Adding Health Economics Capacity • For full-time, internal staff: • Motivating a HE position • Creating a HE position within the department • Getting a HE position approved by administration • Recruiting for a HE position • Other arrangements are possible: Identify and leverage capacity where it exists • External Consultant • Part-time • Project by project • Collaboration with local university • Faculty/Staff • Understand academic tracks (tenure vs. non) & incentives (% effort, publications) • Students • Program requirement vs. Research opportunity

  4. Working with a Health Economist • Prioritizing projects • Who decides how to allocate the scarce resource (HE labor)? • County leadership, Health Department Director, HE Supervisor, HE him/herself • When is a HE brought in on a project? • At project conception, during data collection, during analysis • Who supervises?

  5. Working with a Health Economist • Project requirements • Are the data already available? • Can they be compiled from secondary sources? • Will we have to conduct primary data collection? • Are data from elsewhere sufficient? • Can we use estimates from elsewhere in the state? From New York? From Canada? • Study timelines • “We need this by Friday”  “If all goes well, I can get it to you by the end of the month”

  6. My Experiences • Just because there isn’t a “$” doesn’t mean I can’t help • E.g., one recent project involved gathering Census data to estimate the number of uninsured in the county • Just because there is a “$” doesn’t mean I can • Meet-n-greets & site visits are critical • Warm intros and shared understanding of project(s) • I’m not a consultant here to outsource or eliminate your job! • Position funding matters • County funding  Broad range of work within or beyond the dept • Grant funding  Deep involvement in defined range of projects

  7. Current Work

  8. Ongoing Analysis: Cost of Immunizations to a LHD • MCDPH provides childhood vaccines at 3 clinics • We bill Medicaid and recently began billing private insurance providers • We know: total amount budgeted for the 3 clinics, total amount of revenue received from our billing partner. Clinic A Clinic B Clinic C Total Revenues $100,000 $220,000 $60,000 Total Expenditures $97,000 $190,000 $75,000 # Clients 20,000 35,000 5,000 • We don’t really know: how much it costs to administer vaccine(s), how much we are being reimbursed for each vaccine

  9. Purpose of Study • We anticipate looming changes in patients served under the ACA. • Likely shifts in insurance plans & uninsurance • Comparison of last year’s costs vs. last year’s revenues does not facilitate future projections • For each client, do the costs of providing immunizations exceed, meet, or fall short of the revenues eventually realized through insurance billing? • Does this vary by insurance type? • Does this vary by immunization type?

  10. Determining Costs • Two types of costs: • Fixed • Rent, utilities • Office supplies (refrigerator, computers) • Administration (program manager) • Variable • Vaccine cost (for non-VFC) • Vaccine supplies (needle, bandaids) • Nurse Labor? • Labor can be tricky: • Fixed in the short-term, variable in the long-term • How to allocate down time?

  11. Determining Costs • To determine total cost: perform microcosting analysis • Observe workflow at each clinic • Luckily, they all generally use the same processes • Major events: • Client arrives and completes paper form • Intake clerk verifies data and checks against insurance databases • Client moves to next window/station • Intake nurse determines necessary shots by consulting online portal or patient-provided information • Client moves to next window/station • Immunization nurse draws up and administers vaccine(s) • Client departs • Time each step of the process and record other relevant details

  12. Matching Costs & Revenues • Match time data to administrative wage data • Intake clerk time: 3 mins @ $12.00/hour  $0.60/patient • Intake nurse time: 5 mins @ $29.16/hour  $2.43/patient • Immunization nurse time: 5 mins @ $34.78/hour  $2.90/patient • Other variable costs: $7.50/patient • Fixed costs: $10.00/patient • Total: $23.43/patient Estimate Sources: Revenues – Expenses = $3 • Revenues National /state data Secondary sources • Average $26.43/patient Primary sources • A lot of work to arrive at $3! • Payoff will be the following: • Average for Medicaid patients is $X • Average for private insurance is $Y • Average for Clinic A if total patient volume drops 25% is $x • Average for Clinic B without Medicaid patients is $y

  13. Questions?

  14. Ongoing Analysis: Dental Sealant Intervention – Return on Investment • MCDPH conducts dental sealant outreach to hundreds of schools (2 nd & 6 th grade) • Reimbursed on a per-child basis through contract with state • Purpose of study: • What is the minimum number of students needed for MCDPH to schedule a visit with positive cash flow? • A new intervention may help increase the number of students seen per school. What is the minimum boost needed for a positive return on investment?

  15. Intervention: Provide education to students From 10 to 100 per school Can increase by up to 50% Screen almost 100% of Will this remain unchanged? those who consented Will this remain unchanged? About 60% of those screened will require ≥ 1 sealant

  16. Initial Findings • Complex relationship between # served and MCDPH costs: 120 Cost per Child Screened ($) Originally, we thought “the 100 more the better”. 80 60 But after certain thresholds, 40 a second team or a second 20 visit is needed to screen/ 0 seal all children 5 15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85 95 Number of Children Screened

  17. Questions?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend