The ROI Workforce for Public Health J. Mac McCullough, PhD, MPH - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the roi workforce for
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The ROI Workforce for Public Health J. Mac McCullough, PhD, MPH - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The ROI Workforce for Public Health J. Mac McCullough, PhD, MPH Assistant Professor School for the Science of Health Care Delivery Arizona State University The LHD Health Economist Workforce The position Health Economist is


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The “ROI” Workforce for Public Health

  • J. Mac McCullough, PhD, MPH

Assistant Professor School for the Science of Health Care Delivery Arizona State University

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The LHD Health Economist Workforce

  • The position “Health Economist” is quite rare for local

health departments

  • More state health departments have this capacity
  • Full-time, internal positions: currently found in large

jurisdictions

  • Los Angeles County (pop. 9,285,379)
  • Maricopa County (pop. 3,880,244)
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Adding Health Economics Capacity

  • For full-time, internal staff:
  • Motivating a HE position
  • Creating a HE position within the department
  • Getting a HE position approved by administration
  • Recruiting for a HE position
  • Other arrangements are possible: Identify and leverage

capacity where it exists

  • External Consultant
  • Part-time
  • Project by project
  • Collaboration with local university
  • Faculty/Staff
  • Understand academic tracks (tenure vs. non) & incentives (% effort, publications)
  • Students
  • Program requirement vs. Research opportunity
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Working with a Health Economist

  • Prioritizing projects
  • Who decides how to allocate the scarce resource (HE labor)?
  • County leadership, Health Department Director, HE Supervisor, HE

him/herself

  • When is a HE brought in on a project?
  • At project conception, during data collection, during analysis
  • Who supervises?
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Working with a Health Economist

  • Project requirements
  • Are the data already available?
  • Can they be compiled from secondary sources?
  • Will we have to conduct primary data collection?
  • Are data from elsewhere sufficient?
  • Can we use estimates from elsewhere in the state? From New York?

From Canada?

  • Study timelines
  • “We need this by Friday” 

“If all goes well, I can get it to you by the end of the month”

slide-6
SLIDE 6

My Experiences

  • Just because there isn’t a “$” doesn’t mean I can’t help
  • E.g., one recent project involved gathering Census data to estimate

the number of uninsured in the county

  • Just because there is a “$” doesn’t mean I can
  • Meet-n-greets & site visits are critical
  • Warm intros and shared understanding of project(s)
  • I’m not a consultant here to outsource or eliminate your job!
  • Position funding matters
  • County funding  Broad range of work within or beyond the dept
  • Grant funding  Deep involvement in defined range of projects
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Current Work

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Ongoing Analysis: Cost of Immunizations to a LHD

  • MCDPH provides childhood vaccines at 3 clinics
  • We bill Medicaid and recently began billing private insurance

providers

  • We know: total amount budgeted for the 3 clinics, total

amount of revenue received from our billing partner.

  • We don’t really know: how much it costs to administer

vaccine(s), how much we are being reimbursed for each vaccine

Clinic A Clinic B Clinic C Total Revenues $100,000 $220,000 $60,000 Total Expenditures $97,000 $190,000 $75,000 # Clients 20,000 35,000 5,000

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Purpose of Study

  • We anticipate looming changes in patients served under

the ACA.

  • Likely shifts in insurance plans & uninsurance
  • Comparison of last year’s costs vs. last year’s revenues does not

facilitate future projections

  • For each client, do the costs of providing immunizations

exceed, meet, or fall short of the revenues eventually realized through insurance billing?

  • Does this vary by insurance type?
  • Does this vary by immunization type?
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Determining Costs

  • Two types of costs:
  • Fixed
  • Rent, utilities
  • Office supplies (refrigerator, computers)
  • Administration (program manager)
  • Variable
  • Vaccine cost (for non-VFC)
  • Vaccine supplies (needle, bandaids)
  • Nurse Labor?
  • Labor can be tricky:
  • Fixed in the short-term, variable in the long-term
  • How to allocate down time?
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Determining Costs

  • To determine total cost: perform microcosting analysis
  • Observe workflow at each clinic
  • Luckily, they all generally use the same processes
  • Major events:
  • Client arrives and completes paper form
  • Intake clerk verifies data and checks against insurance databases
  • Client moves to next window/station
  • Intake nurse determines necessary shots by consulting online

portal or patient-provided information

  • Client moves to next window/station
  • Immunization nurse draws up and administers vaccine(s)
  • Client departs
  • Time each step of the process and record other relevant details
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Matching Costs & Revenues

  • Match time data to administrative wage data
  • Intake clerk time: 3 mins @ $12.00/hour  $0.60/patient
  • Intake nurse time: 5 mins @ $29.16/hour  $2.43/patient
  • Immunization nurse time: 5 mins @ $34.78/hour  $2.90/patient
  • Other variable costs: $7.50/patient
  • Fixed costs: $10.00/patient
  • Total: $23.43/patient
  • Revenues
  • Average $26.43/patient
  • A lot of work to arrive at $3!
  • Payoff will be the following:
  • Average for Medicaid patients is $X
  • Average for private insurance is $Y
  • Average for Clinic A if total patient volume drops 25% is $x
  • Average for Clinic B without Medicaid patients is $y

Estimate Sources: National /state data Secondary sources Primary sources

Revenues – Expenses = $3

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Questions?

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Ongoing Analysis: Dental Sealant Intervention – Return on Investment

  • MCDPH conducts dental sealant outreach to hundreds of

schools (2nd & 6th grade)

  • Reimbursed on a per-child basis through contract with state
  • Purpose of study:
  • What is the minimum number of students needed for MCDPH to

schedule a visit with positive cash flow?

  • A new intervention may help increase the number of students seen

per school. What is the minimum boost needed for a positive return

  • n investment?
slide-15
SLIDE 15

From 10 to 100 per school Screen almost 100% of those who consented About 60% of those screened will require ≥ 1 sealant Can increase by up to 50% Will this remain unchanged? Will this remain unchanged? Intervention: Provide education to students

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Initial Findings

  • Complex relationship between # served and MCDPH costs:

20 40 60 80 100 120 5 15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85 95

Cost per Child Screened ($) Number of Children Screened

Originally, we thought “the more the better”. But after certain thresholds, a second team or a second visit is needed to screen/ seal all children

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Questions?