The regional foundations on which the worlds first industrial nation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The regional foundations on which the worlds first industrial nation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The regional foundations on which the worlds first industrial nation was built Sebastian Keibek & Leigh Shaw-Taylor Amsterdam, Workshop Economic Geography of Long-Run Industrialization 22 & 23 March 2018 Contents An early start
Contents
- An early start
- A (very) brief overview of our data sources
- The national context for examining regional developments
- Regional divergence before and during the Industrial Revolution
- The formation and longevity of Britain’s industrial geography
- Regional concentration and its drivers
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 1350 1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000
Industry employed nearly half the labour force by the early eighteenth century - a peak never again achieved
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain project
The occupational structure of England and Wales – both sexes
(% of the labour force) Agriculture Industry Services Mining
The moment agriculture dived below 40 per cent of the labour force
1700 1800
1720 1740 1760 1780
1900 2000
1820 1840 1860 1880 1920 1940 1960 1980 2020
England and Wales Belgium France Germany & US Japan China Spain Italy Netherlands
Source: author’s analyses (E&W); Cheng Yang (China); Leigh Shaw-Taylor and other contributors to INCHOS (other countries)
Contents
- An early start
- A (very) brief overview of our data sources
- The national context for examining regional developments
- Regional divergence before and during the Industrial Revolution
- The formation and longevity of Britain’s industrial geography
- Regional concentration and its drivers
Data sources underpinning the analyses for this presentation
1600 1700 1800 1900 2000
‘20 ‘40 ‘60 ‘80 ‘20 ‘40 ‘60 ‘80 ‘20 ‘40 ‘60 ‘80 ‘20 ‘40 ‘60 ‘80 ‘20
National censuses Parish registers
First source of pre-census (male) occupational information: Anglican parish registers
Example of a baptism register after Rose’s Act of 1812
Year Occupation Location
100% However, insufficient and non-random coverage before 1813
1600 1700 1800 1850
1620 1640 1660 1680 1720 1740 1760 1780 1820 1840
11% 3% 4%
Data sources underpinning the analyses for this presentation
1600 1700 1800 1900 2000
‘20 ‘40 ‘60 ‘80 ‘20 ‘40 ‘60 ‘80 ‘20 ‘40 ‘60 ‘80 ‘20 ‘40 ‘60 ‘80 ‘20
National censuses Parish registers Probate documents
First source of pre-census (male) occupational information: (indexes to) probate documents
Example of a probate inventory
Location Occupation Year
National and gender coverage over time
1600 1700 1800 1900 2000
‘20 ‘40 ‘60 ‘80 ‘20 ‘40 ‘60 ‘80 ‘20 ‘40 ‘60 ‘80 ‘20 ‘40 ‘60 ‘80 ‘20
1841/51-2011 1600-1841 Focus in this presentation on the longue durée and, therefore, on male
- ccupations in
England and Wales.
Contents
- An early start
- A (very) brief overview of our data sources
- The national context for examining regional developments
- Regional divergence before and during the Industrial Revolution
- The formation and longevity of Britain’s industrial geography
- Regional concentration and its drivers
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000
It helps to break such a long period up into shorter ones
1601 to 1701 1701 to 1761 1761 to 1817 1817 to 1901 1901 to 1971 Post 1971
The male occupational structure of England and Wales
(% of the labour force)
Structural change Quiet before the storm? Industrial Revolution Industrial Maturation Fluctuating fortunes Collapse
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
It helps to break such a long period up into shorter ones
Development of the male labour force share by sector – England and Wales
(difference between %-share at end and beginning of period)
- 18%
1% 14% 4%
1601-1701
- 5%
1% 1% 3%
1701-1761
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
It helps to break such a long period up into shorter ones
- 18%
1% 14% 4%
1601-1701
- 5%
1% 1% 3%
1701-1761
- 2%
1% 0% 2%
1761-1817
Development of the male labour force share by sector – England and Wales
(difference between %-share at end and beginning of period)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
It helps to break such a long period up into shorter ones
- 5%
1% 1% 3%
1701-1761
- 2%
1% 0% 2%
1761-1817
- 26%
2% 4% 20%
1817-1901
Development of the male labour force share by sector – England and Wales
(difference between %-share at end and beginning of period)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
It helps to break such a long period up into shorter ones
- 2%
1% 0% 2%
1761-1817
- 26%
2% 4% 20%
1817-1901
- 9%
- 3%
2% 9%
1901-1971
Development of the male labour force share by sector – England and Wales
(difference between %-share at end and beginning of period)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
It helps to break such a long period up into shorter ones
- 26%
2% 4% 20%
1817-1901
- 9%
- 3%
2% 9%
1901-1971
- 2%
- 2%
- 23%
28%
1971-2011
Development of the male labour force share by sector – England and Wales
(difference between %-share at end and beginning of period)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
It helps to break such a long period up into shorter ones
- 9%
- 3%
2% 9%
1901-1971
- 2%
- 2%
- 23%
28%
1971-2011
Development of the male labour force share by sector – England and Wales
(difference between %-share at end and beginning of period)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
Contents
- An early start
- A (very) brief overview of our data sources
- The national context for examining regional developments
- Regional divergence before and during the Industrial Revolution
- The formation and longevity of Britain’s industrial geography
- Regional concentration and its drivers
National developments not representative of regional ones
Secondary sector share of the male labour force
(% of total) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 E&W
Bedfordshire
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
National developments not representative of regional ones
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 E&W
Derbyshire Secondary sector share of the male labour force
(% of total)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
National developments not representative of regional ones
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 E&W
Berkshire Secondary sector share of the male labour force
(% of total)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
National developments not representative of regional ones
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 E&W
Warwickshire Secondary sector share of the male labour force
(% of total)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
National developments not representative of regional ones
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 E&W
``
Lancashire Secondary sector share of the male labour force
(% of total)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
National developments not representative of regional ones
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 E&W
Hertforshire Secondary sector share of the male labour force
(% of total)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
National developments not representative of regional ones
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 E&W
Norfolk Secondary sector share of the male labour force
(% of total)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
National developments not representative of regional ones
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 E&W
South Wales Secondary sector share of the male labour force
(% of total)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
National developments not representative of regional ones
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 E&W
Yorshire West Riding Secondary sector share of the male labour force
(% of total)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
National developments not representative of regional ones
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 E&W
London, Middlesex, and Surrey Secondary sector share of the male labour force
(% of total)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
Seventeenth century saw general industrialisation
< -3%
- 3 to -1½%
- 1½ to -1%
- 1 to -½%
- ½ to -¼%
- ¼% to ¼%
¼% to ½% ½ to 1% 1 to 1½% 1½ to 2% > 2%
(delta % per decade) Standardized difference in industrial male labour share at end versus beginning
- f period
1601-1701
But in run-up to the Industrial Revolution, industry started to concentrate in the north-west and the Midlands
1701-1761
< -3%
- 3 to -1½%
- 1½ to -1%
- 1 to -½%
- ½ to -¼%
- ¼% to ¼%
¼% to ½% ½ to 1% 1 to 1½% 1½ to 2% > 2%
(delta % per decade) Standardized difference in industrial male labour share at end versus beginning
- f period
During the Industrial Revolution, the great majority of countries actually de-industrialised
1761-1817
< -3%
- 3 to -1½%
- 1½ to -1%
- 1 to -½%
- ½ to -¼%
- ¼% to ¼%
¼% to ½% ½ to 1% 1 to 1½% 1½ to 2% > 2%
(delta % per decade) Standardized difference in industrial male labour share at end versus beginning
- f period
Maturity phase saw re-industrialisation of formerly de- industrialising counties
1817-1901
< -3%
- 3 to -1½%
- 1½ to -1%
- 1 to -½%
- ½ to -¼%
- ¼% to ¼%
¼% to ½% ½ to 1% 1 to 1½% 1½ to 2% > 2%
(delta % per decade) Standardized difference in industrial male labour share at end versus beginning
- f period
Post-war boom reflected in rapid growth of industry, almost everywhere …
1901-1971
< -3%
- 3 to -1½%
- 1½ to -1%
- 1 to -½%
- ½ to -¼%
- ¼% to ¼%
¼% to ½% ½ to 1% 1 to 1½% 1½ to 2% > 2%
(delta % per decade) Standardized difference in industrial male labour share at end versus beginning
- f period
… but the post-1970 collapse was even more general, and spectacular
1971-2011
< -3%
- 3 to -1½%
- 1½ to -1%
- 1 to -½%
- ½ to -¼%
- ¼% to ¼%
¼% to ½% ½ to 1% 1 to 1½% 1½ to 2% > 2%
(delta % per decade) Standardized difference in industrial male labour share at end versus beginning
- f period
Regional contribution to industrial growth changed over time
The total growth in the industrial male labour force, divided over the contributing regions – E&W
(% of national growth) 21% 55% 63% 45% 31%
- 41%
20% 9% 11% 17% 14%
- 21%
24% 1% 0% 9% 11%
- 8%
59% 36% 27% 38% 55%
- 38%
Heartlands London + environs Old textile Other
Industrial heartlands1 London & environs2 Old textile counties3 28 other counties
1 Lancashire, West Riding, Staffordshire, Warwickshire, Cheshire 2 London, Middlesex, Surrey 3 Essex, Gloucestershire, Kent, Norfolk, Somerset, Suffolk, Wiltshire
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
1601-1701 1601-1761 1761-1817 1817-1901 1901-1971 1971-2011
Contents
- An early start
- A (very) brief overview of our data sources
- The national context for examining regional developments
- Regional divergence before and during the Industrial Revolution
- The formation and longevity of Britain’s industrial geography
- Regional concentration and its drivers
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1601
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1621
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1641
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1661
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1681
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1701
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1721
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1741
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1761
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1781
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1801
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1817
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1841
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1851
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1861
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1871
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1881
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1891
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1901
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1911
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1921
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1931
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1951
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1961
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1971
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1911
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
2011
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
1601
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
1661
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
1710
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
1755
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
1785
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
1817
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
1851
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
1881
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
1911
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
1971
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
Share of male workers in industry (excl. building)
(% of total male labour force)
Source: Occupational Structure of Britain Project; testamentary database; parish register database; national censuses; I-CeM; C.H. Lee; UK Dataservice
2011
Contents
- An early start
- A (very) brief overview of our data sources
- The national context for examining regional developments
- Regional divergence before and during the Industrial Revolution
- The formation and longevity of Britain’s industrial geography
- Regional concentration and its drivers
Strong and increasing industrial concentration, up to the early twentieth century
Share of male industrial workers per country group – E&W
(% of national total) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Industrial heartlands London & environs Old textile counties 28 other counties
Metal working increasingly concentrated in the East Midlands, South Yorkshire, and other coal mining areas
* Lancashire, Durham & Northumberland, South Wales 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
East Midlands + West Riding London & environs Other coal mining counties* 33 other counties Share of male metal workers per country group – E&W
(% of national total)
Textiles, the most heavily concentrated industry of all – up to the end of the nineteenth century
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Lancashire, West Riding, Cheshire London+ Old textile counties* 31 other counties
* Essex, Gloucestershire, Kent, Norfolk, Somerset, Suffolk, Wiltshire
Share of male textile workers per country group – E&W
(% of national total)
Shipbuilding strongly concentrated in a limited number of coastal counties
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Durham & Northumberland London+ Lancashire, Cheshire, Hampshire, Kent, South Wales, East Midlands, East and North Riding 32 other counties Share of male ship building workers per country group – E&W
(% of national total)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Vehicle manufacturing strong but developing concentration
- ver two centuries
Share of male workers in vehicle manufacturing per country group – E&W
(% of national total)
Warwickshire London and environs Industrial heartlands (except Warwickshire) New southern automotive counties* 27 other counties
*Bedfordshire, Essex, Gloucestershire, Hampshire, Hertfordshire, Oxfordshire, Wiltshire
Engineering/machine making concentrated in industrial heartlands and London, but dominance diminished over time
Share of male workers in engineering and machine making per country group – E&W
(% of national total) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
London and environs Industrial heartlands New southern automotive counties 27 other counties
Also at local scales
Industrial (ex building) male labour share in Cheshire, by registration sub- district (% of total labour force)
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1601
Also at local scales
Industrial (ex building) male labour share in Cheshire, by registration sub- district (% of total labour force)
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1710
Also at local scales
Industrial (ex building) male labour share in Cheshire, by registration sub- district (% of total labour force)
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1755
Also at local scales
Industrial (ex building) male labour share in Cheshire, by registration sub- district (% of total labour force)
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1785
Also at local scales
Industrial (ex building) male labour share in Cheshire, by registration sub- district (% of total labour force)
0-10 10-20 20-27.5 27.5-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-100
1817
Also at local scales
19% 25% 32% 49% 40% 34% 32% 21% 41% 41% 36% 30% c.1620 c.1700 c.1760 c.1817 Macclesfield Broxton LD, Bucklow, Chester All others 18% 33% 58% 86% 32% 27% 22% 12% 50% 40% 20% 2% c.1620 c.1700 c.1760 c.1817 Bucklow Northwich Macclesfield Bucklow, Northwich All others Chester Broxton (lower div.)
Secondary sector Textiles
Macclesfield Source: author’s analyses; CamPop parish register database
Regional concentration enabled by precociously well- developed transport network
Areas at less than ten miles of a navigable waterway
1680 1770
Source: Dan Bogart; Leigh Shaw-Taylor; Eduard Alvarez
In 1770, all of the waterway network and seventy per cent of the turnpike network were already in place
Share of network in place in a given year (% of maximum network size)
Source: Dan Bogart; Leigh Shaw-Taylor; Eduard Alvarez
56.9 15.0 12.8 9.9 8.9 8.3 8.1 7.9 6.3 3.6 3.4 1.7 Mining Transport Dealers and sellers Services & professions Metal trades & tools Building Footwear Other sec. sector Other prim. sector Clothing Textiles Agriculture Avg = 3.9
Transport and the distributive trades the fastest growing
- ccupational sub-sectors up to and during industrialisation
Ratio between the number of male workers in 1851 compared to 1601 (England and Wales, 1601-1851)
Conclusions (1/3)
- In occupational terms, Britain’s transition to an industrialized economy
was complete by 1700, with nearly half of all men and women working in the secondary sector
- The structural shift of agriculture to industry, traditionally associated with
the Industrial Revolution, had instead taken place during the sixteenth and, particularly, the seventeenth century
- Although there were some fluctuations – such as early-twentieth-century
decline, followed by a post-war boom – the secondary sector share of the labour force held largely steady until 1970, after which it went into rapid decline
- However, this surface level calm concealed regional and local turbulence;
at the level of counties and below, developments differed greatly from the national average, particularly during the 18th and early 19th century
Conclusions (2/3)
- The 18th-century lead-up to the Industrial Revolution saw the formation
- f the industrial heartlands; by 1760, Britain’s core industrial geography
was in place, to remain unchanged until the end of the 20th century
- This formation led, particularly in textiles, Britain’s dominant industry, to
the demise of the existing industrial geography with long-established, southern centres of manufacturing declining rapidly and dramatically
- The geographic concentration of function which typified the early 18th
century was made possible by a precociously well-developed transport network, whose pre-rail elements were largely in place at the eve of the Industrial Revolution
- They continued to stimulate regional specialistion during the first phase of
the Industrial Revolution (1760-1817), with most areas outside the North- West and the West Midlands de-industrialising
Conclusions (3/3)
- Whereas canals and turnpike roads had enabled industrial concentration,
the expansion of the railways led to a degree of re-industrialisation of formerly de-industrialised areas, with the industrial labour force growing faster outside than inside the heartlands
- The twentieth century witnessed a further geographic widening, with new
industries such as automotive production partly established in famously agricultural counties like Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire
- And although the post-1970 collapse of British industry hit these new
industrial areas hard, it hit the industrial heartlands harder; indeed, by 2011, the share of men working in manufacturing was remarkably uniform across Britain
- The industrial geography, established in the first half of the eighteenth