The Practice of Emerging Technology Management
Context, Issues and Opportunities
Jonathan Livingston December 30, 2008
The Practice of Emerging Technology Management Context, Issues and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The Practice of Emerging Technology Management Context, Issues and Opportunities Jonathan Livingston December 30, 2008 Agenda for Today What are Emerging Technologies? Cross the chasm Resources and best practices for
Context, Issues and Opportunities
Jonathan Livingston December 30, 2008
2
3
4
“A technology or solution, not in common use, that promises a quantifiable increase in efficiency of energy end-use as seen by utility customers.“ - BPA, 2008
5
long lead-time and risk tolerance
efficiency impacts
6
1.0 1.2 1.4
1.8 2.0 0.2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 0.4 0.8
0.6
1.6 10 40 50 70 80 100 20
30 60 90
Residential electronics Commercial electronics Residential buildings - Lighting Fuel economy packages – Cars Cellulosic biofuels Industry – Combined heat and power Conservation tillage Fuel economy packages – Light trucks Coal mining – Methane mgmt Nuclear new-build Natural gas and petroleum systems mgmt Afforestation of pastureland Reforestation Winter cover crops Coal power plants – CCS new builds with EOR Biomass power – Cofiring Industry – CCS new builds on carbon- intensive processes Coal-to- gas shift – dispatch of existing plants Car hybridi- zation Commercial buildings – HVAC equipment efficiency Residential buildings – HVAC equipment efficiency Industrial process improve- ments Manufac- turing – HFCs mgmt Distributed solar PV Commercial buildings – New shell improvements Abatement costs <$50/ton
Cost
Real 2005 dollars per ton CO2e
Low-, mid- penetration
Active forest management
7
8
Diffusion of Innovation (Rogers 2003)
9
Reason for Dissatisfaction % of CFL Bulbs for Which This Answer Was Given Should dim better 0.2% Too bright 0.4% Needs to be dimmable 0.6% Needs to be 3-way 0.7% Fit in fixture 0.9% Should last longer 3.0% Not bright enough 4.5% Color 6.5% Appearance 15.6% Eliminate flicker 23.1% Should reach full brightness faster 39.6% Population surveyed 394
CFL saturation (KEMA 2007)
10
11
12
13
14
Partners (Wisconsin)
Collaborative
15
16
Initial Market Acceptance ETs Assessed / Validated Projects Selected Technologies Screened Objectives and Resources Set Program Criteria Established Measure Transferred to Program
17
18
safety, productivity, aesthetics, self-esteem?
business, market?
19
discloses flaws
without hesitation
20
2009 2010 2011 Potential Savings Sponsor
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
HVAC Hybrid RTU
300 GWh (lifetime), 92 MW Regional Agency
Mesh Wireless EMS
620 GWh (lifetime), 44 MW Utility A
Quality Installation Package
97 GWh (lifetime), 17 MW Utility B
Economizer Enthalpy Control
TBD Manufacturer
Assessment Program Uptake Market Adoption Low-Rise Commercial Res / Comm’l. New Const. All Commercial
Technology Application
21
22
truly significant value creation.
select a "Play to Win" or a "Play not to Lose" innovation strategy.
that the company generates successful new ideas and gains the maximum return on its investment.
they are different from the norm.
networks that include people and knowledge, both inside and
23
24
25
26
Reason for Dissatisfaction % of CFL Bulbs for Which This Answer Was Given Should dim better 0.2% Too bright 0.4% Needs to be dimmable 0.6% Needs to be 3-way 0.7% Fit in fixture 0.9% Should last longer 3.0% Not bright enough 4.5% Color 6.5% Appearance 15.6% Eliminate flicker 23.1% Should reach full brightness faster 39.6% Population surveyed 394
CFL saturation (KEMA 2007)
27
28
29
climate change
information and communication technology innovations
30
31
Direct: 415.383.7480 Cell: 415.306.3582 Email: jonathan@livingston-ei.com