the poincar birkhoff theorem in the framework of
play

The Poincar - Birkhoff theorem in the framework of Hamiltonian - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Poincar - Birkhoff theorem in the framework of Hamiltonian systems Alessandro Fonda (Universit degli Studi di Trieste) The Poincar - Birkhoff theorem in the framework of Hamiltonian systems Alessandro Fonda (Universit degli Studi


  1. The Poincaré - Birkhoff theorem in the framework of Hamiltonian systems Alessandro Fonda (Università degli Studi di Trieste)

  2. The Poincaré - Birkhoff theorem in the framework of Hamiltonian systems Alessandro Fonda (Università degli Studi di Trieste) a collaboration with Antonio J. Ureña

  3. Jules Henri Poincaré (1854 – 1912)

  4. Poincaré’s “Théorème de géométrie”

  5. Poincaré’s “Théorème de géométrie” A is a closed planar annulus

  6. Poincaré’s “Théorème de géométrie” A is a closed planar annulus P : A → A is an area preserving homeomorphism

  7. Poincaré’s “Théorème de géométrie” A is a closed planar annulus P : A → A is an area preserving homeomorphism and

  8. Poincaré’s “Théorème de géométrie” A is a closed planar annulus P : A → A is an area preserving homeomorphism and ( ⋆ ) it rotates the two boundary circles in opposite directions

  9. Poincaré’s “Théorème de géométrie” A is a closed planar annulus P : A → A is an area preserving homeomorphism and ( ⋆ ) it rotates the two boundary circles in opposite directions (this is called the “twist condition”).

  10. Poincaré’s “Théorème de géométrie” A is a closed planar annulus P : A → A is an area preserving homeomorphism and ( ⋆ ) it rotates the two boundary circles in opposite directions (this is called the “twist condition”).

  11. Poincaré’s “Théorème de géométrie” A is a closed planar annulus P : A → A is an area preserving homeomorphism and ( ⋆ ) it rotates the two boundary circles in opposite directions (this is called the “twist condition”). Then, P has two fixed points.

  12. An equivalent formulation

  13. An equivalent formulation S = R × [ a , b ] is a planar strip

  14. An equivalent formulation S = R × [ a , b ] is a planar strip P : S → S is an area preserving homeomorphism

  15. An equivalent formulation S = R × [ a , b ] is a planar strip P : S → S is an area preserving homeomorphism, and writing P ( x , y ) = ( x + f ( x , y ) , y + g ( x , y )) ,

  16. An equivalent formulation S = R × [ a , b ] is a planar strip P : S → S is an area preserving homeomorphism, and writing P ( x , y ) = ( x + f ( x , y ) , y + g ( x , y )) , both f ( x , y ) and g ( x , y ) are continuous, 2 π -periodic in x ,

  17. An equivalent formulation S = R × [ a , b ] is a planar strip P : S → S is an area preserving homeomorphism, and writing P ( x , y ) = ( x + f ( x , y ) , y + g ( x , y )) , both f ( x , y ) and g ( x , y ) are continuous, 2 π -periodic in x , g ( x , a ) = 0 = g ( x , b ) (boundary invariance) ,

  18. An equivalent formulation S = R × [ a , b ] is a planar strip P : S → S is an area preserving homeomorphism, and writing P ( x , y ) = ( x + f ( x , y ) , y + g ( x , y )) , both f ( x , y ) and g ( x , y ) are continuous, 2 π -periodic in x , g ( x , a ) = 0 = g ( x , b ) (boundary invariance) , and ( ⋆ ) f ( x , a ) < 0 < f ( x , b ) (twist condition) .

  19. An equivalent formulation S = R × [ a , b ] is a planar strip P : S → S is an area preserving homeomorphism, and writing P ( x , y ) = ( x + f ( x , y ) , y + g ( x , y )) , both f ( x , y ) and g ( x , y ) are continuous, 2 π -periodic in x , g ( x , a ) = 0 = g ( x , b ) (boundary invariance) , and ( ⋆ ) f ( x , a ) < 0 < f ( x , b ) (twist condition) .

  20. An equivalent formulation S = R × [ a , b ] is a planar strip P : S → S is an area preserving homeomorphism, and writing P ( x , y ) = ( x + f ( x , y ) , y + g ( x , y )) , both f ( x , y ) and g ( x , y ) are continuous, 2 π -periodic in x , g ( x , a ) = 0 = g ( x , b ) (boundary invariance) , and ( ⋆ ) f ( x , a ) < 0 < f ( x , b ) (twist condition) . Then, P has two geometrically distinct fixed points.

  21. George David Birkhoff (1884 – 1944)

  22. The Poincaré – Birkhoff theorem In 1913 – 1925, Birkhoff proved Poincaré’s “théorème de géométrie”, so that it now carries the name “Poincaré – Birkhoff Theorem”.

  23. The Poincaré – Birkhoff theorem In 1913 – 1925, Birkhoff proved Poincaré’s “théorème de géométrie”, so that it now carries the name “Poincaré – Birkhoff Theorem”. Variants and different proofs have been proposed by: Brown–Neumann, Carter, W.-Y. Ding, Franks, Guillou, Jacobowitz, de Kérékjartó, Le Calvez, Moser, Rebelo, Slaminka, ...

  24. The Poincaré – Birkhoff theorem In 1913 – 1925, Birkhoff proved Poincaré’s “théorème de géométrie”, so that it now carries the name “Poincaré – Birkhoff Theorem”. Variants and different proofs have been proposed by: Brown–Neumann, Carter, W.-Y. Ding, Franks, Guillou, Jacobowitz, de Kérékjartó, Le Calvez, Moser, Rebelo, Slaminka, ... Applications to the existence of periodic solutions were provided by: Bonheure, Boscaggin, Butler, Corsato, Del Pino, T. Ding, Fabry, Garrione, Hartman, Manásevich, Mawhin, Omari, Ortega, Sabatini, Sfecci, Smets, Torres, Zanini, Zanolin, ...

  25. Periodic solutions as fixed points of the Poincaré map

  26. Periodic solutions as fixed points of the Poincaré map We consider the system x = ∂ H y = − ∂ H ˙ ˙ ∂ y ( t , x , y ) , ∂ x ( t , x , y ) , and assume that the Hamiltonian H ( t , x , y ) is T -periodic in t .

  27. Periodic solutions as fixed points of the Poincaré map We consider the system x = ∂ H y = − ∂ H ˙ ˙ ∂ y ( t , x , y ) , ∂ x ( t , x , y ) , and assume that the Hamiltonian H ( t , x , y ) is T -periodic in t . The Poincaré time – map is defined as P : ( x 0 , y 0 ) �→ ( x T , y T )

  28. Periodic solutions as fixed points of the Poincaré map We consider the system x = ∂ H y = − ∂ H ˙ ˙ ∂ y ( t , x , y ) , ∂ x ( t , x , y ) , and assume that the Hamiltonian H ( t , x , y ) is T -periodic in t . The Poincaré time – map is defined as P : ( x 0 , y 0 ) �→ ( x T , y T ) i.e.

  29. Periodic solutions as fixed points of the Poincaré map We consider the system x = ∂ H y = − ∂ H ˙ ˙ ∂ y ( t , x , y ) , ∂ x ( t , x , y ) , and assume that the Hamiltonian H ( t , x , y ) is T -periodic in t . The Poincaré time – map is defined as P : ( x 0 , y 0 ) �→ ( x T , y T ) i.e. to each “starting point” ( x 0 , y 0 ) of a solution at time t = 0,

  30. Periodic solutions as fixed points of the Poincaré map We consider the system x = ∂ H y = − ∂ H ˙ ˙ ∂ y ( t , x , y ) , ∂ x ( t , x , y ) , and assume that the Hamiltonian H ( t , x , y ) is T -periodic in t . The Poincaré time – map is defined as P : ( x 0 , y 0 ) �→ ( x T , y T ) i.e. to each “starting point” ( x 0 , y 0 ) of a solution at time t = 0, P associates

  31. Periodic solutions as fixed points of the Poincaré map We consider the system x = ∂ H y = − ∂ H ˙ ˙ ∂ y ( t , x , y ) , ∂ x ( t , x , y ) , and assume that the Hamiltonian H ( t , x , y ) is T -periodic in t . The Poincaré time – map is defined as P : ( x 0 , y 0 ) �→ ( x T , y T ) i.e. to each “starting point” ( x 0 , y 0 ) of a solution at time t = 0, P associates the “arrival point” ( x T , y T ) of the solution at time t = T .

  32. Good and bad news We consider the system x = ∂ H y = − ∂ H ˙ ˙ ∂ y ( t , x , y ) , ∂ x ( t , x , y ) , and assume that the Hamiltonian H ( t , x , y ) is T -periodic in t .

  33. Good and bad news We consider the system x = ∂ H y = − ∂ H ˙ ˙ ∂ y ( t , x , y ) , ∂ x ( t , x , y ) , and assume that the Hamiltonian H ( t , x , y ) is T -periodic in t . Good news: The Poincaré map P is an area preserving homeomorphism. Its fixed points correspond to T -periodic solutions.

  34. Good and bad news We consider the system x = ∂ H y = − ∂ H ˙ ˙ ∂ y ( t , x , y ) , ∂ x ( t , x , y ) , and assume that the Hamiltonian H ( t , x , y ) is T -periodic in t . Good news: The Poincaré map P is an area preserving homeomorphism. Its fixed points correspond to T -periodic solutions. Bad news: It is very difficult to find an invariant annulus for P .

  35. Generalizing the Poincaré – Birkhoff theorem (in the framework of Hamiltonian systems) We consider the system x = ∂ H y = − ∂ H ˙ ˙ ∂ y ( t , x , y ) , ∂ x ( t , x , y ) , and assume that the Hamiltonian H ( t , x , y ) is T -periodic in t .

  36. Generalizing the Poincaré – Birkhoff theorem (in the framework of Hamiltonian systems) We consider the system x = ∂ H y = − ∂ H ˙ ˙ ∂ y ( t , x , y ) , ∂ x ( t , x , y ) , and assume that the Hamiltonian H ( t , x , y ) is T -periodic in t . Assume H ( t , x , y ) to be also 2 π -periodic in x .

  37. Generalizing the Poincaré – Birkhoff theorem (in the framework of Hamiltonian systems) We consider the system x = ∂ H y = − ∂ H ˙ ˙ ∂ y ( t , x , y ) , ∂ x ( t , x , y ) , and assume that the Hamiltonian H ( t , x , y ) is T -periodic in t . Assume H ( t , x , y ) to be also 2 π -periodic in x . Let S = R × [ a , b ] be a planar strip.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend