The Nature of Evidence: How Do You Know? QEP Goal : Curricular - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the nature of evidence how do you know
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Nature of Evidence: How Do You Know? QEP Goal : Curricular - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Nature of Evidence: How Do You Know? QEP Goal : Curricular Component : Evidence-Focused First Year Seminars (E-FSEM) make teaching about evidence explicit Evidence-Focused Criteria focus & structure of the course


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • QEP Goal:
  • Curricular Component:

Evidence-Focused First Year Seminars (E-FSEM) make teaching about evidence explicit

  • Evidence-Focused Criteria

focus & structure of the course

  • Applicable across disciplines and content areas (to date, 37 departments

have participated)

The Nature of Evidence: How Do You Know?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

1. 2. 3. 4.

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Regardless of theoretical orientation, assessment is a research process and should

follow the best research methodology.

  • Our goal: use best social science research methods for the QEP assessment.

Research Question Does the QEP enhance student learning about evidence? Outcome (dependent variable): Student learning about evidence Independent variable: QEP Curricular Element: Evidence-Focused First Year Seminars

  • Two Research Designs (Assessment Strategies) using different operationalizations of

the Outcome: “Student Learning about Evidence”

2015-2017: Standardized Test of Critical Thinking/Evidence Skills 2017-2020: Evidence Assignments from First Year Seminar Courses

slide-5
SLIDE 5

E-FSEM Assessment: 2015-2017

  • Results: No statistically significant differences pre-post for either

group, either year.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Change in Mean WG-II Scores (Pre-Post)

25.61 25.31 26.17 25.87

Experimental Control

N=1,301

slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9

E-FSEM Assessment: 2017-2020

  • Assessment Measure
  • Student coursework: 1 course assignment completed by all students
  • Qualitative, Standard Rubrics (based on AAC&U’s VALUE Rubrics)
  • (NOTE: not all assignments will address all learning outcomes)
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • For instance:
  • Strength:
  • Weakness: Students struggled to articulate specific areas for future research beyond a

general argument for “more” research

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Using student coursework and transdisciplinary rubrics is an effective

method

slide-17
SLIDE 17

data from multiple years of implementation conceptual, research-informed process

assignment-based assessment strategies

slide-18
SLIDE 18

tscott@emory.edu bsimula@emory.edu www.evidence.emory.edu