The Nassau Hub Study The Nassau Hub Study TAC Presentation January - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the nassau hub study the nassau hub study tac presentation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Nassau Hub Study The Nassau Hub Study TAC Presentation January - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Nassau Hub Study The Nassau Hub Study TAC Presentation January 17, 2012 Agenda Agenda 1) Study Update 2) Refined Long-List Alternatives Development 3) 3) Refined Long-List Alternatives Definition 4) Refined Long-List Alternatives Screening


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Nassau Hub Study The Nassau Hub Study TAC Presentation

January 17, 2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda Agenda

1) Study Update 2) Refined Long-List Alternatives Development 3) 3) Refined Long-List Alternatives Definition 4) Refined Long-List Alternatives Screening 4) Refined Long List Alternatives Screening 5) Assessment Of Mode Options 6) Recommendations

2

7) Next Steps

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Study Update

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Previous Alternatives Evaluation Previous Alternatives Evaluation

  • 14 Preliminary Long-List Alternatives Evaluated

During The Fatal Flaw Screening During The Fatal Flaw Screening

  • Alternatives 9-14 Were Fatally Flawed

y

  • Alternatives 1-8 Were Advanced To Refined

Long-List Alternatives

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Refined Long-List Alternatives Refined Long List Alternatives Development

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Refined Long-List Alternatives Development Refined Long List Alternatives Development

  • Alternatives Advanced to Long-List Were Further

D fi d / D l d With M D t il Defined / Developed With More Detail

  • Items Considered Include:
  • Activity Center Connections

L d U C tibilit

  • Land Use Compatibility
  • Stakeholder And Public Input

p

  • Infrastructure And Operational Characteristics

6

  • Ridership Potential
slide-7
SLIDE 7

A ti it C t C ti Activity Center Connections

  • Previously Identified Study Area Attractors And

y y Generators (Activity Centers)

  • Activity Centers Grouped By Relative Significance
  • Activity Centers Grouped By Relative Significance

Essential Attractors/Generators Important Attractors/Generators Additional Attractors/Generators Downtown Mineola Mineola Intermodal Center Downtown Hempstead Hempstead Intermodal Center Roosevelt Field Mall Hofstra University Source Mall Museum Row Downtown Westbury Westbury LIRR Station Downtown Garden City Garden City LIRR Station Mitchel Field County Park Eisenhower Park Country Life Press LIRR Station Roosevelt Field Mall Roosevelt Field Transit Center Nassau Community College Nassau Coliseum Nassau County Government Complex RXR Plaza Westbury LIRR Station Country Life Press LIRR Station Carle Place LIRR Station

7

RXR Plaza Nassau University Medical Center (NuHealth)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Activity Centers Activity Centers

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

L d U C tibilit Land Use Compatibility

  • Evaluated Existing Land Use Patterns

Evaluated Existing Land Use Patterns

  • Identified Redevelopment Opportunities
  • Determined Potential Transit-Oriented-

Determined Potential Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Opportunities / Constraints

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

P bli I t Public Input

  • Project Committees

Project Committees

  • Project Website
  • Public Meetings

O i i / D i i S

  • Origin / Destination Survey
  • Stated Preference Survey

Stated Preference Survey

  • One-on-One And Small Group Meetings

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

I f t t A d O ti l Ch t i ti Infrastructure And Operational Characteristics

  • Developed Preliminary Operating Scenarios

p y p g

  • Running Within Mixed Traffic
  • Running In Exclusive Right-Of-Way
  • Determined Travel Times Between Key Activity

y y Centers

  • Number Of Transfers A Key Service Factor
  • Number Of Transfers A Key Service Factor
  • Identified Track / Lane Miles

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Rid hi P t ti l Ridership Potential

  • Completed Comprehensive Origin / Destination

p p g And Stated Preference Surveys

  • Developed Order Of Magnitude Ridership
  • Developed Order-Of-Magnitude Ridership

Estimates

  • Ongoing Refinement Of Ridership Model For

More Detailed Ridership Forecasting, Which Will Ultimately Lead To LPA Selection

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Refined Long-List Alternatives Refined Long List Alternatives Definition

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Refined Long-List of Alternatives Definition e ed

  • g

st o te at es e t o

  • Alternatives Were Defined For Evaluation Against

Study Goals And Objectives Study Goals And Objectives

  • Characteristics Include:
  • Travel Times

Daily Trips

  • Daily Trips
  • Trips Per Track / Lane Mile
  • Trips Per Annual Vehicle Mile

Transit Connections / Activity Centers Served

14

  • Transit Connections / Activity Centers Served
slide-15
SLIDE 15

E l Example Alternative

Transit Connections Mineola Intermodal Center Transit Connections Mineola Intermodal Center Potential New Transit Center Activity Centers Served Downtown Mineola Downtown Hempstead Roosevelt Field Mall Nassau Community College Nassau Coliseum Hofstra University Hempstead to Roosevelt Field Mall Mineola to Coliseum Potential Daily Trips 2035 Trips per Track/Lane Mile Trips per Annual Vehicle Mile Travel Time Transfers Travel Time Transfers

15 15

Mixed Flow 14:17 14:48 4,600 285 1.90 Exclusive ROW 10:32 10:32 6,100 378 2.52

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Refined Long-List Alternatives Refined Long List Alternatives Screening

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Methodology Methodology

  • Created A Series Of Matrices Based On Defined

Alternatives Alternatives

  • Ranked Alternatives Based On:

S Of – Relative Strength Of Ridership – Track / Lane Mileage – Annual Vehicle Mileage – Travel Times – Number Of Transfers – Transit Connections And Activity Centers Served

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Screening Results Screening Results

Alternatives Identified For Advancement Alt ti 2

  • Alternative 2
  • Alternative 3

Alternatives Identified For Elimination Alternatives Identified For Elimination

  • Alternative 1
  • Alternative 6
  • Alternative 4
  • Alternative 5
  • Alternative 7
  • Alternative 8

18

Alternative 5 Alternative 8

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Alternative 2 Alternative 2

Transit Connections Mineola Intermodal Center Potential New Transit Center Hempstead Intermodal Center Activity Centers Served Downtown Mineola Downtown Hempstead Roosevelt Field Mall Nassau Community College Nassau Coliseum Hofstra University RXR Plaza Nassau University Medical C t Center Source Mall Museum Row Mitchel Field Eisenhower Park Hempstead to Roosevelt Field Mall Mineola to Coliseum Potential Daily Trips 2035 Trips per Track/Lane Mile Trips per Annual Vehicle Mile Travel Time Transfers Travel Time Transfers

19 19

Mixed Flow 14:04 14:43 6,200 283 1.89 Exclusive ROW 10:30 10:47 8,100 370 2.47

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Alternative 3 Alternative 3

T i C i Mi l I d l C Transit Connections Mineola Intermodal Center Potential New Transit Center Hempstead Intermodal Center Activity Centers Served Downtown Mineola D t H t d Downtown Hempstead Roosevelt Field Mall Nassau Community College Nassau Coliseum Hofstra University RXR Plaza RXR Plaza Nassau University Medical Center Museum Row Eisenhower Park Hempstead to Roosevelt Field Mall Mineola to Coliseum Potential Daily Trips 2035 Trips per Track/Lane Mile Trips per Annual Vehicle Mile Travel Time Transfers Travel Time Transfers

20 20

Mixed Flow 14:13 14:44 6,100 349 2.33 Exclusive ROW 10:19 10:18 8,000 458 3.05

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Assessment of Mode Options Assessment of Mode Options

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Modal Transit Technologies Modal Transit

  • Street Transit

– Jitney

Technologies

Jitney – Circulator Bus – Conventional Bus

  • Separated Transit

– Aerial Tram – Trolley Bus – Commuter Bus Modern Streetcar Aerial Tram – Cable-Drawn Systems (CDS) – Modern Streetcar

  • Semi-Separated Transit

– Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) – Automated Guideway Transit (AGT) – Commuter Rail – Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) – Light Rail Transit (LRT) Commuter Rail – Heavy Rail

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Criteria for Transit Mode Screening Criteria for Transit Mode Screening

  • Flexibility
  • Capacity Ridership

Capacity, Ridership

  • Service Frequency
  • Effect On Congestion
  • Effect On Congestion
  • Cost
  • System Accessibility
  • System Accessibility
  • Compatibility
  • Proven Technology
  • Proven Technology
  • Land Use Compatibility

Environmental Impact

  • Environmental Impact

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Recommended Modes For Further Recommended Modes For Further Evaluation

  • BRT
  • Modern Streetcar

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Recommendations and Next Steps

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Recommended Alternatives to be Advanced Recommended Alternatives to be Advanced Alternatives 2 and 3 Alternatives 2 and 3 Each As BRT And / Or Modern Streetcar

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Next Steps Next Steps

  • Detailed Definition And Evaluation Of

Alternatives Alternatives

– Refined Operating Plans Cost – Cost – Ridership Forecasts E i t l C id ti – Environmental Considerations – Financial Considerations St k h ld A d P bli I t – Stakeholder And Public Input

  • Selection of LPA

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Q&A Q&A

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

The Nassau Hub Study The Nassau Hub Study TAC Presentation

January 17, 2012