Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence
‘The Multilateral Diplomacy of the European Union’
Athens University of Economic and Business
- Dr. Dimitris Bourantonis
The Multilateral Diplomacy of the European Union Athens University - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence The Multilateral Diplomacy of the European Union Athens University of Economic and Business Dr. Dimitris Bourantonis The Role of the Chair in International Organisations Dimitris Bourantonis
Professor of International and European Studies
◼
◼
➢
➢
➢ At what cost the Chair exercises its functions? ➢ What conditions the President’s effectiveness
(In other words which are the basic parameters of the Chair’ effectiveness?)
◼
Chairs are set in place to address collective action problems in multilateral negotiations.
◼
Chairs-agents are expected to:
➢
ensure procedural order,
➢
➢
enhance rule-making efficiency
◼
Functions
➢
agenda management (administrative-procedural and an agenda-shaping component ) Why agenda management? In order to avoid agenda failure due to
a.
The existence of a large number of negotiating parties
b.
Large number of preferences over the agenda
c.
Large number of proposals for inclusion in the agenda (a) (b) and (c)can lead to conflict over the agenda setting (agenda setting failure) Through compromises and information gained by the Chair the Agenda for negotiations is set up.
➢
brokerage (to address tactical information-concealing) Why brokerage? In order to avoid negotiation failure
a.
in the early stage of negotiations parties conceal for tactical reasons their true preferences
b.
This in turn creates uncertainty over the contract zone or the settlement zone and lead to a situation whereby the parties are not able to find out a basis for negotiations. (a) and (b) can lead to negotiations failure Through information gained the Chair submits his/her own negotiating text as a basis for negotiations. He can also submit a new negotiating text to be used as the basis for a final agreement
➢
external representation Why External Representation: As a way to represent the mutliple negotiating parties in their deals with external actors.
◼
◼
◼
◼
➢
➢
◼
◼
➢
➢
➢
◼
➢
➢
➢
TABLE 1: PARAMETERS OF CHAIR EFFECTIVENESS PARAMETERS OPERATIONALIZATION IMPACT on CHAIR EFFECTIVENESS NEGOTIATING CONTOUR INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENT: Systemic Power Configuration Conditions of amity : + / Polarization and enmity: - CONTENT and STRUCTURE of NEGOTIATIONS Nature of Issue: Degree of Salience/Controversy Negotiation Structure Decision-Making Rules
ORGANIZATIONAL FEATURES INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT Design (rotation/ election/ appointment) Process Control/Continuity/Duration of Tenure Operational Rules: Mandate (delineates formal process control) Constraints: Formal (control mechanisms) and informal (behavioral norms) Narrow and Specific Mandate: - Efficient Control Mechanisms: - RESOURCES Informational Chair Legitimacy and Authority Political Support by Other Parties (within/outside negotiations) + + + PERSONAL SKILLS Personality-specific Features + Expertise + Leadership Potential + COUNTRY-OF- ORIGIN ATTRIBUTES Power Reflection ambiguous Country Legitimacy and Authority +
◼
◼
➢
➢
➢
◼
◼
◼
Blavoukos, S. and D. Bourantonis (2011) Chairing Multilateral Negotiations: the Case of the United Nations, London, Routledge.
◼
Blavoukos, S., Bourantonis, D. and G. Pagoulatos (2007) ‘A President for the European Union: A New Actor in Town?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (2): 231-52.
◼
Blavoukos, S., Bourantonis, D., and P. Tsakonas, P. (2006) ‘Parameters of the Chairmanship’s Effectiveness: The Case of the UN Security Council’, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 1(2): 143-70.
◼
Elgström, O. (2006) ‘The Presidency: The Role(s) of the Chair in European Union Negotiations’, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 1(2): 171-95.
◼
Elgström, O. (ed.) (2003) European Union Council Presidencies: A Comparative Perspective, London, Routledge.
◼
Hayes-Renshaw, F. and. Wallace, H. (2006) The Council of Ministers, London, Macmillan.
◼
Malnes, R. (1995) ‘Leader and Entrepreneur in International Negotiations: A Conceptual Analysis’, European Journal of International Relations 1(1): 87-112.
◼
McCubbins, M. D., Noll, R. G. and. Weingast, B. R (1987) ‘Administrative Procedures as Instruments
◼
Metcalfe, David (1998) Leadership in European Union Negotiations: The Presidency of the Council. International Negotiation 3 (3): 413-34.
◼
Moe, T. and W. Howell (1999) ‘The Presidential Power of Unilateral Action’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 15(1): 132-79.
◼
Tallberg, J. (2010) ‘The Power of the Chair: Formal Leadership in International Cooperation’, International Studies Quarterly 54(2): 241-65.
◼
Tallberg, J. (2006a) Leadership and Negotiation in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
◼
Tallberg, J. (2006b) ‘Formal leadership in Multilateral Negotiations: A Rational Institutionalist Theory’, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 1(2): 117-41.
◼
Tallberg, J. (2004) ‘The Power of the Presidency: Brokerage, Efficiency and Distribution in EU Negotiations’, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 42(5):
◼
999–1022.
◼
Tallberg, J. (2003) ‘The Agenda-shaping Powers of the EU Council Presidency’, Journal of European Public Policy 10(1):1–19.