The low energy theories of the Higgs sector Daniel Egana-Ugrinovic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the low energy theories of the higgs sector daniel egana
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The low energy theories of the Higgs sector Daniel Egana-Ugrinovic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The low energy theories of the Higgs sector Daniel Egana-Ugrinovic Scott Thomas Rutgers University Daniel Egana, Scott Thomas. Rutgers University May 4, 2015 1 / 12 The LHC is turning on: it is time to probe the Higgs sector. Recall that m 2


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The low energy theories of the Higgs sector Daniel Egana-Ugrinovic

Scott Thomas

Rutgers University

Daniel Egana, Scott Thomas. Rutgers University May 4, 2015 1 / 12

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The LHC is turning on: it is time to probe the Higgs sector. Recall that ρ = m2

W

m2

Z cos2 θW

= 1.0008+0.0017

−0.0007

(1) Delicate relation ρ = 1 only preserved “easily” if the BSM Higgs sector contains only singlets or doublets. (or no mixing with the Higgs). Since LHC data is consistent with SM like Higgs couplings (alignment limit), the decoupling limit is a very attractive possibility: → Use EFT’s!!

Daniel Egana, Scott Thomas. Rutgers University May 4, 2015 2 / 12

slide-3
SLIDE 3

For simplicity we will work at tree level. Example: Higgs mixing with a heavy real singlet. Fermionic and gauge higgs couplings must be diluted accordingly. In EFT this is packaged in WF renormalization through operators η m2

s

∂µ(H†H)∂µ(H†H) (2)

Daniel Egana, Scott Thomas. Rutgers University May 4, 2015 3 / 12

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The 2HDM

General 2HDM: 11 parameters only in the potential!. Work in the Higgs basis, < H2 >= 0 V = ˜ m2

1H† 1H1 + ˜

m2

2H† 2H2 +

  • ˜

m2

12H† 1H2 + h.c.

  • + 1

2 ˜ λ1(H†

1H1)2 + ˜

λ6H†

1H1H† 1H2 + . . .

(3) From EWSB conditions ˜ m2

12 = −1

2 ˜ λ6v 2 → ED := nD + 2n ˜

m2

12

Effective dimension

Daniel Egana, Scott Thomas. Rutgers University May 4, 2015 4 / 12

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Example 1: Modifications to the Higgs potential

Consider the following diagrams at zero momentum

˜ λ†

6

˜ λ6 H1 H†

1

H†

1

H†

1

H1 H1 ˜ m2†

12

˜ λ6 H1 H1 H†

1

H†

1

˜ λ∗

λ6 ˜ m2

2

(H†

1H1)3

(˜ λ∗

6 ˜

m2

12 + h.c.)

˜ m2

2

(H†

1H1)2

They are of the same effective dimension (six)

Daniel Egana, Scott Thomas. Rutgers University May 4, 2015 5 / 12

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Example 2: Modifications to Higgs-fermion interaction Lagrangian and four fermion interactions

Q ¯ u Q ¯ u ˜ λu†

2ij

˜ λu

2ij

˜ λ†

6

˜ m2

12

H1 H1 H†

1

H1

−QiH1 ˜ λu

2ij ˜

λ∗

6

˜ m2

2

H†

1H1 +

˜ λu

2ij ˜

λ∗

6

˜ m2

2

  • ¯

uj (4) They are of the same effective dimension (six)

Daniel Egana, Scott Thomas. Rutgers University May 4, 2015 6 / 12

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Summary of effects

We work at ED 6 in the fermionic sector, and 8 in the bosonic sector. After calculating ≈ 20 diagrams we get Is modified at effective dimension: Higgs potential ≥ 6 Higgs-fermion interactions * ≥ 6 Four-fermion interactions * ≥ 6 Higgs kinetic lagrangian ≥ 8 Higgs-gauge boson interactions ≥ 8 ∗ carries CP and/or flavor violation. Compare with the xSM: in that case, Higgs-gauge boson interactions are modified at effective dimension 6.

Daniel Egana, Scott Thomas. Rutgers University May 4, 2015 7 / 12

slide-8
SLIDE 8

List of results

Only one coupling (some sort of “complex” alignment parameter) and the yukawas of the heavy higgs control most of the modifications to the SM Higgs couplings at first order. gϕVV = 2m2

V

v

  • 1 − 1

2 ˜ λ∗

λ6 v 4 ˜ m4

2

+ O v 6 ˜ m6

2

  • gϕ2VV = 2m2

V

v 2

  • 1 − 3˜

λ†

λ6 v 4 ˜ m4

2

+ O v 6 ˜ m6

2

  • (5)

λf

ϕij = mf i

v δij − 2 ˜ λf

2ij ˜

λ∗

6

2 √ 2 v 2 ˜ m2

2

  • + O

v 4 ˜ m4

2

  • No CP violation in the bosonic interactions up to at least effective

dimension 10 (or more). Background invariants Arg ˜ λ2

λ∗

5

  • , Arg

˜ λ2

λ∗

5

  • are

irrelevant at ED 6.

Daniel Egana, Scott Thomas. Rutgers University May 4, 2015 8 / 12

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Further applications: CP violation.

In any 2HDM with Glashow-Weinberg conditions, there is only one relevant CP violating phase at ED 6, carried exclusively in the higgs-fermion interactions. θ := v 2 ˜ m2

2

sin

  • arg
  • ˜

λ∗

6e−iξ/2

+ O v 4 ˜ m2

2

  • Important for EDM’s. We can directly relate an EDM measurement with a

higgs-fermion coupling measurement.

ϕ e e e t γ γ t t

Daniel Egana, Scott Thomas. Rutgers University May 4, 2015 9 / 12

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Example: type II 2HDM

At large tan β, only significant deviation from SM couplings is in down type yukawas. λd,ℓ

ϕij = δij

md,ℓ

i

v

  • 1 + ˜

λ∗

6e−iξ/2 tan β v 2

˜ m2

2

+ O v 4 ˜ m4

2

  • vλd,ℓ

ϕ2ij = v 2λd,ℓ ϕ3ij = δij

md,ℓ

i

v

λ∗

6e− iξ

2 tan β v 2

˜ m2

2

+ O v 4 ˜ m4

2

  • (6)

Daniel Egana, Scott Thomas. Rutgers University May 4, 2015 10 / 12

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Further applications: flavor physics.

Flavor physics: flavor violation in four fermion operators from integrating out the heavy doublet and the higgs boson come at the same order. ˜ λu

2ij ˜

λu†

2mn

˜ m2

2

(Qi ¯ uj)(¯ u†

mQ† n)

λu

ϕijλu ϕmn

m2

ϕ

(ui ¯ uj)(um ¯ un) From heavy higgs From light higgs But they have a different chiral, parametric and flavor violating structure. Important for flavor observables. If we are in the exact alignment limit, only deviation to SM is in four fermion operators induced by integrating out the heavy Higgs.

Daniel Egana, Scott Thomas. Rutgers University May 4, 2015 11 / 12

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Conclusions

The results presented here, unless stated otherise are valid for the most general 2HDM with heavy BSM higgses. Is modified at effective dimension: Higgs potential ≥ 6 Higgs-fermion interactions * ≥ 6 Four-fermion interactions * ≥ 6 Higgs kinetic lagrangian ≥ 8 Higgs-gauge boson interactions ≥ 8 ∗ carries CP and/or flavor violation.

Daniel Egana, Scott Thomas. Rutgers University May 4, 2015 12 / 12