the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) Gregorio E.H. Del - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the international personality item
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) Gregorio E.H. Del - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Validating the MAPA English with the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) Gregorio E.H. Del Pilar, Marston S. Pascasio, Rene Ela P. Ignacio, Christie P. Sio Personality Research Laboratory Department of Psychology University of the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Validating the MAPA English with the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP)

Gregorio E.H. Del Pilar, Marston S. Pascasio, Rene Ela P. Ignacio, Christie P. Sio Personality Research Laboratory Department of Psychology University of the Philippines - Diliman

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Why use IPIP scales for validation?

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Developed to address stagnation in personality research.
  • Widely available (Can be accessed online in various

languages)

  • Widely cited (3571 citations as of 2006)
slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Widely used (1301 publications made use of IPIP scales as of

2016)

  • The large pool of items have been used to create proxies of

well-known commercial personality inventories, such as the NEO-PI R

  • Free!
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Specific IPIP scales used

  • Validating MAPA NG LOOB English Factors
  • Goldberg’s Big Fiver Marker Domains (Goldberg, 1992).
  • Validating MAPA NG LOOB English Facets
  • Goldberg’s IPIP Analogs for NEO-PI R facet scales (Goldberg, 1999).
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Specific IPIP scales used

MAPA English Domains Big Five Marker Domains Extraversion Factor I: Surgency / Extraversion Agreeableness Factor II: Agreeableness Conscientiousness Factor III: Conscientiousness Neuroticism Factor IV: Emotional Stability Openness to Experience Factor V: Intellect

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Specific IPIP scales used

MAPA English Facets IPIP proxies for NEO PI R facets

N3 Apprehensiveness N1 Anxiety N1 Vulnerability to Stress N6 Vulnerability E1 Cheerfulness E6 Cheerfulness E2 Friendliness E2 Gregariousness O3 Aesthetic Sensitivity O2 Openness to Aesthetics O4 Imaginativeness O1 Openness to Fantasy A1 Modesty A5 Modesty A4 Obligingness A4 Cooperation C1 Goal Striving C4 Achievement Striving C4 Carefulness C6 Cautiousness

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Method

  • Instruments
  • MAPA NG LOOB English Version
  • Big Fiver Marker Domains
  • Specific IPIP Analogs of NEO-PI R facet scales
  • Participants
  • General Psychology students from UP Diliman (N=187, 63 males and 124

females, 16-24 y/o) for MAPA English

  • General Psychology students from UP Diliman (N=188, 64 males and 124

females, 16-24 y/o) for IPIP scales

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Method

  • Procedure
  • Both measures were administered online
  • MAPA English was administered earlier.
  • A subset of participants who took both the MAPA English and IPIP scales was

extracted (N=167, 52 Males and 115 Females, 16-24 y/o)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Results - Reliabilities

MAPA ENGLISH ALPHA BIG FIVE MARKER DOMAINS ALPHA Neuroticism 0.88 Emotional Stability 0.93 Extraversion 0.91 Extraversion 0.92 Openness to Experience 0.85 Intellect 0.87 Agreeableness 0.86 Agreeableness 0.89 Conscientiousness 0.90 Conscientiousness 0.89

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Results - Reliabilities

MAPA ENGLISH FACETS ALPHA IPIP NEO FACETS ALPHA N3 Apprehensiveness 0.73 N1 Anxiety 0.81 N1 Vulnerability to Stress 0.67 N6 Vulnerability 0.86 E1 Cheerfulness 0.82 E6 Cheerfulness 0.81 E2 Friendliness 0.86 E2 Gregariousness 0.88 O3 Aesthetic Sensitivity 0.75 O2 Openness to Aesthetics 0.79 O4 Imaginativeness 0.73 O1 Openness to Fantasy 0.83 A1 Modesty 0.67 A5 Modesty 0.80 A4 Obligingness 0.68 A4 Cooperation 0.70 C1 Goal Striving 0.72 C4 Achievement Striving 0.81 C4 Carefulness 0.66 C6 Cautiousness 0.76

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Results - Convergences

MAPA English vs BFM CONVERGENT VALIDTY COEFFICIENTS Neuroticism vs Emotional Stability

  • 0.73

Extraversion vs Extraversion 0.84 Openness to Experience vs Intellect 0.62 Agreeableness vs Agreeableness 0.49 Conscientiousness vs Conscientiousness 0.75

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Results - Convergences

MAPA English Facets vs IPIP NEO PI Analogs Convergent Validity Coefficients Apprehensiveness vs Anxiety 0.66 Vulnerability to Stress vs Vulnerability 0.70 Cheerfulness vs Cheerfulness 0.74 Friendliness vs Gregariousness 0.68 Aesthetic Sensitivity vs Openness to Aesthetics 0.71 Imaginativeness vs Openness to Fantasy 0.63 Modesty vs Modesty 0.47 Obligingness vs Cooperation 0.44 Goal Striving vs Achievement Striving 0.70 Carefulness vs Cautiousness 0.60

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Why do we have lower convergence for Agreeableness?

  • Convergent validity coefficients have acceptable values except for

Agreeableness dimension and its facets

  • Big Five Agreeableness seem to be have a large component of Extraversion in

its items.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Significant correlations between Big Five A items and Big Five E Total Score

Items Correlation Coefficient Item 4: Feel little concern for others. .201** Item 24: Am hard to get to know. .519** Item 124: Am not really interested in others. .227** Item 19: Inquire about others' well-being. .208** Item 39: Take time out for others. .235** Item 44: Am on good terms with nearly everyone. .348** Item 59: Am interested in people. .398** Item 99: Think of others first. .152* Item 119: Make people feel at ease. .423** Item 156: Love children. .198* Item 159: Know how to comfort others. .438** Item 172: Love to help others. .185* Item 175: Have a good word for everyone. .227**

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Correlations between E and A

BIG FIVE MARKER A BIG FIVE MARKER E MAPA ENGLISH A MAPA ENGLISH E BIG FIVE MARKER A

  • .394**

.492** .431** BIG FIVE MARKER E .394**

  • .836**

MAPA ENGLISH A .492**

  • MAPA ENGLISH

E .431** .836**

  • ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Non significant correlations were not shown

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Why do we have lower convergence for Agreeableness?

  • Convergent validity coefficients have acceptable values except for

Agreeableness dimension and its facets

  • Big Five Agreeableness seem to be have a large component of Extraversion in

its items.

  • Low BF A convergent validities were also obtained in other studies (e.g.

Donnelan, Oswald, Baird, and Lucas, 2006; Gow, Whiteman, Pattie, and Deary, 2005; Zheng, Goldberg, Zheng, Zhao, Tang, and Liu, 2008).

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Why do we have lower convergence for Agreeableness?

  • Convergent validity coefficients have acceptable values except for

Agreeableness dimension and its facets

  • Agreeableness Facets of the IPIP NEO analogs seem to differ slightly in

defining its constructs.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

IPIP NEO Proxy Modesty vs MAPA English Modesty

MAPA English Modesty Items IPIP NEO Proxy Modesty Items It is not important to me that others know that I am better than them. Think highly of myself. I do not seek praise. Boast about my virtues. I like knowing that people envy me. Have a high opinion of myself. I readily agree with the good things said about me. Seldom toot my own horn. I feel uncomfortable when my family talks about my accomplishments to relatives and friends. Dislike being the center of attention. I feel discouraged when others get more praise than I do. Consider myself an average person. Even though I like it, I feel uncomfortable when I am praised. Dislike talking about myself. If it might cause ill feelings in others, I'd rather not be praised.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

MAPA English Modesty vs IPIP NEO Proxy

Modesty

  • MAPA English Modesty
  • The tendency to dislike and avoid

presenting oneself as being better than others. High scorers feel uncomfortable talking highly about their abilities, traits, accomplishments, looks, and possessions. Embarrassed by being praised in public, they also disapprove of self-promoting behavior in others. Low scorers tend to take credit for positive outcomes, and feel that it is natural and gratifying to speak and act in a manner that calls attention to their accomplishments and their valued attribute.

  • IPIP NEO Proxy Modesty
  • High Scorers on this scale do not like

to claim that they are better than

  • ther people. In some cases this

attitude may derive from low- confidence or self-esteem... Those who are willing to describe themselves as superior tend to be seen as disagreeably arrogant by other people.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

MAPA English Obligingness vs IPIP NEO Proxy Cooperation

MAPA English Obligingness Items IPIP NEO Proxy Cooperation Items It is easy for me to accommodate what other people want. Yell at people. I prefer to cooperate with others rather than compete with them. Insult people. I would willingly give up something I want to someone who wants it more. Hold a grudge. I get annoyed when other people are served ahead of me. Love a good fight. I dislike having to share my belongings with others. Get back at others. I am used to insisting on getting what I want. Contradict others. I want to have my way all the time. Can't stand confrontations. I think it is better to take advantage than be taken advantage of. Hate to seem pushy. Am easy to satisfy.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

MAPA English Obligingness vs IPIP NEO Proxy Cooperation

  • MAPA English Obligingness
  • The tendency to give in, yield, or

comply, rather than assert oneself. High scorers value interpersonal harmony and cooperation, and willingly subordinate their own needs and desires to those of others. Low scorers, on the other hand, seek to advance their personal interests and concerns with less regard for other people’s welfare. They have no reservations in seeking to get their

  • wn way, and expect consistently to

prevail upon others.

  • IPIP NEO Proxy Cooperation
  • Individuals who score high on this scale

dislike confrontations. They are perfectly willing to compromise or deny their own needs in order to get along with others. Those who score low

  • n this scale are more likely to

intimidate others to get their way.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Final Notes

  • The MAPA English showed acceptable convergent validity coefficients

for four of the dimensions and 8 of the personality facets.

  • BFM Agreeableness got a lower convergent validity coefficient as it

correlates as well with Extraversion of both BFM and MAPA English

  • IPIP analogs for NEO Modesty and Cooperation facet also got lower
  • convergence. This seem to be due to difference in definition in some

respects to the MAPA English Modesty and Obligingness facets

  • Validation with other personality inventories, particularly those with

similar constructs.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Thank you!