The Institution as Learner
- Dr. Joyce C Romano
The Institution as Learner Dr. Joyce C Romano Students In - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The Institution as Learner Dr. Joyce C Romano Students In Transition Conference 2011 Valencia College 65,000 students annual headcount 5 campuses in 2 counties in Central Florida (Orlando area) 87% of students are degree-seeking
65,000 students annual headcount 5 campuses in 2 counties in Central Florida (Orlando area) 87% of students are degree-seeking 58% Associate in Arts (traditional transfer to bachelors) 42% Associate in Science (traditional workforce related) 45% Full time enrollment 72% age 24 or younger 16% African-American, 28% Hispanic, 40% Caucasian 50% students receive financial aid
Fall to Spring persistence of new students
increased to 86.2%
Fall to Fall persistence of new students
increased to 67%
Developmental education completion increased
20%
#1 community college in associate degrees
awarded
Leah Meyer Austin Award for Achieving the
Dream (1st recipient)
Recently named in Top Ten Community Colleges
by Aspen Institute based on student outcomes.
Title III Title III
Osceola
Title III
East
Title V Osceola Title III West Title III East
AtD
Pew Round- tables
Van- guard LC Coll
Student Success Course (SLS1122) ~ Learning-Centered Focus ~ LifeMap ~ Faculty Development Models ~
Strategic Learning Plan ~ Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATs) ~ Action Research ~ LinCs(Learning in Community)~ TVCA ~ College Prep Task Force ~ Teaching and Learning Academy ~ Scenarios ~ Atlas ~ Portfolios ~ Learning Evidence Team ~ Supplemental Learning ~ General Education Outcomes ~ Learning Assessment
Late 1980s 1994-1999 2000 2004 2009 Present
Foud
Exc. Dev Ed Init. National Initiatives:
Valencia Innovations brought to Scale:
Strategic Goal in 2001-2004 Strategic Plan “Ensure that students experience extraordinary learning
success in their earliest encounters at the college…”
Students develop an educational plan in first term. Provide learning experiences in a variety of methods,
scheduling, approaches to address different learning styles.
Firmly establish assessment, placement, pre-requisite and
progression policies to ensure students readiness to learn.
Align the college’s marketing and recruitment messages
with its learning mission.
(Degree seeking students)
Application deadline 2 weeks before classes start (added
Flex Start parts of term)
New student orientation required prior to class
registration
Entry testing, placement and course enrollment required
in first term
Required SLS1122 for students with course requirements
in all 3 developmental education areas
Students cannot add a class once it has met (all students) All course pre-requisites strictly enforced
Students are more likely to persist if they:
Feel safe, welcome, respected, and acknowledged
make social as well as academic connections hold and sense from others a belief in their potential
Are both challenged and supported academically
can link new learning to prior knowledge engage actively in their learning have multiple opportunities to give and receive
constructive feedback
Have a plan for completion
LEARNER
END-TO-END PROCESSES (Collegewide Engagement and Integration) TECHNOLOGY (ATLAS) DEVELOPMENTAL ADVISING (LIFEMAP) LEARNING OUTCOMES (TVCA)
Students will succeed if they:
Have a career goal. Have relationships with others on campus (peers, faculty,
advisors, mentors, etc.)
Experience high engagement at the college. (Clarify
definition of engagement)
Are self-sufficient.
Innovation Management System
1000’s of
tried. Maintain a Research and Development Component. Climate of Innovation Level I Level II Level III “Eye for Evidence”: More rigorous at each level. Standard of evidence increases at each level.
100 are selected for support as Phase I Innovations. “Angel Capital Stage” Prototype
10 supported as Phase II Innovations. “Venture Capital Stage” Pilot Implementation (Limited Scale) 1 or 2 are brought up to scale and Institutionalized. Level II Innovations must be scalable and must show potential to bring systemic change and “business-changing results.”
Challenge is in moving from Level II to Level III.
LifeMap Conceptual Model: 1995 – 1999 LifeMap system development: 1999 – 2002
(and continuing)
Atlas system design and development: 2000-
2002 (and continuing)
Re-designed Student Services (Integrated
Services Model) design and development: 2001-2003 (and continuing)
Valencia’s Developmental Advising Model The “brand name” that:
describes to students what they should do and when. links all of the services/program/activities that form the
developmental advising system.
describes to faculty and staff how they contribute and participate
with students in developmental advising
presents to students visual cues in the physical college
environment as to where they can obtain different forms of assistance towards their career/educational goals.
links together written publications that are designed to assist
students in achieving their career/educational goals.
Promotional marketing campaign of LIFEMap
Chapters follow O’Banion model (life, career, and
educational goals, building a schedule, success tips, learning
College services are listed in the chapter related to the goals
they support.
Includes self-assessments and interpretations. Calendar pages like “Day-Timer” include key college dates. “To Do” cues are listed on each calendar page and are tied to
Developmental Advising Stages with icons.
“Been There” quotes add advice from peers.
“Gap” Analysis and Re-alignment
LifeMapsm
Faculty Alliances Computer-Based Planning Tools: My Education Plan,
My Career Planner, My Portfolio, My Job Prospects, My Profile
Faculty/Staff Development Atlas: Learning Support System Engagement Model: Re-engineer Delivery of Traditional
Student Services
Measure and Evaluate Results
Career or Education Plans as part of Student
Motivation
Inclusive classrooms Engagement in learning strategies Connection and Direction critical to student success A “Competency” of Valencia Faculty Included in Teaching and Learning Academy
curriculum (tenure process)
Faculty LifeMap Groups Faculty LifeMap Guidebook corollary to LifeMap
Student Handbook
Designed to support “Connection” and “Direction” Integrated Portal: single sign-on to numerous separate
applications
Enhance student planning (My LifeMap) and self-
sufficiency
Encourage connection through on-line learning
communities.
Meinthemaking.com User: catlas Pin: ca1111 My LifeMap tab
LifeMap stages and resources LifeMap tools
My Career Planner My Educational Plan My Portfolio My Financial Plan My Job Prospects
Governance Structure (Learning Council, Planning
Council, Operations Council, Faculty Council)
Big Meetings (high bandwidth discussion of progress and
ideas, next steps)
Innovation Funnel (strategic initiatives process) Campus Plans Strategic Plan (expressed in meaningful “short hand”)
Build Pathways Learning Assured Invest in Each Other Partner with the Community
Re-Design of Student Service Delivery
With Student LEARNING as the design principle:
Emphasize level of assistance students are seeking
rather than the content.
Create staff positions whose primary job is working
directly with students and staff positions whose primary job is processing and verifying information .
Focus on students LEARNING process, not just
getting answers to questions.
View technology as a tool to enhance learning, not to
drive our processes
Information Station
– Directional Information
The Answer Center
General Information (End-to-End Process)
Student Services
–More complex and specialized transactions
District Offices
Information processing
Composition of members Development of Data Review Model Term-based strategy level and overall strategy evaluation From Snapshots to Trends From “Data Driven” to “Data Informed” From “Culture of Evidence” to “Culture of Inquiry”
Data Processing Defining the Message Information Sharing Identify needed Changes based on reflection Identify Intended Outcomes New / Revised Assessment Activity
Our Data Processing Model is part of an Institutional Effectiveness process Data Collection
Statistically significant improvement in target quantitative
measures.
Significant improvement relative to a comparative group. Economic efficiency in relationship to difficulty of
improving the success of students.
Reflection on the human impact in terms of the goals of
the initiative and the mission of the institution.
A consideration of faculty /staff perception of benefit
versus cost.
A consideration of student perception of benefit.
http://valenciacollege.edu/IR/pdf/Strategic%20Indicators%20Report.pdf
Build Pathways – to, through and beyond Valencia
Student Growth Diversity & Equity Enrollment Patterns Targeted Initiatives
Learning Assured
College Prep Completion Graduation Rates Graduation Rates Cohort Comparison
Partner with Community
AA Degree Transfers Efficient Learning Environments
Focus on measurable results – what is the
motivation for change?
Conceptual model for foundation (Big Ideas) Look from the student perspective outward Start with reality but design for ideal The “whole” is more than the sum of the
parts (system alignment)
How are we doing? (Feedback to
stakeholders – Keep going deeper)
“Culture will trump strategy everytime.”
Shugart, S., Romano, J., Phelps, J., Puyana, A., & Walter, K.
(in press) “Valencia’s Big Ideas: Sustaining Authentic Organizational Change through Shared Purpose and Culture.” In Focus on Learning: A Learning College Reader, League for Innovation in Community Colleges
Shugart, S. and Romano, J.(2008) Focus on the front
door of the college. In Schuetz, P. and Barr, J. (editors) Are Community Colleges Underprepared for Underprepared Students? New Directions for Community Colleges, no. 144, Wiley Periodicals.