The Learner Record Index The Learner Record Index Building a better - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the learner record index the learner record index
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Learner Record Index The Learner Record Index Building a better - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Learner Record Index The Learner Record Index Building a better student Building a better student experience together experience together What is the LRI ? The ability to match and identify students across multiple organizations when the SS#


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Building a better student experience together

The Learner Record Index The Learner Record Index

Building a better student experience together

slide-2
SLIDE 2

What is the LRI ?

The ability to match and identify students

across multiple organizations when the SS# is not a viable, comprehensive or legal solution.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

What does the LRI solve?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Jane Smith

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Student ID #29582

Jane Smith

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Student ID #29582

Jane Smith

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Student ID #13679-253 Student ID #0093764 Student ID #29582

Jane Smith

Jane Smith-Jones

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Student ID #13679-253 Student ID #48202 Student ID #348889 Student ID #0093764 Student ID #68459 Student ID #29582

Jane Smith

Jane Smith-Jones

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Student ID #13679-253 Student ID #48202 Student ID #348889 Student ID #0093764 Student ID #68459 Student ID #29582

Jane Smith

Jane Smith-Jones

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Student ID #13679-253 Student ID #48202 Student ID #348889 Student ID #0093764 Student ID #68459 Student ID #29582

Jane Smith

Jane Smith-Jones

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Student ID # 29582 Student ID # 68459 Student ID # 348889 Student ID # 13679-253 Student ID # 0093764 Student ID # 48202

slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Jane Smith-Jones

LRI #29573345

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Feels like Déjà vu all over again?

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Déjà vu and IdM

Ann West - Internet2

Suspects, Prospects and Applicants

  • Third Party Matching
  • Student Ease of Use
  • Identity Proofing
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Déjà vu and IdM The Common Identity and Trust (CommIT) ID

Goals of CommIT (~2011 – 2015)

https://spaces.at.internet2.edu/display/InCAdmissions/CommIT+Documents

  • Support and Enhance Identity and Trust
  • Provide matching process for electronic records for applicants

and institutions

  • Create a unique Student Identifier
  • do away with the last remaining vestiges of dependency on the social

security number.

  • Person Registry
  • Store minimum data required to support user uniqueness and

password re-sets

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Déjà vu and IdM The Common Identity and Trust (CommIT) ID

Goals of CommIT (~2011 – 2015)

https://spaces.at.internet2.edu/display/InCAdmissions/CommIT+Documents

  • Federated Single Sign-On Solution (SSO)
  • Single set of credentials that can be used across various services
  • Only the applicant can initiate record aggregation and release
  • No third party access to data without applicant consent
  • Provide a means for Identity Proofing
  • Become a sustainable shared service for IdM
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Déjà vu and IdM CommIT – Ahead of its' Time?

Factors contributing to lack of traction in HE Community (Monday morning QB)

  • CommIT had to be "Inserted" into HE Application Process
  • Introduction of the SSO from variety of
  • rganizations/institutions
  • Credential Management and Administration
  • e.g., "Shared Secret" management, Password reset, etc.
  • Enabling student self-sovereignty
  • Authorization and disclosure of records/credentials
  • Identity Proofing
  • Value Proposition to Stakeholders (Institutions)
  • Admissions/SEM professionals may not bear cost of matching
  • Lack of Scale
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Déjà vu and IdM LRI – Why might it be different?

Learner Record Index

  • Identification NOT Authentication or Authorization
  • Requires no end user intermediation
  • Low Entry Bar
  • Scale
  • Extensibility
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Data Strategy, the Education Community, and LRI

“set of choices and decisions that together, chart a high- level course of action to achieve high-level goals.” (Source: Dataversity)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Building a better student experience together

The Learner Record Index The Learner Record Index

Building a better learner experience together

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Data Strategy

If we are a community that wants to build “a better learner experience together”, let’s put on ‘data glasses’ and look at what that means:

  • Agreement on a shared purpose
  • Governance
  • Determination of the data involved
  • Definitions & Lineage of the data involved
  • Rules regarding usage
  • Definitions of Quality and Accuracy
  • Monitoring, Maintenance, and Metrics
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Thinking about the Data

Consistent and defined set of identifiers and attributes that are typically slow to change, yet used across multiple processes in which learners engage:

First Name Middle Name Middle Initial Last Name Date of Birth Student ID Reporting Entity Jane J Smith 03/20/2001 29582 Institution A Jane Julie Jones 13679-253 Testing Entity Jane Smith Jones 03/20/2001 348889 Support Service J Julie Jones 48202 Institution B Jane J Jones 03/2001 C1524A Online Provider

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Approach and Architecture

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Jane Smith-Jones

High School Test Agency Index Server University Data Consumers

Service Providers: Transcripts, Diplomas, etc.

Learner Personal Information Learner Record Index Academic Information with Index

LRI #29573345

slide-26
SLIDE 26

A Closer Look

  • Learner engages with a system participant
  • High School
  • Testing Agency
  • University
  • Data exchange from a previous participant may contain LRI
  • Otherwise, LRI is retrieved from Index Server via Lookup API
  • LRI is added to system participant’s record for learner
  • LRI is included in data exchanges with other participants for learner

information instead of SSN or student ID

  • Cycle continues when Learner engages with another participant
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Jane Smith-Jones

AWS Cloud LRI API High Schools Testing Agencies Universities

  • LRI ID
  • Person

Attributes

API Server Index LRI ID Generator

Person Attributes LRI ID

 LRI Enabled  LRI Enabled  LRI Enabled Matching Engine

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Index Server & Lookup API

  • Index Server
  • Managed, centralized LRI database to store and manage records
  • Lookup API
  • Secure Web API with access restricted to system participants
  • ~20 attributes of personal information about a learner
  • Matching engine used to compare against existing records in Index Server
  • Returns either existing LRI if match found
  • Otherwise, generates and returns new LRI
  • Management Interface
  • Tools for management of index records
  • Reconciliation of reported mismatched records
  • Manual attribution of matches red-flagged by system as uncertain
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Applied Technologies

  • Matching Engine
  • Logic to compare learner attributes against existing LRI data to locate matches
  • Based on level of match, different actions are taken
  • Beyond high threshold, match is made and LRI is returned
  • Under low threshold, no match is made and new LRI is generated with learner attributes
  • Clearinghouse enrollment reporting process will identify and resolve match

discrepencies

  • Cloud Hosting
  • Scalability, security and availability
  • Can be maintained as separate, isolated system
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Considered Additional Technologies

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Machine Learning or Deep Learning could be utilized to improve matching

results and reduce need for management of the system as database grows

  • Blockchain
  • Sensitivity of PII required to operate system may make blockchain undesirable

for solution

  • If only index is stored within the chain, separate database will still need to be

maintained to securely store related PII off-chain

  • No real ROI for immutability or distributed ledger
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Bringing it all together

The business case for why we need to do this now could not be clearer

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Mobility rates are growing: Nearly 40 % of learners who initially enrolled in 2011 transferred at least once in six years.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Impacts of mobility are even more pronounced in 4 year schools

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Across ALL industry sectors

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Campus level view

The acute transfer impact on campus cannot be overstated

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Predominantly on-Line campus

Data from 2014 cohort of students:

  • 15% of students transferred out to 1,327 institutions
  • 90% students transferred in from 2,650 institutions
  • 75% of all learners over the age of 30
  • 60% have a prior credential

Data from 2017 fall cohort of students:

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Four year public campus:

Data from 2014 cohort of students:

  • 30% of students transferred out to 1,300 institutions
  • 60% students transferred in from 2,000+ institutions
  • 66% transferred in from out of state
  • 33% of out of state transfer ins had two or more

previous enrollments

Data from 2017 fall cohort of students:

slide-38
SLIDE 38

In addition:

DELIVERY

  • On-line learning
  • Across state lines
  • Non-traditional enrollments (not for credit, CEU’s etc)

OUTCOMES

  • CBE and academic completions
  • Advent of proliferation of micro-credentials
  • Recognition of the validity of workforce credentials

Fragmentation of traditional learning models:

slide-39
SLIDE 39

The LRI initiative is timely: Industry complexity & getting out in front of a future of growing complexity

THE ASK Help deliver for the industry

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Coalition of the willing!

Workstreams: The establishment of workgroups to help bring a proof of concept to life:

  • School Participation
  • Operations
  • Technology
  • Governance
  • Operations
  • Sustainability
  • Project Mgmt
slide-41
SLIDE 41

Indication of Interest Form – Get Involved!

http://www.tiny.cc/LRI-Interest

slide-42
SLIDE 42

THANK YOU