The Initiative for Accelerating Cooperative Riparian Restoration and Management
Created in 1996 BLM, USFS in partnership with NRCS
The Initiative for Accelerating Cooperative Riparian Restoration - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The Initiative for Accelerating Cooperative Riparian Restoration and Management Created in 1996 BLM, USFS in partnership with NRCS Healthy Streams Through Bringing People Together Restoration will not happen by regulation, changes
Created in 1996 BLM, USFS in partnership with NRCS
“Restoration will not happen by regulation, changes in the law, more money or any of the normal bureaucratic
social factors, and participation of affected interests.”
Coordination Network
Training
vegetation hydrology soil
What’s working well? W h a t m a y b e l i m i t i n g ? How can management be improved? What further evaluations are appropriate?
Provides common terms, definitions and concepts important to building a shared understanding and vision among diverse stakeholders.
energy
development
retention and groundwater recharge
that stabilize stream banks
quality and quantity
and channel characteristics
wildlife
presentations
– 10,000 people
– 12,000 people
– 3,000 people
communication
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
relationship between stream attributes and processes determining functionality determine minimum conditions relative to stream potential and capability design monitoring strategies importance of experienced ID team relationship between function and values
no yes
Lack of diverse participation participation
Limited long-
term improvement in improvement in cooperation cooperation
...the initiative’s mission cannot be fulfilled through training sessions alone. Training sessions are important to building awareness and a shared understanding...
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% working cooperatively cooperative management plans improved riparian condition yes no
Lack of up-front participation by all stakeholders. Insufficient
dialogue and mutual learning. Limited follow-up.
PFC training sessions... Service trips...
Network...
community needs
Institutionalization Process Organizational Hierarchy Workforce Constraints
Differing levels of support from partnering agencies and individuals partnering agencies and individuals
Current organizational cultures do not create time and priority for the activities create time and priority for the activities associated with this type of work associated with this type of work
Bureaucracies are naturally resistant to risk taking, innovation and integration risk taking, innovation and integration
traditional problem solving approaches
benefits gained by employee participation in this initiative
Lack of clear and consistent message across all ‘appropriate lines of authority’ supporting innovative approaches to problem solving has been a barrier to agency support for this initiative
Organizational downsizing + increasing responsibility =
Many agency employees trained in the bio- physical aspects of natural resource management... …some are disinterested
address the social dimensions of natural resource management.
There are not enough specialists available to participate in the type of interdisciplinary dialogue needed to properly assess specific riparian conditions...
Vegetation Erosion - Deposition Hydrology
It is often difficult to share resources across disciplinary, programmatic and jurisdictional boundaries...