The indep endene numb ers and the hromati numb ers of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the indep enden e numb ers and the hromati numb ers of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The indep endene numb ers and the hromati numb ers of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The indep endene numb ers and the hromati numb ers of random subgraphs Andrei Raigo ro dskii Moso w Institute of Physis and T ehnology Moso w, Russia A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 1 / 10


slide-1
SLIDE 1 The indep enden e numb ers and the hromati numb ers
  • f
random subgraphs Andrei Raigo ro dskii Mos o w Institute
  • f
Physi s and T e hnology Mos o w, Russia A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 1 / 10
slide-2
SLIDE 2 Main question A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 2 / 10
slide-3
SLIDE 3 Main question Erd
  • sR
  • enyi
random graph Let n ∈ N, p ∈ [0, 1]. G(n, p) is
  • btained
b y dra wing indep endently edges
  • n n
verti es, ea h with p robabilit y p . A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 2 / 10
slide-4
SLIDE 4 Main question Erd
  • sR
  • enyi
random graph Let n ∈ N, p ∈ [0, 1]. G(n, p) is
  • btained
b y dra wing indep endently edges
  • n n
verti es, ea h with p robabilit y p . Theo rem Let p b e a
  • nstant
  • r
a fun tion tending to zero and b
  • unded
from b elo w b y a value c

n

, where c > 1 . Let d =

1 1−p

. Then w.h.p.

α(G(n, p)) ∼ 2 logd(np), χ(G(n, p)) ∼ n 2 logd(np).

A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 2 / 10
slide-5
SLIDE 5 Main question Erd
  • sR
  • enyi
random graph Let n ∈ N, p ∈ [0, 1]. G(n, p) is
  • btained
b y dra wing indep endently edges
  • n n
verti es, ea h with p robabilit y p . Theo rem Let p b e a
  • nstant
  • r
a fun tion tending to zero and b
  • unded
from b elo w b y a value c

n

, where c > 1 . Let d =

1 1−p

. Then w.h.p.

α(G(n, p)) ∼ 2 logd(np), χ(G(n, p)) ∼ n 2 logd(np).

A general random subgraph Let n ∈ N, p ∈ [0, 1], Gn = (Vn, En)
  • an
a rbitra ry sequen e
  • f
  • graphs. Gn,p
is
  • btained
from Gn b y k eeping indep endently edges
  • f Gn
, ea h with p robabilit y p . A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 2 / 10
slide-6
SLIDE 6 Main question Erd
  • sR
  • enyi
random graph Let n ∈ N, p ∈ [0, 1]. G(n, p) is
  • btained
b y dra wing indep endently edges
  • n n
verti es, ea h with p robabilit y p . Theo rem Let p b e a
  • nstant
  • r
a fun tion tending to zero and b
  • unded
from b elo w b y a value c

n

, where c > 1 . Let d =

1 1−p

. Then w.h.p.

α(G(n, p)) ∼ 2 logd(np), χ(G(n, p)) ∼ n 2 logd(np).

A general random subgraph Let n ∈ N, p ∈ [0, 1], Gn = (Vn, En)
  • an
a rbitra ry sequen e
  • f
  • graphs. Gn,p
is
  • btained
from Gn b y k eeping indep endently edges
  • f Gn
, ea h with p robabilit y p . What an b e said ab
  • ut α(Gn,p)
and χ(Gn,p) ? A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 2 / 10
slide-7
SLIDE 7 A sp e ial ase Main denition Let r, s, n ∈ N, s < r < n , and let G(n, r, s) = (V, E) , where

V = {x = (x1, . . . , xn) : xi ∈ {0, 1}, x1 + . . . + xn = r}, E = {{x, y} : (x, y) = s}.

A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 3 / 10
slide-8
SLIDE 8 A sp e ial ase Main denition Let r, s, n ∈ N, s < r < n , and let G(n, r, s) = (V, E) , where

V = {x = (x1, . . . , xn) : xi ∈ {0, 1}, x1 + . . . + xn = r}, E = {{x, y} : (x, y) = s}.

Equivalent denition Let r, s, n ∈ N, s < r < n . Let [n] b e an n -element set, and let

G(n, r, s) = (V, E)

, where

V = [n] r

  • ,

E = {A, B ∈ V : |A ∩ B| = s}.

A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 3 / 10
slide-9
SLIDE 9 A sp e ial ase Main denition Let r, s, n ∈ N, s < r < n , and let G(n, r, s) = (V, E) , where

V = {x = (x1, . . . , xn) : xi ∈ {0, 1}, x1 + . . . + xn = r}, E = {{x, y} : (x, y) = s}.

Equivalent denition Let r, s, n ∈ N, s < r < n . Let [n] b e an n -element set, and let

G(n, r, s) = (V, E)

, where

V = [n] r

  • ,

E = {A, B ∈ V : |A ∩ B| = s}.

Again, what an b e said ab
  • ut α(Gp(n, r, s))
and χ(Gp(n, r, s)) ? A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 3 / 10
slide-10
SLIDE 10 Some motivation Why studying G(n, r, s) ? A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 4 / 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11 Some motivation Why studying G(n, r, s) ? Co ding theo ry (Johnson's graphs): A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 4 / 10
slide-12
SLIDE 12 Some motivation Why studying G(n, r, s) ? Co ding theo ry (Johnson's graphs): the indep enden e numb er α(G(n, r, s)) stands fo r the maximum size
  • f
a
  • de
with
  • ne
fo rbidden distan e; A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 4 / 10
slide-13
SLIDE 13 Some motivation Why studying G(n, r, s) ? Co ding theo ry (Johnson's graphs): the indep enden e numb er α(G(n, r, s)) stands fo r the maximum size
  • f
a
  • de
with
  • ne
fo rbidden distan e; the lique numb er ω(G(4k, 2k, k)) is resp
  • nsible
fo r the existen e
  • f
an Hadama rd matrix; et . A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 4 / 10
slide-14
SLIDE 14 Some motivation Why studying G(n, r, s) ? Co ding theo ry (Johnson's graphs): the indep enden e numb er α(G(n, r, s)) stands fo r the maximum size
  • f
a
  • de
with
  • ne
fo rbidden distan e; the lique numb er ω(G(4k, 2k, k)) is resp
  • nsible
fo r the existen e
  • f
an Hadama rd matrix; et . Combinato rial geometry: G(n, r, s) is a
  • distan e
graph, i.e., its edges a re
  • f
the same length
  • 2(r − s)
. The hromati numb er χ(G(n, r, s)) p rovides imp
  • rtant
b
  • unds
in the NelsonHadwiger p roblems
  • f
spa e
  • lo
ring as w ell as in the Bo rsuk p roblem
  • f
pa rtitioning sets in spa es into pa rts
  • f
smaller diameter. A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 4 / 10
slide-15
SLIDE 15 Some motivation Why studying G(n, r, s) ? Co ding theo ry (Johnson's graphs): the indep enden e numb er α(G(n, r, s)) stands fo r the maximum size
  • f
a
  • de
with
  • ne
fo rbidden distan e; the lique numb er ω(G(4k, 2k, k)) is resp
  • nsible
fo r the existen e
  • f
an Hadama rd matrix; et . Combinato rial geometry: G(n, r, s) is a
  • distan e
graph, i.e., its edges a re
  • f
the same length
  • 2(r − s)
. The hromati numb er χ(G(n, r, s)) p rovides imp
  • rtant
b
  • unds
in the NelsonHadwiger p roblems
  • f
spa e
  • lo
ring as w ell as in the Bo rsuk p roblem
  • f
pa rtitioning sets in spa es into pa rts
  • f
smaller diameter.

G(n, r, 0)

is the lassi al Kneser graph; G(n, 1, 0) is just a
  • mplete
graph. A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 4 / 10
slide-16
SLIDE 16 Some motivation Why studying G(n, r, s) ? Co ding theo ry (Johnson's graphs): the indep enden e numb er α(G(n, r, s)) stands fo r the maximum size
  • f
a
  • de
with
  • ne
fo rbidden distan e; the lique numb er ω(G(4k, 2k, k)) is resp
  • nsible
fo r the existen e
  • f
an Hadama rd matrix; et . Combinato rial geometry: G(n, r, s) is a
  • distan e
graph, i.e., its edges a re
  • f
the same length
  • 2(r − s)
. The hromati numb er χ(G(n, r, s)) p rovides imp
  • rtant
b
  • unds
in the NelsonHadwiger p roblems
  • f
spa e
  • lo
ring as w ell as in the Bo rsuk p roblem
  • f
pa rtitioning sets in spa es into pa rts
  • f
smaller diameter.

G(n, r, 0)

is the lassi al Kneser graph; G(n, 1, 0) is just a
  • mplete
graph. Constru tive b
  • unds
fo r Ramsey numb ers. A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 4 / 10
slide-17
SLIDE 17 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
indep enden e numb ers Theo rem (F rankl, F uredi, 1985) Let r, s b e xed as n → ∞. If r 2s + 1 , then α(G(n, r, s)) = Θ (ns) . A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 5 / 10
slide-18
SLIDE 18 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
indep enden e numb ers Theo rem (F rankl, F uredi, 1985) Let r, s b e xed as n → ∞. If r 2s + 1 , then α(G(n, r, s)) = Θ (ns) . If r > 2s + 1 , then α(G(n, r, s)) = Θ
  • nr−s−1
. A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 5 / 10
slide-19
SLIDE 19 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
indep enden e numb ers Theo rem (F rankl, F uredi, 1985) Let r, s b e xed as n → ∞. If r 2s + 1 , then α(G(n, r, s)) = Θ (ns) . If r > 2s + 1 , then α(G(n, r, s)) = Θ
  • nr−s−1
. Theo rem (Bogoliubskiy , Gusev, Py aderkin, A.M., 20132016) Let r, s b e xed as n → ∞. If r 2s + 1 , then w.h.p. α(G1/2(n, r, s)) = Θ (α(G(n, r, s)) log n) . A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 5 / 10
slide-20
SLIDE 20 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
indep enden e numb ers Theo rem (F rankl, F uredi, 1985) Let r, s b e xed as n → ∞. If r 2s + 1 , then α(G(n, r, s)) = Θ (ns) . If r > 2s + 1 , then α(G(n, r, s)) = Θ
  • nr−s−1
. Theo rem (Bogoliubskiy , Gusev, Py aderkin, A.M., 20132016) Let r, s b e xed as n → ∞. If r 2s + 1 , then w.h.p. α(G1/2(n, r, s)) = Θ (α(G(n, r, s)) log n) . If r > 2s + 1 , then w.h.p. α(G1/2(n, r, s)) ∼ α(G(n, r, s)) . A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 5 / 10
slide-21
SLIDE 21 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
indep enden e numb ers fo r r > 2s + 1 Let r 2 , s = 0 . Then G(n, r, s) is Kneser's graph. A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 6 / 10
slide-22
SLIDE 22 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
indep enden e numb ers fo r r > 2s + 1 Let r 2 , s = 0 . Then G(n, r, s) is Kneser's graph. Bollob
  • as,
Na ra y anan, A.M., 2016 Fix a real numb er ε > 0 and let r = r(n) b e a natural numb er su h that

2 r(n) = o(n1/3)

. Let pc(n, r) = ((r + 1) log n − r log r)/

n−1

r−1

  • .
As n → ∞,

P

  • α(Gp(n, r, 0)) = α(G(n, r, 0)) =

n − 1 r − 1

  • 1
if p (1 + ε)pc(n, r) if p (1 − ε)pc(n, r). A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 6 / 10
slide-23
SLIDE 23 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
indep enden e numb ers fo r r > 2s + 1 Let r 2 , s = 0 . Then G(n, r, s) is Kneser's graph. Bollob
  • as,
Na ra y anan, A.M., 2016 Fix a real numb er ε > 0 and let r = r(n) b e a natural numb er su h that

2 r(n) = o(n1/3)

. Let pc(n, r) = ((r + 1) log n − r log r)/

n−1

r−1

  • .
As n → ∞,

P

  • α(Gp(n, r, 0)) = α(G(n, r, 0)) =

n − 1 r − 1

  • 1
if p (1 + ε)pc(n, r) if p (1 − ε)pc(n, r). Su essively imp roved b y Das, T ran, Balogh, and
  • thers.
A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 6 / 10
slide-24
SLIDE 24 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
indep enden e numb ers fo r r > 2s + 1 Let r 2 , s = 0 . Then G(n, r, s) is Kneser's graph. Bollob
  • as,
Na ra y anan, A.M., 2016 Fix a real numb er ε > 0 and let r = r(n) b e a natural numb er su h that

2 r(n) = o(n1/3)

. Let pc(n, r) = ((r + 1) log n − r log r)/

n−1

r−1

  • .
As n → ∞,

P

  • α(Gp(n, r, 0)) = α(G(n, r, 0)) =

n − 1 r − 1

  • 1
if p (1 + ε)pc(n, r) if p (1 − ε)pc(n, r). Su essively imp roved b y Das, T ran, Balogh, and
  • thers.
Let r 4 , s = 1 . A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 6 / 10
slide-25
SLIDE 25 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
indep enden e numb ers fo r r > 2s + 1 Let r 2 , s = 0 . Then G(n, r, s) is Kneser's graph. Bollob
  • as,
Na ra y anan, A.M., 2016 Fix a real numb er ε > 0 and let r = r(n) b e a natural numb er su h that

2 r(n) = o(n1/3)

. Let pc(n, r) = ((r + 1) log n − r log r)/

n−1

r−1

  • .
As n → ∞,

P

  • α(Gp(n, r, 0)) = α(G(n, r, 0)) =

n − 1 r − 1

  • 1
if p (1 + ε)pc(n, r) if p (1 − ε)pc(n, r). Su essively imp roved b y Das, T ran, Balogh, and
  • thers.
Let r 4 , s = 1 . Py aderkin, A.M., 2017 W.h.p. α(G1/2(n, r, s)) = α(G(n, r, s)) . A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 6 / 10
slide-26
SLIDE 26 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
indep enden e numb ers fo r r > 2s + 1 Let r 2 , s = 0 . Then G(n, r, s) is Kneser's graph. Bollob
  • as,
Na ra y anan, A.M., 2016 Fix a real numb er ε > 0 and let r = r(n) b e a natural numb er su h that

2 r(n) = o(n1/3)

. Let pc(n, r) = ((r + 1) log n − r log r)/

n−1

r−1

  • .
As n → ∞,

P

  • α(Gp(n, r, 0)) = α(G(n, r, 0)) =

n − 1 r − 1

  • 1
if p (1 + ε)pc(n, r) if p (1 − ε)pc(n, r). Su essively imp roved b y Das, T ran, Balogh, and
  • thers.
Let r 4 , s = 1 . Py aderkin, A.M., 2017 W.h.p. α(G1/2(n, r, s)) = α(G(n, r, s)) . Of
  • urse 1/2
an b e repla ed b y another fun tion. Ho w ever, the threshold is unkno wn. A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 6 / 10
slide-27
SLIDE 27 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
indep enden e numb ers fo r r > 2s + 1 Let r 2 , s = 0 . Then G(n, r, s) is Kneser's graph. Bollob
  • as,
Na ra y anan, A.M., 2016 Fix a real numb er ε > 0 and let r = r(n) b e a natural numb er su h that

2 r(n) = o(n1/3)

. Let pc(n, r) = ((r + 1) log n − r log r)/

n−1

r−1

  • .
As n → ∞,

P

  • α(Gp(n, r, 0)) = α(G(n, r, 0)) =

n − 1 r − 1

  • 1
if p (1 + ε)pc(n, r) if p (1 − ε)pc(n, r). Su essively imp roved b y Das, T ran, Balogh, and
  • thers.
Let r 4 , s = 1 . Py aderkin, A.M., 2017 W.h.p. α(G1/2(n, r, s)) = α(G(n, r, s)) . Of
  • urse 1/2
an b e repla ed b y another fun tion. Ho w ever, the threshold is unkno wn. No
  • ther
ases
  • f
strong stabilit y a re kno wn. A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 6 / 10
slide-28
SLIDE 28 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
indep enden e numb ers fo r r 2s + 1 Remind that Theo rem (Bogoliubskiy , Gusev, Py aderkin, A.M., 20132016) Let r, s b e xed as n → ∞. If r 2s + 1 , then w.h.p.

α(G1/2(n, r, s)) = Θ (α(G(n, r, s)) log n)

. A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 7 / 10
slide-29
SLIDE 29 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
indep enden e numb ers fo r r 2s + 1 Remind that Theo rem (Bogoliubskiy , Gusev, Py aderkin, A.M., 20132016) Let r, s b e xed as n → ∞. If r 2s + 1 , then w.h.p.

α(G1/2(n, r, s)) = Θ (α(G(n, r, s)) log n)

. If r = 1 , s = 0 , then w e have already ited the mu h subtler lassi al result. A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 7 / 10
slide-30
SLIDE 30 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
indep enden e numb ers fo r r 2s + 1 Remind that Theo rem (Bogoliubskiy , Gusev, Py aderkin, A.M., 20132016) Let r, s b e xed as n → ∞. If r 2s + 1 , then w.h.p.

α(G1/2(n, r, s)) = Θ (α(G(n, r, s)) log n)

. If r = 1 , s = 0 , then w e have already ited the mu h subtler lassi al result. Theo rem Let p b e a
  • nstant
  • r
a fun tion tending to zero and b
  • unded
from b elo w b y a value c

n

, where c > 1 . Let d =

1 1−p

. Then w.h.p. α(Gp(n, 1, 0)) ∼ 2 logd(np). A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 7 / 10
slide-31
SLIDE 31 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
indep enden e numb ers fo r r 2s + 1 Remind that Theo rem (Bogoliubskiy , Gusev, Py aderkin, A.M., 20132016) Let r, s b e xed as n → ∞. If r 2s + 1 , then w.h.p.

α(G1/2(n, r, s)) = Θ (α(G(n, r, s)) log n)

. If r = 1 , s = 0 , then w e have already ited the mu h subtler lassi al result. Theo rem Let p b e a
  • nstant
  • r
a fun tion tending to zero and b
  • unded
from b elo w b y a value c

n

, where c > 1 . Let d =

1 1−p

. Then w.h.p. α(Gp(n, 1, 0)) ∼ 2 logd(np). There a re
  • nly
t w
  • mo
re ases where the Θ notation is repla ed b y the ∼
  • ne.
A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 7 / 10
slide-32
SLIDE 32 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
indep enden e numb ers fo r r 2s + 1 Remind that Theo rem (Bogoliubskiy , Gusev, Py aderkin, A.M., 20132016) Let r, s b e xed as n → ∞. If r 2s + 1 , then w.h.p.

α(G1/2(n, r, s)) = Θ (α(G(n, r, s)) log n)

. If r = 1 , s = 0 , then w e have already ited the mu h subtler lassi al result. Theo rem Let p b e a
  • nstant
  • r
a fun tion tending to zero and b
  • unded
from b elo w b y a value c

n

, where c > 1 . Let d =

1 1−p

. Then w.h.p. α(Gp(n, 1, 0)) ∼ 2 logd(np). There a re
  • nly
t w
  • mo
re ases where the Θ notation is repla ed b y the ∼
  • ne.
Theo rem (Py aderkin, 2016) W.h.p. α(G1/2(n, 3, 1)) ∼ 2α(G(n, 3, 1)) log2 n . A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 7 / 10
slide-33
SLIDE 33 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
indep enden e numb ers fo r r 2s + 1 Remind that Theo rem (Bogoliubskiy , Gusev, Py aderkin, A.M., 20132016) Let r, s b e xed as n → ∞. If r 2s + 1 , then w.h.p.

α(G1/2(n, r, s)) = Θ (α(G(n, r, s)) log n)

. If r = 1 , s = 0 , then w e have already ited the mu h subtler lassi al result. Theo rem Let p b e a
  • nstant
  • r
a fun tion tending to zero and b
  • unded
from b elo w b y a value c

n

, where c > 1 . Let d =

1 1−p

. Then w.h.p. α(Gp(n, 1, 0)) ∼ 2 logd(np). There a re
  • nly
t w
  • mo
re ases where the Θ notation is repla ed b y the ∼
  • ne.
Theo rem (Py aderkin, 2016) W.h.p. α(G1/2(n, 3, 1)) ∼ 2α(G(n, 3, 1)) log2 n . (Kiselev, Derevy ank
  • ,
2017) W.h.p. α(G1/2(n, 2, 1)) ∼ α(G(n, 2, 1)) log2 n . A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 7 / 10
slide-34
SLIDE 34 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
hromati numb ers Let us skip rather umb ersome ases
  • f
a rbitra ry r, s and
  • n entrate
  • n
Kneser's graphs (r > 1 , s = 0 ). A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 8 / 10
slide-35
SLIDE 35 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
hromati numb ers Let us skip rather umb ersome ases
  • f
a rbitra ry r, s and
  • n entrate
  • n
Kneser's graphs (r > 1 , s = 0 ). Lov
  • asz,
1978: if r n/2 , then χ(G(n, r, 0)) = n − 2r + 2 . A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 8 / 10
slide-36
SLIDE 36 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
hromati numb ers Let us skip rather umb ersome ases
  • f
a rbitra ry r, s and
  • n entrate
  • n
Kneser's graphs (r > 1 , s = 0 ). Lov
  • asz,
1978: if r n/2 , then χ(G(n, r, 0)) = n − 2r + 2 . V ery simply the hromati numb er
  • f G(n, r, 0)
is not so stable as the indep enden e numb er: w.h.p. even χ(G1/2(n, r, 0)) < n − 2r + 2 . Ho w ever A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 8 / 10
slide-37
SLIDE 37 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
hromati numb ers Let us skip rather umb ersome ases
  • f
a rbitra ry r, s and
  • n entrate
  • n
Kneser's graphs (r > 1 , s = 0 ). Lov
  • asz,
1978: if r n/2 , then χ(G(n, r, 0)) = n − 2r + 2 . V ery simply the hromati numb er
  • f G(n, r, 0)
is not so stable as the indep enden e numb er: w.h.p. even χ(G1/2(n, r, 0)) < n − 2r + 2 . Ho w ever Theo rem (Kupavskii, 2016) F
  • r
many dierent n, r, p , w.h.p. χ(Gp(n, r, 0)) ∼ n − 2r + 2. A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 8 / 10
slide-38
SLIDE 38 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
hromati numb ers Let us skip rather umb ersome ases
  • f
a rbitra ry r, s and
  • n entrate
  • n
Kneser's graphs (r > 1 , s = 0 ). Lov
  • asz,
1978: if r n/2 , then χ(G(n, r, 0)) = n − 2r + 2 . V ery simply the hromati numb er
  • f G(n, r, 0)
is not so stable as the indep enden e numb er: w.h.p. even χ(G1/2(n, r, 0)) < n − 2r + 2 . Ho w ever Theo rem (Kupavskii, 2016) F
  • r
many dierent n, r, p , w.h.p. χ(Gp(n, r, 0)) ∼ n − 2r + 2. F
  • r
example, if g(n) is any gro wing fun tion and r is a rbitra ry in the range b et w een 2 and n

2 − g(n)

, then fo r any xed p , χ(Gp(n, r, 0)) ∼ n − 2r + 2. A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 8 / 10
slide-39
SLIDE 39 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
hromati numb ers Let us skip rather umb ersome ases
  • f
a rbitra ry r, s and
  • n entrate
  • n
Kneser's graphs (r > 1 , s = 0 ). Lov
  • asz,
1978: if r n/2 , then χ(G(n, r, 0)) = n − 2r + 2 . V ery simply the hromati numb er
  • f G(n, r, 0)
is not so stable as the indep enden e numb er: w.h.p. even χ(G1/2(n, r, 0)) < n − 2r + 2 . Ho w ever Theo rem (Kupavskii, 2016) F
  • r
many dierent n, r, p , w.h.p. χ(Gp(n, r, 0)) ∼ n − 2r + 2. F
  • r
example, if g(n) is any gro wing fun tion and r is a rbitra ry in the range b et w een 2 and n

2 − g(n)

, then fo r any xed p , χ(Gp(n, r, 0)) ∼ n − 2r + 2. Many imp rovements b y Kupavskii and b y Alishahi and Hajiab
  • lhassan.
A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 8 / 10
slide-40
SLIDE 40 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
hromati numb ers A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 9 / 10
slide-41
SLIDE 41 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
hromati numb ers Theo rem (Kiselev, Kupavskii, 2019+) If r 3 , then w.h.p.

n − c1

2r−2

  • log2 n χ(G1/2(n, r, 0)) n − c2

2r−2

  • log2 n.
A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 9 / 10
slide-42
SLIDE 42 Random subgraphs
  • f G(n, r, s) :
hromati numb ers Theo rem (Kiselev, Kupavskii, 2019+) If r 3 , then w.h.p.

n − c1

2r−2

  • log2 n χ(G1/2(n, r, 0)) n − c2

2r−2

  • log2 n.
If r = 2 , then w.h.p.

n − c1

2

  • log2 n · log2 log2 n χ(G1/2(n, r, 0)) n − c2

2r−2

  • log2 n · log2 log2 n.
A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 9 / 10
slide-43
SLIDE 43 A general result A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 10 / 10
slide-44
SLIDE 44 A general result Theo rem (A.M., 2017) Let Gn = (Vn, En) , n ∈ N, b e a sequen e
  • f
graphs. Let Nn = |Vn|, αn = α(Gn) . Let γn b e the maximum numb er
  • f
verti es
  • f Gn
that a re non-adja ent to b
  • th
verti es
  • f
a given edge. Assume that the quantities Nn, αn, γn a re monotone in reasing to innit y and there exists a fun tion βn su h that 1

βn > γn

and βn = o(αn) ; 2

log2 Nn = o

  • αn

βn

  • ;
3

log2 Nn = o (βn − γn)

. Then w.h.p. α(Gn, 1/2) ∼ α(Gn) . A. Raigo ro dskii (MIPT) 2019 T ehran, Iran 10 / 10