the heart outcomes prevention evaluation hope 3 trial
play

The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) 3 Trial Eva Lonn, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) 3 Trial Eva Lonn, Jackie Bosch, Salim Yusuf For the HOPE-3 Investigators Population Health Research Institute, (PHRI) McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada


  1. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) – 3 Trial Eva Lonn, Jackie Bosch, Salim Yusuf For the HOPE-3 Investigators Population Health Research Institute, (PHRI) McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada Unrestricted grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and AstraZeneca

  2. Unique Aspects of HOPE-3 • BP lowering trial with wide range of BP entry criteria • Cholesterol lowering treatment based on risk opposed to baseline LDL or HDL measurement • Diverse population 4

  3. CV Death, MI, Stroke, Cardiac Arrest, Revascularization, Heart Failure 0.10 HR (95% CI) = 0.95 (0.81-1.11) 0.08 Cumulative Hazard Rates P-value = 0.51 0.06 Placebo 0.04 Candesartan + HCTZ 0.02 0.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 No. at Risk Years Cand + HCTZ 6356 6272 6200 6103 5968 4969 2076 522 Placebo 6349 6270 6198 6096 5967 4970 2075 488 14

  4. Prespecified Subgroups: By Thirds of SBP CV Death, MI, Stroke, Cardiac Arrest, Revasc, HF SBP Placebo HR (95% CI) P Trend Cutoffs Mean Diff Event Rate% ≤ 131.5 122 6.1 3.5 1.25 (0.92-1.70) 0.009 131.6-143.5 138 5.6 4.6 1.02 (0.77-1.34) 154 >143.5 5.8 7.5 0.76 (0.60-0.96) 0.5 1.0 2.0 Candesartan + HCTZ Better Placebo Better 17

  5. Meta analysis of BP Lowering Trials in DM Results by Baseline Levels Brunström & Carlberg, BMJ 2016

  6. BP Lowering Arm: Conclusions • Fixed dose combination of Candesartan 16 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg/day reduced BP by 6.0/3.0 mmHg, but did not reduce CV events • CV events were significantly reduced in the highest third of SBP – SBP >143.5 mmHg, mean 154 mmHg • Results were neutral in the middle third, and trended towards harm in the lowest third of SBP • Treatment increased lightheadedness, but not syncope or renal dysfunction 19

  7. Cholesterol Lowering Arm Results Jackie Bosch 20

  8. Unique Aspects of Cholesterol Lowering Arm • No entry criteria based on lipid level • No routine monitoring • No dose titration • Low dose of rosuvastatin

  9. Cholesterol Lowering: Outcomes Rosuvastatin Placebo HR Outcome p N (%) N (%) (95% CI) 235 (3.7) 304 (4.8) 0.76 (0.64-0.91) 0.002 Co-Primary 1 277 (4.4) 363 (5.7) 0.75 (0.64-0.88) 0.0004 Co-Primary 2 306(4.8) 393 (6.2) 0.77 (0.66-0.89) 0.0006 Secondary 1 154 (2.4) 171 (2.7) 0.89 (0.72-1.11) 0.31 CV Death 45 (0.7) 69 (1.1) 0.65 (0.44-0.94) 0.02 MI 70 (1.1) 99 (1.6) 0.70 (0.52-0.95) 0.02 Stroke 281 (4.4) 369 (5.8) 0.75 (0.64-0.88) 0.0003 CV Hosp. 22

  10. CV Death, MI, Stroke, Cardiac Arrest, Revasc, Heart Failure 0.10 HR (95% CI) = 0.75 (0.64-0.88 ) Cumulative Hazard Rates 0.08 P-value = 0.0004 0.06 Placebo 0.04 Rosuvastatin 0.02 0.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Years Rosuva 6361 6241 6039 2122 Placebo 6344 6192 5970 2073 23

  11. HOPE-3 & Other Studies of LDL Lowering and CVD

  12. Cholesterol Lowering: Conclusions • Rosuvastatin 10mg/day reduced: – LDL-C by 34.6 mg/dl (0.9 mmol/l; i.e. 27% in LDL-C) – CVD by 25% • Consistent benefits regardless of: – LDL-C – SBP – Risk – CRP – Ethnicity • Excess in muscle pain/weakness (reversible) and perhaps cataract surgery • No excess in rhabdomyolysis, myopathy or new diabetes 27

  13. Combined BP & Cholesterol Lowering vs Double Placebo Salim Yusuf 28

  14. Unique Aspects of BP & Chol Lowering • First formal testing of polypill concept on clinical events • Demonstrates that the concept is valid in people with elevated BP; in others there is no benefit

  15. CV Death, MI, Stroke, Cardiac Arrest, Revasc, Heart Failure 0.10 0.08 Double Placebo Cumulative Hazard Rates Combination 0.06 0.04 0.02 HR (95% CI) = 0.72 (0.57-0.89) P-value = 0.0030 0.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Years Combination 3180 4 3063 1057 Rosuvastatin 3181 3061 1045 Candesartan/HCTZ 3176 3040 1019 32 Double Placebo 3168 3035 1030

  16. RRR of Combination and Each Intervention vs Double Placebo 50% Overall Co-Primary 2 40% 28% 26% RRR 30% 20% 6% 10% 0% Rosuva Combo Cand + HCTZ Only Only 50% Highest Third of SBP Lower Two Thirds of SBP 50% 40% 40% 40% 31% 30% 24% 30% 20% 19% RRR 20% 20% 10% 10% Cand + HCTZ Only 0% 0% Rosuva Cand+HCTZ Combo Rosuva Only Combo Only Only 34 -8%

  17. Clinical Implications • Statins beneficial in intermediate-risk individuals without CVD • BP lowering benefits only those with elevated BP • Combined BP & cholesterol lowering: – Leads to a 40% risk reduction in hypertensives (benefits from both BP lowering and statin) • In others, 30% RRR from statin alone • Pragmatic strategy: – No Lipid or BP entry criteria or targets – No Dose titration – Infrequent safety monitoring Strategy used in HOPE-3 is simple, safe and effective and widely applicable 37

  18. Back up

  19. BP Lowering by CV Risk Active. Control BP Diff HR (95%CI) 5 yr Risk <11% 11-15% 15-21% >21% Overall (6.5%) SBP 155 159 162 165 158 BPLTC Lancet 2014

  20. 1 st & Recurrent CV Events Total Events HR: 0.65 350 P Value: 0.0003 300 250 N EVENTS 53 96 200 57 48 150 First Event 100 HR: 0.72 P Value: 0.0012 50 147 159 188 205 0 First Event 2+ Events Dbl Active Rosuva Only Cand + HCTZ Dbl Plac Only

  21. NNT Combination vs Double Placebo: Recurrent CV Events (Secondary) Overall 30 Upper 1/3 rd 16 Lower 2/3 rd 41

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend