the hamstring acl success and understnding how and why
play

The Hamstring ACL: Success and Understnding How and Why! Orthopedic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Hamstring ACL: Success and Understnding How and Why! Orthopedic Summit 2017 Mark E. Steiner, MD New England Baptist Hospital Boston Disclosures Royalties Stryker Fellowship Support Arthre Don Joy Mitek Smith & Nephew


  1. The Hamstring ACL: Success and Understnding How and Why! Orthopedic Summit 2017 Mark E. Steiner, MD New England Baptist Hospital Boston

  2. Disclosures • Royalties Stryker • Fellowship Support Arthre Don Joy Mitek Smith & Nephew Con Med • Research Support Don Joy Stryker

  3. Good and Bad of Hamstring Grafts Good Bad • Easy access • Sensory nerve injury • Doubled G + ST • Incomplete graft harvest > 4000 N strength • Hemorrhage > 700 N/mm stiffness • hamstring weakness • hamstring strength • Minimal donor site morbidity

  4. Patinent Perspective on Graft Options • Internet Information • Good in HS & College athletes • Offer all Options Revisions • Hamstring Graft concerns: Retears Muscle weakness Infection Years Small Graft Anxiety Poor fixation

  5. Retears Scandinavian Registries • 60,000 ACL reconstructions (85% hamstring grafts) Revisions Gifstad AJSM ’14 Hamstrings 2.7 % Rahr AJSM ’13 PT 2.3 % “Ham grafts increased the risk of revision compared with PT” Surgical Technique ? Patient Selection?

  6. Allografts in Athletes ? • MARS group 2014 1205 Revisions, mean age 26 1. “an autograft decreased risk rerupture” 2. “No differences between soft tissue and B-T-B grafts ” • MOON group 2801 ACL all ages 1. Allograft in young athletes increased risk for graft tear 2. No differences between soft tissue and B-T-B grafts • Daruwalla 184 Division I College football players Autograft was associated with a greater RTP

  7. HSS ACL Graft Registry 2009 - 2013 • PT auto 47% • Ham auto 30% • Allograft 23% • No Allograft in < 18 y.o. • Overall revision 5.1% • Failure: No association with graft type (BTB vs Ham)

  8. Kaiser San Diego <18y.o. KSST 2016 • PT auto 10 % • Ham auto 73 % • Allograft 17 % • Revision PT 5.5% • Revision Ham 7.5% • Revision Allograft 13.2%

  9. Infection Ham vs PT (> 7000 cases) • Ham .6 % (20 in 3257 cases) Maletis AJSM ’13 PT .06% ( 2 in 2965 cases) • Ham 2 in 118 Katz Arth’08 PT 0 in 52 Katz Arthroscopy ’08

  10. Graft Irrigation May Prevent Infections No Hamstring irrigation 1.7% infection (1095 cases) Vancomycine Hamstring irrigation 0% infection (2034 cases) Phegan ‘16 Perez ‘16

  11. Graft Size and Graft Strength • Graft size related to height, weight and sex • 4 strand grafts < 8 mm increased failures Spragg ’16 Magnussen ’11 Mariscalco ’13 • ? Tensioning vs Size Hamner ‘99 7 mm Hamner ‘99

  12. Hamstring Tensioning Equal on All Limbs • Manual tension 2831 N • Equally tension 4590 N = PT Hamner JBJS ‘99 NO YES

  13. Making Hamstring Grafts Larger 5 vs 4 strands • Add allograft to make 9 mm Ham = poor results Burrus ’15, McCarty ‘17 ? • Make 5 strand graft = good results Lee ’14 Lavery ‘14

  14. Interference Screw Fixation with Osteoporotic Bone Domnick J Arth ‘17 • Low Fixation Strength with osteoporotic bone • Consider BTB graft with older patients • Consider staple or sutures to a post

  15. Hamstring Weakness with hamstring ACL ? Related to Pain or Regeneration • Normal flexion torque @ 2yr Karlson ‘94 • All tendons regenerated = Normal Flexion and Int Rot Strength Ahlen ‘12 • 11% No Tendon regeneration Less Strength & Agility Choi ‘12

  16. Set Up and Incision • Done in 90° flexion • Vertical Incision near tibial tubercle

  17. Graft Preparation • Circumferential Ligate • Equal tensioning sutures

  18. Locating an “Anatomic” Femoral Tunnel • Remnants • Clock face • Ridges • Measurements 

  19. Measurements in 90° flexion Height and Depth Guidelines for Anatomic Femoral Tunnels in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study A. David Davis, M.D. J. Arthroscopy 2016

  20. Measurements to the ACL Center at 90° flexion • 8.5 mm up lateral wall • 1.5 mm deep to the low point

  21. Radiographic Grid Validation of Measurements • ACL height ≈ Prior Measurements • ACL depth: ? Slightly shallow to Prior Measurements Prior measurements

  22. AM Aimer at Height of ACL → Point close to ACL center • 7 mm offset aimer • Elevated 8.5 mm

  23. View Pilot Hole from Medial Portal Lateral Portal View Medial Portal View

  24. Aimer Placed Through AM Portal Pin Positioned in Starter Hole

  25. Guidepin Placement • Pin Exits in safe zone on lateral thigh

  26. Advance Flexible Reamer Over Pin

  27. Tunnel low at 90° = Tunnel posterior at 20° V extended 90°

  28. Tibial Tunnel Placed Relative to Notch • Normal ACL “bundles” into the notch • ACL graft is a cylinder

  29. Tibial Tunnel Placed Medial

  30. Passage of the Graft • One suture tensions all 4 limbs equally

  31. Interference Screw Fixation with Rigid Screwdriver no hyperflexion place pin first to prevent graft / screw wrapping

  32. Tibial Fixation • Equally Tension • Knee in full extension • Fixation with IS = or 1 mm larger than tunnel

  33. Tibial Tunnel Placed Medial

  34. Graft Placement > Graft Type = Stable Knee V 8.5 mm extended 90°

  35. Hamstring Graft for Whom • Patient requests • Pain and motion concerns • recreational athletes • Senior athletes who don’t want an allograft

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend