Y.Itow, The first results from the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 AUG 2010
The First Results from the LHCf experiment
Yoshitaka Itow Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory Nagoya University for the LHCf collaboration
HESI 2010 Aug 10-13, 2010, YITP
The First Results from the LHCf experiment Yoshitaka Itow - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Y.Itow, The first results from the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 AUG 2010 The First Results from the LHCf experiment Yoshitaka Itow Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory Nagoya University for the LHCf collaboration HESI 2010 Aug 10-13,
Y.Itow, The first results from the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 AUG 2010
Yoshitaka Itow Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory Nagoya University for the LHCf collaboration
HESI 2010 Aug 10-13, 2010, YITP
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010 IP1 : ATLAS, LHCf IP5 :CMS TOTEM IP2: ALICE IP8: LHCb, MoEDAL
Dedicated to 0-deg. Verify cosmic ray interaction models
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
K.Fukatsu, Y.Itow, K.Kawade, T.Mase, K.Masuda, Y.Matsubara, G.Mitsuka, K.Noda, T.Sako, K.Suzuki, K.Taki
Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory, Nagoya University, Japan
K.Yoshida
Shibaura Institute of Technology, Japan
K.Kasahara, M.Nakai, Y.Shimizu, T.Suzuki, S.Torii
Waseda University, Japan
T.Tamura
Kanagawa University, Japan
Y.Muraki
Konan University, Japan
Y.Shimizu
ICRR, University of Tokyo,Japan
M.Haguenauer
Ecole Polytechnique, France
W.C.Turner LBNL, Berkeley, USA O.Adriani, L.Bonechi, M.Bongi, R.D’Alessandro, M.Grandi, H.Menjo, P.Papini, S.Ricciarini, G.Castellini
INFN, Univ. di Firenze, Italy
A.Tricomi
INFN, Univ. di Catania, Italy
J.Velasco, A.Faus IFIC, Centro Mixto CSIC-UVEG, Spain D.Macina, A-L.Perrot CERN, Switzerland
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
140m
IP1
140m 95mm
Compact calorimeter TAN absorber 140m
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
INTERACTION POINT INTERACTION POINT IP1 (ATLAS) IP1 (ATLAS)
Detector II Detector II Tungsten Tungsten Scintillator Scintillator Silicon Silicon µ µstrips strips Detector I Detector I Tungsten Tungsten Scintillator Scintillator Scintillating Scintillating fibers fibers
Beam line Beam line
140 m 140 m 140 m 140 m 140 m 140 m 140 m 140 m
Arm#1 Detector 20mmx20mm+40mmx40mm 4 SciFi tracking layers
44X0, 1.6 λint
Arm#2 Detector 25mmx25mm+32mmx32mm 4 Silicon strip tracking layers
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
Arm#2 Detector Arm#1 Detector 9 m m 2 9 m m
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
Remotely changed by a manipulator( w/ accuracy 50 µm)
Distance from neutral center Beam pipe aperture Data taking mode 3 different position To cover PT gap
Garage position when beam tune To prevent unnecessary dose (10-3 of data taking mode)
N L G
All γ from IP
Viewed from Interaction Point Neutral flux center N L
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
8.4 < η < ∞ Multiplicity Energy Flux All particles neutral
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
Gamma-rays (E>100GeV,dE/E<5%) Neutral Hadrons (E>a few 100 GeV,
Neutral Pions (E>700GeV, dE/E<3%)
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
Uncertainty in air-shower observables QGSJET Ⅰ、
DPMJET SIBYLL EPOS
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
γ
p n p
+ μ +
+
γ
E = 1
2 0e
V E . 8 x 1
2 0e
V ~
KNEE LHC 14TeV
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
Air Florescence telescope (FD) Surface Detectors (SD)
Scintillation lights Shower directions Shower max altitude Number of particles Arrival timing Muon or EM component ( at given altitude) EM component (most of energy)
Model uncertainty in hadron interactions at UHE
Floresense detectors
Robust against interaction model. Detector systematics interaction model dependence.
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
AGASA (SD) HiRes (FD) TA (SD+FD)
3000km2 100km2
Airs shower experiments for UHECRs
760km2 Thick water Cherenkov (µ sensitive) Thin plastic scinti (EM sensitive)
AUGER (SD+FD)
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
~ recent situation ~
1020eV 1018eV 1020eV 1018eV AUGER Xmax HiRes Xmax p p Fe Fe
AUGER E spectrum TA Xmax
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
① Inelastic cross section ② Forward energy spectrum (or Inelasticity k ) Need both ① and ②
If large k rapid development If small k deep penetrating If large σ rapid development If small σ deep penetrating
LHCf is dedicated to ②
① will be give by Roman Pod at LHC
③ 2ndary interactions
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
#of particles
AUGER alt.
E-scale error
J.Knapp Astropart. Phys.19 (2003) 77
Surface detector would get uncertainty of E-scale (AGASA claims 20%) Florescence should be OK ( a few %) for E-scale But FD SD problem Composition uncertainty AUGER ICRC09 Composition error
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
single γ
Neutrons (w/ 30% resolution) Neutrons (true energy)
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
900 GeV run (no crossing angle)
06 Dec. –15 Dec. 2009 (27.7 hrs, 500K collisions)
2.8K / 3.7K single showers at Arm1 / Arm2
02 May – 27 May in 2010 (15hrs, 5.5M collisions)
44K / 63K single showers at Arm1 / Arm2
7 TeV run (0µrad and 100µrad crossing angle)
30 Mar. – 19 July in 2010 (~150hrs, )
172M / 161M single showers at Arm1 / Arm2 345K / 676 K π0s at Arm1 / Arm2
Detectors removal was done at 20 Jul.
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
L90% @ 40mm cal. of Arm1
Thick for E.M. interaction (44X0) Thin for hadronic interaction(1.7λ)
A transition curve for Gamma-ray A transition curve for Hadron
Definition of L90%
Gamma-ray like
Hadron like
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
Normalized by total # of events.
Gamma Gamma-
ray like Hadron like Hadron like Gamma Gamma-
ray like Hadron like Hadron like
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
preliminary preliminary Gamma Gamma-
ray like Hadron like Hadron like
preliminary preliminary Gamma Gamma-
ray like Hadron like Hadron like
Only 2% of data shown. Now study is under going.
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
σ =6.3MeV (4.7%) σ =3.1MeV (2.3%)
LHCf Preliminary LHCf Preliminary
Arm2 7TeV Arm2 7TeV
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
Revisit LHC when next energy upgrade (i.e. @14
Detector will be upgraded with rad-hard GCO scintillator
Light ion collision to understand nuclear effects
So far only heavy ions (Pb-Pb) collisions are forseen
( in late 2010) at LHC, in which LHCf will not perticipate.
Feasible study under going to cope with high multiplicity
at 0 degree.
0.5 particle/cm^2 DPMJET3 QGSJET2 3.5TeV/n N- N collisions Mulitiplicity in 0-1cm cone at 140m
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
LHCf : Dedicated measurements of neutral particles
Phase-I run completed. Analysis on-going.
900 GeV run : ~ 100K showers in both arms 7 TeV runs : ~300M showers, ~1M π0 in both arms
Revisit LHC for next energy upgrade at ~2013 with
Possible future Light Ion runs? R&D in progress.
UHECR data may hint ultra high energy interactions at beyond-LHC energy. To approach, LHCf will give firm base of understanding at 1017eV.
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
Very big reduction in the Beam Gas contribution!!!!
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
Gamma‐ray like Hadron like
Comparison between calorimeter towers of Arm2 Comparison between two Arms
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
Uncertainty of Multi Hit contamination Uncertainty of energy scale : assumed as ±5% Uncertainty of relative normalization btw 2 pos. <0.1% Uncertainty of neutral beam center <0.1% Peak=134MeV σ=4.9MeV Cut 125MeV
Based on ~104 π0 samples at 2 positions Mass cut π0 energy resolution
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
Hadron like @ Arm2
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
Energy spectra with 30% energy resolution
1.5 x 10 6 collisions
10 29cm -2s-1
with 5% energy resolution
We w ill see 7TeV collisions tomorrow !!
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
Large difference in cross section (or a γ/n ratio) . Initial accuracy of luminosity 15% by “luminosity scan” would be even enough to discriminate.
DPMJET3 QGSJET2 QGSJET1 SIBYLL
Including 30% E resolution
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
3.5TeV LHCf aperture
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
Assuming to measure at the LHCf installation location Gamma spectra at <1cm from 0 degree
DPMJET3 Neutron spectra at <1cm from 0 degree
neutron Neutron spectra at 1‐2cm (off center)
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
Very forward region : collision of a low-x parton with a large-x
parton
Small-x gluon become dominating in higher energy collision by
self interaction.
But they may be saturated (Color Glass Condenstation)
Low-x high-x Very forward
Naively CGC-like suppression may
However situation is more complex (not simple hard parton collsions, but including soft + semi-hard ) soft semi- hard hard
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
Projection of a eliptical beam pipe Beam Crossing Angle = 0 rad. Beam Crossing Angle = 140 urad.
Zero Beam Crossing Angle
140urad Beam Crossing Angle
*) psudorapidity: η = - ln (tan θ/2)
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
7mm(2r.l.)
40mm 20mm
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
Jul 2006 construction
May 2004 LOI Feb 2006 TDR June 2006 LHCC
approved
Jan 2008 Installation Aug 2007 SPS beam test Sep 2008 1st LHC beam Mar 2010 1st 7TeV run Dec 2009 1st 900GeV run Jul 2010 Detector removal
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
p 150,350 GeV/c GeV/c
e 100,200 GeV/c GeV/c
µ 150 150 GeV/c GeV/c
Energy calibration
Spatial resolution
PID capability , etc… … position energy
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
L H C L H C L H C L H C f f Lum inosity Lum inosity Monitor (BRAN) Monitor (BRAN) ATLAS ZDC ATLAS ZDC Installation perform ed in two phases: Installation perform ed in two phases: 1.
Pre -
Installation (2007) Baking out of the beam pipe (200 Baking out of the beam pipe (200 ° °C) C) 2.
Final Installation (Jan 2008)
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
LHCf Front Counter LHCf Calorimeter BRAN-IC ZDC type1 ZDC type2
Beam pipe
TAN
Neutral particles
Side view
BRAN-Sci
IP1
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
AUGER, TA TALE HEAT
1020 1017 1014
eV 7TeV 3.5 5 0.45
Knee GZK Ankle 2nd Knee?
1.1TeV Nov. Dec. 450GeV 1.1TeV 3.5TeV 5TeV Lead 5TeV 2009 2010 2011 7TeV
Detector upgrade LHCf I LHCf II Current detector will be “burned” until 3.5TeV run New detector w/ rad-hard GSO scinitillator will be ready for 5 and 7 TeV runs LHC energy schedule
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
XF = E/Etot
Half of shower particles comes from large XF γ
Measurement at very forward region is needed
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
A clean sample against
beam-gas background.
Energy scale can be
checked by data itself
QGSJETII ⇔ DPMJET3χ2= 106 (C.L. <10-6) ⇔ SIBYLL χ2= 83 (C.L. <10-6) DPMJET3 ⇔ SIBYLL χ2= 28 (C.L.= 0.024) 107events DOF = 17-2=15
Shape comparison
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
Slow recovery of light yield with time at the end of fill (Annealing)
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
AUGER HiRes AGASA Energy scaling by +-25%
c.f. Energy scale was determined by fluorescence detector for AUGER
@ICRR, Mar. 2008
Y.Itow, The first results from the the LHCf experiment HESI10@ 12 Aug 2010
M.Fukushima@ISVHECRI2010