The fate of electron-capture supernovae in binaries John Antoniadis - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the fate of electron capture supernovae in binaries
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The fate of electron-capture supernovae in binaries John Antoniadis - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

14 th Bonn NS workshop 17 February 2020 The fate of electron-capture supernovae in binaries John Antoniadis Savvas Chanlaridis , Gtz Grfener, Norbert Langer ArXiv: 1912.07608 credit: WISE 14 th Bonn NS workshop 17 February 2020 Type


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The fate of electron-capture supernovae in binaries

Savvas Chanlaridis, Götz Gräfener, Norbert Langer

John Antoniadis

credit: WISE

ArXiv: 1912.07608 14th Bonn NS workshop — 17 February 2020

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Savvas Chanlaridis, Götz Gräfener, Norbert Langer

John Antoniadis

credit: WISE

ArXiv: 1912.07608

Type Ia supernovae from non-accreting progenitors

14th Bonn NS workshop — 17 February 2020

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Electron-capture supernovae (ECSNe): a primer

What about stars in between? A difficult question…

ZAMS masses below ~7 Msun make CO white dwarfs ZAMS masses above ~10 Msun make neutron stars / black holes

Dohertly et al. 2015

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Electron-capture supernovae (ECSNe): a primer 7—10 Msun mass range is dominated by super-AGB stars: non-explosive carbon burning

Thermal pulses Second dredge-up

  • ff-centre C-burning

weak interactions

Poelarends et al. 2008 Poelarends et al. 2008 Farmer et al. 2015 Schwab et al. 2017

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Electron-capture supernovae (ECSNe): a primer Neon consumes a lot of electrons leading to collapse electron consumption vs runaway nuclear burning Outcome depends sensitively on initial conditions (density) and flame propagation core-collapse ECSN thermonuclear ECSN multi-D simulations for 𝜍!

≃ 10"#gcm$ predict tECSNe that

eject 0.1–1.0 Msun and leave behind small bound ONeFe white dwarfs (Jones et al. 2016/2019).

slide-6
SLIDE 6

ECSNe in binaries In isolation, very few SAGB stars reach 𝑁%& What about binaries? Some aspects more complicated, but if the H-envelope is removed then 2DU and thermal pulses are avoided! More (all?) SAGB stars reach 𝑁%& Core grows via stable shell burning

Dohertly et al. 2015

slide-7
SLIDE 7

2.5 Msun helium star, solar metallicity

JA, Chanlaridis, Gräfener & Langer, 2020, A&A; ArXiv:1912.07608

ECSNe in binaries

slide-8
SLIDE 8

ECSNe in binaries

JA, Chanlaridis, Gräfener & Langer, 2020, A&A; ArXiv:1912.07608

carbon burning helium burning

  • xygen ignition

shells merge

2.5 Msun helium star, solar metallicity

slide-9
SLIDE 9

ECSNe in binaries

JA, Chanlaridis, Gräfener & Langer, 2020, A&A; ArXiv:1912.07608

2.5 Msun helium star, solar metallicity

slide-10
SLIDE 10

ECSNe in binaries What flavour of Type Ia? ✓Short delay times in respect to star formation ✓Owing to IMF, rates comparable to Ib/c ✓Explosions possible for both stars in a binary

JA, Chanlaridis, Gräfener & Langer, 2020, A&A; ArXiv:1912.07608

slide-11
SLIDE 11

ECSNe in binaries What flavour of Type Ia? ✓The available nuclear energy suffices to unbind the star and to produce ejecta with kinetic energies of order 0.8-1.2 x 1051 erg ✓Short delay times in respect to star formation ✓Owing to IMF, rates comparable to Ib/c ✓Depending on deflagration-to-detonation transition anything from Type Iax to SC Ia is possible ✓Explosions possible for both stars in a binary

JA, Chanlaridis, Gräfener & Langer, 2020, A&A; ArXiv:1912.07608

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Summary

✓Helium stars with masses between 1.8 and 2.7 solar masses evolve into near-Mch ONeMg or hybrid CO/ONeMg objects ✓These cores ignite explosively at "low" densities, and therefore they most likely disrupt ✓Available nuclear energy suffices to yield ejecta velocities similar to what is expected for a typical Ia ✓ Frequency comparable to type Ib/c rates ✓Short delay times in respect to star formation: relevant to SNe iin star-forming galaxies