SLIDE 1 The fate of electron-capture supernovae in binaries
Savvas Chanlaridis, Götz Gräfener, Norbert Langer
John Antoniadis
credit: WISE
ArXiv: 1912.07608 14th Bonn NS workshop — 17 February 2020
SLIDE 2 Savvas Chanlaridis, Götz Gräfener, Norbert Langer
John Antoniadis
credit: WISE
ArXiv: 1912.07608
Type Ia supernovae from non-accreting progenitors
14th Bonn NS workshop — 17 February 2020
SLIDE 3
Electron-capture supernovae (ECSNe): a primer
What about stars in between? A difficult question…
ZAMS masses below ~7 Msun make CO white dwarfs ZAMS masses above ~10 Msun make neutron stars / black holes
Dohertly et al. 2015
SLIDE 4 Electron-capture supernovae (ECSNe): a primer 7—10 Msun mass range is dominated by super-AGB stars: non-explosive carbon burning
Thermal pulses Second dredge-up
weak interactions
Poelarends et al. 2008 Poelarends et al. 2008 Farmer et al. 2015 Schwab et al. 2017
SLIDE 5
Electron-capture supernovae (ECSNe): a primer Neon consumes a lot of electrons leading to collapse electron consumption vs runaway nuclear burning Outcome depends sensitively on initial conditions (density) and flame propagation core-collapse ECSN thermonuclear ECSN multi-D simulations for 𝜍!
≃ 10"#gcm$ predict tECSNe that
eject 0.1–1.0 Msun and leave behind small bound ONeFe white dwarfs (Jones et al. 2016/2019).
SLIDE 6
ECSNe in binaries In isolation, very few SAGB stars reach 𝑁%& What about binaries? Some aspects more complicated, but if the H-envelope is removed then 2DU and thermal pulses are avoided! More (all?) SAGB stars reach 𝑁%& Core grows via stable shell burning
Dohertly et al. 2015
SLIDE 7
2.5 Msun helium star, solar metallicity
JA, Chanlaridis, Gräfener & Langer, 2020, A&A; ArXiv:1912.07608
ECSNe in binaries
SLIDE 8 ECSNe in binaries
JA, Chanlaridis, Gräfener & Langer, 2020, A&A; ArXiv:1912.07608
carbon burning helium burning
shells merge
2.5 Msun helium star, solar metallicity
SLIDE 9
ECSNe in binaries
JA, Chanlaridis, Gräfener & Langer, 2020, A&A; ArXiv:1912.07608
2.5 Msun helium star, solar metallicity
SLIDE 10
ECSNe in binaries What flavour of Type Ia? ✓Short delay times in respect to star formation ✓Owing to IMF, rates comparable to Ib/c ✓Explosions possible for both stars in a binary
JA, Chanlaridis, Gräfener & Langer, 2020, A&A; ArXiv:1912.07608
SLIDE 11
ECSNe in binaries What flavour of Type Ia? ✓The available nuclear energy suffices to unbind the star and to produce ejecta with kinetic energies of order 0.8-1.2 x 1051 erg ✓Short delay times in respect to star formation ✓Owing to IMF, rates comparable to Ib/c ✓Depending on deflagration-to-detonation transition anything from Type Iax to SC Ia is possible ✓Explosions possible for both stars in a binary
JA, Chanlaridis, Gräfener & Langer, 2020, A&A; ArXiv:1912.07608
SLIDE 12
Summary
✓Helium stars with masses between 1.8 and 2.7 solar masses evolve into near-Mch ONeMg or hybrid CO/ONeMg objects ✓These cores ignite explosively at "low" densities, and therefore they most likely disrupt ✓Available nuclear energy suffices to yield ejecta velocities similar to what is expected for a typical Ia ✓ Frequency comparable to type Ib/c rates ✓Short delay times in respect to star formation: relevant to SNe iin star-forming galaxies