The Effects of a Web-Based Application on the Cognitive Processing - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the effects of a web based application on the cognitive
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Effects of a Web-Based Application on the Cognitive Processing - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Effects of a Web-Based Application on the Cognitive Processing of Students Part of a Three Year Study on the Implications of Adding Technology into the Traditional Classroom Environment Caitlyn Ralph WHY? The twenty-first centurys


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Effects of a Web-Based Application on the Cognitive Processing of Students

Part of a Three Year Study on the Implications of Adding Technology into the Traditional Classroom Environment Caitlyn Ralph

slide-2
SLIDE 2

WHY?

The twenty-first century’s change in learning Online testing (FCAT, EOC) Online classes (FLVS, SCVS) Need to test and analyze these alterations effect on learning

WWW.FLVS.NET

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Previous Years’ Studies

9th grade: Face-to-face (traditional) vs. webcam (technological) tutoring 10th grade: Face-to-face vs. webcam immediacy (group working interactions) Elementary/middle school students Traditional environment more efficient

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Cognitive Diagrams

Total Cognitive Load =

Intrinsic + Extraneous + Germane

! ! What is wanted: More Germane Less Extraneous ! ! What is not wanted: Less Germane More Extraneous

slide-5
SLIDE 5

How?

Paper-based comic activity (traditional method) Redesigned with four parts Web-based application (technological method) Information is identical (intrinsic cognitive load) 130 students (32 traditional/98 technological)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Web-Based Application

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Web-Based Application

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Web-Based Application

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Web-Based Application

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Unpaired T-Test P-Values

Means and Standard Deviations

Efficiency (E) is positive when performance (P) > mental effort (M), negative if P < M, and zero if P = M. Ideally, M < P, therefore the more efficient a strategy, the higher E value.

Ef

E = P - M /√ 2

Training Efficiency Formula

  • Data Analysis
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Graphs

Method Average Average Level Of Agreement

Traditional Web-Based 1 2 3 4 5

Traditional vs. Web-Based Survey Overall Averages

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Graphs

Traditional vs. Web-Based Accuracy

Traditional Web-Based 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Method Average Score

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Graphs

Traditional Web-Based 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Average Level Of Mental Effort Method Average

Traditional vs. Web-Based Average Mental Effort

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Graphs

Traditional Web-Based

  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 4

Method Average Training Efficiency

Traditional vs. Web-Based Average Training Efficiency Scores

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Conclusions and Discussion

Activity was successful (based on the means) Limited difference between traditional and technological methods Relationship with previous studies Inverse relationship Younger students: Gradual incorporation Older students: More rapid All ages: Progressive exposure (increase experience/accuracy) Other ramifications

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank:

  • Dr. Vogel-Walcutt
  • Dr. Dahl
  • Mr. Okraski
  • Mrs. Moosavifazel

Contact: Caitlyn Ralph caitlyn.ralph13@gmail.com