The Effect of Implant Surface Bioactivation with PRGF on Cell - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the effect of implant surface bioactivation with prgf on
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Effect of Implant Surface Bioactivation with PRGF on Cell - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Effect of Implant Surface Bioactivation with PRGF on Cell Attachment in the Presence of Cigarette Smoke Extract PHILLIP LIP CRUM, DDS LSU SCHOO OOL L OF OF D DENTIST ISTRY RY DEPAR ARTM TMENT ENT OF PERIODO DONT NTICS ICS


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Effect of Implant Surface Bioactivation with PRGF on Cell Attachment in the Presence of Cigarette Smoke Extract

PHILLIP LIP CRUM, DDS LSU SCHOO OOL L OF OF D DENTIST ISTRY RY DEPAR ARTM TMENT ENT OF PERIODO DONT NTICS ICS

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Cigarette Smoking

Ef Effect ct on Pe Perio iodonta tal l St Structu ctures res and Na Natural l Teeth Ef Effect ct on De Dental l Impla lants nts

  • Increased incidence of periodontal disease (Bergström, 1991)
  • Increased levels of periodontal pathogens (Haffajee and Socransky,

2001)

  • Poor healing results (Tonetti, 1998)
  • Poorer long term prognosis (Tonetti, 1998)
  • Implants in smokers 2.5x more likely to fail (Bain and

Moy,1993)

  • Increased incidence of peri-implant mucositis and

peri-implantitis (Renvert, 2015)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

How do Cigarettes Effect Dental Implant Success

PATI TIENT ENT LEVEL VEL SUR URGE GEON ON LEVEL VEL CELLULA ELLULAR R LEVEL VEL

slide-4
SLIDE 4

CELLULA ELLULAR R LEVEL VEL

How

  • w Doe
  • es

s Sm Smok

  • king

ing Af Affec ect t Cel ells ls?

PDL DL fi fibrob roblast last att ttachmen chment t and d differen fferentia tiation tion Gi Gingival ngival fi fibro roblast blast att ttach chment ment and d differen fferentia tiation tion Os Oste teob

  • blast

last att ttachmen achment t and d differen fferentiatio tiation

Cel ells ls Used ed in in thi his St Stud udy

Human man gingival ingival fi fibro robla blasts sts obtain tained ed fr from m 13 year ar old ld male le patie tient nt at t LSU

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Cigarette Smoke Extract (CSE)

Wh What at is is it it?

CSE is a solution prepared by drawing the smoke from a lit cigarette through 10ml of MEMα media over 60 seconds Used in research to mimic the effect of smoking on cells

How

  • w was

as it it us used? ed?

A dilution of 1.5% CSE solution was used in the current study. This level reflects the salivary levels of CSE

  • f resting saliva in an

average smoker

100% CSE

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Implant Surface Bioactivation

Wh What at is is it it? Coating a dental implant surface in a bioactive material in the hopes of improving the biological compatibility

  • f the dental implant

How

  • w is

is it it ac achieved? hieved?

BMPs PRGF GF, PRP, PRF TGF Peptides Extracellular matrices

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Plasma Rich in Growth Factors

100% Autologous pure platelet-rich plasma (P-PRP) product Does not contain leukocytes - avoiding their pro-inflammatory activity PRGF releases growth factors and proteins that are involved in wound healing

  • Platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) - Insulin like growth factor (IGF)
  • Transforming growth factor β(TGF-β)
  • Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)
slide-8
SLIDE 8

PRGF Preparation

After centrifugation Collect fractions Centrifuge for 8 mins Blood Draw Implant placed in PRGF for 5 mins Fraction 2=PRGF

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Cur urrent rent Stu tudy dy Ob Objectives ectives

Pu Purpose: This study was designed to examine the effect of implant surface bioactivation with PRGF in the presence of CSE on the attachment of gingival fibroblasts to four different dental implant surfaces

Hypo pothesi thesis: Surface bioactivation of dental implants with PRGF will enhance the attachment of gingival fibroblasts to the dental implant surface in the presence of CSE.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Study Design

Im Implant lant Bran rands ds Used ed

Su Surface ce 1: Osseoti

  • tite

te Su Surface ce 2: TiU iUnit ite Su Surface ce 3: SL SLA Su Surface ce 4: MTX

Phase ase 1: : +/- PRGF GF

Control: Uncoated Implants (n=4 per surface) Test: Implants coated in PRGF (n=4 per surface)

Phase ase 2: : +/- PRGF GF in n th the pres resen ence ce of f CSE SE

Control: Uncoated Implants in presence of CSE (n=4 per surface) Test: Implants coated in PRGF in presence of CSE (n=4 per surface)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Study Methods

PRGF Group soaked for 5 mins

  • Gingival fibroblasts, CSE and

dental implants plated

  • Placed in fresh well at 24 hours

and incubated for 48 hours Fluorescence Microplate Reader used to quantify cellular attachment

  • Cells frozen
  • Cells vortexed to release

RNA

  • Cy-QUANT fluorescent

dye added

slide-12
SLIDE 12

RESULTS

Implan plant t Surfac rface Mean ean Cellul llular ar Attachm achment ent Control

  • ntrol Group
  • up (SD)

D) PRGF GF Group

  • up (SD)

D) 3i 26,908 (+10,873.9) 21,610 (+3,126.03) Nobel 28,768 (+9,708.53) 22,032 (+7,800.79) Straumann 23,106 (+5,047.50) 26,983(+2,318.63) Zimmer 31,509 (+8,938.61) 27,859(+8,938.61)

Ph Phase I: Ce Cell ll A Attach chme ment nt to dental l im impla lants s wi with and wit without PR PRGF Su Surface ce Bi Bioactiv ivati ation **NSSD between implant brands in either group

slide-13
SLIDE 13

RESULTS

Ph Phase II: I: Ce Cell ll At Attach chment ent to dental l im impla lants wi with and wit without PR PRGF Su Surface ce Bi Bioactiva ivati tion

  • n in

in t the Pr Presence of CS CSE

Implan plant t Surfac rface Mean ean Cellul llular ar Attachm achment ent CSE Alon

  • ne Gro

Group up (SD) D) CSE + PR PRGF GF Gr Grou

  • up

(SD) D) 3i 12,034 (+3,624.77) 11,594 (+2,321.38) Nobel 5,872 (+1,506.55) 13,319 (+4,159.53) Straumann 5,682 (+1,999.37) 13,662 (+3,773.63) Zimmer 10,968 (+2,374.82) 11,890 (+3,036.68)

**SS reduction in cellular attachment to Nobel and Straumann implants in the presence of CSE, PRGF helped rescue this reduction

slide-14
SLIDE 14

RESULTS

**The addition of PRGF in the presence of CSE lead to a SS increase in attachment of gingival fibroblasts to Nobel and Straumann Implants

slide-15
SLIDE 15

RESULTS

Control PRGF CSE CSE + PRGF

slide-16
SLIDE 16

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that in the presence of cigarette smoke extract; the overall attachment of gingival fibroblasts was reduced to various implant surfaces. When implants were placed in PRGF for 5 minutes prior to cell exposure, this reduction in cellular attachment was corrected. Within the limitations of this study, this provides a proof of concept for additional, large-scale studies to evaluate the true efficacy of implant surface bioactivation with PRGF.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

FUTURE RESEARCH

Larger studies are needed to evaluate the true impact of PRGF surface bioactivation

  • n cellular attachment, including evaluation
  • f PDL fibroblasts and osteoblasts

Future clinical studies for implant survival and incidence of peri-implant diseases

slide-18
SLIDE 18

THANK YOU

  • Dr. Thomas

as Lalli lier er

  • Dr. Pooja

ja Maney

  • Dr. Jess

ssic ica a Ow Owens

  • Dr. Angela

ela Palaiol aiologo

  • gou-Gal

Gallis lis Perio io Dental tal Assista istants nts