The Critical Role of Evidence in the Title V Block Grant Childrens - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the critical role of evidence in the title v block grant
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Critical Role of Evidence in the Title V Block Grant Childrens - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Critical Role of Evidence in the Title V Block Grant Childrens Healthy Weight CoIIN Bethesda, MD Michael D. Kogan, PhD HRSA / MCHB Happy New Year! For last year's words belong to last year's language And next year's words await another


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Critical Role of Evidence in the Title V Block Grant

Children’s Healthy Weight CoIIN Bethesda, MD Michael D. Kogan, PhD HRSA / MCHB

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Happy New Year!

For last year's words belong to last year's language And next year's words await another voice. And to make an end Is to make a beginning. T.S. Eliot

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Role of Evidence in Your Life

Consumer Reports Yelp Amazon ratings

slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Jenicek M. J Epidemiol 1997;7:187-97

Definition of Evidence-Based Public Health

  • “EBPH is the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of

current best evidence in making decisions about the care of communities and populations in the domain of health protection, disease prevention, health maintenance and improvement.” Jenicek (1997)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Best Evidence

  • Makes sense (it’s relevant)
  • Unbiased
  • Available
  • Statistically significant
  • Significant to public health
  • Leads to correct decisions
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Evidence

Statistical significance Meaningful to Public Health BOTH good best fair We have been taught to accept statistical significance. If large samples (as in many cases), we are bound to have it, even if it is not meaningful.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Key Characteristics of Evidence-Based Public Health

  • Engaging community in assessment and decision

making

  • Using data and information systematically
  • Making decisions with best available evidence
  • Applying program planning frameworks
  • Conducting sound evaluation
  • Disseminating what is learned

Jacobs JA et al. Prev Chronic Des. 201;9:110324.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

So why wasn’t evidence- based decision-making used more often?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

How were Decisions Often Made?

  • Decisions on policies and programs were sometimes

made based on:

  • Personal experience
  • What we learned in formal training
  • What we heard at a conference
  • What a funding agency required/ suggested
  • What others are doing
slide-11
SLIDE 11

What are some of the barriers to having and using more evidence, particularly in MCH?

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Limited funding for longitudinal cohort studies
  • Randomized controlled trials, often a gold

standard for establishing evidence, would be unethical for many children’s issues

  • State and local health departments may not

have access to medical and public health journals

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Emergency Hamilton Break

slide-14
SLIDE 14

I am not throwing away my shot! I am not throwing away my shot! You know, I’m just like my country, I’m young, scrappy, and hungry, And I’m not throwing away my shot!

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Why the Increased Emphasis on Evidence in Title V Programs?

  • Good stewards of taxpayer funds
  • The evidence base for many public health

interventions has been increasing in recent years

slide-16
SLIDE 16

The Increased Emphasis on Evidence and Measurement in Other Parts of MCHB

  • The Discretionary Grant Information System
  • Home Visiting and performance measurement
  • Healthy Start evaluation
  • New performance measures for other

statutory programs

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Title V Measurement Framework

ESMs

Evidence-based Strategy Measures

NPMs

National Performance Measures

NOMs

National Outcome Measures

Process Inputs/ Outputs Short, Medium Term Outcomes Long Term Outcomes Evaluation Logic Model

Kogan and Lawler 2015

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Examples

ESM: % birth hospitals that adopt safe sleep practices NPM 5: % infants placed to sleep in safe sleep positions NOM: IMR, PNMR, SUID ESM % facilities with plan to transport high risk OB patients NPM 3: % VLBW infants born in hospital with Level III+ NICU NOM: PNMR, IMR, NMR, Preterm related mortality

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Evidence-based/informed strategy measures (ESMs)

  • Key to understanding and demonstrating impact of Title V investments
  • n NPMs and longer term NOMs
  • Not just showing that NPMs/NOMs change but how Title V may

influence those changes

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

What is Meant by Evidence-informed?

  • Many strategies may not have strong evidence of

effectiveness with replicated and robust evaluation methods published in peer-reviewed journals

  • Evidence-informed is meant to convey that there is

information suggesting that a certain strategy could be effective in addressing a NPM but evaluation data are limited

  • These strategies may incorporate a theoretical model

from other effective public health practices or apply a novel approach grounded in scientific theory

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Evidence-based/informed strategy measures (ESMs)

  • Primary selection criteria
  • Measurable
  • Data available or planned to be collected
  • Quantifiable (e.g., percentage, count, yes/no)
  • Can show incremental improvement over time
  • Meaningful
  • Related to the NPM and state priority objective
  • Based or informed by evidence of effective practice
  • Involve stakeholders for feedback/buy-in

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Evidence-based/informed strategy measures (ESMs)

  • Strategies/ESMs may be refined or replaced with new ESMs
  • Strengthen the Evidence Center at Georgetown
  • More involvement from the Office of Epidemiology and Research in

Block Grant Reviews

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Are evidence-based approaches sufficient?

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • Not always
  • Sometimes MCH outcomes are

affected by issues in other areas

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Day of the Week: Delivery Route

20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Index of Occurrence

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Day of Week

Index of Occurrence of Delivery Route: Florida 2004-2006*

Singletons, 34-41 Weeks, No Previous Cesarean, Low Documented Risk, and No Medical Induction (N=263,326) Vaginal Cesarean with Labor Cesarean without Labor

Goodman, et al, 2008.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Day of the Week: Late Preterm

Index of Occurrence of Late Preterm: Florida 2004-2006*

Singletons, 34-41 Weeks, No Previous Cesarean, Low Documented Risk, and No Medical Induction (N=263,326)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Index of Occurrence

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Day of Week

Vaginal Cesarean with Labor Cesarean without Labor

Goodman, et al, 2008.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

English Country Dance Tonight!

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Evidence For…

  • Social connections help our well-being
  • Exercise helps prevent some chronic diseases
  • You will appear great-looking after your partner is spun

around a few times

  • And visa versa

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Evidence Against…

  • None

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Contact Information

Michael Kogan Office of Epidemiology and Research Maternal and Child Health Bureau Health Resources and Services Administration mkogan@hrsa.gov