The City Of Oklahoma City The City Of Oklahoma City Oklahoma - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the city of oklahoma city the city of oklahoma city
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The City Of Oklahoma City The City Of Oklahoma City Oklahoma - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The City Of Oklahoma City The City Of Oklahoma City Oklahoma Department of Transportation December 3, 2012 Agenda Introductions Project History P j t Hi t Western/Classen/Reno Area Summary of Process Summary of Process


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The City Of Oklahoma City The City Of Oklahoma City Oklahoma Department of Transportation

December 3, 2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

  • Introductions

P j t Hi t

  • Project History
  • Western/Classen/Reno Area
  • Summary of Process
  • Summary of Process
  • Alternatives
  • Evaluation Criteria
  • Alternatives Development
  • Recommendation
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Project History

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Project History

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Project History

  • January 1996 – Citizens Advisory Committee and Technical

Advisory Committee formed and the first public meeting held at d so y Co ttee o ed a d t e st pub c eet g e d at the Myriad Convention Center.

  • 1997 – 1998 – Research and studies continue.
  • December 1998 – Alternate D is announced as the preferred

December 1998 Alternate D is announced as the preferred route for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. (Included 6-lane Boulevard)

  • May 2002 – Record of Decision is signed by the Federal

May 2002 Record of Decision is signed by the Federal Highway Administration.

  • June 2002 – Land acquisition process began.
  • November 2005

Groundbreaking Ceremony

  • November 2005 – Groundbreaking Ceremony.
  • February 2012 – I-40 Crosstown open to traffic.
  • August 2012 – Public Meeting - Boulevard
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Western/Classen/Reno Area

Original ODOT Option Original ODOT Option

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Review of Western/Classen/Reno Area

O i i l ODOT O ti Original ODOT Option

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Summary of Process

Hi i C lt t Hiring Consultant

  • City contacted numerous Engineering Firms with

y g g established expertise in Traffic Engineering, Urban Planning and Roundabout Design T l h i t i d t d ith t t d

  • Telephone interviews were conducted with structured

questions

  • Shortlist of firms was developed based on Traffic

Shortlist of firms was developed based on Traffic Engineering and Planning Department input

  • Negotiations completed, contract entered and study

i iti t d i S t b 2012 initiated in September 2012

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Summary of Process

St t B k d Stantec Background

  • Stantec, founded in 1954, is a nationally recognized firm

Stantec, founded in 1954, is a nationally recognized firm in the Transportation Industry and has 190 offices throughout the North America and four internationally.

  • Stantec provides transportation services with a holistic

approach that considers not only alternative technical approach that considers not only alternative technical solutions, but also the impacts of land use patterns and economic, environmental, and community concerns. This incl des planning design and constr ction includes planning, design, and construction administration of over 100 roundabout projects.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Summary of Process

Alt ti A h Alternatives Approach

 “Boulevard” Project Area

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Summary of Process

Pl i Planning

Future Streetcar Line Future Transit Hub Proposed “Boulevard” I-40 Major Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Boulevard Existing Bus Transit Route

 Vehicular Access/ Circulation and Transit

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Summary of Process

T ffi Traffic

Approximately 800 Feet (3) North – South Movements (4) East – West Movements

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Summary of Process

L d U Land Use

Industrial Deep Deuce (DTWN Housing) DBD DTD 2

 Existing Land Use

Surplus ROW Devon Historic Bricktown CBD Existing Public Uses Existing Park/ Open Space Existing Commercial Areas DTD-2

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Summary of Process

L d U C t Sh Land Use - Core to Shore

Proposed Boulevard Mixed Use Future Public Use Wh l P k R d l t

 Proposed Land Use – Core to Shore

Proposed Park/ Open Space West Park Parkview Wheeler Park Redevelopment Bridgewater Redevelopment North Shore Mews Redevelopment Producers’ Coop Redevelopment

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Summary of Process

B l d Z Boulevard Zones

Boulevard Confluence Zone Boulevard Downtown Zone Boulevard Access Zone Boulevard Transition Zone

 Synthesis of Urban Design: Boulevard Zones

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Summary of Process

U b D i Urban Design

Boulevard Downtown Zone Boulevard Access Zone

Boulevard Confluence Zone

Key “Boulevard” Intersections

Boulevard Transition Zone

Opportunity Redevelopment Parcels Key “Boulevard” Redevelopment Parcels Critical Intersections

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Summary of Process

C ti it Connectivity

Gateway Intersection Iconic Intersection Key Activity Node Key Intersections Pedestrian Enhanced Streetscape Proposed Bike Route Bike Path/Lane/Shared Lane Bik P th L Key Pedestrian Zone Downtown Entry Corridor Bike Path or Lane Bike Path Only Key Pedestrian Route Existing Multi-Use Trail

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Summary of Process

Obj ti

  • Reinforce Core to Shore Plan

recommendations

Objectives

recommendations

  • Provide enhanced pedestrian and bicycle

access, facilities and crossings Support redevelopment opportunities and

  • Support redevelopment opportunities and

support economic growth

  • Incorporate an enhanced urban tree canopy

d t t t

Boulevard Design Obj ti

and stormwater management

  • Provide an enhanced public realm with

improved streetscape facilities

Objectives

  • Improve overall transportation efficiently and

circulation to/ from Downtown core

  • Support enhanced traffic movements and

improve system deficiencies

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Alternatives

  • Grade Separated Roadway

Grade Separated Roadway

  • Grade Separated Intersections
  • Roundabouts
  • Parkways
  • Indirect Left Turns (Superstreet Concept)
  • Limiting Access
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Alternatives

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Alternatives

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Alternatives

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Alternatives

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Alternatives

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Alternatives

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Alternatives

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Evaluation Criteria

  • ROW Impacts

ROW Impacts

  • Functionality
  • Facilitate Future Development

p

  • Elevated Roadway Remaining
  • Driver Friendly
  • Facilitates Pedestrian and Bicyclist Activity
  • Improves Existing Network Deficiencies

Add M j E t T ffi

  • Addresses Major Event Traffic
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Alternatives Development

  • Evaluation:

– 38 Concepts were reduced to 7 Alternatives 38 Concepts were reduced to 7 Alternatives

  • Additional Evaluation Criteria:

– Reno must remain as a through movement – Boulevard must remain as a through movement Western as connector to new I 40 – Western as connector to new I-40

  • Further Evaluation:

– 7 Alternatives reduced to 4 Alternatives for Detailed Traffic Analysis

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Alternatives Development

  • Detailed Traffic Analysis:

– Intersection Turning Movement Counts (2012) g ( )

  • Walker @ Reno
  • Classen @ Reno
  • Main @ Western

Sh t l @ 3 d St t

  • Shartel @ 3rd Street
  • Reno @ Robinson
  • Classen and Sheridan
  • Main and Classen

Main and Classen

  • Sheridan and Western
  • Western and Reno (including SB Exchange Avenue)
  • Klein, Exchange, SW 3 Street

– Growth

  • 1% per year (2030)
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Alternative A

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Alternative A

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Alternative A

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Alternative A

  • Alternative A - AM Peak SimTraffic Model
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Alternative B

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Alternative B

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Alternative B

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Alternative B

  • Alternative B - AM Peak SimTraffic Model
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Alternative C

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Alternative C

  • Alternative C - AM Peak SimTraffic Model
slide-40
SLIDE 40

Alternative D

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Alternative D

  • Alternative D - AM Peak VISSIM Model
slide-42
SLIDE 42

Recommendation

Alternative A:

G d i B l d W

  • Grade-separation new Boulevard over Western
  • Realignment of Classen with Western
  • Connections to Klein
  • Elimination of segments of Exchange, Classen and Western
  • Superior development opportunities

– Less retaining wall on Boulevard frontage Less retaining wall on Boulevard frontage

  • Superior pedestrian walkability

– Western Avenue Corridor F tilit i t l t i i ll l th

  • Fewer utility impacts, less retaining wall length
  • Maintain Traffic Flow
slide-43
SLIDE 43

Recommendation

Alt ti A Alternative A

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Alternative A

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Recommendation

Alt ti A Alternative A

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Recommendation

Alternative A provides:

I t ti i t th di t t ti – Integration into the surrounding transportation network – Correct design deficiencies with the adjacent streets Correct design deficiencies with the adjacent streets – Fundamentally change the image and character of the corridor and provide a greatly enhanced arrival i i t d t Okl h Cit experience into downtown Oklahoma City

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Recommendation

Alternative A provides:

S t d i ti id b i hil – Support and serve existing corridor businesses while leveraging surplus right of way to support long term redevelopment opportunities – Utilize portions of the surplus right of way to accomplish dual objectives of greening the corridor to improve image of the area improve image of the area – Compliment and enhance the downtown core

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Other Outcomes

  • Western/Classen traffic improvements
  • Increased accessibility at Klein/Boulevard
  • Increased accessibility at Klein/Boulevard
  • Exchange/Klein/3rd roundabout option
slide-49
SLIDE 49

Questions