Catheter Ablation versus Standard conventional Treatment in patients with LEft ventricular dysfunction and Atrial Fibrillation
The CASTLE-AF trial
Nassir F. Marrouche and Johannes Brachmann,
- n behalf the CASTLE AF Investigators
The CASTLE-AF trial Nassir F. Marrouche and Johannes Brachmann, on - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Catheter Ablation versus Standard conventional Treatment in patients with LEft ventricular dysfunction and Atrial Fibrillation The CASTLE-AF trial Nassir F. Marrouche and Johannes Brachmann, on behalf the CASTLE AF Investigators CASTLE-AF
EuroQoL EQ-5D
(appropriate/inappropriate)
blanking period post ablation
Ablation group (179 patients) Conventional group (184 patients)
†Age – years
64 (56-71) 64 (56-73.5) New York Heart Association class I (%) 11 11 II (%) 58 61 III (%) 29 27 IV (%) 2 1
†Left ventricular ejection fraction – %
32.5 (25.0-38.0) 31.5 (27.0-37.0) Current type of atrial fibrillation Paroxysmal (%) 30 35 Persistent (%) 41 35 Long-standing persistent (>1-year) (%) 28 30
§CRT-D implanted (%)
27 28
§ICD implanted (%)
73 72
Patients at Risk Ablation 1 7 9 1 4 1 1 1 4 7 6 5 8 2 2 Conventional 1 8 4 1 4 5 1 1 1 7 0 4 8 1 2
Ablation Conventional
HR, 0.62 (95% CI, 0.43-0.87); P=0.007 Log-rank test: P=0.006