the bloch iserles system
play

THE BLOCH-ISERLES SYSTEM Tudor S. Ratiu ematiques and Bernoulli - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

THE BLOCH-ISERLES SYSTEM Tudor S. Ratiu ematiques and Bernoulli Center Section de Math Ecole Polytechnique F ed erale de Lausanne, Switzerland tudor.ratiu@epfl.ch Joint work with A. Bloch, V. Br nz anescu, A. Iserles, J.


  1. THE BLOCH-ISERLES SYSTEM Tudor S. Ratiu ematiques and Bernoulli Center Section de Math´ Ecole Polytechnique F´ ed´ erale de Lausanne, Switzerland tudor.ratiu@epfl.ch Joint work with A. Bloch, V. Br ˆ ınz˘ anescu, A. Iserles, J. Marsden F. Gay-Balmaz Bi-Hamiltonian Systems and All That, September 27–October 1, 2011 1

  2. PLAN OF THE PRESENTATION • A new system on symmetric matrices • Lie algebra structure on the space of symmetric matrices • The Mishchenko-Fomenko free rigid bodies • Analysis of the Poisson structures • Relation to the Mischenko-Fomenko systems • Lax pair with parameter • Bi-Hamiltonian structure and integrability • Linearization of the flows Bi-Hamiltonian Systems and All That, September 27–October 1, 2011 2

  3. A NEW SYSTEM ON SYMMETRIC MATRICES Bloch and Iserles [2006] have introduced the system for X ∈ Sym( n ) X = [ X 2 , N ] = [ X, XN + NX ] , ˙ N ∈ so ( n ) constant . Since [ X 2 , N ] ∈ Sym( n ), so X (0) ∈ Sym( n ) ⇒ X ( t ) ∈ Sym( n ), ∀ t . � � X, Y � � := trace ( XY ), X, Y ∈ Sym( n ) is positive definite. Function 1 2 trace( X 2 ) = 1 2 � � X, X � � X = [ X 2 , N ] has solutions ∀ t ∈ R . ˙ conserved, compact level sets so Reasons given for studying this system: ˙ 1.) X = [ X, N ] X + X [ X, N ] a special case of a congruent flow X = A ( X ) X + XA ( X ) T , ˙ A : Sym( n ) → gl ( n, R ) smooth Solution is X ( t ) = V ( t ) X (0) V ( t ) T , where V ( t ) is the solution of � V ( t ) X (0) V ( t ) T � ˙ V ( t ) = A V ( t ) , V (0) = I. Bi-Hamiltonian Systems and All That, September 27–October 1, 2011 3

  4. So the solution is given by the action of GL( n, R ) on Sym( n ) by congruence. In particular, the signature of X ( t ) is conserved. ˙ 2.) X = [ X, XN + NX ], B ( X ) := XN + NX , is isospectral. The solution is given by the SO( n )-action on Sym( n ) by similarity: X ( t ) = Q ( t ) − 1 X (0) Q ( t ), where Q ( t ) ∈ SO( n ) is the solution of � Q ( t ) − 1 X (0) Q ( t ) � ˙ Q ( t ) = Q ( t ) B , Q (0) = I. X = [ X 2 , N ] = [ X, NX + XN ] is evolving under two ˙ So the system distinct group actions. M = [ M, Ω] = [Ω 2 , J ], where ˙ 3.) “Dual” to the SO( n ) rigid body M = J Ω + Ω J for J = diag( J 1 , . . . , J n ) with J i + J j > 0 for i � = j . 4.) Numerically: regular behavior as for an integrable system. EXAMPLE 1. 3 × 3 case with N 12 = N 23 = 1, so N invertible with ( x 12 , x kl ) for ( k, l ) = (1 , 1) , (1 , 3) , (2 , 2) , (2 , 3) , (3 , 3) with a random initial condition; Bloch-Iserles [2005]. Bi-Hamiltonian Systems and All That, September 27–October 1, 2011 4

  5. 5

  6. EXAMPLE 2. Lowest dimension degenerate case 2 p + d = 3 with p = 1 , d = 1. Let   a e f � � S A X = e b g  =:   A T c  f g c and � ¯   0 1 0 � N 0 N = − 1 0 0  =: .   0 0  0 0 0 X = [ X 2 , N ] is ˙ Then the dynamics ˙ a = − 2( ae + eb + fg ) , ˙ b = 2( ae + eb + fg ) , c = 0 , ˙ e = a 2 + f 2 − b 2 − g 2 , ˙ ˙ g = af + ge + cf, ˙ f = − ( ef + bg + gc ) . We shall see later that the Bloch-Iserles system is Lie-Poisson. The two Casimir functions are C 2 = c , so that ˙ c = 0 and − ba + g 2 a + f 2 b � � C 1 = 1 + e 2 − 2 fge = − det X 2 2 c c c c Can check directly that C 1 , C 2 are conserved. Bi-Hamiltonian Systems and All That, September 27–October 1, 2011

  7. 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 −0.1 −0.2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 trace( X ) and trace( X 2 ) are conserved. Conservation of trace( X ) is given by adding the first two equations of motion while trace( X 2 ) / 2 is the Hamiltonian. Bi-Hamiltonian Systems and All That, September 27–October 1, 2011 6

  8. Time plot of flow in the 3 × 3 degenerate case for a , b , c , e , f , g Phase plane portraits projected to the a - e and the b - e planes 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.3 0 0.2 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Bi-Hamiltonian Systems and All That, September 27–October 1, 2011 7

  9. 5.) Fundamental link with plasma phyiscs; Holm-Tronci [2009] Poisson-Vlasov system � � f, δH ˙ f + = 0 δf can where { , } can is the canonical Poisson bracket on R 2 n , f ( q , p , t ) is the plasma density, H ( f ) := 1 � � p � 2 + U f ( q , t ) � � f ( q , p , t ) d q d p 2 is the Hamiltonian and U f is the nonlinear collective potential de- � f ( q , p , t )d p . termined by ∆ U f ( q , t ) = Hamiltonian system relative to the Lie-Poisson bracket on F ( R 2 n ) � � δF δf , δG � { F, G } ( f ) = f ( q , p ) d q d p δf can What is the group? Bi-Hamiltonian Systems and All That, September 27–October 1, 2011 8

  10. Naive: all symplectic diffeomorphisms of R 2 n . But this implies that we identify Hamiltonian vector fields with their Hamiltonians, which is incorrect. The correct group is formed by contactomorphisms Cont( R 2 n +1 , θ ) := ϕ ∈ Diff( R 2 n +1 ) | ϕ ∗ θ = θ � � , θ := p · dq − d s whose Lie algebra is ∼ cont ( R 2 n +1 , θ ) := � X ∈ X ( R 2 n +1 ) | £ X θ = 0 � → θ ( X ) ∈ F ( R 2 n ) ∋ X �− θ ( X ) is independent of s ; van Hove [1951] (thesis) isomorphism Geodesic Vlasov equations: ˙ f + { f, G ⋆ f } can = 0 G ( z , z ′ ) a kernel z := ( q , p ) and ⋆ is convolution. H ( f ) = 1 f ( z ) G ( z , z ′ ) f ( z ′ )d z d z ′ = 1 �� 2 � f � 2 G 2 Bi-Hamiltonian Systems and All That, September 27–October 1, 2011 9

  11. m th statistical moment : contravariant symmetric tensor on R 2 n m X m ( f ) := 1 � R 2 n , z ⊗ m f ( z )d z ∈ � m = 0 , 1 , 2 , . . . i.e., m ! i =0 X m ( f ) i 1 ··· i m := 1 � z i 1 · · · z i m f ( z ) d z , z = ( z 1 , . . . , z n ) m ! f �→ { X m ( f ) } to the moments takes the Vlasov Lie-Poisson bracket �� m i =0 R 2 n � to the Lie-Poisson bracket on moments ST ( R 2 n ) := ⊕ ∞ m =0 � ∂F ∞ , ∂G � �� � { F, G } ( X ) = X n + m − 2 , ∂X n ∂X m n,m =0 where � , � is given by tensor contraction, the moment Lie bracket on symmetric contravariant tensors is ( n + m − 2)! � sym [ S n , S ′ � S n J − 1 S ′ m ] := − m ( n − 1)!( m − 1)! A sym is the symmetric part of the tensor A , ( AB ) hk... ij... := A ij...p B phk... Bi-Hamiltonian Systems and All That, September 27–October 1, 2011 10

  12. � � 0 1 = − J − 1 = − J T J = − 1 0 m =0 S m z ⊗ m ∈ Holm, Lysenko, Scovel [1990]: ST ( R 2 n ) ∋ { S m } �→ � ∞ F ( R 2 n ) is a Lie algebra homomorphism and [ ST m ( R 2 n ) , ST p ( R 2 n )] ⊂ ST m + p − 2 ( R 2 n ). So ST 2 ( R 2 n ) = Sym( R 2 n ) = R 2 n ∨ R 2 n subalgebra. Consider three moments in Sym( R 2 n ) ⊕ R 2 n ⊕ R . Lie-Poisson bracket   � � ∂F , ∂G { F, G } ( X 2 , X 1 , X 0 ) = Tr  X 2  ∂X 2 ∂X 2 J � � ∂F J ∂G − ∂G J ∂F + X T 1 ∂X 1 ∂X 2 ∂X 1 ∂X 2 � T � ∂F ∂G + X 0 J ∂X 1 ∂X 2 where � � � z ⊗ 2 f ( z )d z X 0 = f ( z )d z , X 1 = z f ( z )d z , X 2 = Bi-Hamiltonian Systems and All That, September 27–October 1, 2011 11

  13. The function h ( X 2 , X 1 , X 0 ) = 1 2 ) + 1 4 � X 1 � 2 + 1 2 Tr( X 2 8 X 2 0 comes from the quadratic Vlasov Hamiltonian H ( f ) = 1 G ( z , z ′ ) = 1 8+1 4 z · z ′ +1 �� f ( z ) G ( z , z ′ ) f ( z ′ )d z d z ′ 8( z · z ′ ) 2 for 2 We shall see: h is a Bloch-Iserles Hamiltonian for N of corank 1. Gay-Balmaz & Tronci [2011] have determined the underlying group. Will be discussed later. LIE ALGEBRA STRUCTURE ON SYMMETRIC MATRICES (Sym( n ) , [ , ] N ) is a Lie algebra: [ X, Y ] N := XNY − Y NX ∈ Sym( n ) N can be thought of as a Poisson tensor on R n : { f, g } N = ( ∇ f ) T N ∇ g or X h = N ∇ h Bi-Hamiltonian Systems and All That, September 27–October 1, 2011 12

  14. Each X ∈ Sym( n ) defines the quadratic Hamiltonian Q X by Q X ( z ) := 1 z ∈ R n . 2 z T Xz, Define Q := { Q X | X ∈ Sym( n ) } . Then Q : X ∈ Sym( n ) �→ Q X ∈ Q is a linear isomorphism. The Hamiltonian vector field of Q X has the form X Q X = NX and the Poisson bracket of two such quadratic functions is { Q X , Q Y } N = Q [ X,Y ] N , ∀ X, Y ∈ Sym( n ) Q : X ∈ (Sym( n ) , [ , ] N ) �→ Q X ∈ ( Q , { , } N ) Lie algebra isomorphism. Bi-Hamiltonian Systems and All That, September 27–October 1, 2011 13

  15. LH = the Lie algebra of linear Hamiltonian vector fields on R n relative to the commutator bracket of matrices X ∈ (Sym( n ) , [ · , · ] N ) �→ NX ∈ ( LH , [ · , · ]) is a Lie algebra homomorphism and if N is invertible (so n is even) it induces an isomorphism of (Sym( n ) , [ · , · ] N ) with sp ( n, N − 1 ) := { Z ∈ gl ( n ) | Z T N − 1 + N − 1 Z = 0 } ( u , v ) �→ u · N − 1 v symplectic form. The key identity in the proof is: N [ X, Y ] N = [ NX, NY ] , X, Y ∈ Sym( n ) Bi-Hamiltonian Systems and All That, September 27–October 1, 2011 14

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend