International Civil Aviation Organization
THE AVIATION SECTOR: relevant ICAO SARPS AND USOAP Audit Protocol - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
THE AVIATION SECTOR: relevant ICAO SARPS AND USOAP Audit Protocol - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
International Civil Aviation Organization PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PLANNING IN THE AVIATION SECTOR: relevant ICAO SARPS AND USOAP Audit Protocol Questions 13 th Steering Committee Meeting of COSCAP-NA 16-18 April 2013 Jeju Island,
2
Presentation Outline
PHE Impact on air travel ICAO Health Related SARPs and Guidelines USOAP PHE Protocol Questions CAPSCA Asia Pacific Project Lessons from CAPSCA AVs Action by the meeting
3
Impact on air travel
With a public health emergency of
international concern (PHEIC)
Not necessarily an infectious disease
People rushing out of an affected area
Can anything be done at this juncture at the departure airport for departing passengers?
Full flights
What measures can be implemented if a passenger falls ill?
Reflected in the arrival scene …coming away from an affected area
Possibility of implementing measures at arrival airport?
7
….and then
Empty aircraft
Basis for Action - health
Article 14, International Convention on Civil Aviation:
….and to that end contracting States will keep in close consultation with the agencies concerned with international regulations relating to sanitary measures applicable to aircraft.’
Basis for Action - health
Article 14, International Convention on Civil Aviation:
‘Each contracting State agrees to take effective measures to prevent the spread by means of air navigation of cholera, typhus (epidemic), smallpox, yellow fever, plague, and such other communicable diseases as the contracting States shall from time to time decide to designate….
11
ISSUES:
- Panic reactions
- No preparedness plans
- No Harmonization
2003: SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome)
12
2005 ----- H5N1 Avian Influenza
WHO holds global meeting: Timing & severity of next pandemic cannot be predicted Take threat seriously Take appropriate actions & mobilize resources
Start of Pandemic
Spread to rest
- f world
H5N1
Start of Pandemic Spread to rest of world
H1N1 “Swine” flu
There is no evidence of increased illness in the pig population
The Asia-Pacific region remains very sensitive to possible emergence of novel infectious agents
ICAO has been actively engaged with States and organizations
16
International: WHO / ICAO / IATA / ACI / others Regional: Regional offices of WHO, ICAO etc Other Regional Organizations State level planning: usually led by Public Health PoE: CAA, Airport, Airlines, Public Health, other stakeholders
Harmonizing global aviation sector’s preparedness through CAPSCA
- 1. Implementation of ICAO Guidelines (State, Airport & Airline
Guidelines)
- 2. Assistance visits to States and international airports
- 3. Training of personnel
- 4. Developing appropriate networks - public health authorities must
work with civil aviation authorities, airlines, airport operators, air traffic control, customs and immigration and others.
Launched Sept. 2006: Singapore
(ICAO) Collaborative Arrangement for the Prevention and Management of public health events in Civil Aviation Asia Pacific
ICAO Health Related SARPs and Guidelines
Annex 6 Annex 9 Annex 11 Annex 14 PANS -ATM
18 ICAO Annexes contain ‘SARPs’ (Standards and Recommended Practices)
- Annex 1 Personnel Licensing
- Annex 2 Rules of the Air
- Annex 3 Meteorological Service for International Air Navigation
- Annex 4 Aeronautical Charts
- Annex 5 Units of Measurement to be Used in Air and Ground Operations
- Annex 6 Operation of Aircraft *
- Annex 7 Aircraft Nationality and Registration Marks
- Annex 8 Airworthiness of Aircraft
- Annex 9 Facilitation *
- Annex 10 Aeronautical Telecommunications
- Annex 11 Air Traffic Services
- Procedures for Air Navigation Services – Air Traffic Management (PANS-ATM) *
- Annex 12 Search and Rescue
- Annex 13 Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation
- Annex 14 Aerodromes *
- Annex 15 Aeronautical Information Services
- Annex 16 Environmental Protection
- Annex 17 Security: Safeguarding International Civil Aviation Against Acts of Unlawful
- Interference
- Annex 18 The Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air
- Annex 19 Safety Management System
ICAO Health Related SARPs and Guidelines - Annex 6
20
- Annex 6 – Operation of Aircraft
- On board medical supplies
- Inclusion of a universal precaution kit
- Managing on board communicable disease
event
Note: ** IATA Cabin crew procedures for managing travelers with a communicable disease - General Guidelines for Cabin Crew: SUSPECTED COMMUNICABLE DISEASE (October, 2011)
21
- Annex 9 - Facilitation
- provides for compliance with the pertinent provisions of the International
Health Regulations (2005) of the World Health Organization (WHO)
- requires that the pilot-in-command of an aircraft shall ensure that a
suspected communicable disease is reported promptly to air traffic control for onward timely notification to public health authority, in order to facilitate provision for the presence of any special medical personnel and equipment necessary for the management of public health risks on arrival at destination aerodrome
- requires a contracting State to establish a national aviation plan in
preparation for an outbreak of a communicable disease posing a public health risk or public health emergency of international concern. The ICAO guidance in developing a national aviation plan or the ICAO “Template for a National Aviation Public Health Emergency Preparedness Plan” can be found on the ICAO CAPSCA website www.capsca.org.
ICAO Health Related SARPs and Guidelines - Annex 9
22
International Health Regulations (2005)
A global legal framework for public health security
IHR (2005) came into force
- n 15 June 2007*
Legally binding for the world’s countries that have agreed to follow the same rules to secure international health.
Purpose of the IHR (2005)
“To prevent, protect against, control and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease in ways that are commensurate with and restricted to public health risks, and which avoid unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade” – Article 2
Courtesy WHO
ICAO Health Related SARPs and Guidelines - Annex 11
24
- Annex 11 – Air Traffic Services and PANS-ATM
- Detailed procedure for utilising ATC for notifying
destination of an on board public health event
- Public health emergencies included in contingency
planning
- Doc 4444 PANS-ATM detail the procedures to be
followed upon identification of a suspected case of communicable disease by the pilot-in-command in communication with air traffic control. Additionally it details the requirement for the ATS Unit to notify the associated Public Health Authority (PHA), aircraft
- perator and the aerodrome authority.
ICAO Health Related SARPs and Guidelines - Annex 14
25
- Annex 14 – Aerodromes
- Public health emergencies included in
aerodrome emergency plan
USOAP CMA Audit protocol questions undergoing final review
- To be implemented in May 2013
- New questions on Public Health
– crew procedure to evaluate travelers. – crew reporting procedures
- Amended questions on Public Health
USOAP CMA Audit – Organization / SAAQ Profile Page
ICAO ref. Protocol question Reply Guidance for review
- f protocol question
Status of implementation Evidence/Notes/ Comments
ORG: prevention of communicable disease CC Art 14 A9 8.12 & 8.16 A37-13
Has the State identified a clear contact point at national aviation level, with identified individual(s), for policy formulation,
- perational
- rganization of
preparedness and coordination of a national plan in
- rder to respond to
a communicable disease or other public health emergency with the potential to pose a serious public health risk?
Yes No If yes, provide name and contact details
New question
The World Health Organization’s International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005) contain many Articles of relevance to aircraft and airport
- perators. The contact
point addressed by this question (or equivalent individual in the regulatory authority) should be aware of the existence of the IHR (2005) and should have a contact point in the State’s ministry of health to facilitate intersectoral collaboration
Organization protocols
- Has the State identified a clear contact point,
with identified individual(s), at national aviation level for policy formulation,
- perational organization of preparedness and
coordination of a national plan in order to respond to a communicable disease with the potential to pose a serious public health risk?
- CC Art 14; Annex 9, 8.12 & 8.16; A37-13
Aircraft Operations Protocols (1)
- Does the aircraft operations organization
ensure that the air operator has established a procedure for the crew to evaluate a traveller with a suspected communicable disease, based on the presence of a fever and certain other signs or symptoms?
- Annex 9, 8.15, Note 1; Annex 6, 6.2 and
Attachment B
International Civil Aviation Organization
How does the crew know if they have a potential case of communicable disease on board?
ICAO Annex 9 – Facilitation Appendix 1 (2007 amendment) (WHO Annex 9)
- Aircraft General Declaration
Declaration of Health
Name and seat number or function of persons
- n board with illnesses other than airsickness
- r the effects of accidents, who may be
suffering from a communicable disease:
Fever (38°C/100°F or greater) plus
- ne or more of the following signs
- r symptoms:
- Appearing obviously unwell
- Persistent coughing
- Impaired breathing
- Persistent diarrhoea
- Persistent vomiting
- Skin rash
- Bruising or bleeding without
previous injury
- Confusion of recent onset
Guidance for review of question (1)
- Review operations inspectors procedures to ensure they check air
- perators related procedures
- Confirm effective implementation by verifying that an air operator’s
- perations manual or cabin crew manual contains related
procedures
- Sample an air operator procedure to confirm effective
implementation, check if the universal precaution kit is used (not mandatory, recommendation)
- Check the procedure contains communication between the cabin
crew and the flight crew and the transmission, for States where it is required, of a General Declaration form.
Aircraft Operations Protocols (2)
- Does the aircraft operations organization
ensure that the air operator has established procedures for the pilot in command to report promptly to ATC a suspected communicable disease, in order to facilitate the presence of any special medical personnel and equipment necessary for the management of public health on arrival?
- Annex 9, 8.15; PANS ATM Doc 4444, 16.6.1
Guidance for review of question (2)
- Review operations inspectors procedures to ensure they
check air operators related procedures
- Confirm effective implementation by verifying that an air
- perator’s operations manual has procedures for reporting
suspected communicable diseases, including transmission of the following information: 1) Aircraft identification; 2) Departure aerodrome; 3) Destination aerodrome; 4) Estimated time of arrival; 5) Number of persons on board; 6) Number of suspected case(s) on board; and 7) Nature of the public health risk, if known.
Air Navigation Service Protocols (1)
- ANS 7.153 Does the State ensure that
contingency plans have been developed and implemented in the event of disruption
- r potential disruption of air traffic service
(ATS) or related supporting services?
- Annex 11, 2.30, Attachment C
Guidance for review of question
- Review mechanism established to ensure
effective implementation
- Review documented evidence of the
existence of contingency plans and how they are applied
- Ensure that contingency plans also address
natural disasters and public health emergencies.
Air Navigation Service Protocols (2)
- Does the State ensure that the ATS has established a
procedure, upon receipt of information from a pilot regarding a suspected case of communicable disease, to forward a message as soon as possible to:
- the ATS unit serving the destination/departure if
applicable
- the public health authority (PHA) or the appropriate
authority designated by the State
- the aircraft operator or its designated representative
- the aerodrome authority?
- PANS ATM Doc 4444, 16.6.2 & 16.6.3
Guidance for review of question
- Review procedure and mechanism
established to ensure the message is forwarded to the appropriate entities, especially that relating to transfer of information from the destination ATS unit to the public health authority
- Review the mechanism to ensure the
contact details of each entity is up to date and available
- During industry visit ensure the procedure is
known by the staff and contact details of the entities are available
Aerodrome Protocols
- AGA 8.291 Does the State ensure that
aerodrome operators develop emergency plans, including appropriate cooperation and coordination with other entities involved in the provision of emergency services and the development of the plans?
- Annex 14, Vol. I, 9.1.1 to 9.1.3, Rec Annex 14,
- Vol. I, 9.1.4 & 9.1.5, GM Doc 9734 Part A 2.4.7
GM Doc 9774 App. 1 4.3
Guidance for review of question
- Review evidence (regulation & manuals)
to confirm effective implementation, cooperation and coordination
- Sample aerodrome emergency plan
- Check inclusion of:
1. emergencies which may occur in the vicinity of an aerodrome 2. public health emergencies, including coordination with public health services
41
Documents to Review
- National PHE Plan – Aviation part
- Airport Emergency Plan – PHE part
- Operators/ATS Procedures for
communication of on-board cases
Plans and Procedures for Public Health Emergencies in the Aviation Sector
- WHO International Health Regulations (IHR) – 2005
- ICAO Annexes 6, 9, 11, 14 & 18 and Doc. 4444 (PANS-ATM)
National Public Health Emergency Contingency Plan (PHA) National Aviation Regulations updated with international standards related to public health (CAA) National Aviation Plan for a Public Health Emergency (CAA)
Aerodrome Emergency Plan including public health emergencies Air Traffic Services (ATS) contingency plan including public health emergencies ATS Procedures for notification of suspected public health risk on board an aircraft Aircraft Operators Procedures for suspected public health risk on board an aircraft
- Aircraft Callsign (ID)
- Dep. Aerodrome
- Dest. Aerodrome
- Est. Time Arrival
- Number of persons
- n board
- Number of susp. cases
- Nature of public
health risk
- Airport Operator
- Public Health Authority
- Other agency(ies)
NOTIFICATION OF SUSPECTED COMMUNICABLE DISEASE, OR OTHER PUBLIC HEALTH RISK, ON BOARD AN AIRCRAFT
Air Traffic Controller Aircraft Operator (or handling agency) at destination aerodrome Destination Aerodrome TWR ATC ICAO Aircraft General Declaration
- Declaration of Health
(ICAO Annex 9, Appendix 1 & IHR (2005) Annex 9) Departure Aerodrome TWR ATC
Via local procedure (Aerodrome Emergency Plan)
Voice or data link e.g. AFTN*
- Airport Operator
- Public Health
Authority
- Other agency(ies)
Via local procedure (Aerodrome Emergency Plan)
*AFTN = Aeronautical Fixed Telecommunication Network
Afghanistan China Hong Kong, China India Indonesia Macao, China Malaysia Myanmar Mongolia Nepal New Zealand** Papua New Guinea Philippines Singapore Solomon Islands Sri Lanka** Thailand Tonga Viet Nam
CAPSCA Asia Pacific Membership
20 States **2012 ***2013
Brunei Darussalam***
45
12 international airports in 10 States/Administrations in the APAC region have received CAPSCA Assistance Visits :
1.
Singapore 2. Macao 3. Hong Kong 4. Malaysia 5. Thailand 6. Philippines (*Manila , *Cebu) 7. Indonesia (*Bali , *Jakarta) 8. Jinan Airport, China (with WHO) 9. Bhutan (with WHO) 10. Kathmandu (Dec 2012) - With WHO
46
CAPSCA Aviation PHE Preparedness Assistance Visits and Lessons Learned
- The interface between the two sectors (i.e. aviation and public health) is the
most challenging issue
Insufficient communication, cooperation, coordination and collaboration between aviation and public health sectors Little participation in the development and harmonisation of each other's plans and preparedness. Public health officers often do not fully consider the special aspects of aviation when developing national preparedness plans. Likewise, aviation personnel may give insufficient attention to public health emergency planning since they concentrate primarily on prevention of aircraft accidents.
- Civil aviation regulations have not been updated with PHE SARPs
- PHEs not incorporated in AEPs
- Designated aircraft parking position inconvenient for access or operations
- Template for the Health Part of General Declaration not adopted
- AEPs should include procedures and protocols for PHEs harmonised with
national PHEP for aviation sector
- Having developed a national aviation PHE preparedness plan, it needs to be
- tested. A public health emergency simulation should be as realistic as possible
and relatively inexpensive to organise. However, in many States they are not undertaken often enough.
Common Actions required by States
— Aviation and public health authorities to have
formal framework and procedures for working together on the national PHEP for aviation
- Requires collaboration of government at
ministerial level
— Civil aviation regulations should include PHE
related SARPs
— AEPs should include procedures and protocols
for PHEs harmonised with national PHEP for aviation sector
— CAA and PHA should jointly review the AEP — Personnel need training in AEP and AEP should
be exercised through trials and simulations
— Whole of Society Approach to emergency
planning needs consideration (Note: forming
partnerships with non-traditional partners in public health issues can help advance disaster preparedness)
48
ICAO CAPSCA – Future/Next Steps
- Business continuity and communications guidance
- Expand scope of CAPSCA beyond communicable diseases to
incorporate all types of event (“all-hazards”) with the potential to become a public health emergency with an international impact
- Increase collaboration with WHO regional and country offices
- ICAO and WHO to harmonise and include respective cross
references in technical guidance and tools
- Upcoming CAPSCA AP Activities
- 6th CAPSCA AP Meeting, 22-25 April 2013, Manila
- CAPSCA Assistance Visit (Sri Lanka, 28-29 May 2013)
- 4th CAPSCA Global Coordination Meeting – Bern, Switzerland,
18 – 21 June 2013
49
Action by the meeting:
- Recommendations:
That States/Administrations : a) should prepare for the ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme (USOAP) CMA which, from 2013, will include protocol questions concerning Public Health Emergency related Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs); b) prepare and update aviation public health emergency preparedness plans in collaboration with public health authorities, and perform exercises to test such plans in compliance with related ICAO SARPs and WHO IHR (2005); c) consider become participating members of the ICAO CAPSCA Asia Pacific project, if not yet members, and accept Preparedness Assistance Visits by the ICAO CAPSCA Asia Pacific Project, by sending a letter to the ICAO APAC Regional Office.
International Civil Aviation Organization
Thank you
CAPSCA web site: