That's me BENCHMARK STATURE Badminton Basketball Cycling - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
that s me benchmark
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

That's me BENCHMARK STATURE Badminton Basketball Cycling - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sep 22, 2023 161 likes •770 views

That's me BENCHMARK STATURE Badminton Basketball Cycling Fencing Gymnastics Handball Judo Ski Soccer Taekwondo Table tennis Tennis Triathlon Volleyball SMALL TALL Quotient BENCHMARK STATURE Badminton Basketball Cycling

slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

That's me

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Badminton Basketball Gymnastics Judo Fencing Taekwondo Tennis Triathlon Volleyball Cycling

SMALL TALL

Soccer Handball Table tennis Ski

Quotient

BENCHMARK

STATURE

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Badminton Basketball Gymnastics Judo Fencing Taekwondo Tennis Triathlon Volleyball Cycling

SMALL TALL

Soccer Handball Table tennis Ski

Quotient

BENCHMARK

STATURE

slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6

6.410.705 5.674.472 Population in 2015

slide-7
SLIDE 7

321.368.864

56 x 50 x

Disadvantage

slide-8
SLIDE 8

1.367.485.388

Disadvantage

241 x 213 x

slide-9
SLIDE 9

1.367.485.388

Disadvantage ADVANTAGE

241 x 213 x

slide-10
SLIDE 10

TALENT < TIMING < TENACITY

?

16 years

2 1 3

12 years 8 years 4 years

?

slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Talent Detection

slide-13
SLIDE 13

BODY CHARACTERISTICS (4) PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE (8) MOTOR COORDINATION (4)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Physical Performance = ACTUAL PERFORMANCE

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Motor Coordination = PERFORMANCE POTENTIAL

slide-16
SLIDE 16

LUCAS JOSEPH ANNA

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Talent Detection

Primary Schools in Flanders

(Girls n= 211.687)

Sports club membership

(n= 129.225)

85% 39%

3.175

3.175

NOT DETECTED HIGH POTENTIALS

10% Highest Scores 10% Lowest Scores

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Talent Detection

Primary Schools in Flanders

(Boys n= 222.459)

Sports club membership

(n= 152.607)

3.144

NOT DETECTED HIGH POTENTIALS

86% 48%

3.144

10% Highest Scores 10% Lowest Scores

slide-19
SLIDE 19

HOW TO RECOVER HIGH POTENTIALS

3.175

girls

3.144

boys

Talent Detection

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Talent Orientation

Sophie

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Key characteristics

CORRECTLY CLASSIFIED Badminton 96% - 83% Basketball 91% - 80% Gymnastics 98% - 92% Handball 84% - 46% Judo 98% - 71% Soccer 93% - 86% Table tennis 96% - 81% Triathlon 90% - 82% Volleyball 94% - 92% Stature

Sitting Height Weight Fat% BMI Shoulder rotation Sit and reach Counter movement jup Shuttle run 10 x 5m Sprint 5m Sprint 30m Sit ups Knee Push ups Standing broad jump Endurance shuttle run KTK BB KTK JS KTK MS Dribble run Dribble Hands Dribble Feet Throwing shuttles

Generic anthropometric and performance characteristics among elite adolescent boys in nine different sports Johan Pion, Veerle Segers, Job Fransen, Gijs Debuyck, Dieter Deprez, Leen Haerens, Roel Vaeyens, Renaat Philippaerts and Matthieu Lenoir European Journal of Sports Sciences (2014)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

LUCAS JOSEPH ANNA

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Talent Orientation

Anna Joseph Lucas

Triathlon Triathlon

Triathlon Athletics Fond Swimming

Swimming Athletics Fond Swimming

Athletics Fond

Gymnastics

Fencing

Gymnastics Fencing Gymnastics

Fencing

Taekwondo Judo Taekwondo Judo

Taekwondo Judo

Tennis Badminton

Tennis Badminton

Tennis Badminton Basketball Volleyball Basketball Volleyball

Basketball Volleyball

Cycling

Soccer

Cycling Soccer

Cycling

Soccer

slide-24
SLIDE 24

LUCAS JOSEPH ANNA

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Sports Compass for ALL I Do I Like

score = 8/10 score = 3/10 score = 8/10 score = 4/10 score = 9/10 score = 8/10

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Talent Detection Talent Orientation

Skipped phase Missing link 16 years

2 1 3

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Talent Detection Talent Orientation

Skipped phase Missing link 16 years

2 1 3

12 years

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification

Fencing Gymnastics Basketball

Elite Sports Schools (N=16)

Talent Detection Talent Orientation

Skipped phase Missing link

slide-29
SLIDE 29

ANNA

slide-30
SLIDE 30

3y 4y 5y 6y Baseline 5 y later

243 35

Talent in female gymnastics: a survival analysis based upon performance characteristics Pion J, Lenoir M, Vandorpe B, Segers V (2015), Int J Sports Med 2015; 36(11): 935-940

Talent Identification

Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification

Gymnastics

slide-31
SLIDE 31

100% 0% 3 4 5 6 < 3.90 s. > 4.28 s. Sprint 20m Drop Out Ratio 67.6%

Talent in female gymnastics: a survival analysis based upon performance characteristics Pion J, Lenoir M, Vandorpe B, Segers V (2015), Int J Sports Med 2015; 36(11): 935-940

Talent Identification

Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification

Gymnastics

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Talent Identification

Predictive models reduce talent development costs in female gymnastics. Pion J, Hohmann A, Tianbiao Liu, Vandorpe B, Lenoir M, Segers V. (2016) Journal of Sports Science (Published online: 07 jun 2016) Baseline Decision Discriminant Analysis Kohonen Feature Maps Multi Layer Perceptron A.N.N & D.A A.N.N & D.A & Survival N= 138 N=92 28/35 28/35

  • 33%
slide-33
SLIDE 33

TALENT < TIMING < TENACITY

16 years

2 1 3

12 years

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Talent (De)SELECTION

Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification

Provide a broad development

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification

Combat sports Artistic Sports Team Sports

Cluster Sports Schools

Talent Detection Talent Orientation

Skipped phase Missing link

slide-36
SLIDE 36

16 years

2 1 3

12 years 8 years

Junior Talent Development

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Talent Development

Fencing Gymnastics Basketball

Talent Development Talent Development

Junior High Potentials

slide-38
SLIDE 38

JOSEPH

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Muscle Talent Scan

Non-invasive NMR scan 20 min (no radiation) Invasive Muscle biopsy (painful)

slide-40
SLIDE 40
slide-41
SLIDE 41
slide-42
SLIDE 42

Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification

Combat sports Artistic Sports Team Sports

Talent Detection Talent Orientation

Skipped phase Missing link

Talent Transfer

slide-43
SLIDE 43

16 years

2 1 3

12 years 8 years

Senior Talent Development

4 years

slide-44
SLIDE 44

LUCAS

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Positions in elite basketball based on performance characteristics

97,3% correctly classified

Positions in elite basketball based on performance characteristics Pion J, Segers V, Stautemas J, Boone J, Lenoir M,Bourgois J (submitted) Journal of Sports Science

Final adjustments

99,9% correctly classified

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Final decisions

Focus

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Gold Gold Bronze Bronze Silver Silver

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Final decisions

Focus Windows of opportunity

slide-49
SLIDE 49

4th

slide-50
SLIDE 50

6th

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Final decisions

Focus Windows of opportunity Transfer

slide-52
SLIDE 52
slide-53
SLIDE 53
slide-54
SLIDE 54

16 years

2 1 3

12 years 8 years

Talent Confirmation

4 years 1 minute

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Olympic Final (100m Butterfly)

Lane Name Country 1 Sadovnikov Aleksandr RUS 2 Phelps Michael USA 3 Li Zhuhao CHN 4 Schooling Joseph SIN 5 Le Clos Chad RSA 6 Cseh Laslo HUN 7 Shields Tom USA 8 Mettela Mehdi FRA

Succes p = 12.5% (gold) p = 37.5% (medal)

slide-56
SLIDE 56
slide-57
SLIDE 57

CAN SMALL COUNTRIES INFLUENCE THE STARTING LISTS?

SINGAPORE SINGAPORE BELGIUM

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification Talent Development Talent Selection Talent Identification

Combat sports Artistic Sports Team Sports

Talent Detection Talent Orientation

Skipped phase Missing link

Talent Transfer

slide-59
SLIDE 59
slide-60
SLIDE 60

eTALENT Lab