This webinar is organised and funded by Teva Pharmaceuticals Europe B.V. Date of Preparation: December 2018 | HQ/MTCNS/18/0009a
Thank you for joining. The webinar will begin shortly
Thank you for joining. The webinar will begin shortly This webinar - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Thank you for joining. The webinar will begin shortly This webinar is organised and funded by Teva Pharmaceuticals Europe B.V. Date of Preparation: December 2018 | HQ/MTCNS/18/0009a This webinar is organised and funded by Teva Pharmaceuticals
This webinar is organised and funded by Teva Pharmaceuticals Europe B.V. Date of Preparation: December 2018 | HQ/MTCNS/18/0009a
Thank you for joining. The webinar will begin shortly
This webinar is organised and funded by Teva Pharmaceuticals Europe B.V. Date of Preparation: November 2018 | HQ/MTCNS/18/0009a
Welcome and Introduction
Faculty
Deputy Head of the Department of Neuroimmunology and Clinical Multiple Sclerosis Research (nims) at the University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland
Chair of Neurology, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, UK
Agenda
Time (CET) Title Speaker 11:00–11:05 Welcome and introduction Sven Schippling 11:05–11:10 Understanding EDSS Sven Schippling 11:10–11:20 EDSS: Is it fit for purpose? Gavin Giovannoni 11:20–11:25 Ask the audience All 11:25–11:30 Beyond EDSS: How else can we evaluate disability progression? Sven Schippling 11:30–11:40 Exploring other clinical measures of disability: A discussion Gavin Giovannoni 11:40–11:45 Ask the audience All 11:45–11:55 How best to assess disability progression in everyday life? A patient’s perspective Patient contributor 11:55–12:00 Future perspectives Sven Schippling
Join the discussion
Participating is easy:
Technical support
§ Call our support team: +31(0)79 202 0001 § Email us at: support@republic-m.com
Understanding EDSS
Disclosures
Society, the Betty and David Koetser Foundation for Brain Research and the Myelin Repair Foundation (USA).
University of Zurich.
California, USA.
MS trials, the MS in the 21st Century and the ParadigMS initiatives.
Development Network (DDNZ), Zurich, Switzerland.
Sanofi/Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Santen, TEVA.
sent to 13,186 patients in 9 countries
employed or on long-term sick leave is calculated as a percentage of patients 65 years of age or younger
median time to early pension was 10 years for patients and 24 years for controls2
Spain Sweden Switzerland UK Netherlands Italy Germany Belgium Austria ~10 years2
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0.0/1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 6.5 7.0 8.0/9.0
EDSS score Proportion of patients ≤ 65 years of age working (%)
Adapted from 1. Kobelt G, et al. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2006;77:918–26; 2. Pfleger CC, et al. Mult Scler. 2010;16:878–82.
A consequence of increasing disability in MS: Early loss of employment1
EDSS=Expanded Disability Status Scale
What is EDSS?
disability in MS over time
0.5 unit increments
who are able to walk without any aid and is based on measures of impairment in 8 functional systems
impairment to walking
Pyramidal Cerebellar Brainstem Sensory
Bowel and bladder function
Visual function Cerebral function Other
EDSS functional systems
Adapted from https://www.mstrust.org.uk/a-z/expanded-disability-status-scale-edss; Accessed November 2018.
The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
Adapted from Kurtzke JF. Neurology 1983;33:1444–52. 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0
10.0
Normal neurological examination No disability Minimal disability Moderate disability Relatively severe disability Disability precludes full daily activities Assistance required to walk Restricted to a wheelchair Restricted to bed
Confined to bed Death
EDSS
EDSS: Is it fit for purpose?
Disclosures
consultant or speaker for, or has received research support from:
Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Synthon BV and Teva
EDSS: Is it fit for purpose?
What are the strengths of EDSS? What are the weaknesses of EDSS? What do your patients think of the EDSS? What is your experience of using EDSS? Are there any challenges associated with performing EDSS in the clinic?
Beyond EDSS: How else can we evaluate disease progression?
Importance of bodily functions as rated by patients with MS
Adapted from Heesen C, et al. Multiple Sclerosis 2008;14:988–91.
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows:
thickness and macular volume by low coherent near infrared light
pathology
Adapted from Frohman EM, et al. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2008;4:664–75.
Optical coherence tomography
Detector A Transmitted light B Reflected light Detector Semitransparent mirror splits light beam Mirror #2 Infrared light 800nm wavelengths Mirror #2 Infrared light 800nm wavelengths Retina same distance as mirror #2
Adapted from Oberwahrenbrock T, et al. Mult Scler Int. 2012;2012:530305.
OCT findings in MS patients with a history of optic neuritis
Significant difference between the groups ***: p<0.001 HC=healthy control RRMS=relapsing-remitting MS SPMS=secondary progressive MS ON=optic neuritis
Significant difference between the groups: * p<0.05; **p<0.01;***p<0.001 HC=healthy control RRMS=relapsing-remitting MS SPMS=secondary progressive MS PPMS=primary progressive MS NON=No optic neuritis
OCT findings in MS patients without a history of
Adapted from Oberwahrenbrock T, et al. Mult Scler Int. 2012;2012:530305.
Structural retinal, functional visual damage and visual QoL
Walter SD, et al. Ophthalmology 2012; Brandt AU et al. Akt Neurologie 2017
100 80 60 40 20 60 70 80 90 100 Thickness of GCL+IPL (microns) r=0.49, P<0.0001 r=0.31, P=0.0006 NEI-VFQ-25 composite (best QoL=100 points) Low-contrast 2.5% (number of letters identified correctly) 95% confidence interval from SE of Prediction for fitted line GCL+IPL
Photo courtesy of James Fujimoto, PhD
Macular RNFL OPL+PRL OPL+INL
Adapted from Martinez-Lapiscina EH, et al. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:574–84.
≤87 μm (Spectralis) or ≤88 μm (Cirrus) had double the risk of disability worsening at any time after the first and up to the 3rd year of follow up
times after the 3rd year and up to the 5th year of follow up
Retinal thickness is associated with worsening of MS
pRNFL=peripapillary
100 80 60 40 20 Cumulative % Follow-up (years) 2 3 4 5 1
175 179 206 89 96 123 29 35 45 15 22 24 278 268 272 297 290 292 Lowest pRNFL Intermediate pRNFL Highes pRNFL Number at risk Lowest vs highest tertile HR=1.65, 95% CI 1.23-2.21, p=0.001 Intermediate vs highest tertile HR=1.00, 95% CI 0.72-1.38, p=0.982 pRNFL thickness Lowest Intermediate Highest
Amato MP, et al. J Neurol. 2006;253:1054–9.
How ‘benign’ is benign MS?
Benign MS: Cognitive psychological and social aspects in a clinical cohort
– Cognitive impairment 45% – Fatigue 49% – Depression 54%
Patients failing ≥ 2 cognitive tests (%)
p<0.0001
mainly in memory, speed of information processing, attention and executive functions
Adapted from Feuillet L, et al. Mult Scler. 2007;13:124–7.
The hidden symptoms of MS: Cognitive functioning in clinically isolated syndrome
Adapted from Calabrese M, et al. Arch Neurol. 2009;66:1144–50.
Cognitive impairment and grey matter volumes
NCV=normalised neocortical grey matter volume
Cognitive parameters:
processing speed
Exploring other clinical measures of disability: A discussion
Disability assessment
Mobility tests (timed 25 foot walk) EDSS vs MSFC Coordination tests, e.g. 9-hole peg test Visual acuity tests Cognitive testing Smart phone tests Tests in clinical practice vs clinical trials
How best to assess disability progression in everyday life? A patient’s perspective
Krish Chohan
Disability progression in everyday life
Which symptom(s) are you most concerned about? Which symptom has the biggest impact on your quality of life? What are your thoughts
What are your thoughts
walk test? Which symptom has gotten progressively worse with time? What is the impact of symptoms that are less obvious/visible on your quality of life?
Future perspectives
Future perspectives
deliver personalised treatment
depression and pain
practice and trials
Personal communication of the speaker.
Neurologybytes – Register, view & share!
ECTRIMS 2018, read deep dive articles in the MS knowledge hub and watch in-depth interviews with leading MS experts
Thank you!