SLIDE 1 TH THE S STRA TRANG NGE S STATE TE OF TH OF THE LI LIBERAL L INTERNATIONAL L ORDER
Daniel W. Drezner KCIS June 2019
SLIDE 2
WH WHAT IS THE E LI LIBER ERAL L INT NTER ERNA NATIONA NAL L ORDER DER?
SLIDE 3
ME ME IN 2014 2014
SLIDE 4
ME ME IN 2019 2019
SLIDE 5
NOT T JUST T ME
SLIDE 6
WHA WHAT HA T HAPPE PPENE NED?
SLIDE 7
REV REVISION ISIONIS ISTS F S FROM OM W WIT ITHOU HOUT AN AND WI WITHIN
SLIDE 8 MY MY A ARGUME MENT NT
- U.S. structural power has been underestimated
- Revisionism from rising powers has been exaggerated
- U.S. control over structural pillars of power persist
- Revisionism from within is the real problem
- It’s not going away anytime soon
SLIDE 9 TH THINKING ABOUT T POWER
- Resource-based
- Balancing dynamics
CAPABILITIES
- Network-based
- Winner-take-all
STRUCTURES
SLIDE 10
THE STRANG NGE STATE OF THE CURRENT NT OR ORDE DER
SLIDE 11 TH THE FOUR STR TRUCTU TURAL PILLARS OF POWER
SECURITY PRODUCTION AND TRADE CREDIT AND FINANCE IDEAS AND INFORMATION
SLIDE 12 HOW TO REVI VISE A GLOBAL ORDER
- The traditional method is costly
- Concerns about premature exclusion
- Concerns about premature signaling
- Tipping point effects
SLIDE 13
TH THE OPTI TIMAL SEQUENCING
Ideas and information Production Security and finance
SLIDE 14 CHINA NA IN 2008 v 2008 vs.
2018
SLIDE 15
SLIDE 16
SLIDE 17
SLIDE 18
CHIN HINA AS RESPONSIB IBLE STAKEHO HOLDER
SLIDE 19 Ne New w institution
with ol
SLIDE 20
BACKLASH TO BELT T & ROAD
Malaysia Pakistan India
SLIDE 21
WH WHAT AC ACTUALLY WO WORRIES ES ME ME
SLIDE 22
IN REALI LITY…
SLIDE 23 REVI VISIONISM FROM WITH THIN
à “fake news,” “enemy of the people.”
wars!
rhetoric
sanctions
SLIDE 24
WHY POPUL ULISTS DISLIKE E THE E LIBER ERAL INTER ERNATIONAL ORDER ER
Technocratic Cosmopolitan Interdependent Pluralist Populist nationalism
SLIDE 25
Populism Multilateral constraints
SLIDE 26
EX EXITI TING FROM GLOBAL GOVER ERNANCE
SLIDE 27
SLIDE 28 SE SECRETARY OF F STATE TE MIKE MIKE POMP MPEO, DE DECEM EMBER ER 2018
“Multilateralism has too
end unto itself. The more treaties we sign, the safer we supposedly are. The more bureaucrats we have, the better the job gets done. Was that ever really true?”
SLIDE 29
HO HOW DID ID THIS HIS HA HAPPEN?
SLIDE 30 EROSION OF TR TRUST T IN AUTH THORITY TY AND EXPERTI TISE
Edelman Trust Barometer, 2018: “The public’s confidence in the traditional structures of American leadership is now fully undermined and has been replaced with a strong sense
disillusionment.”
SLIDE 31
RISE OF POLITI TICAL POLARIZATI TION
SLIDE 32
HO HOW W POLARIZ IZATON AFFECTS U.S. FOREIG IGN POLIC ICY
SLIDE 33 EBBING OF EXECUTI TIVE VE BRANCH CONSTR TRAINTS
CONGRESS? JUDICIARY?
SLIDE 34
AS A RESULT… T…
SLIDE 35
CA CAN TH THIS BE BE RE REVERSE SED? D?
SLIDE 36
SLIDE 37
SLIDE 38
SLIDE 39
BU BUT… T…
SLIDE 40 HO HOW ENGAGED IS IS TH THE PUBLIC?
- “When asked what the phrase
‘maintaining the liberal international order’ indicated to them, all but one of the participants in our focus group drew a blank.” Center for American Progress, “America Adrift,” May 2019
SLIDE 41
SLIDE 42
SLIDE 43 IN CONCLUSION…. ….
- The liberal international order is not dead, but it’s not
healthy either.
- The problem is not Russia or China: it’s the United States.
- Domestic political changes will make U.S. maintenance very
difficult.