TH THE S STRA TRANG NGE S STATE TE OF TH OF THE LI LIBERAL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

th the s stra trang nge s state te of th of the li
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

TH THE S STRA TRANG NGE S STATE TE OF TH OF THE LI LIBERAL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TH THE S STRA TRANG NGE S STATE TE OF TH OF THE LI LIBERAL L INTERNATIONAL L ORDER Daniel W. Drezner KCIS June 2019 WH WHAT IS THE E LI LIBER ERAL L INT NTER ERNA NATIONA NAL L ORDER DER? ME ME IN 2014 2014 ME ME IN


slide-1
SLIDE 1

TH THE S STRA TRANG NGE S STATE TE OF TH OF THE LI LIBERAL L INTERNATIONAL L ORDER

Daniel W. Drezner KCIS June 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

WH WHAT IS THE E LI LIBER ERAL L INT NTER ERNA NATIONA NAL L ORDER DER?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

ME ME IN 2014 2014

slide-4
SLIDE 4

ME ME IN 2019 2019

slide-5
SLIDE 5

NOT T JUST T ME

slide-6
SLIDE 6

WHA WHAT HA T HAPPE PPENE NED?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

REV REVISION ISIONIS ISTS F S FROM OM W WIT ITHOU HOUT AN AND WI WITHIN

slide-8
SLIDE 8

MY MY A ARGUME MENT NT

  • U.S. structural power has been underestimated
  • Revisionism from rising powers has been exaggerated
  • U.S. control over structural pillars of power persist
  • Revisionism from within is the real problem
  • It’s not going away anytime soon
slide-9
SLIDE 9

TH THINKING ABOUT T POWER

  • Resource-based
  • Balancing dynamics

CAPABILITIES

  • Network-based
  • Winner-take-all

STRUCTURES

slide-10
SLIDE 10

THE STRANG NGE STATE OF THE CURRENT NT OR ORDE DER

slide-11
SLIDE 11

TH THE FOUR STR TRUCTU TURAL PILLARS OF POWER

SECURITY PRODUCTION AND TRADE CREDIT AND FINANCE IDEAS AND INFORMATION

slide-12
SLIDE 12

HOW TO REVI VISE A GLOBAL ORDER

  • The traditional method is costly
  • Concerns about premature exclusion
  • Concerns about premature signaling
  • Tipping point effects
slide-13
SLIDE 13

TH THE OPTI TIMAL SEQUENCING

Ideas and information Production Security and finance

slide-14
SLIDE 14

CHINA NA IN 2008 v 2008 vs.

  • s. 2018

2018

slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

CHIN HINA AS RESPONSIB IBLE STAKEHO HOLDER

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Ne New w institution

  • ns con
  • nsistent wi

with ol

  • ld ideas
slide-20
SLIDE 20

BACKLASH TO BELT T & ROAD

Malaysia Pakistan India

slide-21
SLIDE 21

WH WHAT AC ACTUALLY WO WORRIES ES ME ME

slide-22
SLIDE 22

IN REALI LITY…

slide-23
SLIDE 23

REVI VISIONISM FROM WITH THIN

  • IDEAS AND INFORMATION

à “fake news,” “enemy of the people.”

  • PRODUCTION à Trade

wars!

  • SECURITY à Mostly

rhetoric

  • FINANCE à Hyper-

sanctions

slide-24
SLIDE 24

WHY POPUL ULISTS DISLIKE E THE E LIBER ERAL INTER ERNATIONAL ORDER ER

Technocratic Cosmopolitan Interdependent Pluralist Populist nationalism

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Populism Multilateral constraints

slide-26
SLIDE 26

EX EXITI TING FROM GLOBAL GOVER ERNANCE

slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28

SE SECRETARY OF F STATE TE MIKE MIKE POMP MPEO, DE DECEM EMBER ER 2018

“Multilateralism has too

  • ften become viewed as an

end unto itself. The more treaties we sign, the safer we supposedly are. The more bureaucrats we have, the better the job gets done. Was that ever really true?”

slide-29
SLIDE 29

HO HOW DID ID THIS HIS HA HAPPEN?

slide-30
SLIDE 30

EROSION OF TR TRUST T IN AUTH THORITY TY AND EXPERTI TISE

Edelman Trust Barometer, 2018: “The public’s confidence in the traditional structures of American leadership is now fully undermined and has been replaced with a strong sense

  • f fear, uncertainty and

disillusionment.”

slide-31
SLIDE 31

RISE OF POLITI TICAL POLARIZATI TION

slide-32
SLIDE 32

HO HOW W POLARIZ IZATON AFFECTS U.S. FOREIG IGN POLIC ICY

slide-33
SLIDE 33

EBBING OF EXECUTI TIVE VE BRANCH CONSTR TRAINTS

CONGRESS? JUDICIARY?

slide-34
SLIDE 34

AS A RESULT… T…

slide-35
SLIDE 35

CA CAN TH THIS BE BE RE REVERSE SED? D?

slide-36
SLIDE 36
slide-37
SLIDE 37
slide-38
SLIDE 38
slide-39
SLIDE 39

BU BUT… T…

slide-40
SLIDE 40

HO HOW ENGAGED IS IS TH THE PUBLIC?

  • “When asked what the phrase

‘maintaining the liberal international order’ indicated to them, all but one of the participants in our focus group drew a blank.” Center for American Progress, “America Adrift,” May 2019

slide-41
SLIDE 41
slide-42
SLIDE 42
slide-43
SLIDE 43

IN CONCLUSION…. ….

  • The liberal international order is not dead, but it’s not

healthy either.

  • The problem is not Russia or China: it’s the United States.
  • Domestic political changes will make U.S. maintenance very

difficult.