TESTING PRESENTATION O C T O B E R 1 5 , 2 0 1 9 T R A C E Y M - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
testing
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

TESTING PRESENTATION O C T O B E R 1 5 , 2 0 1 9 T R A C E Y M - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jul 24, 2023 468 likes •745 views

2018-19 TESTING PRESENTATION O C T O B E R 1 5 , 2 0 1 9 T R A C E Y M A R I N E L L I N I C O L E D I L K E S 2019 PARTICIPATAION RATE 5 PERFORMANCE LEVELS Level 1 Not Yet Meeting Expectations Level 2 Partially Meeting

slide-1
SLIDE 1

O C T O B E R 1 5 , 2 0 1 9 T R A C E Y M A R I N E L L I N I C O L E D I L K E S

2018-19 TESTING PRESENTATION

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2019 PARTICIPATAION RATE

slide-3
SLIDE 3

5 PERFORMANCE LEVELS

  • Level 1
  • Not Yet Meeting Expectations
  • Level 2
  • Partially Meeting Expectations
  • Level 3
  • Approaching Expectations
  • Level 4
  • Meeting Expectations
  • Level 5
  • Exceeding Expectations
slide-4
SLIDE 4

50.2 57.4 57.9 56.1 62.8 62.9 82 83 85 86 88 87 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 State Little Falls

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS COMPARISON

PERCENTAGE (%) OF STUDENTS MEETING AND EXCEEDING STANDARDS LITTLE FALLS TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS TO NEW JERSEY

slide-5
SLIDE 5

12 7 6 6 5 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19

Little Falls

Little Falls

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS COMPARISON

PERCENTAGE (%) OF STUDENTS NOT MEETING AND PARTIALLY MEETING STANDARDS LITTLE FALLS TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS

slide-6
SLIDE 6

5 15 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Little Falls State

% Not meeting or partially meeting

Little Falls State

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS COMPARISON

PERCENTAGE (%) OF STUDENTS NOT MEETING AND PARTIALLY MEETING STANDARDS LITTLE FALLS TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS TO NEW JERSEY

slide-7
SLIDE 7

MATHEMATICS COMPARISON

PERCENTAGE (%) OF STUDENTS MEETING AND EXCEEDING STANDARDS LITTLE FALLS TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS TO NEW JERSEY 55.1 51 46.8 40.6 42.1 29.3 43.3 92 75 65 58 66 66 86 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Algebra I State Little Falls

slide-8
SLIDE 8

18 14 12 11 7 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19

Little Falls

Little Falls

MATHEMATICS COMPARISON

PERCENTAGE (%) OF STUDENTS NOT MEETING AND PARTIALLY MEETING STANDARDS LITTLE FALLS TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS

slide-9
SLIDE 9

7 14 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Little Falls State

% Not meeting or partially meeting

Little Falls State

MATHEMATICS COMPARISON

PERCENTAGE (%) OF STUDENTS NOT MEETING AND PARTIALLY MEETING STANDARDS LITTLE FALLS TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS TO NEW JERSEY

slide-10
SLIDE 10

GRADE 3 PERFORMANCE LEVEL ANALYSIS

20 40 60 80 100 120

  • Gr. 3 ELA

State ELA

  • Gr. 3 Math State Math

1 14 1 8 3 14.4 13.9 13 21.4 7 23 54 42.8 51 41.2 28 7.4 42 13.9 Exceeding Meeting Approaching Partially Meeting Not Meeting Numbers represent percentage of students

slide-11
SLIDE 11

GRADE 4 PERFORMANCE LEVEL ANALYSIS

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

  • Gr. 4 ELA State ELA
  • Gr. 4

Math State Math 8.6 8.6 5 12.6 1 14.7 3 21.4 24 25.7 49 39.1 64 43.3 34 18.3 28.2 7.7 Exceeding Meeting Approaching Partially Meeting Not Meeting Numbers represent percentage of students

slide-12
SLIDE 12

GRADE 5 PERFORMANCE LEVEL ANALYSIS

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

  • Gr. 5 ELA State ELA
  • Gr. 5

Math State Math 3 7.4 6.4 5 12.5 8 20.9 7 22.2 27 25.8 54 45.6 50 35.8 31 12.3 15 11 Exceeding Meeting Approaching Partially Meeting Not Meeting Numbers represent percentage of students

slide-13
SLIDE 13

GRADE 6 PERFORMANCE LEVEL ANALYSIS

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

  • Gr. 6 ELA State ELA
  • Gr. 6

Math State Math 1 7.3 2 9.6 4 12.6 8 22.5 9 23.9 32 27.4 46 40.9 49 33.1 40 15.2 9 7.5 Exceeding Meeting Approaching Partially Meeting Not Meeting Numbers represent percentage of students

slide-14
SLIDE 14

GRADE 7 PERFORMANCE LEVEL ANALYSIS

20 40 60 80 100 120

  • Gr. 7 ELA State ELA
  • Gr. 7

Math State Math 3 8.9 1 7.6 10.5 10 21.1 9 17.8 23 29.3 27 33.1 50 33.8 60 29.7 16 8.3 Exceeding Meeting Approaching Partially Meeting Not Meeting Numbers represent percentage of students

slide-15
SLIDE 15

GRADE 8 PERFORMANCE LEVEL ANALYSIS

20 40 60 80 100 120

  • Gr. 8

ELA State ELA

  • Gr. 8

Math State Math 2 9.2 4 22 2 10.3 12 22.7 9 17.7 18 27.1 43 38 59 27.2 44 24.9 7 1 Exceeding Meeting Approaching Partially Meeting Not Meeting Numbers represent percentage of students

slide-16
SLIDE 16

ALGEBRA I PERFORMANCE LEVEL ANALYSIS

20 40 60 80 100 120 LF Alg. I State Alg. I 9.3 26 14 21.4 73 37.7 14 5.6 Exceeding Meeting Approaching Partially Meeting Not Meeting Numbers represent percentage of students

slide-17
SLIDE 17

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19

Mathematics Cohort Achievement and Growth Same students, consecutive grades % Meeting + Exceeding

slide-18
SLIDE 18

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19

Special Education Mathematics Cohort Achievement and Growth Same students, consecutive grades % Meeting + Exceeding

slide-19
SLIDE 19

MATH SUBGROUP CHART OF 5 YEAR GROWTH

48 61 64 68 71 27 33 38 45 40 41 50 48 58 61 17 67 60 50 50 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 All Students Students with Disabilities Economically Disadvantaged English Language Learners

slide-20
SLIDE 20

WHAT CHANGES WILL BE IMPLEMENTED FOR MATHEMATICS IN 2019-20…

  • Made staff changes
  • Addition of Math Intervention Specialist
  • All Math teachers will attend Conquer Math Workshops

with Nancy Shultz

  • Additional professional development and modeling by

math consultant

  • District review and analysis of evidence statements with

staff

  • Staff data binders to be used for PLCs (professional

learning communities)

  • PLCs to be held regularly with administration
  • Continue with BOOST
  • Summer math camp to be established
slide-21
SLIDE 21

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Gr 3-4 Gr 3-4-5 Gr 3-4-5-6 Gr 3-4-5- 6-7 Gr 4-5-6- 7-8 All Grades 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19

ELA Cohort Achievement and Growth Same students, consecutive grades % Meeting + Exceeding

slide-22
SLIDE 22

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Gr 3-4 Gr 3-4-5 Gr 3-4-5- 6 Gr 3-4-5- 6-7 Gr 4-5-6- 7-8 All Grades 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19

Special Education ELA Cohort Achievement and Growth Same students, consecutive grades % Meeting + Exceeding

slide-23
SLIDE 23

ELA SUBGROUP CHART OF 5 YEAR GROWTH

67 72 76 83 85 28 45 49 63 61 57 64 64 74 81 14 50 100 83 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 All Students Students with Disabilities Economically Disadvantaged English Language Learners

slide-24
SLIDE 24

WHAT CHANGES WILL BE IMPLEMENTED FOR ELA IN 2019-20…

  • District review and analysis of evidence

statements with staff

  • Staff data binders to be used for PLCs

(professional learning communities)

  • PLCs to be held regularly with administration
  • Fountas and Pinnell in grades K-2
  • Continue with Orton Gillingham in grades K-2 (3-

8 as needed)

  • Continue with BOOST
  • Summer reading camp continue
slide-25
SLIDE 25

2018-19 WIDA - 11 STUDENTS TESTED

PROFICIENCY LEVEL SCORES ARE REPORTED AS NUMBERS THAT RANGE FROM 1-6. THESE SCORES CORRESPOND TO THE SIX WIDA ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY LEVELS. A SCORE OF 1 CAN BE THOUGHT OF AS A “BEGINNER” SCORE, WHILE A 6 CAN BE THOUGHT OF AS AN “ADVANCED” SCORE IN REGARDS TO ENGLISH PROFICIENCY.

Grade Listening Speaking Reading Writing Oral Language Literacy Comprehension Overall

K 5.7 6.0 1.5 2.0 5.9 1.7 1.8 2.6 K 6.0 6.0 1.7 2.3 6.0 1.9 2.1 3.0 K 5.1 4.0 1.0 1.0 4.2 1.0 1.4 1.4 2 5.5 3.8 6.0 3.9 4.3 4.6 6.0 4.5 2 6.0 2.4 6.0 3.5 3.6 4.1 6.0 3.9 2 3.9 3.4 2.8 3.1 3.6 3.0 3.2 3.2 5 6.0 4.0 2.3 3.2 5.0 2.8 3.7 3.5 6 5.7 2.7 5.0 3.6 3.7 3.8 5.3 3.8 7 6.0 2.5 4.7 4.0 3.9 4.1 5.5 4.0 8 2.7 1.7 1.7 1.4 1.9 1.6 1.8 1.7 8 6.0 3.0 3.7 3.3 4.4 3.4 5.6 3.7

slide-26
SLIDE 26

2018-19 DLM

Subject / Number of Students Emerging Approachin g Target At Target Advanced ELA (14) 7 2 5 Math (14) 8 4 1 1 Science (3) 2 1

Emerging: Student demonstrates emerging understanding of and ability to apply content knowledge and skills represented by the Essential Elements. Approaching the Target: The student’s understanding of and ability to apply targeted content knowledge and skills represented by the Essential Elements is approaching the target. At Target: The student’s understanding of and ability to apply content knowledge and skills represented by the Essential Elements is at target. Advanced: The student demonstrates advanced understanding of and ability to apply targeted content knowledge and skills represented by the Essential Elements.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

TO WHAT DO WE ATTRIBUTE OUR MOBILITY RATE

  • Mobility rate is moving students across proficiency levels

with the goal being to move all into Proficiency Levels 4 and 5.

  • The work of DEAC and ScIP
  • Continuity and Collaboration among administrators and staff
  • Increased PLC time and standardization of PLC procedures and

expectations

  • DATA…DATA…DATA
  • Students Data analysis
  • Informing instruction
  • Informing change
  • Informing curriculum alignment
  • Inclusion and Inclusion Training
  • Access to technology