tao probing the end of the world 2
play

Tao Probing the End of the World 2 Futoshi Yagi (KIAS) Based on - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Tao Probing the End of the World 2 Futoshi Yagi (KIAS) Based on the collaboration with Hirotaka Hayashi, Sung-Soo Kim, Kimyeong Lee, Masato Taki arXiv:1504.03672, 1509.03300, 1505.04439 1 Review of the previous talk + 09 Benini


  1. Tao Probing the End of the World 2 Futoshi Yagi (KIAS) Based on the collaboration with Hirotaka Hayashi, Sung-Soo Kim, Kimyeong Lee, Masato Taki arXiv:1504.03672, 1509.03300, 1505.04439

  2. §1 Review of the previous talk + α

  3. 09’ Benini Benvenuti Tachikawa ’96 Seiberg 5 d N = 1 SU (2) N f flavor , 0 ≤ N f ≤ 7 N f = 0 N f = 1 N f = 2 N f = 3 N f = 4 N f = 5 N f = 6 N f = 7

  4. Period 6d KK mode || 5d Instanton “Tao diagram” Infinite spiral rotation, Periodic structure 5 d N = 1 SU (2) N f = 8 flavor “period” ∝ 1 1 R ∝ g 2

  5. No consistent 5-brane web diagram We cannot move all the 7-branes to infinity 5d N = 1, SU (2), N f = 9 flavor

  6. Finite diagram “Tao diagram” No diagram 5D UV fixed point 6D UV fixed point No UV fixed point Observation For 5 d N = 1 SU (2) , N f flavor 0 ≤ N f ≤ 7 N f = 8 N f ≥ 9

  7. Finite diagram: “Tao diagram”: No diagram: 5D UV fixed point 6D UV fixed point No UV fixed point Conjecture Tao diagrams for “class T ”

  8. §1 Overview of the previous talk + Conjecture §2 Evidence for the conjecture §3 Generalization §4 Conclusion Plan of this talk

  9. §2 Evidence for the conjecture

  10. Finite diagram: “Tao diagram”: No diagram: 5D UV fixed point 6D UV fixed point No UV fixed point Conjecture Tao diagrams for “class T ”

  11. … 5d N = 1, SU ( N ), N f = 2 N + 4 N = 3 N = 2 N = 4

  12. … 5d N = 1, SU ( N ), N f = 2 N + 4 N = 3 N = 2 N = 4 SU (4) , N f = 12

  13. Conjecture For 5d N = 1 SU ( N ), N f flavor, Chern-Simons level κ 6d fixed point for N f = 2 N + 4, κ = 0

  14. Bergman, Zafrir ‘14 Via “Mass deformation” Conjecture For 5d N = 1 SU ( N ), N f flavor, Chern-Simons level κ 6d fixed point for N f = 2 N + 4, κ = 0 5d fixed point for N f < 2 N + 4, κ ≤ 2 N + 4 − N f No fixed point for others

  15. Bergman, Zafrir ‘14 M5-brane probing D N+2 singularity “(D N+2 , D N+2 ) conformal matter” Del Zotto - Heckman - Tomasiello - Vafa ’14 Via “Mass deformation” Conjecture For 5d N = 1 SU ( N ), N f flavor, Chern-Simons level κ 6d fixed point for N f = 2 N + 4, κ = 0 5d fixed point for N f < 2 N + 4, κ ≤ 2 N + 4 − N f No fixed point for others

  16. 5d SU(N>3) theories [Intriligator-Morrison-Seiberg ’97] “All” UV complete theories were claimed to be classified. Comments on the previously known classification

  17. 5d SCFT 5d SU(N>3) theories [Intriligator-Morrison-Seiberg ’97] “dead” (Landau pole) Comments on the previously known classification N f = 0 , 1 , · · · , 2 N, 2 N + 1 , 2 N + 2 , 2 N + 3 , 2 N + 4 0 , 1 , · · · , 2 N { {

  18. O verlooked for 20 years 5d SU(N>3) theories [Intriligator-Morrison-Seiberg ’97] [Bergman, Zafrir ’14] Comments on the previously known classification N f = 0 , 1 , · · · , 2 N, 2 N + 1 , 2 N + 2 , 2 N + 3 , 2 N + 4 0 , 1 , · · · , 2 N 2 N + 4 { { This talk { Previously known 5d SCFT

  19. M5-brane probing D N+2 singularity Tensor branch (≒ Coulomb branch) O8 (2N+4) D8 NS5 (2N-4) D6 Brunner, Karch ’97, Hanany, Zaffaroni ’97 5 7,8,9 6d N = (1 , 0) Sp ( N − 2) gauge theory N f = 2 N + 4, w/tensor multiplet S 1

  20. 5 6 (1,-1) 7-brane (1,1) 7-brane transition Hanany-Witten + (1,-1) 7-brane = (1,1) 7-brane O7 - -plane T-duality (N=3) Diagramatic “Derivation” 7,8,9 5 (2N-4) D6 NS5 (2N+4) D8 O8 Sen ‘96 5d SU ( N ) N f = 2 N + 4

  21. Tao Probing the End of the World 2

  22. Tao Probing the End of the World 2 Tao probing the D-type singularity

  23. §3 Generalization

  24. What about still other types of Tao diagrams?

  25. ’15 Yonekura k 5d [ N + 2] − SU ( N ) − · · · − SU ( N ) − [ N + 2] k = 2 n + 1 6d Sp ( N 0 ) − SU (2 N 0 + 8) − SU (2 N 0 + 16) − · · · − SU (2 N 0 + 8( n − 1)) − [2 N 0 + 8 n ] N 0 = N − 2 n k = 2 n 6d [ A ] − SU ( N 0 ) − SU (2 N 0 + 8) − SU (2 N 0 + 16) − · · · − SU (2 N 0 + 8( n − 1)) − [2 N 0 + 8 n ] N 0 = N − 2 n − 1

  26. ’15 Zafrir ’15 Ohmori, Shimizu 5d [ N + 3] − SU ( N ) − SU ( N − 1) − SU ( N − 2) − · · · − SU (3) − SU (2) − [3] (“Tao-nization” of 5d T N ) N = 3 n : 6d SU (3) − SU (12) − · · · − SU (3 + 9( n − 1)) − [3 + 9 n ] N = 3 n + 1 : 6d SU (3) − SU (12) − · · · − SU (9 n − 6) − [9 n + 3] N = 3 n + 2 : 6d SU (0) − SU (9) − · · · − SU (9 n ) − [9 n + 9]

  27. Finite diagram: “Tao diagram”: No diagram: 5D UV fixed point 6D UV fixed point No UV fixed point … §4 Conclusion Partially checked the conjecture Tao diagrams for “class T ”

  28. Classification by Intriligator - Morrison - Seiberg Chern-Simons level VS Some quiver gauge theories have UV fixed point No UV fixed point for product gauge group Our conjecture flavor Im τ e ff ( a ) > 0 for ∀ a 5 d SU ( N ) ( N > 2) : N f ≤ 2 N κ ≤ 2 N − N f 5 d SU ( N ) : N f ≤ 2 N + 4 , κ ≤ 2 N + 4 − N f

  29. Conflict between their classification and web diagram S-dual 5d UV fixed point No UV fixed point ?! Intriligator-Morrison-Seiberg D5 NS5 D5 NS5 SU (3) N f = 6 [2] − SU (2) − SU (2) − [2]

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend