Tal Sagorsky For Decision Approval of Policy and Communications - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

tal sagorsky for decision
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Tal Sagorsky For Decision Approval of Policy and Communications - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

POLICY AND COMMUNICATIONS PROTOCOL REGARDING MISUSE OF TRUST FUNDS Tal Sagorsky For Decision Approval of Policy and Communications Protocol on Misuse of Trust Funds Board of Directors Meeting 9 10 November 2011 | Copenhagen, Denmark


slide-1
SLIDE 1

POLICY AND COMMUNICATIONS PROTOCOL REGARDING MISUSE OF TRUST FUNDS

Tal Sagorsky

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Board of Directors Meeting

9 – 10 November 2011 | Copenhagen, Denmark page 2

For Decision

Approval of Policy and Communications Protocol on Misuse of Trust Funds

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Board of Directors Meeting

9 – 10 November 2011 | Copenhagen, Denmark page 3

Background

May 2011 (Kigali): Draft Protocol presentednot approved  referred to FAC June 2011: Requested comments from FAC members (Annex 1) & questionnaire to existing and potential Supervising Entities/Implementers (Annex 2) September 2011: Presented revised policy to FACFAC members not ready to comment October 2011: Revised policy sent to Board

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Board of Directors Meeting

9 – 10 November 2011 | Copenhagen, Denmark page 4

Revisions Made (1)

Issue Before After Definition of Misuse Only Fraud and corruption use of funds for a purpose

  • ther than that for which

they were granted Roles of Partners Cast as responsibilities Adds notion of Accountability Accountability of Supervising Entities and Implementers Vaguely defined Better defined, includes minimal standards Secretariat Role Only communications focal point Addition of supporting Supervising Entity/Implementer in fulfilling fiduciary duties Board Role Not Mentioned Added

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Board of Directors Meeting

9 – 10 November 2011 | Copenhagen, Denmark page 5

Revisions (2)

Issue Before After

Communications Principle Confidentiality emphasized First Principle added: transparency Confidentiality provisions Included reputational risk and donor confidence Reputational risk and donor confidence deleted Public Disclosure Provisions Decision in discretion of Chair and Head Added considerations Confidential Email List Only Board Added other donors, with confidentiality undertaking Verbal Report Not mentioned Required from Head at every meeting

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Board of Directors Meeting

9 – 10 November 2011 | Copenhagen, Denmark page 6

Why Do We Need a Policy?

MISUSE

✗ Diversion of funds from students ✗ A major cause of poverty ✗ Leads to loss of donor confidence  affects fundraising efforts

= ZERO TOLERANCE

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Board of Directors Meeting

9 – 10 November 2011 | Copenhagen, Denmark page 7

Reminder: Flow of Funds

Donors contribute

Global Partnership for Education Fund (Trustee)

SE Multilateral included in Board constituency

Multilateral or Bilateral Acting as Implementer

SE Bilateral included in Board constituency

Contribution Agreements (Donor to Trustee) Transfer Agreements (Trustee to SE/Implementer) Grant Agreements: use own policies and procedures

Developing Country Government

Developing Country Government

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Board of Directors Meeting

9 – 10 November 2011 | Copenhagen, Denmark page 8

untability of Each Partner

  • Establish robust financial management &procurement systems with

strong internal controls

  • Communicate any findings of Misuse to the Supervising Entity

Developing Country Partners

  • Fiduciary duties, due diligence of developing country partners (next

slide)

Supervising Entities and Implementers

  • Monitor implementation of education plan
  • Communicate with each other and the Secretariat regarding misuse

LEG members

  • Focal point for communications
  • Support SEs in fulfilling fiduciary duties (new)

Secretariat

  • Approve allocations, Supervising Entities and Implementers
  • Fulfill duties in compliance with COI policies and minimization of risk

Board (New)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Board of Directors Meeting

9 – 10 November 2011 | Copenhagen, Denmark page 9

Accountability of Supervising Entities and Implementers

Supervising Entities: due diligence of developing country partners Minimal Requirements for SE and Implementers:

  • Familiarity impropriety types & alert for indications of irregularity
  • Ensure strong risk management & procedures to prevent Misuse at

every step of the grant life cycle

  • have regular, open & immediate communication with the LEG and

Secretariat regarding any suspicion or evidence of Misuse

  • recover and reimburse misappropriated funds
  • ensure compliance with Board decisions
  • Encourage pursuit of perpetrators under appropriate legal

mechanism

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Board of Directors Meeting

9 – 10 November 2011 | Copenhagen, Denmark page 10

Actions Taken by Secretariat

Improving communication with SEs & Implementers Strengthening Country Support Team: additional staff, greater engagement countries Training staff on fraud prevention and detection Improving communications with Board re suspected misuse Visiting countries where Misuse suspected, acting as “honest broker” with government, civil society, donors Monitoring the findings of misuse by other “global funds” and agencies to focus on high-risk countries

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Board of Directors Meeting

9 – 10 November 2011 | Copenhagen, Denmark page 11

Trust Fund documents requirements, etc.

  • use their framework to manage Misuse in relation to Trust Funds
  • provide prompt information regarding suspicion or evidence of

Misuse of Trust Funds to the Secretariat

  • comply with the decisions of the Board

Transfer Agreements Trustee to Supervising Entities and Implementers

  • anti-fraud provisions
  • obligations to comply with the decisions of the Board
  • obligations to provide prompt communication to Supervising Entity

re Misuse

Grant Agreements Supervising Entities to Developing Country Partners

  • Prevent retaliatory actions against staff

Whistleblowing Protections

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Board of Directors Meeting

9 – 10 November 2011 | Copenhagen, Denmark page 12

Balancing Act: Information on misuse is sensitive information

Transparency Confidentiality

Risk of Legal Actions Protect Safety of Whistleblowers Protect investigation Protects taxpayer $£€¥ Reputation: zero tolerance Deterrence of future fraud

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Board of Directors Meeting

9 – 10 November 2011 | Copenhagen, Denmark page 13

Communications with the Board

Information Sent to Secretariat Head

  • Supervising Entities,

Implementers and others should direct information to Secretariat Head

Head Shares with Chair

  • Consider how/what to

share with Board

Head/Chair Share with Confidential Email List

  • May lead to

public disclosure where appropriate

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Board of Directors Meeting

9 – 10 November 2011 | Copenhagen, Denmark page 14

Decision Requested

BOD/2011/11-XX – Policy and Communications Protocol on Misuse of Trust Funds: The Board of Directors approves the Policy and Communications Protocol on Misuse of Trust Funds, attached as Annex 3 to BOD/2011/11—DOC 08.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Board of Directors Meeting

9 – 10 November 2011 | Copenhagen, Denmark page 15

Next Steps

Post on website Email to Partnership Disseminate confidentiality undertakings Create new Misuse email list

slide-16
SLIDE 16