tackling astrophysical uncertainties in dark matter
play

Tackling astrophysical uncertainties in dark matter direct detection - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Tackling astrophysical uncertainties in dark matter direct detection experiments Bradley J. Kavanagh ppxbk2@nottingham.ac.uk Particle Theory Group University of Nottingham UKCosmo, 12 March 2013 [arXiv:1207.2039] (BJK, AM Green)


  1. Tackling astrophysical uncertainties in dark matter direct detection experiments Bradley J. Kavanagh ppxbk2@nottingham.ac.uk Particle Theory Group University of Nottingham UKCosmo, 12 March 2013 [arXiv:1207.2039] (BJK, AM Green) [arXiv:1303.XXXX] (BJK, AM Green) BJ Kavanagh (Nottingham) Dark Matter Detection UKCosmo, 12 March 2013 1 / 10

  2. The Search for Dark Matter (DM) ◮ Overwhelming evidence for DM on all scales ◮ Weakly Interacting Massive Particle (WIMP) is a well-motivated and popular candidate ◮ Many experiments aiming to detect WIMP-nucleus interactions in the lab - Direct Detection ◮ Detection would allow us to probe DM astrophysics, as well as particle physics beyond the Standard Model BJ Kavanagh (Nottingham) Dark Matter Detection UKCosmo, 12 March 2013 2 / 10

  3. DM Direct Detection ◮ Aim to measure recoil energies ( O ( keV )) caused by DM-nucleus interactions in dedicated low background detectors ◮ Rate of nuclear recoils R per unit recoil energy E R given by: d R σ p × A 2 F 2 ( E R ) = × ρ 0 η ( v min ) 2 m χ µ 2 d E R � �� � � �� � χ p Nuclear physics Astrophysics � �� � Particle physics ◮ DM speed distribution f ( v ) enters in � ∞ f ( v ) η ( v min ) = d v v v min where v min = v min ( E R , m χ ) is the minimum WIMP speed required to excite a recoil of energy E R BJ Kavanagh (Nottingham) Dark Matter Detection UKCosmo, 12 March 2013 3 / 10

  4. DM Speed Distribution ◮ Fraction of DM particles with speed v → v + d v in the lab frame ◮ Depends on growth history of Milky Way Halo ◮ Typically assume equilibrated Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution (Standard Halo Model) ◮ However, could be dominated by tidal stream, dark disk, debris flow, ... 0.02 SHM Dark disk 0.015 Stream f(v) / km −1 s 1 0.01 0.005 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 v / km s −1 BJ Kavanagh (Nottingham) Dark Matter Detection UKCosmo, 12 March 2013 4 / 10

  5. Parameter Reconstruction ◮ Pick values for m χ , σ p and choose a form for f ( v ) ◮ Generate mock data for a set of proposed experiments ◮ Attempt to reconstruct parameters by exploring the posterior likelihood using MultiNest ◮ Here we generate data using a stream distribution but assume a Standard Halo Model in the reconstruction: −4 10 σ p / (10 −40 cm 2 ) −5 10 1 2 3 10 10 10 m χ / (GeV) BJ Kavanagh (Nottingham) Dark Matter Detection UKCosmo, 12 March 2013 5 / 10

  6. Previous Work ◮ Many attempts at dealing with these astrophysical uncertainties, usually by parametrising f ( v ) and including these parameters in the fit, e.g. ◮ parametrise in terms of galactic parameters (scale radius, inner slope ...) [Pato et al. - arXiv:1211.7063] ◮ parametrise as a series of constant bins in speed [Peter - arXiv:1103.5145]... ◮ ...or as a series of constant bins in momentum [BJK & Green - arXiv:1207.2039] ◮ and others... ◮ So far attempts at a model independent approach have either been too narrow or have failed BJ Kavanagh (Nottingham) Dark Matter Detection UKCosmo, 12 March 2013 6 / 10

  7. A New Parametrisation ◮ Motivated to consider functions which are strictly positive and decay at large v ◮ Start with a ‘Maxwell-Boltzmann’-type function, with corrections to the exponent - can fit many shapes of f ( v ) ◮ Write f ( v ) = v 2 exp � − a 0 − a 1 v − a 2 v 2 − ... � ◮ With O (100) events, only need a few a i ’s - say 5 ◮ Fit m χ , σ p and set of { a i } BJ Kavanagh (Nottingham) Dark Matter Detection UKCosmo, 12 March 2013 7 / 10

  8. Results Incorrect assumption True ‘stream’ distribution New method Reconstructed 1- σ interval −4 10 σ p / (10 −40 cm 2 ) −5 10 1 2 3 10 10 10 m χ / (GeV) Works well for a range of masses, cross-sections and both simple and complex distribution functions (with only a few caveats) BJ Kavanagh (Nottingham) Dark Matter Detection UKCosmo, 12 March 2013 8 / 10

  9. What does this mean? ◮ If a signal is observed in DM detectors - we can now reliably recover its mass ◮ A new handle on structure formation ( hot vs cold ) and for probing BSM physics ◮ Making few assumptions, we can measure the DM distribution function - WIMP Astronomy ◮ Probe DM distribution on scales inaccessible to N-body simulations or other methods ◮ Probe growth and merger history of Milky Way halo ◮ What next? Extend the method to directional DM detection - can we measure the full 3-D velocity distribution? BJ Kavanagh (Nottingham) Dark Matter Detection UKCosmo, 12 March 2013 9 / 10

  10. Thank You BJ Kavanagh (Nottingham) Dark Matter Detection UKCosmo, 12 March 2013 10 / 10

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend