Systemic Risk: What is it? Are Insurance Firms Systemically - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

systemic risk what is it are insurance firms systemically
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Systemic Risk: What is it? Are Insurance Firms Systemically - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Systemic Risk: What is it? Are Insurance Firms Systemically Important? Viral V Acharya (NYU-Stern, CEPR and NBER) What is system ic risk? Micro-prudential view: Contagion Failure of an entity leads to distress or failures of others


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Systemic Risk: What is it? Are Insurance Firms Systemically Important?

Viral V Acharya (NYU-Stern, CEPR and NBER)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

What is “system ic risk”?

 Micro-prudential view: Contagion

 Failure of an entity leads to distress or failures of others  Too-big-to-fail institutions  Regulate TBTF better  The Dodd-Frank Act is primarily the “micro-prudential view”  Systemically Important Financial Institutions (SIFIs)  Regulate SIFIs better

slide-3
SLIDE 3

What is “system ic risk”?

 Macro-prudential view:

(Diamond-Dybvig + Shleifer-Vishny)

 Common factor exposures  Runs  Several entities fail together as  Short-term creditors demand immediacy  Against long-term assets  But the system has limited capacity (capital?) to provide immediacy  The micro-prudential and macro-prudential views are not

necessarily mutually exclusive

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Two views lead to different reform s

  • I. Micro-prudential view:

 Design “top-down” bankruptcy procedure for failing SIFI  Example: Dodd-Frank Act, contingent capital, bail-in

  • II. Macro-prudential view:

 Design “bottom-up” resolution at market-level for

systemically important assets & liabilities (SIALs)

 Example: Derivatives/ Repo clearinghouses, LOLR

slide-5
SLIDE 5

System ic risk need NOT be about SIFIs

 There have indeed been runs on SIFIs in the past  But a number of runs in the 2007-09 crisis were also runs

  • n relatively smaller shadow banks (such as hedge funds,

conduits and SIVs and money-market funds)

 Failures of collection of smaller lenders has historically

led to significant crises such as S&L crisis in the United States and the current Spanish woes due to Cajas

slide-6
SLIDE 6

ABCP “run” (Acharya, Schnabl and Suarez)

ABCP outstanding

500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1/ 7/ 2004 1/ 7/ 2005 1/ 7/ 2006 1/ 7/ 2007 1/ 7/ 2008 1/ 7/ 2009 Billion

slide-7
SLIDE 7

ABCP “run” (Acharya, Schnabl and Suarez)

  • 20

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Basis points

BNP Paribas announces that it cannot value mortgage assets in some money funds (Aug 9, 2007)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

ABCP “run” (Acharya, Schnabl and Suarez)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Im m ediacy: a source of system ic risk

 Prior to fiat money, there was often a shortage of money

 Solution: Commercial bank clearinghouses  Suspend conversion of immediacy, adopt joint liability

 Problem: If there isn’t adequate capital with joint liability

providers, runs may not get stemmed

 In extremis, bank runs can morph into sovereign crisis (Ireland)

 Modern-day runs: Resolution difficulties stem from

inability to suspend conversion of immediacy

 LOLR takes on significant asset risk while providing immediacy  Safe-harbor provisions may require systemic exception

slide-10
SLIDE 10

What about contagion?

 Macro-prudential view: Contagion can amplify problems

provided rest of the system cannot

 Withstand the distress or failures of others, e.g., because it is under-

capitalized too due to a common shock (AIG FP failure)

 Re-intermediate the liquidated assets of distressed firms (Lehman)  Contagion can arise w ithout inter-connections  Information contagion

 Learning about common assets (Great Depression “runs”)  Learning about regulatory policy (Greece, Cyprus interventions)

 Flow of funds or re-intermediation contagion

 Insurance firms withdraw from bonds inducing LC runs on banks  Corporations draw down money-market deposits affecting banks…

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Ticker Asset SRISK GICS Subindustry BAC Bank Of America 93066.6867 Other Diversified Financial Services JPM JP Morgan Chase 79993.74914 Other Diversified Financial Services C Citigroup 57388.01611 Other Diversified Financial Services MS Morgan Stanley 37679.0014 Investment Banking & Brokerage GS Goldman Sachs 33573.11695 Investment Banking & Brokerage Ticker Asset SRISK GICS Subindustry MET MetLife 40686.07964 Life & Health Insurance PRU Prudential Financial 40289.71961 Life & Health Insurance HIG Hartford Financial Services 16146.21157 Multi‐line Insurance LNC Lincoln National Corp 13665.86848 Life & Health Insurance PFG Principal Financial Group 9738.121129 Life & Health Insurance Top 5 Bank and Bank Holding Companies Top 5 Insurers

slide-12
SLIDE 12

NYU Stern Systemic Risk Rankings at http://vlab.stern.nyu.edu/

slide-13
SLIDE 13

10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 1/ 3/ 2006 1/ 3/ 2007 1/ 3/ 2008 1/ 3/ 2009 1/ 3/ 2010 1/ 3/ 2011 1/ 3/ 2012 1/ 3/ 2013 HIG LNC MET PFG PRU

SRISK: Capital shortfall in case of 40% market correction

slide-14
SLIDE 14

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 1/ 3/ 2006 1/ 3/ 2007 1/ 3/ 2008 1/ 3/ 2009 1/ 3/ 2010 1/ 3/ 2011 1/ 3/ 2012 1/ 3/ 2013 HIG LNC MET PFG PRU

MES: %Loss of market value in case of 2% market correction

slide-15
SLIDE 15

50 100 150 200 250 1/ 3/ 2006 1/ 3/ 2007 1/ 3/ 2008 1/ 3/ 2009 1/ 3/ 2010 1/ 3/ 2011 1/ 3/ 2012 1/ 3/ 2013 HIG LNC MET PFG PRU

LVG: (Book Liabilities + Mkt Equity) / Mkt Equity

slide-16
SLIDE 16

20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000 180000 1/ 3/ 2006 1/ 3/ 2007 1/ 3/ 2008 1/ 3/ 2009 1/ 3/ 2010 1/ 3/ 2011 1/ 3/ 2012 1/ 3/ 2013 BAC C GS JPM MS

SRISK: Capital shortfall in case of 40% market correction

slide-17
SLIDE 17

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 1/ 3/ 2006 1/ 3/ 2007 1/ 3/ 2008 1/ 3/ 2009 1/ 3/ 2010 1/ 3/ 2011 1/ 3/ 2012 1/ 3/ 2013 BAC C GS JPM MS

MES: %Loss of market value in case of 2% market correction

slide-18
SLIDE 18

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 1/ 3/ 2006 1/ 3/ 2007 1/ 3/ 2008 1/ 3/ 2009 1/ 3/ 2010 1/ 3/ 2011 1/ 3/ 2012 1/ 3/ 2013 BAC C GS JPM MS

MES: %Loss of market value in case of 2% market correction

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Open questions (for Insurance Firm s!)

 Why did market values of insurance firms collapse so

much in Fall of 2008?

 Why are downside risk or beta estimates of insurance

firms as high as those of banks and bank holding companies?

 Why were insurance firms owning banks, making

guaranteed financial products, selling CDS, etc.?

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Open questions (for Insurance Firm s!)

 If insurance firm liabilities are more stable, won’t they

take advantage of that and keep less equity on balance- sheet a priori?

 When market value of insurance firms collapse, won’t

that affect their corporate bond market purchases and potentially also result in fire sales, policy lapses, etc.?

 Won’t lack of corporate bond market access cause firms

to draw down bank lines of credit causing “bank runs”?