swims 18 pfs 2 and ultimate k
play

SWIMS-18, PFS 2 , and ULTIMATE-K Tadayuki Kodama (Tohoku Univ.) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NIR Wide-Field Workshop NAOJ Mitaka 2019/7/1-2 SWIMS-18, PFS 2 , and ULTIMATE-K Tadayuki Kodama (Tohoku Univ.) HSC-HSC/PFS-PFS, Mahalo-Subaru, SWIMS-18, and ULTIMATE-Subaru teams A galaxy cluster RXJ0152 at z=0.83 (Subaru/Suprime-Cam)


  1. NIR Wide-Field Workshop � NAOJ Mitaka � 2019/7/1-2 � SWIMS-18, PFS 2 , and ULTIMATE-K Tadayuki Kodama (Tohoku Univ.) HSC-HSC/PFS-PFS, Mahalo-Subaru, SWIMS-18, and ULTIMATE-Subaru teams A galaxy cluster RXJ0152 at z=0.83 (Subaru/Suprime-Cam)

  2. What accelerates/quenches star formation since z~5 ? SWIMS-18, ULTIMATE-K HSC 2 , PFS 2 Redshift (z) Star formation rate density Peaking Quenching Accelerating First galaxies Morphology of galaxies established Formation of galaxy clusters Reionization Formation of the Earth 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Cosmic age (Gyr)

  3. Red fraction Quenching mechanisms Mass and Environmental Q. Mass: AGN Q., Halo Q., Morphological Q. Overdensity Environ.: RP strip., Tidal strip., Mergers When does this relation first appear? How does it evolve with cosmic time? What are the relative importance of the above physical processes as a func. of time, mass and environ.? Mass SDSS (z~0), Peng et al. (2010)

  4. HSC, PFS, ULTIMATE, SWIMS are powerful to probe LSSs 1.3 � = 75 Mpc (z=1), 100 Mpc (z=1.5), 118 Mpc (z=2) in co-moving CL0016 cluster (z=0.55) Millenium Simulation (Tanaka, M. et al. 2009) (Springel et al. 2005) Suprime-Cam 7-pointings ULTIMATE SWIMS PFS HSC LSS around the richest cluster at z=0.55 ~1,200 redshifts from spectroscopy red are cluster members, while blue are non-members

  5. S W I M S-18 SWIMS is a new wide-field, two-band-simultaneous NIR camera and spectrograph for TAO 6.5m telescope in Chile, and saw the first light at Subaru in Hawaii in 2018. Super multi- λ (NIR) imaging survey of the Cosmic Noon over a 1-deg 2 unbiased field + some high density regions on Subaru (8.2m; 2018-2022) and TAO (6.5m; 2022-) • 6 Narrow-Band Filters (NBF) SFR limited sample and AGNs at z=0.9, 1.5, 2.3, 3.3. H α & [OIII] dual emitters with pair NBFs. • 9 Medium-Band Filters (MBF) Stellar mass limited sample at 1<z<5 with improved phot-z ( Δz/(1+z) ~ 0.01 ). • 3 Broad-Band Filters (BBF) à Tracking the cosmic histories of “mass assembly” and “star formation/AGN activities” back to z~3-5.

  6. Six Narrow-band filters (NBF) SFR-limited sample at z=0.9, 1.5, 2.3, and 3.3 4C65.22(z=1.52) 4C65.22(z=1.52) Dual emitters ([OIII] & Hα) with 4 pair NBFs à Redshift identification, SFR, Ionization states

  7. [OIII]/H α ratio à Ionization State SWIMS-18 can do this only by imaging ! High-z > Low-z Both higher sSFR and � og ([OIII]/Hα) lower metallicity are contributing to much higher ionization states of high-z SF galaxies. (Kewley et al. 2013) SDSS cluster (stacked) (Dust extinction will be (z~2) cluster corrected with SED) (Hβ à Hα conversion) field Shimakawa et al. (2014b)

  8. Nine Medium-band filters (MBF) M*-limited sample of galaxies up to z~5 BB filters FWHM λ λ c ( µ m) ( µ m) ( µ m) J 1.17–1.33 1.25 0.16 H 1.48–1.78 1.63 0.30 K s 1.99–2.30 2.15 0.30 Improved measurements of phot-z and SED-based Av. Will open a new window to 4<z<5 with K1,K2,K3 ! J1,J2,J3,Hs,Hl, Ks ZFOURGE (Magellan) SWIMS-18 MBFs

  9. Hunting High-z Monsters ! Massive quiescent galaxies with strong Balmer abs. lines at z~4 ZF-COSMOS-20115 at z=3.717, 1.5 � 10 11 M � , K(AB) = 22.4 Glazebrook et al. (2017; Nature) See also Schreiber+’18 for more (24) samples age ~ 0.7Gyr, � SF < 0.25Gyr Keck/MOSFIRE: 4 and 7 hours in the H and K band, respectively. We can extend this survey to z~5 with deep MB imaging with SWIMS-18/ULTIMATE The existence of such massive high-z monsters, and/or their old stellar populations, can put strong constraints on cosmology & galaxy formation theory.

  10. Some numbers: We will get to 23.8-24.1 AB in 1 hour exposure (5σ) each for K1, K2, and K3. à 1 deg^2 is 7x7 pointings with SWIMS/TAO in 15-30 nights (depending on the # of detectors). 15 high-z (z~4) quiescent galaxies in Straatman+ with K<24 in 360 arcmin^2. à 150 in 1 deg^2. Double that for massive SFGs. ~ 40 really bright ones like ZF-20115! If we assume evolution from z=4 to z=5, ie. extrapolation of Straatman+, this could be a factor of 3 less. Straatman et al. (2014), ZFourge survey

  11. GOLDRUSH Proto-clusters at 2<z<6 with LBGs over 1,400 deg 2 (HSC-SSP-W) 179 proto-clusters at z~3.8 over 121 deg 2 using HSC-SSP-Wide ( g -dropouts) Toshikawa et al. (2017), Onoue et al. (2017) ULTIMATE will provide rest-frame optical view of these proto-clusters (e.g. M*, SFR)

  12. ULTIMATE-Subaru Why 0.2” ? 0.2” ⇔ 1.5kpc at 1<z<3 (~ 1/3-1/2 Re for SFGs) For compact QGs ⇒ Sensitivity gain (~2x)! • For extended SFGs ⇒ Anatomy (bulge & clumps)! • A star-forming galaxy at z~2 Seeing limited (~0.5”) w/ GLAO (~0.2”)

  13. G alaxy A natomy with N arrow- B and A O imaging with Subaru ( GANBA ) Spatially resolved M* and SFR distributions at z~2 w/AO Stacked images (Ks and NB) with FWHM=0.15-0.25” by IRCS+AO/Subaru Low-mass, M* High-mass, M* High-mass, SFR Low-mass, SFR Suzuki et al. (2019) Radial profiles sSFR SFR M* 1arcmin 2 (IRCS) à *Inside-out SF/quenching rather than compaction in massive galaxies? 200 arcmin 2 (ULTIMATE) *No clear environmental dependence in radial profiles?

  14. ULTIMATE-K survey NB/MB/K s wide-field imaging with GLAO+WFI (14’) over 2deg 2 • 0.75 mag deeper (point-source), 8 times wider FoV than the current instrument MOIRCS, and 0.2” spatial resolution. • NB survey with 0.2” seeing (Extension of MAHALO/GANBA) Propagation/quenching of SF in galaxies with H α ,[OIII] map for 1,000s of SFGs at 2<z<3.7 with a 1.6kpc resolution. • MB survey (K1, K2, K3 (+Ks)) (Extension of SWIMS-18) 10 hrs exp. (26mag; 5 σ )/FoV/band = 640hrs/deg 2 for 4 filters Mass assembly history back to z~5 with Balmer break galaxies at 4<z<5 of ~4,000 / deg 2 (?) • WFIRST/EUCLID only up to 2µm. JWST has much narrower FoV ( 2.2’ � 2.2’ � 2 = 1/20 ULTIMATE ).

  15. Mass assembly history of galaxies: Stellar mass functions back to z~5 ULTRA-VISTA (COSMOS) Muzzin et al. (2013) 100K galaxies over a 1.62 deg 2 field down to K s =23.4 (AB) z=4 ? z=4 ? z=5 ? z=5 ? Down to 1 (2) x 10 10 M � back to z~4 (5) with ULTIMATE K1-K3 imaging (5hr/band)

  16. Size and profile evolution of massive galaxies back to z~5 van Dokkum et al. (2010) van der Wel et al. (2014) M stars = 3 � 10 11 M � (z=0) Massive galaxies’ radial profiles z~5 Star forming natural seeing Quiescent (0.5” in diameter) r=0.1” 0.2” diameter at K (ULTIMATE) à r~0.75kpc at z=2-3

  17. (Long) -II WSECOND WISH was a planned 1.5-m class space telescope mission for 1-5μm with a FoV of 0.24 sq. deg. (PI. Yamada T. [JAXA]) Now dedicated to 2~5μm, and coordinated with WFIRST (1~2μm)!? JAXA small-class mission (~2030)? 1.2m? Highly complementary to JWST in FoV ! Mass limited sample ( > 10 9 M � ) back to z~10 • Phot-z with WISH (2-5µm) + WFIRST (1-2µm) + HSC (<1µm) • SFR limited sample back to z~7 H α /[OIII] emitters with NB filters or grism spec. (2-5µm) à “Mass assembly history” on LSS-galaxy scales all the way from z=10 to the present-day.

  18. WISH can detect building blocks of galaxies out to z~8 WISH Ultra Deep Survey (UDS) M stars = 10 8 M � (z=1) ~ 10 9 M � (z=8) 10 10 M � 10 9 M � 10-20 hours/band Based on Kodama et al.’s (1999) model

  19. Hyb ybrid Sea earc rch f for r Clu lusters with HSC HSC-SSP (Deep and Ultra-Deep layers; 27 deg 2 ) Hybrid cluster finder Two galaxy populations blue cloud (narrow-band) red sequence green valley blue cloud red sequence (broad-band color) The conventional red seq. technique alone will bias your sample of galaxy clusters. HSC 2 is a large, systematic cluster survey with little selection bias to z~1.7

  20. Red sequence galaxies at 0.8<z<0.9 Panoramic Large scale structures! Yamamoto, N., TK, et al., in prep.

  21. [OIII] line emitters at 0.82<z<0.86 Blue peaks do not necessarily host red seq. galaxies. Yamamoto, N., TK, et al., in prep.

  22. Pano anoram amic Fol ollow ow-up up Spect ctrosco scopy with PFS ( PFS 2 ) Key targets: Recently-quenched galaxies in/around clusters and with various M* Post-starburst galaxies (E+A/k+a) Balmer absorption lines are excellent tracers for recently-quenched/PSB galaxies (e.g., E+A, k+a, a+k…) We can access to these lines back to z~2 with PFS and to z~4.5 with ULTIMATE Constraints on the recent star formation histories (quenching time-scale, and w/ or w/o starburst). PFS-SSP may not sample galaxies in high density regions very efficiently. We aim to go for a separate, dedicated program to follow-up the HSC selected clusters (e.g. intensive program~40nights).

  23. Absorption line diagnostic of recently-quenched (PSB) galaxies − to constrain the timescales of star-formation/quenching − Balmer absorption lines (A-type stars) Mg/Fe ratio à timescale of quenching, existence of starburst à timescale of SF before quenching Kriek+ (2016) Couch & Sharples (1987) Truncation w/ starburst Simple truncation w/o starburst z=2.1 α enhancement à short timescale or D4000 [nm] We can access to these lines to z=1.5 (Mg/Fe) ~ z=2 (Hδ) with PFS and z=3.5-4.5 with ULTIMATE

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend