survey rationale and target population first national
play

Survey Rationale and Target Population First National - PDF document

Survey Rationale and Target Population First National Environmental Health Survey was recommended in Survey of Child Care 2000 Federal Strategy Centers: Lead Results 100,000 institutional (licensed) child care centers in continental


  1. Survey Rationale and Target Population First National Environmental Health • Survey was recommended in Survey of Child Care 2000 Federal Strategy Centers: Lead Results • 100,000 institutional (licensed) child care centers in continental US Presenter: Warren Friedman, Ph.D., CIH; serving children under 6 years at CDC ACCLPP meeting March 23, 2004. Research Team: J.Y. Zhou 1 , W. Friedman 1 , • 4.6 million children under 6 years in D.E. Jacobs 1 , N.S. Tulve 2 , P.A. Jones 2 , those child care centers C.W. Croghan 2 , C.J. Cave 3 , J. Rogers 4 , S.M. Viet 4 , D. Marker 4 , A. Fraser 4 1 HUD, 2 EPA, 3 CPSC, 4 Westat Questionnaire, Sampling and Survey Sample Analysis • Nationally (CONUS) representative sample • Center Director (usually) recruited by • Random population-weighted selection and answered survey questions from 30 primary sampling units asked by CPSC staff (Metropolitan Statistical Areas or portions, • Two classrooms, 1 multi-purpose or non-metropolitan groups of counties) room, exterior bare soil; randomly • Appx. 11 institutional (state-licensed) selected centers/PSU; of 334 sampled centers, • Paint tested by XRF; dust and soil 68 were not eligible for the survey samples collected • Of 266 eligible centers remaining, • Samples analyzed for lead, selected 168 (63%) agreed to participate and allergens and selected pesticide completed the survey residues Lead Measurements Data Limitations • Paint (XRF measurement) • Classification may be biased from: • Painted building components, • Sampling and measurement bookshelves and cabinets in variation sampled rooms • Incomplete sampling of rooms • Exterior painted components, resulting in missing a room with a including play equipment LBP hazard • Dust Wipe: Floor and window sill in • Comparison with National Survey of sampled rooms Lead and Allergens in Housing (HUD and NIEHS, 1999-2000) indicates bias • Soil: Composite soil core in play is small area 1

  2. Significant LBP Hazard per Results: Significant LBP Hazards HUD Lead Safe Housing Rule • Significant deterioration of LBP Large surfaces: 2 ft 2 interior, or 20 ft 2 exterior; • Of 100,000 institutional child Small surfaces: 10% total area of a component care centers nationally: type • Lead-contaminated dust • 14% (9% to 22%) have 40 μ g/ft 2 on floor; or significant LBP hazards 250 μ g/ ft 2 on window sill • Bare, lead-contaminated soil 400 μ g/g in play area; or 1200 μ g/g in > 9 ft 2 of bare soil in rest of yard Factors Related to Significant Number of Centers with LBP Hazards Significant LBP Hazards • p < 0.05: • Construction Year: Centers in older 99,952 Child Care Centers Nationally buildings more likely • Race: Centers where majority of children are African-American as reported by Center Soil:1,002 Director more likely than those where majority of children are white Dust: Paint: • 0.05 < p < 0.10: 2,829 11,409 • Region: Northeast/Midwest somewhat more likely than South/West • Note: No urban/rural difference (both 14%) yxwutsronlkihfedaUSPNIEDCB Centers with Significant LBP Results: Lead-Based Paint Hazards by Construction Year Number of Centers 8,000 • Of 100,000 institutional centers nationally: Paint Soil 6,000 Dust • 28% (22% to 35%): some LBP 4,000 • 16% (10% to 24%): deteriorated LBP 2,000 • 11% (6% to 20%): significantly 0 deteriorated LBP Unknown Before 1960- 1978 - 1960 1977 2001 Construction Year 2

  3. Location of LBP Painted Components with LBP 99,952 Centers Nationally • Components most likely to have LBP: • Interior trim, Exterior surfaces Exterior: 19,780 • Components with largest area of LBP: • Interior walls, Exterior walls Interior: • Components with highest lead loading: 20,503 • Doors, Walls, Windows, Trim LBP Deterioration vs. Results: Dust Lead Loading Construction Year • In 100,000 centers nationally: 60 Number of Centers • No floor samples had a dust lead Significantly Deteriorated LBP 50 loading ≥ 40 μ g/ft 2 Slightly Deteriorated LBP Thousands Undamaged LBP 40 • Window sill dust lead loading is No LBP higher than floor lead loading 30 • 3% (1% to 7%) have window sill 20 lead loading ≥ 250 μ g/ft 2 10 • Indicates a lead dust hazard in 0 about 2,800 child care centers Unknown Before 1960 1960 1977 - 1978-2001 Construction Year Window Sill Dust Lead Loading Results: Play Area Soil Lead by Construction Year 40 • Of 100,000 institutional centers nationally: Number of Centers 35 >500 • 4% (2 - 9%): no play area 30 Thousands 250-500 25 125 to 250 • 23% (15 - 34%): no play area soil 20 RL to 125 • 38% (26 - 51%): no bare play area soil 15 LOD to RL 10 <LOD • 33% (23 – 45%): bare play area soil 5 lead < 400 μ g/g 0 Unknown Before 1960- 1978- • 1% (0 - 6%): soil lead hazards 1960 1977 2001 (bare play area soil Construction Year lead > 400 μ g/g) 3

  4. Summary: First National Environmental Health Survey of Child Care Centers: Lead Results • Survey of 168 institutional child care centers representing 100,000 centers nationally serving 4.6 M children < 6 yr old • 28% have some LBP • 14% have a significant LBP hazard: • 11% have significantly deteriorated LBP • 3% have a dust lead hazard • 1% have a soil lead hazard (and significantly deteriorated LBP) • 0.3% have significantly deteriorated LBP and a dust lead hazard 4

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend