Surface-based Analysis: Inter-subject Registration and Smoothing - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

surface based analysis inter subject registration and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Surface-based Analysis: Inter-subject Registration and Smoothing - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Surface-based Analysis: Inter-subject Registration and Smoothing Outline Exploratory Spatial Analysis Coordinate Systems 3D (Volumetric) 2D (Surface-based) Inter-subject registration Volume-based Surface-based


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Surface-based Analysis: Inter-subject Registration and Smoothing

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Outline

  • Exploratory Spatial Analysis
  • Coordinate Systems
  • 3D (Volumetric)
  • 2D (Surface-based)
  • Inter-subject registration
  • Volume-based
  • Surface-based
  • Surface-based smoothing
  • Surface-based clustering
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Exploratory Spatial Analysis

  • Don’t know where effect is going to be
  • vs ROI analysis
  • Analyze each voxel separately
  • Create a map
  • Find clusters
slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Aging Exploratory Analysis

Cortical Thickness vs Aging; Salat, et al, 2004, Cerebral Cortex

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

p<.01

Aging Thickness Study

Positive Age Correlation Negative Age Correlation

N=40

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Individual Exploratory Analysis

  • fMRI Words-vs-Fixation
  • Single subject (eg, presurgical planning or functional ROI)
  • Outlines are FreeSurfer cortical ROIs
  • Yellow and blue blobs are functional activation
  • Activation does not lie cleanly within a predefined ROI
slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Exploratory Spatial Analysis

  • Generally requires spatial smoothing of data to

increase SNR

  • For group analysis, requires that subjects’ brains

be aligned to each other on a voxel-wise basis

  • Neither needed for an ROI analysis
  • Smoothing and inter-subject registration can be

performed in the volume or on the surface

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Why Is a Model of the Cortical Surface Useful?

Local functional organization of cortex is largely 2-dimensional! Eg, functional mapping of primary visual areas: From (Sereno et al, 1995, Science).

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Coordinate Systems: 3D (Volumetric)

  • 3D Coordinate System
  • XYZ
  • RAS (Right-Anterior-Superior)
  • CRS (Column-Row-Slice)
  • Origin (XYZ=0, eg, AC)
  • MR Intensity at each XYZ

x z y

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Coordinate Systems: 2D (Surface)

superior temporal calcarine central sylvian

anterior posterior pial inflated Curvature

  • SULCUS (+)
  • GYRUS (-)

Sheet: 2D Coordinate System (X,Y) Sphere: 2D Coordinate System

  • Latitude and Longitude (q, f)
  • Continuous, no cuts
  • Value at each point (eg, thickness)

x y

q f

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Inter-subject Registration

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Volumetric Inter-subject Registration

  • Affine/Linear
  • Translate
  • Rotate
  • Stretch
  • Shear
  • (12 DOF)
  • Match Intensity, Voxel-by-Voxel
  • Problems
  • Can use non-linear volumetric (cf CVS)
slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Surface-based Inter-subject Registration

Subject 2 Subject 1

  • Translate, Rotate, Stretch, Shear (12 DOF)
  • Match Curvature, Vertex-by-Vertex
  • Nonlinear Stretching (“Morphing”) allowed (area regularization)
  • Actually done on sphere
  • “Spherical Morph”

Curvature “Intensity”

  • SULCUS (+)
  • GYRUS (-)
  • Codes folding pattern
slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

A Surface-Based Coordinate System

Common space for group analysis (like Talairach)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

fsaverage

  • Has “subject” folder like individual FS subjects
  • “Buckner 40” subjects
  • Default registration space
  • MNI305 coordinates

?h.average.curvature.filled.buckner40.tif

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Surface-based Inter-subject Registration

  • Gray Matter-to-Gray Matter (it’s all gray matter!)
  • Gyrus-to-Gyrus and Sulcus-to-Sulcus
  • Some minor folding patterns won’t line up
  • Fully automated, no landmarking needed
  • Atlas registration is probabilistic, most variable

regions get less weight

  • Done automatically in recon-all
  • fsaverage
slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Spatial Smoothing

Why should you smooth?

  • Might Improve CNR/SNR
  • Improve inter-subject registration

How much smoothing?

  • Blob-size
  • Typically 5-20 mm FWHM
  • Surface smoothing more forgiving than volume-based
slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Volume-based Smoothing

  • Smoothing is

averaging of “nearby” voxels

7mm FWHM 14mm FWHM

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Volume-based Smoothing

  • 5 mm apart in 3D
  • 25 mm apart on surface!
  • Kernel much larger
  • Averaging with other

tissue types (WM, CSF)

  • Averaging with other

functional areas

14mm FWHM

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Spatial Smoothing

Full-Width/Half-max

  • Spatially convolve image with Gaussian kernel.
  • Kernel sums to 1
  • Full-Width/Half-max: FWHM = s/sqrt(log(256))

s = standard deviation of the Gaussian

0 FWHM 5 FWHM 10 FWHM

2mm FWHM 10mm FWHM 5mm FWHM Full Max Half Max

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Effect of Smoothing on Activation

  • Working memory paradigm
  • FWHM: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20
slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Surface-based Smoothing

superior temporal calcarine central sylvian

anterior posterior Sheet: 2D Coordinate System (X,Y) Sphere: 2D Coordinate System (q,f)

  • Smoothing is averaging
  • f nearby vertices
slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Group fMRI Analysis: Volume vs Surface

Affine registration to MNI305 with volume smoothing Surface-based Registration and smoothing

Probe-vs-Fixation. Data from Functional Biomedical Informatics Research Network (fBIRN)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

5HT4 BP Asymmetry Study (N=16)

Surface Smoothing Volume Smoothing

Left > Right Right > Left

p<10-2 p<10-3 p<10-3 p<10-2

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Surface-based Clustering

  • A cluster is a group of connected (neighboring)

vertices above threshold

  • Neighborhood is 2D, not 3D
  • Cluster has a size (area in mm2)
  • Reduced search space (corrections for multiple

comparisons)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Summary

  • Why Surface-based Analysis?

– Function has surface-based organization – Inter-subject registration: anatomy, not intensity – Smoothing – Clustering – Like 3D, but 2D Use FreeSurfer Be Happy