Supporting Women Scientists via the NSF ADVANCE Program Georgia A. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

supporting women scientists via the nsf advance program
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Supporting Women Scientists via the NSF ADVANCE Program Georgia A. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Supporting Women Scientists via the NSF ADVANCE Program Georgia A. Arbuckle-Keil, Department of Chemistry Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Goals of NSF ADVANCE (NSF 0941 Publication) Develop systemic approaches to increase the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Supporting Women Scientists via the NSF ADVANCE Program

Georgia A. Arbuckle-Keil, Department of Chemistry Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Goals of NSF ADVANCE (NSF 0941 Publication)

  • Develop systemic approaches to increase the representation &

advancement of women in academic science, technology, engineering & mathematics (STEM) careers, thereby contributing to a more diverse science & engineering workforce

  • 3 Types of Projects: Institutional Transformation (IT); IT-

Catalyst; Partnerships for Adaptation, Implementation & Dissemination (PAID)

  • IT: comprehensive programs for institution-wide change; must

include research component to study effectiveness of proposed innovations

  • PAID: adaptation & implementation of materials, tools,

research, & practices; dissemination & diffusion of materials, Solicitation: (09-504)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

ONE UNIVERSITY: 3 DISTINCT LOCATIONS

  • Most well-known campus:

New Brunswick or Piscataway (PhD Chemistry)

  • Newark campus (also offers

PhD Chemistry)

  • Camden campus:

Predominantly Undergraduate Institution (PUI) (MS Chemistry)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

ONE UNIVERSITY: THREE DISTINCT LOCATIONS

Demographics:

  • Douglas College –

Women’s College

  • Female chemistry faculty

became part of Rutgers University Department of Chemistry

  • One of the larger

(percent women faculty) (~35% 2008)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

DEMOGRAPHICS

  • Campus Campus – originally College of South Jersey
  • Predominantly Undergraduate Institution (PUI)

Currently: 25% female (n = 4) Soon to be 20% (n = 5) Over a decade ago: 50% female (n = 6)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Comparison Between Campuses

Compiled for the RU-FAIR Annual Report 2010 NSF HRD-0810978 (D. Valentine)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Number of Faculty in SEM Disciplines

Difference between number of faculty increase with rank

RU-FAIR Annual Report 2010 (NSF HRD-0810978)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Full-time SEM Women Faculty at Rutgers

For Rutgers University as a whole, the percent of women faculty in science, engineering & mathematics (SEM) disciplines decreases with increasing rank

RU-FAIR Annual Report 2010 (NSF HRD-0810978)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Women In Chemistry (3 campuses) (3 years)

  • New Brunswick:

~ 30% (n = 40)

  • Newark:

~20% (n = 14)

  • Camden:

(n = 4) 2009-10 (n = 5) 2010-11

RU-FAIR Annual Report 2010 (NSF HRD-0810978)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Demographics: SEM Disciplines (Camden)

  • Comparison

with available pool of PhD degreed women

  • Camden

campus needs improvement

RU-FAIR Annual Report 2010 (NSF HRD-0810978)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

NSF ADVANCE GRANT FALL 2008

  • Office for the Promotion of Women in Science,

Engineering and Mathematics (WiSEM)

  • Profiles of Women Faculty: http://

sciencewomen.rutgers.edu/profiles

  • Rutgers University for Faculty Advancement &

Institutional Re-imagination (RU-FAIR) http:// rufair.rutgers.edu

  • RU-FAIR Mini-grants; RU-FAIR Life Cycle Grants
  • RU-FAIR Professors (focus on specific campus

environment)

slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

ACTIVITIES IN CAMDEN

  • Focus Group
  • Exit Interviews
  • Grant Workshop(s)
  • Work-Life Balance Workshop
  • Mentoring
  • Recruitment
  • Communication
slide-16
SLIDE 16

EXIT INTERVIEW SUMMARY

  • Camden only: small group physical science

tenure-track faculty (male & female)

  • Resources needed: technicians, administrative

support, grant support, laboratory facilities and equipment

  • Professional Development: need for research

collaborations (small departments)

  • Promotion Criteria: teaching valued by

departments yet not major part of tenure/ promotion decision (grants/papers required)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

FOCUS GROUP

  • Invited all science faculty

including social science

  • Majority female in social science departments (satisfied with

informal mentoring)

  • Resources: grant writing/administrative support needed
  • Rutgers has a policy of “stopping the tenure clock” for child

birth

  • Women felt more obligated to attend university events
  • Supportive role of women in campus functions, but may deter

individual research progress

slide-18
SLIDE 18

WORKSHOPS

  • Grant Workshop
  • Work-Life Balance
  • Leadership
  • Negotiation
  • Coaching
slide-19
SLIDE 19

CONCERNS

  • Communication (at Camden & between

campuses)

  • Challenge of traveling to other campuses
  • Video conferencing option
  • Time for everything we desire . . .
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Advantages of Professional Organizations

  • American Chemical Society (ACS)
  • COACh (http://coach.uoregon.edu): Committee on

the Advancement of women in Chemistry; excellent, affordable training (Highly recommend!)

  • Local section ACS networking: ability to meet other

women faculty from other institutions

  • Networking with women at ACS national meetings
  • AWIS (http://www.awis.org)
  • ASA (http://www.asa3.org)
slide-21
SLIDE 21

SUMMARY

  • NSF ADVANCE Support
  • One University: 3 campuses:

unique concerns/needs

  • PUI more like liberal arts

institution

  • Mentoring support throughout

career

  • Reach out to others
  • Care for colleagues
slide-22
SLIDE 22

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

  • RU-FAIR NSF Award to Rutgers University

(HRD-0810978)

  • NB Staff: Christina Leshko, Doreen Valentine,

Natalie Batmanian

  • Co-PIs: Joan Bennett, Pat Roos, Nancy Rosoff
  • RU-FAIR Faculty: Judith Weis, Maggie Shiffrar,

Helen Buettner

  • RU-NB Faculty: Kathryn Uhrich, Lisa Klein
  • New Assistant in Camden: Daitza Frydel

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.