Supporting Teacher Learning through Self and Peer Observation E. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

supporting teacher learning through self and peer
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Supporting Teacher Learning through Self and Peer Observation E. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Supporting Teacher Learning through Self and Peer Observation E. Caroline Wylie, ETS NCSA, Philadelphia, 2016 6/20/2016 Overview Purpose and outline of the online training modules A process for collaborative inquiry and learning


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Supporting Teacher Learning through Self and Peer Observation

  • E. Caroline Wylie, ETS

NCSA, Philadelphia, 2016

6/20/2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Overview

  • Purpose and outline of the online training modules
  • A process for collaborative inquiry and learning
  • Research on formative feedback in an observation setting
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Purpose of the Modules

The FARROP training modules:

  • Assume that participants have some background knowledge

about formative assessment practices

  • Introduce the Formative Assessment Rubrics, Reflection and

Observation Protocols (FARROP);

  • Provide opportunities for teachers to identify and manage

personal and professional biases that could affect observations of

  • ther teachers;
  • Provide video exemplars of practice for each dimension and at

varying levels of the rubric;

  • Provide practice for giving feedback to a peer and guidance for

requesting and receiving feedback from a peer. But:

  • They do not provide extensive training in how to implement

formative assessment in the classroom

  • They are not intended to calibrate individual observers to a level of

reliability needed for high-stakes evaluation systems

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Sequence of Learning

There is a series of seven modules for the basic training. 1. Introduction and Understanding Bias 2. Learning About the Dimensions: Learning Goals and Criteria for Success 3. Learning About the Dimensions: Tasks/Activities, and Questioning Strategies 4. Learning About the Dimensions: Self-Assessment, Peer Feedback, and Collaboration 5. Learning About the Dimensions: Feedback Loops, Descriptive Feedback, & Use of Evidence 6. Giving and Receiving Feedback 7. Putting It All Together: Reflecting on Two Lessons Across All Ten Dimensions

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Common Module Structures

Scaffolded learning

  • pportunities:
  • Begin with teacher’s own

experiences

  • Read rubrics and consider

distinctions among levels for each indicator

  • Multiple choice questions that

focus on information provided in observation notes

  • Presentation of benchmark

videos with context information, opportunity for the teacher to write up evidence followed by presentation of notes from master coding

  • Matching evidence statements

to rubric levels

  • Concluding practice

5

Content Indicator Connections Indicator Presentation Indicator Reference Indicator

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The Process of Getting Feedback

6

Collect Information

  • Select specific

dimensions for focused practice.

  • Select a specific

lesson.

  • Complete a self-

assessment of the lesson against specific dimensions.

Process Information

  • Review your
  • bserver’s and your

perspectives on the lesson.

  • Conference with the
  • bserver (if desired).
  • Set the feedback

aside for a day if you feel that you strongly disagree with it. Come back with fresh eyes the next day.

  • Review rubrics for

selected dimensions.

  • Compare/contrast

two perspectives with respect to the rubrics.

  • Identify strengths

and weaknesses.

Take Action

  • Record any new

insights about the dimensions, the rubrics, and your formative assessment practice in your journal.

  • Review your

previous action plan.

  • Based on the

feedback you received, update your current action plan or start a new

  • ne.
slide-7
SLIDE 7

The Process of Observing a Peer

7

Collect information

  • Review lesson

episodes prior to

  • bservation.
  • Review rubrics for

selected dimensions prior to observation.

  • Conduct classroom
  • bservation

focusing note-taking

  • n the selected

dimensions.

Process information

  • For each dimension

to be scored:

  • identify the most

relevant evidence,

  • review each level
  • f the rubric and

identify the rubric that best matches across all indicators, and

  • write a summary

statement.

Take action

  • Record any insights

about the rubrics, the dimensions, and your formative assessment practice in your journal, based on the

  • bservation.
  • Review the previous

action plan.

  • Update your current

action plan or start a new one to reflect any insights.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Roles in the Observation Process

8

Action Who is responsible for each action? Person Being Observed Observer No One Selects the dimensions for the observation Identifies teaching episodes Provides feedback Tells a neighbor what was observed in a classroom today Shares feedback with the school-based learning community Shares observation notes and scores with the principal Develops an action plan

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Roles in the Observation Process

9

Action Who is responsible for each action? Person Being Observed Observer No One Selects the dimensions for the observation  Identifies teaching episodes  Provides feedback Tells a neighbor what was observed in a classroom today Shares feedback with the school-based learning community  Shares observation notes and scores with the principal  Develops an action plan 

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Roles in the Observation Process

10

Action Who is responsible for each action? Person Being Observed Observer No One Selects the dimensions for the observation  Identifies teaching episodes  Provides feedback  Tells a neighbor what was observed in a classroom today Shares feedback with the school-based learning community  Shares observation notes and scores with the principal  Develops an action plan  

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Roles in the Observation Process

11

Action Who is responsible for each action? Person Being Observed Observer No One Selects the dimensions for the observation  Identifies teaching episodes  Provides feedback  Tells a neighbor what was observed in a classroom today  Shares feedback with the school-based learning community  Shares observation notes and scores with the principal  Develops an action plan  

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Learning From and Applying the Research on Feedback

The research on feedback identifies three important considerations for providing effective feedback:

  • 1. The source of the feedback
  • 2. The content of the feedback
  • 3. Attitudes toward feedback

Understanding the research and how it plays out in the FARROP

  • bservation process is important for supporting changes to practice.

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

What We Know from Research on Feedback How We Applied the Research to the FARROP Feedback is more effective when information is gathered from oneself as well as from others. For FARROP, that translates to encouraging teachers to reflect on the observed lesson before getting feedback from the peer. Feedback is more effective when the source of the information is perceived as credible, knowledgeable, and well intentioned.

  • It is important to rely on the rubrics and benchmark

examples so that the feedback is as accurate as possible.

  • It is also important to remember that everyone is

learning together. Assume that the feedback is well intentioned even if you don’t agree with all of it, or if you have to step away from the feedback after you first read it. Feedback from a peer is more effective than feedback from someone of higher status. For FARROP, we are focusing on peer-to-peer

  • bservations and not on feedback from a principal or

teacher leader, since the latter provides less opportunity for reciprocal learning.

Considering the source of feedback

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

What We Know from Research on Feedback How We Applied the Research to the FARROP Feedback is more effective when it is focused. The observed teacher is in control and gets to identify the specific areas on which she or he wishes to focus. Feedback is more effective when it creates cognitive dissonance. Positive feedback causes less dissonance and reflection, and therefore less growth.

  • Even when you have asked for feedback in a specific

area for improvement, being given feedback that says that the evidence was best characterized as Developing practice can be disconcerting.

  • Getting feedback that indicates the need for growth in

an area you thought was strong can be challenging, and you may need a little time to process it. It’s OK to ignore feedback for a day before coming back to it. Feedback is more effective when it creates models for appropriate behavior. In addition to reviewing the evidence and the summary statements from the observer, refer back again to benchmarks and rubrics—especially the next level above your current level—to help you develop your action plan for moving forward.

Considering the content of feedback

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

What We Know from Research on Feedback How We Applied the Research to the FARROP Feedback is more effective when it is considered as a process, There should be multiple cycles of observation, feedback, reflection, and action planning. Feedback is more effective when the information from the provider of feedback is judged to be confidential. As noted earlier, it is critical to protect each other’s privacy and to not talk about what you observed outside of the classroom.

Considering Attitudes towards feedback

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Conclusion and Next Steps

  • Training modules will be used this summer along with revised

rubrics.

  • Opportunity to collect feedback on time required to complete the

modules, on teachers’ level of confidence in the process of peer

  • bservation, and on reactions to the collaborative inquiry process.
  • Future research can examine the accuracy in teacher judgments,

whether/how they change over time, whether/how accuracy impacts teachers’ ability to use the information to spur reflection

  • n and improvements to practice, how practice changes over time,

and the impact of feedback from school-based peers versus virtual peers.

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

For more information:

Caroline Wylie ecwylie@ets.org