summary
play

Summary Project Background Why Rehab? & Alternatives Bid - PDF document

7/11/2012 Michigan Water Environment Association 2012 Annual Conference Boyne Mountain Resort Thomas Gossiaux, PE (AECOM) Matt Raysin, PE (GCDC-WWS) Dave Barnas, PE (AECOM) Ed Tharp, PE (AECOM) June 25, 2012 Summary Project Background


  1. 7/11/2012 Michigan Water Environment Association 2012 Annual Conference Boyne Mountain Resort Thomas Gossiaux, PE (AECOM) Matt Raysin, PE (GCDC-WWS) Dave Barnas, PE (AECOM) Ed Tharp, PE (AECOM) June 25, 2012 Summary  Project Background  Why Rehab? & Alternatives Bid  Project Concerns  What is CIPP Lining?  Construction – Setup, Lining/Curing, Demob  Time Criteria  Project Hiccups 1

  2. 7/11/2012 Project Background  72-inch RCP sanitary sewer interceptor installed to collect several aging sanitary sewer pump station and service additional area.  Installed interceptor had high infiltration and evidence of structural failure, which was not solved through grouting.  Alternatives were bid to fix this issue. Why Rehab? 2

  3. 7/11/2012 Why Rehab? Why Rehab? 3

  4. 7/11/2012 Proposed Alternatives Alternative Low Bid High Bid CIPP (Composite) Lining $4,720,220 $5,561,870 CIPP (Fiber/Felt) Lining $4,055,140 $5,790,420 Slip lining $5,519,810 $9,605,350 Parallel Tunnel $6,578,700 (only bid) *CIPP Composite Liner was $665,080 more than CIPP (Fiber/Felt) Liner, but selected due to increased strength and reduced thickness. Benefits of CIPP Composite  Bid was less expensive than slip-lining and parallel tunnel  Lighter/thinner and stronger than traditional felt CIPP Liner  Reduces infiltration and exfiltration (no pipe joints)  Protect pipes from corrosion  Minimal traffic disruption/Social costs vs. open-cut  Increase flow capacity 4

  5. 7/11/2012 Pipe Comparison CIPP CIPP Sliplining RCP (composite) (fiber/felt) (Hobas) Design Flow 61 MGD 61 MGD 61 MGD 61 MGD Design Slope 0.05% 0.05% 0.05% 0.05% Manning's 0.013 0.010 0.010 0.0105 Roughness (n) 72” 69.2” 67.8” 64” Nominal ID Flow Capacity (Q) 61.2 MGD 71.6 MGD 67.6 MGD 55 MGD Project Specific Concerns  Interceptor Size:  72-inch Interceptor (not a typical liner installation)  Run Lengths:  1,200 to 1,400 feet per run  Depth:  50-feet  Water Table:  20+ feet of hydrostatic pressure  Constructability Issues:  Weight and stretching liner  Over the hole ‘wet - out’ 5

  6. 7/11/2012 What is CIPP?  Cured In Place Pipe  Thermosetting resin is injected into a felt tube  The tube is inserted into an existing host pipeline by water inversion  The CIPP tube is cured using hot water  Ends are cut and the final product is a fully-functional pipe-within-a- pipe Slide courtesy of: Water Inversion 6

  7. 7/11/2012 Liner Technical Information  Liner Thickness: ~1.4” (approx. 33 mills)  “Over the hole” wetout  Additional structural component  Carbon Fiber  Added strength with less thickness and weight  Designed for Class 5 RCP equivalent strength  Cured at ~180 F for about 12 hours Liner Layers Host Pipe Carbon Fiber Felt Layers Plastic Layer Sewage Flow 7

  8. 7/11/2012 Liner Structural Member iPlus Composite ™ Slide courtesy of: 8

  9. 7/11/2012 Preparation for Lining - Level Site Preparation for Lining - Mobilize Equipment Boilers Liner Brake Frac Tanks Inversion Structure 9

  10. 7/11/2012 Preparation for Lining - Layout Liner Lining Operations - Begin Inversion 10

  11. 7/11/2012 Lining Operation Begin Wet-out Lining Operation - Wet-out 11

  12. 7/11/2012 Lining Operation - End of Wet-out Lining Operation - End of Wet-out 12

  13. 7/11/2012 Lining Operation - End Inversion * Photo is not from Genesee County Project Lining Operation - Curing Liner 13

  14. 7/11/2012 Lining Operations - Cut Ends Finished Product! 14

  15. 7/11/2012 Time Criteria  Prep For Lining:  Level site around manhole: 4 hours per inversion MH  Install water line: 4 hours  Clean/TV: 2-4 hours (more if additional grouting is necessary)  Grout major leaks (if necessary): 1-2 days  End Seals: ~ 4 hours  Equipment Set-up: 36 hours Total Prep Time: ~ 3 - 5 days (2- 12 hour crews per day) Time Criteria (cont.)  Lining:  Wet-out/Inversion: 1-day (over the hole ‘wetout’)  Cure: 1-day  Cut ends/clean edges: 1-day Total Lining Time: ~ 3 days Total Time Including Prep: ~ 6-7 days 15

  16. 7/11/2012 Time Criteria (cont.)  Demob/Cleanup:  Tear down equipment: 1 day Total Demob Time: ~ 1 days Total Time Including Prep and demob: ~ 7 to 8 days Project Hiccups  Curing issue in first liner length was due to water behind pipe.  Some non-fully cured pipe bubbles required special resin to be injected to create a seal. Structural strength was not compromised.  Finished pipe had some wrinkles  If in flow path, ground down and sealed. 16

  17. 7/11/2012 Bubbles and Wrinkles Summary  Project Background  Why Rehab? & Alternatives Bid  Project Concerns  What is CIPP Lining?  Construction – Setup, Lining/Curing, Demob  Time Criteria  Project Hiccups 17

  18. 7/11/2012 Comments? Questions? 18

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend