Summary Project Background Why Rehab? & Alternatives Bid - - PDF document

summary
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Summary Project Background Why Rehab? & Alternatives Bid - - PDF document

7/11/2012 Michigan Water Environment Association 2012 Annual Conference Boyne Mountain Resort Thomas Gossiaux, PE (AECOM) Matt Raysin, PE (GCDC-WWS) Dave Barnas, PE (AECOM) Ed Tharp, PE (AECOM) June 25, 2012 Summary Project Background


slide-1
SLIDE 1

7/11/2012 1

Thomas Gossiaux, PE (AECOM) Matt Raysin, PE (GCDC-WWS) Dave Barnas, PE (AECOM) Ed Tharp, PE (AECOM) Michigan Water Environment Association 2012 Annual Conference Boyne Mountain Resort

June 25, 2012

Summary

  • Project Background
  • Why Rehab? & Alternatives Bid
  • Project Concerns
  • What is CIPP Lining?
  • Construction– Setup, Lining/Curing, Demob
  • Time Criteria
  • Project Hiccups
slide-2
SLIDE 2

7/11/2012 2

  • 72-inch RCP sanitary sewer interceptor installed to

collect several aging sanitary sewer pump station and service additional area.

  • Installed interceptor had high infiltration and

evidence of structural failure, which was not solved through grouting.

  • Alternatives were bid to fix this issue.

Project Background Why Rehab?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

7/11/2012 3

Why Rehab? Why Rehab?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

7/11/2012 4

Proposed Alternatives

Alternative Low Bid High Bid CIPP (Composite) Lining $4,720,220 $5,561,870 CIPP (Fiber/Felt) Lining $4,055,140 $5,790,420 Slip lining $5,519,810 $9,605,350 Parallel Tunnel $6,578,700 (only bid) *CIPP Composite Liner was $665,080 more than CIPP (Fiber/Felt) Liner, but selected due to increased strength and reduced thickness.

Benefits of CIPP Composite

  • Bid was less expensive than slip-lining and parallel tunnel
  • Lighter/thinner and stronger than traditional felt CIPP

Liner

  • Reduces infiltration and exfiltration (no pipe joints)
  • Protect pipes from corrosion
  • Minimal traffic disruption/Social costs vs. open-cut
  • Increase flow capacity
slide-5
SLIDE 5

7/11/2012 5

Pipe Comparison

RCP CIPP (composite) CIPP (fiber/felt) Sliplining (Hobas)

Design Flow 61 MGD 61 MGD 61 MGD 61 MGD Design Slope 0.05% 0.05% 0.05% 0.05% Manning's Roughness (n) 0.013 0.010 0.010 0.0105 Nominal ID 72” 69.2” 67.8” 64” Flow Capacity (Q) 61.2 MGD 71.6 MGD 67.6 MGD 55 MGD

Project Specific Concerns

  • Interceptor Size:

 72-inch Interceptor (not a typical liner installation)

  • Run Lengths:

 1,200 to 1,400 feet per run

  • Depth:

 50-feet

  • Water Table:

 20+ feet of hydrostatic pressure

  • Constructability Issues:

 Weight and stretching liner  Over the hole ‘wet-out’

slide-6
SLIDE 6

7/11/2012 6

What is CIPP?

  • Cured In Place Pipe
  • Thermosetting resin is injected

into a felt tube

  • The tube is inserted into an

existing host pipeline by water inversion

  • The CIPP tube is cured using hot

water

  • Ends are cut and the final product

is a fully-functional pipe-within-a- pipe

Slide courtesy of:

Water Inversion

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7/11/2012 7

Liner Technical Information

  • Liner Thickness: ~1.4” (approx. 33 mills)
  • “Over the hole” wetout
  • Additional structural component

 Carbon Fiber

  • Added strength with less thickness and weight
  • Designed for Class 5 RCP equivalent strength
  • Cured at ~180 F for about 12 hours

Liner Layers

Felt Layers Carbon Fiber Host Pipe Plastic Layer Sewage Flow

slide-8
SLIDE 8

7/11/2012 8 iPlus Composite™

Slide courtesy of:

Liner Structural Member

slide-9
SLIDE 9

7/11/2012 9

Preparation for Lining - Level Site Preparation for Lining - Mobilize Equipment

Inversion Structure Frac Tanks Liner Brake Boilers

slide-10
SLIDE 10

7/11/2012 10

Preparation for Lining - Layout Liner Lining Operations - Begin Inversion

slide-11
SLIDE 11

7/11/2012 11

Lining Operation Begin Wet-out Lining Operation - Wet-out

slide-12
SLIDE 12

7/11/2012 12

Lining Operation - End of Wet-out Lining Operation - End of Wet-out

slide-13
SLIDE 13

7/11/2012 13

Lining Operation - End Inversion

* Photo is not from Genesee County Project

Lining Operation - Curing Liner

slide-14
SLIDE 14

7/11/2012 14

Lining Operations - Cut Ends Finished Product!

slide-15
SLIDE 15

7/11/2012 15

Time Criteria

  • Prep For Lining:

 Level site around manhole: 4 hours per inversion MH  Install water line: 4 hours  Clean/TV: 2-4 hours (more if additional grouting is

necessary)

 Grout major leaks (if necessary): 1-2 days

 End Seals: ~ 4 hours  Equipment Set-up: 36 hours

Total Prep Time: ~ 3 - 5 days (2- 12 hour crews per day)

Time Criteria (cont.)

  • Lining:

 Wet-out/Inversion: 1-day (over the

hole ‘wetout’)

 Cure: 1-day  Cut ends/clean edges: 1-day

Total Lining Time: ~ 3 days Total Time Including Prep: ~ 6-7 days

slide-16
SLIDE 16

7/11/2012 16

Time Criteria (cont.)

  • Demob/Cleanup:

 Tear down equipment: 1 day

Total Demob Time: ~ 1 days Total Time Including Prep and demob: ~ 7 to 8 days

Project Hiccups

  • Curing issue in first liner length was due to water

behind pipe.

 Some non-fully cured pipe bubbles required special

resin to be injected to create a seal. Structural strength was not compromised.

  • Finished pipe had some wrinkles

 If in flow path, ground down and sealed.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

7/11/2012 17

Bubbles and Wrinkles Summary

  • Project Background
  • Why Rehab? & Alternatives Bid
  • Project Concerns
  • What is CIPP Lining?
  • Construction– Setup, Lining/Curing, Demob
  • Time Criteria
  • Project Hiccups
slide-18
SLIDE 18

7/11/2012 18

Comments? Questions?